News Ticker >
[ December 17, 2017 ]

Chain Migration Imported 120,000 Foreign Nationals from Terrorist-Funding Countries Since 2005

[ December 17, 2017 ]

Sex Offender Al Franken Still Has Not Left Senate, Despite “Resigning” Two Weeks Ago

[ December 17, 2017 ]

We have become scared of killing terrorists

[ December 17, 2017 ]

Hamas: Trump’s Jerusalem decision “racist” and “hateful,” intifada should escalate

[ December 17, 2017 ]

Hungarian Public Overwhelmingly Rejects ‘Soros Plan’ for Mass Migration to Europe

[ December 17, 2017 ]

New Jersey Imam who called for killing the Jews will NOT BE FIRED

[ December 17, 2017 ]

FATWA: NJ Senator Cory Booker gets DEATH THREATS after he slams ‘repugnant’ call for killing...

[ December 17, 2017 ]

Germany: Muslim teen migrant who raped and murdered EU official’s daughter is actually 33 years...

[ December 17, 2017 ]

Shouting “Allahu akbar!” knife wielding jihadi STABS two Danish National Geographic journalists

[ December 17, 2017 ]

“Blood-smeared floors”: At least five killed in devout Muslim homicide attack on Pakistan church

YouTube fails to ban 70,000 VIDEOS of terror preacher Anwar al-Awlaki’s calls for violent jihad


Yet my account was recently terminated because of a 2014 video entitled, “Al Qaeda and Islamic State flags in London’s tunnels.” The video shows jihadis displaying al Qaeda and Islamic state flags on one of London’s tunnels (see this). So telling the truth gets your account terminated at YouTube, but Anwar al-Awlaki’s calls for killing the kuffar are just fine.

You fought back and won and my YouTube account was reinstated. But I am still concerned about others who are suspended and don’t have a large social media presence to deploy. We must consider anti-trust laws or legislation to penalize social media giants who suppress our unalienable rights.

“YouTube accused of labelling terror preacher Anwar al-Awlaki’s calls for violent jihad as ‘inappropriate’ content – but failing to ban up to 70,000 of his videos,” by Jasper Hamill, The Sun, September 29, 2017:

YOUTUBE has been accused of labelling videos of an infamous terror preacher’s calls for violent jihad “inappropriate” and leaving them available for viewing rather than banning them altogether.

The Counter Extremism Project (CEP), a non-profit dedicated to tackling extremism, alleged that it has found more than 70,000 videos of Anwar al-Awlaki, a dead radical imam whose sermons are said to have inspired atrocities including the 7/7 bombings, the Charlie Hebdo attacks and the Orlando Pulse nightclub massacre.

Jean-Charles Brisard, chairman of the Center for the Analysis of Terrorism, said: “YouTube is a prime example of how internet companies are inconsistently responding to terrorist propaganda online.

“These companies need to take more transparent, coherent and vigorous actions if we are to reduce the spread of this terrorist content.”

YouTube recently introduced a new policy known internally as “tougher treatment” which is designed to reduce the audience for videos deemed to be “inappropriate or offensive to some audiences”.

The Google-owned video site is now putting videos into a “limited state” if they are deemed controversial enough to be considered objectionable, but not hateful, pornographic or violent enough to be banned altogether.

Videos which are put into a limited state cannot be embedded on other websites, easily published on social media using the usual share buttons and other users cannot comment on them – but they can still be watched.

But the CEP’s research suggests al-Awlaki has been subjected to “tougher treatment” rather than being banned.

It said one particularly vitriolic speech called the “Battle of Hearts and Minds” could still be seem om YouTube and had been labelled “inappropriate or offensive to some viewers”.

The CEP said Al Qaeda and ISIS have used the video “to rally supporters and lionize terrorists”.

It claimed that Awlaki’s “content remains consistently and readily available on YouTube” and alleged that it found 70,000 results when it searched YouTube for “Anwar al-Awlaki” just one month ago – up from 61,900 when it did the same on December 19 2015.

The non-profit also alleged that YouTube’s recommendations “nudged” users towards Awlaki’s “incendiary and egregious content”….

Pamela Geller's shocking new book, "FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA" is now available on Amazon. It's Geller's tell all, her story - and it's every story - it's what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

  • True Kafir

    Of course FB does not delete it. Violent jihad is not islamophobic, is it?

  • livingengine

    Watching terrorist propaganda online to become a criminal offence, says Tory Home Secretary Amber Rudd

    Home Secretary Amber Rudd will say those found guilty of repeatedly viewing terrorist material could face up to 15 years in jail.

    The new law will extend an existing ban on downloading and possessing the content on a PC to repeatedly watching it through sites like YouTube.

    Watch for this law to be applied to counter jihad content.

