News Ticker >
[ December 15, 2017 ]

Wave on an open thread

[ December 15, 2017 ]

Houston Muslim Taken into Custody on Charges of Islamic Terrorism

[ December 15, 2017 ]


[ December 15, 2017 ]

Bitcoin jihad: New York Muslima Laundered Nearly 100k In Bitcoin For Islamic State (ISIS)

[ December 15, 2017 ]

New Jersey Imam Calls for Killing of Jews

[ December 15, 2017 ]

Faisal Kutty, who wants Pamela Geller banned from Canada, supports killer of Christians and pro-Hitler...

[ December 15, 2017 ]

VIDEO: Police shoot knifeman who threatened crowd at Amsterdam airport – terminal evacuated

[ December 15, 2017 ]

Netherlands: Muslim migrant stabs two to death, cops say no terrorist motive

[ December 15, 2017 ]

Muslim migrant with nine bombs strapped to suicide vest takes 13 hostages inside Canada bank

[ December 15, 2017 ]

Minneapolis Prosecutor: Investigators ‘didn’t do their jobs’ in probe of police officer Mohamed Noor’s murder...

Italian foreign minister warns of migrant wave of ‘Biblical proportions’


You think things in Europe are bad now? The now nonstop Islamic attacks, the rampant rape jihad, the welfare costs — well, you ain’t seen nothing yet.

Italian FM warns of migrant wave of ‘Biblical proportions’

65 million forced migrants in 2015, WFP report

Ansad, 11 October, 16:51

(ANSAmed) – ROME, OCTOBER 11 – Italian foreign minister said Wednesday that migration seen in the Mediterranean ”is only the tip of the iceberg of an exodus that may end up being of Biblical proportions”.  Alfano’s comments were made during his opening remarks of the conference to present the World Food Programme report ‘At the Root of Exodus: food security, conflict and international migration’ at the Italian foreign ministry. Alfano noted that, according to the report, in 2015 there were ”some 244 million people who migrated internationally, while the number of those suffering from forced migration – refugees, the displaced and asylum seekers – reached a peak of 65.3 million people”.

The study ”confirms that food insecurity is a decisive factor in migration”, he added, stressing that ”the report is a call to the international community to do a great deal more to solve the problem at its roots”. The minister said that ”no compromises can be made on human rights. Italy has saved hundreds of thousands of human lives and, in so doing, it saved Europe’s honor, as recognized by European Commission president Jean Claude Juncker.” ”In saving migrants, Italy has shown that between rigor and humanity, between rules and solidarity, between security and human rights, there is no competition,” Alfano said. ”We cannot allow the EU to turn its face away, enabling another human tragedy on land instead of at sea. A tragedy of refugees and the displaced, who suffer both hunger and often unspeakable violence”.

This is why, he said, ”there are two key points that we need to discuss: solidarity and responsibility, which are also as the basis of the Italian approach”. The recommendations within the report, Alfano said, ”contain elements of the Italian way: the stress put in equal measure on humanitarian assistance and protection of human rights of the most vulnerable people.” He concluded by saying that ”the time has come for the European Union to invest without fear in Africa so that returns be achieved in terms of growth and economic development in both directions”. ”By recognizing that Europe and Africa are on a shared path of growth and development,” he added, ”we will understand that through investing in Africa we will solve European problems.

This is because many of our problems are symptoms of something that begins elsewhere.” (ANSAmed).

Pamela Geller's shocking new book, "FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA" is now available on Amazon. It's Geller's tell all, her story - and it's every story - it's what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

  • RealEngineer2

    Third world demographics depend almost entirely on their children as a “social safety net”; hence, on provision of the most basic needs of survival (in this case, food) the first consequence is exponential population growth.

    The industrial world, with an over-abundance of food, faces a dilemma; feed them, and instantly create MORE POVERTY and MISERY, or allow them to starve, equally as cruel.

