News Ticker >
[ August 22, 2017 ]

Democrat’s Office Approved $120k Missing Equipment Write-off Linked To Muslim Spy Ring

[ August 22, 2017 ]

Why are those concerned with slavery anti-Trump but pro-Islam?

[ August 22, 2017 ]

VIDEO/Photos: Smiling axe-wielding jihadi stabs 8 people in supermarket in Russia

[ August 22, 2017 ]

Raw Story throws a fit after PayPal reinstates Pamela Geller’s AFDI

[ August 22, 2017 ]

VIDEO and PHOTOS: “Trump is Killing Us: Mourning Heather Heyer” Protest in NYC – Part...

[ August 22, 2017 ]

Hizballah condemns Barcelona attack, saying it “harms the image of jihad”

[ August 22, 2017 ]

Virginia Muslim pleads guilty: helped buy rocket-propelled grenade for ISIS

[ August 22, 2017 ]

Trump’s Afghanistan speech: mentioned “terrorists” 16 times but for 1st time left out word “Islamic”

[ August 22, 2017 ]

Alliance Between the Left and Islam Cemented by Lenin and Hitler

[ August 22, 2017 ]

BBC Asks Twitter Followers If Criticism of Muslim Child Sex Gangs Is ‘Racist’

23

AFDI and ACLU Sue D.C. Metro For First Amendment Violations Over ‘Geller Ban’ on Ads

It is good to see an uber-left organization like the ACLU, historically aligned with the jihad force, taking up a key fight for us in defense of our First Amendment freedoms.

We have moved forward with our D.C. legal action. On July 24, our legal team, AFLC, filed our opening brief in the DC Circuit in our lawsuit against Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA). Read it here:

15

Trademark Victory in the Supreme Court #SIOA

Today the US Supreme Court ruled in our favor, that the government may not refuse to register “potentially offensive” names (SIOA is not offensive, that is a smear). We have been suing to trademark SIOA (Stop Islamization of America) for a number of years but were repeatedly refused because it was considered “disparaging” to Muslims. Longtime Geller Report readers are quite familiar with our First Amendment trademark case. It was, in effect, an application of sharia law (‘do not criticize Islam’).We have been fighting to trademark SIOA (Stop Islamization of America) for a number of years but were repeatedly refused because the courts considered it “disparaging” to Muslims. Longtime Geller Report readers are quite familiar with our First Amendment trademark case. It was, in effect, an application of sharia law (‘do not criticize Islam’). Today the US Supreme Court Given ruled that the government may not refuse to register potentially offensive names. Excelsior!

24

Pamela Geller, WND Column: San Francisco wages brutal war on free speech

In a unanimous vote, the uber-left San Francisco autocratic government shut down free speech on transit systems last Tuesday after our organization, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, or AFDI, submitted our latest ad campaign to the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Authority to run on buses across the city.

27

WikiLeaks Silenced? Assange’s Internet Link ‘Intentionally Severed By a State Party’

WikiLeaks announced Monday morning that Julian Assange’s Internet connection was cut by a “state party” – a chilling hit to freedom of speech that comes amid the company’s release of numerous messages painting presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton in a poor light. Social media, meanwhile, jumped to theorize that the Internet cut, which was preceded by…

14

Hillary Clinton on Michael Savage: Let’s Keep Him on the U.K. Ban List

Hillary Clinton didn’t do a thing while secretary of State to help Michael Savage get his ban from the United Kingdom lifted, despite the top-ranked radio host’s request for her to use her diplomatic station to sway British authorities into admitting his speech was hardly vitriolic or dangerous. Robert Spencer and I were banned from…

34

Pamela Geller, Breitbart News: DoJ Responds to Our Social Media Lawsuit

Our lawsuit proceeds to finally hold the social media giants accountable for rampant free speech violations. “Pamela Geller: Left Press Lashes Out Against Our Free Speech Lawsuit,” Breitbart News, October 16, 2016: Leftist publications and pundits are rubbing their hooves in glee at the Department of Justice’s response to our recent lawsuit challenging Section 230…

35

Pamela Geller, American Thinker: Leftist Press Lashes Out Against Our Free Speech Lawsuit

The Department of Justice responded to our Facebook/social media first amendment lawsuit. The American Thinker has it here. Leftist Press Lashes Out Against Our Free Speech Lawsuit By Pamela Geller, The American Thinker, October 10, 2016: Leftist publications and pundits are rubbing their hooves in glee at the Department of Justice’s response to our recent…

44

CAIR Wins $1.7 Million Settlement From Michigan Town That Said No to Mosque

Want to see America’s future? Here it is, in brief: The people of one Michigan community, Pittsfield, spoke, and their message was clear: We don’t want a mosque in our community. But then the people of the U.S. Justice Department spoke, too, and their message was even clearer: OK, but now you’ll have to pay…

35

Imam Admits: Islam and Democracy ‘Absolutely Incompatible’

Well, this is a bit shocking – and truthful. From Jihad Watch: “Mazin AbdulAdhim, a prominent Imam of Iraqi descent in London, Ontario who is affiliated with the radical Islamic global movement of Hizb ut-Tahrir, asserts that “Islam and democracy are contradictory and absolutely incompatible.” The imam was in Canada to call for Muslims to…

45

AFDI Sues Over Facebook, Twitter Censorship and Discrimination

Press Release: AFDI Sues Over Facebook, Twitter Censorship and Discrimination NEW YORK, July 13, 2016: The renowned human rights organization the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI)’s legal counsel, the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC), is filing a federal lawsuit today in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging Section 230 of the…

16

Eugene Volokh, Washington Post on AFDI v MTA SCOTUS Dissent: “Justices Thomas and Alito urge court to decide First Amendment”

Make no mistake — we amended our suit (more here) to correct the “factual errors,” and we will go back. The error in our ad was that we implied the reward for the capture of an FBI terrorism suspect was paid for by the FBI when in fact, the reward is paid by the State…

Pin It on Pinterest