    • The crack down against free speech across Europe is despicable. I have watched a gazillion Jihadi videos. Some were embedded on this very site. They are less concerned with “recruitment” than about people finding out what is going on.

      • Daizys Loyd

        “They are less concerned with “recruitment” than about people finding out what is going on.”
        Exactly, watch “V for vendetta”, a politically loaded movie that treats the subject, if you haven’t already.

        Also the article talks about ecryption. The NSA and other intelligence agencies pressured big tech companies to build a back door for them into the said programs, to be able to spy on whomever they choose if and when they see fit. In other words people who think their communications and private info is encrypted, are being deceived.

    • SryMrsJackson

      And then another Obama gets elected and he controls what is deemed “terrorist material”

      The same guy who had the IRS target tea partiers and allowed the Russia hoax to foment.

      • ladywarrior

        True. But we could be here all day listing all the things the Muslim/Marxist Obama did and allowed to take down our country.

  • Mahou Shoujo

    U tube is as hypocritical as any other social media that is bought and paid for by islam.

  • Daizys Loyd

    One can safely say that You tube, google, disqus and many other are Muslim owned.

    • Or at least leftist-owned. But these days, there seem to be little difference, the two are firmly allied against conservatives in the West.

    • ladywarrior

      Disqus? Really? I hadn’t heard that. I use Disqus…..could you give me more info?

      • Daizys Loyd

        They “kill” anybody who give out factual truth about is-scumbag-lam. I saw it many times. There is even a thug who spread rumors as to the miracles Mo-scumbag-med made as in “splitting the moon” and I kid you not. Anybody who challenged IT (as in challenge the goony terrorist and it’s excrement), they banned them, deleted their posts, etc. But the vile terrorist, they pampered and babied as if it was baby Jesus in person. The only thing I can see that thug “splitting” is 6 years old Aisha little behind, and him being known to smoke hashish as to Muz, hashish is not bad or illegal, the thug may have fooled itself into actually having “split the moon”.

        • ladywarrior

          Like I said, I have a Disqus account and I post on Breitbart and Pamela Geller’s site and talk openly about the dangers of Islam. So far I’ve not been stopped or banned.

          Are you sure it’s not paid trolls blocking you?

          • Daizys Loyd

            These sacs of feces just blocked my answer to you. And again, no profanities were used. So I know it’s their whoriness..
            Paul Craig Roberts was right when he said something along the lines of “this country no longer has a Media but, instead, what it has, is A Ministry of Propaganda .”.. RIGHT ON THE MARK Mr. Roberts!!!
            Yesterday Pamela was citing as “a credible source” the newspaper of ISIS, to claim that Steven Paddock was a Muslim?!?!?! the very thugs who apparently attempted to cut off her head!!?!?!?!?! Now if that is not Nuts, what is.

          • ladywarrior

            Daizy, you need to write Pamela at
            Yesterday I was trying to Block a troll who was blaming Pamela for the Oslo shootings. I responded to the troll and once I did I went to the block function, but it wouldn’t block the vile person. I tried several times. I have run into this before on her site only.

            I wrote Pamela and within thirty minutes I got a message back from her thanking me for the alert and they stopped that poster.

            Somehow some of them know how to keep from getting blocked…..and from keeping others from posting…not just individuals responding to each other.

            Her site has been a big target by Mulsims.

          • Daizys Loyd

            She is amazing. I did ask if I could pay for her new book with a money order and she answered me within a 10 mns frame!!!!!! But this thing with citing ISIS as A trustworthy source? I don’t think so. Cite the Ukrainians, the Russians, the Chinese, the green little men, the reptilians. But don’t expect me to approve of these criminal slimballs. I WILL NEVER DO THAT. They are the devil’s hideous slaves. Out of all people in the world, she Knows it Better than anybody else.
            As far as The blocking thing, you might want to contact Disqus for it. I have a whiiiiile back, and they gave me the link to this program that you can use to do the same and, if I can remember correctly, that give you the ability to, then, block them once you download and install it, as you will be on the same footing as the “unblockable” poster. I didn’t keep it.
            I understand they must cheat every once in a while as if they are too pure, the CIA will take her out. They do it to people who were loyal to them for decades. Let alone a Rogue woman such as her. But there is a limit. Thank you Ladywarrior for your kindness.

  • AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020

    Facebook ONLY removes items that offend ISLAM,…. but keeps ensuring ISLAM’s message of ‘PEACE’ reaches ALL !!!

  • YouTube is indirectly enabling terrorism, I am afraid, if it resolutely refuses to remove these kinds of radicalism-promoting videos.

  • dad1927
  • ladywarrior

    Anyone still on You Tube is just asking for it…..I am never on there. In the past a few times I went on it I got so slammed with spam it crashed my computer. And..oh…yes, they are the Libtards best friends.

Pin It on Pinterest