    The mechanics of poverty containment to address this were applied in China, until recently pretty much a third world country. A “one-child only” rule stabilized the population until their economy “caught up” with self-sustainment of basics; and now they have a growing economy and have dropped the “one-child” rule.

    Big doubts Africa, the MidEast, and SouthEast Asia have the wherewithal (either politically, socially, or legally) to advance population growth controls (as did China), and their situation will simply perpetuate as their population expands… and migrates elsewhere in perpetuity.

    • Halal Boycott will end Islam

      Thanks. Very interesting.

    • Donafugata

      Couldn’t agree more, an excellent comment.

      Just to add to ” politically, socially or legally “, intellectually.

    • Connor Larkin

      Add to that inbreeding and resulting widespread IQ of less than 80.

  • Dennis

    While I certainly recognize that we all have a moral duty to provide sustenance to those people in need, as that is basic to our humanity, and while I agree that providing sustenance is a first priority, there is more to the problem that exists with immigration today then is outlined in this article. Contrary to the reports that we hear emanating from Poland, Bulgaria and other European countries to the effect that those countries are being overwhelmed by the influx of refugees who will not assimilate, the humanity being expressed in this article is ignoring the problems that the refugees will naturally bring with them to the countries to which they emigrate. Many of theses refugees are bringing with them a belief system that is so prevailing, that they cannot accept the social mores of the countries that they emigrate to, and they end up as being unable to assimilate, and many become radical and become dangerous to the new societies that they find themselves in. This is the real problem facing this world, and that problem needs to be faced first, with feeding and jobs and living conditions second. Unless those problems are faced head on, feeding these people will become moot. These countries ought to consider directly helping the countries that now face an outward migration, with efforts being put in place in these countries where the agriculture and food production is optimized, and jobs are their available, all of which would tend to terminate the refugee crisis that is the cause of many of this world’s problems.

    • yiyoya

      The “moral duty” to help others, and self-preservation, in other words SELFISHNESS, don’t mix so well, do they? It’s either one or the other, you can’t have both. Basic to any humanity is self-preservation, not self-sacrifice to any and all strangers in need. Where’s the basic humanity when you’ve committed suicide in the name of altruistic self-sacrifice? The real problem facing the modern world is the ethics of Altruism versus the ethics of Rational Selfishness, self-immolation versus self-preservation, the two are incompatible, and we’re seeing it play out in Western Europe.

      “What is the moral code of altruism? The basic principle of altruism is that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that service to others is the only justification of his existence, and that self-sacrifice is his highest moral duty, virtue and value.

      Do not confuse altruism with kindness, good will or respect for the rights of others. These are not primaries, but consequences, which, in fact, altruism makes impossible. The irreducible primary of altruism, the basic absolute, is self-sacrifice—which means; self-immolation, self-abnegation, self-denial, self-destruction—which means: the self as a standard of evil, the selfless as a standard of the good.

      Do not hide behind such superficialities as whether you should or should not give a dime to a beggar. That is not the issue. The issue is whether you do or do not have the right to exist without giving him that dime. The issue is whether you must keep buying your life, dime by dime, from any beggar who might choose to approach you. The issue is whether the need of others is the first mortgage on your life and the moral purpose of your existence. The issue is whether man is to be regarded as a sacrificial animal. Any man of self-esteem will answer: “No.” Altruism says: “Yes.” – Ayn Rand

      • Dennis

        While I understand your outline of the frustrations that we are facing, I cannot come to any conclusion that might result in the abandonment of out humanity and our need to help those in distress. That is contrary to what I believe being a human being is all about. I believe that those societies that can help the “beggars” out there have a duty to do what they can to help them, but before doing so we do need to accept the realities and circumstances that exist in that regard. When you have people in need, who because of the way they have lived and believe, cannot assimilate into the existing societies, they should be first helped by keeping them within their indigenous homelands, and your efforts should be to help those locations prosper to the point that they become better sustaining locations, thereby cutting off the need to emigrate. That is what I believe. I see that thinking as being centrist, rather then being accused of any phobias or being accused of being politically incorrect or liberal to a fault.

        • yiyoya

          In other words you can not bring yourself to reject your lifelong belief in the validity of Altruism as the highest moral good. Fine, that is your right as a free individual.

          But in a free society of individual rights and private property rights, private property rights begin with self-ownership of your body, life, mind, actions, and earnings. You, as an individual, have the right to spend your earnings as you deem good, right, and worthy, but you do not have the right to force other individuals to spend their earnings as you demand, that is slavery, that is tyranny, and that is what Altruism ultimately demands and leads to. It is the ethics of Altruism that justify Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Sharia Law, and every other form of tyranny over the individual. Under the ethics of Altruism the individual does not belong to himself, he is the property of others.

          “Some unphilosophical, eclectic altruists, invoking such concepts as “inalienable rights,” “personal freedom,” “private choice,” have claimed that service to others, though morally obligatory, should not be compulsory. The committed, philosophical altruists, however, are consistent: recognizing that such concepts represent an individualist approach to ethics and that this is incompatible with the altruist morality, they declare that there is nothing wrong with compulsion in a good cause—that the use of force to counteract selfishness is ethically justified—and more: that it is ethically mandatory.

          Every man, they argue, is morally the property of others—of those others it is his lifelong duty to serve; as such, he has no moral right to invest the major part of his time and energy in his own private concerns. If he attempts it, if he refuses voluntarily to make the requisite sacrifices, he is by that fact harming others, i.e., depriving them of what is morally theirs—he is violating men’s rights, i.e., the right of others to his service—he is a moral delinquent, and it is an assertion of morality if others forcibly intervene to extract from him the fulfillment of his altruist obligations, on which he is attempting to default. Justice, they conclude, “social justice,” demands the initiation of force against the non-sacrificial individual; it demands that others put a stop to his evil. Thus has moral fervor been joined to the rule of physical force, raising it from a criminal tactic to a governing principle of human relationships.” – Leonard Peikoff

    • dad1927

      we have NO moral duty to help these people who will kill you and your children

  • yiyoya

    All the Muslims and those misunderstood young rascals, ISIL, really need is a good jobs program and some food stamps, the Great Obama pointed this out years ago, these Italians are so slow.

    More of the Altruism clap-trap. More calls for self-sacrifice. ” Italy has shown that between “rigor” (selfish self-preservation) and “humanity” (self-sacrificial suicide), between “security” (selfish self-preservation) and “human rights”(Altruism) there is no competition (there never has been!).”

    ” Italy has saved hundreds of thousands of human lives and, in so doing, it saved Europe’s honor, as recognized by European Commission president Jean Claude Juncker.” Altruism equals honor, oh boy! Save your honor, commit national, cultural, suicide for the sake of Muslims! You are your Muslim brother’s keeper after all, Altruism is your highest moral duty, higher than mere selfish, self-preservation!

    • ed

      Italy, and all of Europe, needs to close their ports IMMEDIATELY. If the moslem filth still tries to get in, then the Italians/Europeans need to start sinking EVERY boat in the middle of the ocean.

      • dad1927

        you better send them all back as well

    • dad1927

      these hundreds of thousands saved will KILL millions

  • Mahou Shoujo

    One of the many problems with altruism, is that it is not a two way street, the way it is practiced relative to muslims. It is all well and good to have concern for one’s fellow human beings, it is necessary for the recipients of others generosity at very minimum appreciate it, making some attempt to improve their situation by using the gifts they received. This is not the case, muslims contemptuously demand more, they define themselves in the words of mutgonand, police beat upon him, as “the best of all people” correspondingly, they consider non muslims, even those who help he as inferior creatures to be treated worse than animals.
    Then there are enablers, that treat their culture and nation with contempt, submitting to every demand any muslim makes. Italy used to be a Catholic nation, now, the pope clearly favours islam and neglects Christians being oppressed by muslims in their home lands. In Italy, parish priests have grovelled before muslim demands to not ring church bells or pray above a whisper. The resentment of the ordinary citizen will eventually erupt in some genuine unpleasantness.

    • Halal Boycott will end Islam

      Also don’t forget the thrill of something for nothing is human nature. I’ve worked in countries and got away with tax avoidance, and it’s pleasing.

      You can multiply my attitude 1000x for a poor migrant. And the therefore the best way is through economics and legislation. Cut back on child benefit, introduce stricter economic criteria for entry, and my latest favorite:

      Abbass v Home Department

      Pakistanis are no longer assured a uk visa to visit a relative (and end up accidentally getting married and having 5 kids).

      • dad1927

        you mean 5 wives….. And 8,000 pounds welfare a month

    • yiyoya

      But Jesus Christ chose self-immolation and death to redeem worthless sinners, Jesus Christ is the example par excellence of self-abnegation, self-immolation, and self-sacrifice. How can true followers of Christ refuse to die on the cross for the sake of worthless Muslims?

      Christ commanded, love your enemy, turn the other cheek, love your neighbor as yourself, you are your brother’s keeper, live for others, die for others, that is the purpose of a truly Christian life. To act otherwise is to be selfish, and selfishness is un-Christian.

      The meek shall inherit the earth alright, as the meek dhimmis of their Muslim masters!

      • Mahou Shoujo

        You are trying the “proof by selected instance” gambit. You will notice that no where does it say in scripture that “thou shalt be stupid”.

        • dad1927

          Exodus 22:18King James Version (KJV)
          18 Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.
          What these people practice…

          • Mahou Shoujo

            They have a bit too broad a definition of what constitutes a witch.

      • NeilM

        the ‘meek’ will inherit dirt, the ground, nothing of the soul . . .that’s what that phrase meant; it meant speak up, act, don’t navel-gaze and equivocate . .

      • dad1927

        Romans 1:26-31English Standard Version (ESV)

        26 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

        28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. 29 They
        were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness,
        malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness.
        They are gossips, 30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless.

      • katzkiner

        The Scripture also says “cursed be he who deceitfully does the work of the Lord & “cursed be he who keeps his sword from blood”.
        A reading of Psalm 83 will erase any doubt of a duty of a Christian to submit to evil.
        On the contrary, we are commissioned to eradicate evil.
        The very reason God left evil in the world is that His children might learn war Judges 3 v 2.
        And while you are close skippey over to Judges 2v2 where God ordered us to make no deals with the enemies.
        The Beatitudes of Jesus were meant for dealing with Christian Brothers Sisters and regular people, not savage barbarian Satan possessed muslims.
        We are ordered to erase such demons from the earth.
        If you think Christians are ordered to be docile wait till the King of kings returns, you will be amazed, briefly.
        Christians did not conquer the world by being panzi’s, we are trying to give you non Christians a break.
        Don’t push your luck.

        • katzkiner
          • yiyoya

            It took centuries of rigorous, fearless, courageous, reasoning, rationality, logic, mathematics, engineering, and science for men to produce such marvels as the jet plane and the aircraft carrier, didn’t it?! Let us stand and salute the powers of reason!

        • yiyoya

          “We are trying to give you non-Christians a break”, “Don’t push your luck”, a Mystic of any stripe, secular or religious, atheist or monotheist, will sooner or later introduce the threat of force.

          Having abandoned reason, logic, demonstrable proof or evidence for his arbitrary assertions, there is no other recourse left but brute force to drive his irrational believes down the throat of the the unbeliever, the denier, the infidel. Men must either choose to live by reason or force, there are no other options.

          I recognize no Kings, Masters, Owners, or Lords over me. I submit (Islam) to no one. I do not submit to Mohammed. I do not submit to Allah. I do not submit to a Lord. I do not submit to Al Gore and his climate change religion. I bow to no one, I kneel to no one. Self-ownership is the basis of freedom, individual rights, and private property rights. I submit to reason, evidence, proof, logic, I submit to reality. And I walk away and leave in peace those that reject reason as I would a madman, unfortunately madmen have a habit of not returning the favor – Al Gore, Hitler, Stalin, Mohammed, et al..

          If a creator of man actually existed, the proper relationship between that creator and his supreme, reasoning, thinking, creation, man, would be one of first among equals, a guiding mentor, not a King, Master, Owner, or Lord.

          “Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because, if there be one, he must more approve of a homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear.” – Thomas Jefferson

    • marlene

      American: “I share with you what little I have”
      Muslim: “I kill you and take it all”

    • dad1927

      like paying off a bully

      • Mahou Shoujo

        Very much so, the bribe that keeps getting demanded.

    • mezcukor

      I agree with you Mahou. You are always so clear headed

      • Mahou Shoujo

        Thank you, there are a lot of good comments post by you and others.

  • karrin

    why cant they stay in their own countries surely once upon a time it was rich. why all of a sudden go to europe for what the welfare system? the euro will fall. asulym seekers get better handouts than natives of that country for sure how unfair is that.

    • Michaela Dransfield

      Q. “why cant they stay in their own countries”?
      A. ‘Hijra,’ Jihad by migration.

  • Alleged-Comment

    THERE is no way Europe can handle the MILLIONS of TURD world migrants coming to your country. Most who are Moslems. Lazy crazy anti-man uckers that out produce you 10 to 1.

    They will be a BURDEN on your country. They will bankrupt your system just so a few hundred of your ‘elite can remain in power.

    To these people the most important thing is a BOOT on your g*damn necks. Yes! They don’t like you! They are PSYCHOPATHS!

    Study history. They are SICK people!

  • marlene

    All damn muslims should stay in their own damn continent!

    • yiyoya

      First the Muslims never had a continent, the continent was Christian until the Muslims either forced the Christians to convert, become dhimmis, or were slaughtered. Second you can not be a true Muslim and reject Jihad, a Muslim is commanded by Mohammed and Allah to conquer the entire world, to convert, conquer, or kill ALL unbelievers.

      You might as well say why didn’t Hitler and the Nazis just stay in Germany, why didn’t the Communists just stay in Russia. Why? Because any ideology or religion that does not respect the rights and freedom of a single individual, will not recognize the rights of any individual or nation of individuals on earth.

      • marlene

        If they’re from any country in Africa, they should be returned to Africa. Same for all the other continents in which they have countries. Get it now?

  • Michaela Dransfield

    I don’t believe the Italian stupidity was about altuism. They wanted to copy Turkey and get billions of EU Euros. But the EU wouldn’t pay up, so they had to change their plans– after inflicting how much harm on Europe?

    • yiyoya

      By “THEY” you must mean the ruling class of parasites that always spring up in a nation whose policies are driven by sacrifice and altruism. Altruism is a morality of masters and slaves, where does the ruling class of the EU get it’s money? From their slaves, er, I mean citizens. Who was trying to get billions of Euros to Italy? Italy’s ruling class for their own pockets and altruistic schemes, not for their slaves, excuse me, I meant citizens.

      “It only stands to reason that where there’s sacrifice, there’s someone collecting the sacrificial offerings. Where there’s service, there is someone being served. The man who speaks to you of sacrifice is speaking of slaves and masters, and intends to be the master.”
      –Ayn Rand

      “Even though altruism declares that “it is more blessed to give than to receive,” it does not work that way in practice. The givers are never blessed; the more they give, the more is demanded of them; complaints, reproaches and insults are the only response they get for practicing altruism’s virtues (or for their actual virtues). Altruism cannot permit a recognition of virtue; it cannot permit self-esteem or moral innocence. Guilt is altruism’s stock in trade, and the inducing of guilt is its only means of self-perpetuation. If the giver is not kept under a torrent of degrading, demeaning accusations, he might take a look around and put an end to the self-sacrificing. Altruists are concerned only with those who suffer—not with those who provide relief from suffering, not even enough to care whether they are able to survive. When no actual suffering can be found, the altruists are compelled to invent or manufacture it.” – Ayn Rand

  • bcainw

    The Big Picture: Globalists are using Muslim migration to push forward a police state and global government.

  • DaveM12

    For decades people like Mark Steyn have warned against this massive tide of humanity growing exponentially because the West practices death control in their respective countries. Digging wells, providing sanitation, medical groups like Doctors without Borders, food donations by the thousands of tons, clothes, everything to allow more and more babies to be born and people to live where in earlier times they would have died. Because birth control was refused or not used the population exploded into the billions we see today.

    As predicated by various sages this huge population growth overwhelmed their own lands and the migration to the source of all this munificence, Europe and the US, began and will destroy it totally. Remember islam produces nothing only babies to continue its conquest and another country collapses into violence, misogyny and death. Africa had 2 jewels, Rhodesia and South Africa, and they are disappearing into corruption and destruction.

    • Joe Blow

      We need to stop all aid to these stupid crappy African and other countries and let them fix their own problems or croak.

  • Michaela Dransfield

    This is a very thorough, well- documented coverage of the issues: Aspasia, A. 2017
    On Migration: An Open Letter to George Soros, New English Review, 1 Oct.

    • yiyoya

      Oh my goodness! What a waste of time for the writer to write this article. This person assumes that George Soros somewhere deep inside him seeks the good, but he’s just misguided, misled, or ignorant, LOL!

      George Soros is an extremely intelligent, fully aware, well-read and widely-read, NIHILIST pure and simple! He seeks to destroy for the sake of destroying. He seeks power for the sake of power. He doesn’t seek to help poor non-Westerners become westernized, but to destroy the West, pure and simple. The idea that someone would seek to destroy for the pleasure of destroying has always been hard to believe possible, and today evil is explained away with one kind of psycho-babble theory or another, but evil does exist and some people choose evil with full awareness and pleasure.

      Why did Nero play the fiddle and burn down Rome? Because he could and he wanted to! Why did Caligula wish all of Rome had but one neck to crush? Because he found it a pleasure to destroy!

  • Platopus

    as Ayn Rand wrote altruism says “that person is homeless… you should help them”. EU is altruism on display to their own demise!!

    • yiyoya

      No, no, no. This is a major reason why Ayn Rand is misunderstood by laypeople and laypeople are put off by her (the professional intellectuals are not so innocent). The moral doctrine of Altruism does not mean kindness, generosity, charity, or helping people. Ayn Rand was not against charity, generosity, kindness, nor helping people, so long as it was done with wisdom and rationality. And so long as it is understood that helping other people is not a DUTY, and it is not the central purpose, nor moral meaning of life.

      Duty is not the same as responsibility, a responsibility is a freely chosen obligation, a duty is an unchosen obligation enforced by others, usually the government. Altruism is the moral doctrine that claims that complete self-immolation, complete self-sacrifice is the highest virtue, the only true virtue, and a DUTY. If you gain anything by an action, including personal satisfaction, or pride, or happiness by that action, to the degree that you profit from that action, materially or spiritually, your virtue is compromised and tainted. To be totally and completely virtuous you must lose and never gain and lose completely and totally, that is the meaning of Altruism.

      Be aware that helping other people, as such, is not automatically a virtue nor a vice, it all depends on the context, if you donate all your money to Hitler, Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, a drug addict, the Clinton Foundation,or the Muslim Brotherhood, you are being charitable, generous, and helpful, but are you being virtuous or vicious? Rational charity and kindness would make a distinction, Altruism demands no distinction, it demands sacrifice for sacrifice’s sake, sacrifice as a blind duty, sacrifice as self-destruction.

      For further elucidation you can read this excellent article: “Is Altruism Really A Virtue?”

  • Joe Blow

    This is because many of our problems are symptoms of something that begins elsewhere.”
    This is because most of your problems are caused by you liberal douchebags

Pin It on Pinterest