News Ticker >
[ November 18, 2017 ]

Pakistan: Christians flee for their lives after Muslims blame them for “blasphemous” Facebook page

[ November 18, 2017 ]

UK’s top counterterror officers urge media to rein in coverage of Islamic State and jihad...

[ November 18, 2017 ]

Massachusetts’ WBUR: Muslim who plotted to behead Pamela Geller “may be an emblem of the...

[ November 17, 2017 ]

Morrissey’s Israel on an open thread

[ November 17, 2017 ]

Pamela Geller Talk, Book Signing, Metropolitan Republican Club November 29th, 7:00 PM

[ November 17, 2017 ]

Young Mother Who Converted to Islam Murdered in Hammer Attack After Going Back to Western...

[ November 17, 2017 ]

ACT Space Coast Talk: “Pamela Geller Defies Fatwa in Florida”

[ November 17, 2017 ]

FATWA: How the West Was Lost

[ November 17, 2017 ]

Swedish Woman Raped by Refugee Commits Suicide After Prosecutor Claims ‘Lack of Evidence’

[ November 17, 2017 ]

U.S. Admits Role in Arming Iranian-Backed Jihadists in Iraq

9th Circuit Appeals Court Rules Against Donald Trump Over Scope Of Travel Ban

12

The left is sick — morally, intellectually, politically.

What do they think will happen, or should I say, what does the left hope will happen?

More jihad mass murderers will enter the country. More Americans will be killed. That is apparently what the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals wants.

“BREAKING: Appeals Court Rules Against Donald Trump Over Scope Of Travel Ban,” by Justin Caruso, Daily Caller, September 7, 2017:

Reuters reports, “U.S. appeals court rules against President Donald Trump over scope of travel ban.”

The full opinion can be read here.

The 9th Circuit declined to overturn a previous district court ruling. In doing so, the 9th circuit smacks down the Trump administration’s attempt to deny certain family members of Americans an exemption from the travel ban.

The modified travel ban previously held up by the Supreme Court did not classify grandparents, cousins, or aunts and uncles as close family, thus denying them an exception to the ban.

The ruling also provides for more refugees to come to the United States…

Pamela Geller's shocking new book, "FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA" is now available on Amazon. It's Geller's tell all, her story - and it's every story - it's what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

  • Patti York

    How in HELL does any court have any authority to do this? Someone please explain this to me.

    • Dennis

      The court’s jurisdiction to hear the motioned appeals of the parties is a procedural right granted to the Appeals Court, and is not inconsistent with our Constitution. Whether you agree with or do not agree with the conclusions is of little moment as the issue will likely go to the Supreme court for final clarification, though, unless the Supreme court stays this finding it will go into effect. I think what we can learn from a review of the ruling is that this country needs to rethink it relationship with the U.N. and it’s Refugee body, which I believe deserves some immediate consideration by our legislators, who, unfortunately do nothing except prioritize their getting elected to what they believe is a full time job, and never seem to understand that they are elected to represent the citizens of this great country first and foremost. If the legislators would re-write our immigration laws to protect those here who love the way our society functions and get off their liberal backside to provide laws which preclude with more definition who can and cannot legitimately become immigrants into these United States, we will go a long way to clarifying for our executive branch who can enter this country. It always seems to come down to the failure of our legislative branch to outline what our laws should be to protect its citizens. Though you might disagree with the 9th Circuits defining determination, they had every right to rule as they did, and that is the way our legal system works.

      • Ziggy46

        It seems your commentary is not popular, not that it matters; however, you are absolutely right, unfortunately, Dennis.

        Dennis: “If the legislators would re-write our immigration laws to protect those
        here who love the way our society functions and get off their liberal
        backside to provide laws which preclude with more definition who can and
        cannot legitimately become immigrants into these United States, we will
        go a long way to clarifying for our executive branch who can enter this
        country.”

        This has been a never-ending issue that legislators perceive and consider a pariah. Until, as said, they, the legislators get their act together, this madness will continue. Moreover, if they would enforce our present immigration laws, it may restore some accountability to the farcical illegal-immigration of present day. Those of the Leftist contagion demand we place a welcome mat on our borders, this is madness, a menace to our nation and its citizens’ security.

        • Patti York

          The travel ban is one measure to take control of our borders. The president has the authority and responsibility to do just that.

          • Ziggy46

            I agree, something has to be done to the judiciary’s calling the shots over the duly elected President, Trump. If it were Obama running the show, the same judiciary would be bowing and scraping to the bogus messiah. I sense it is another leftist ruse to embarrass or worse, usurp Trump. The swamp is thick with thieves, usurpers, seditionists and meaning, the parasitical leftists.

  • santashandler

    No surprise here. The courts are out of control. Just who these courts are supposed to be representing is a mystery. It’s certainly not the law-abiding, taxpaying American citizen.

  • Suresh

    why the Hell judges who subvert the Law that gives the President right to decide who should be denied permission to come into the country for security reasons Not impeached and kicked out ?

    America’s First Muslim President , Obama also pulled a Taqiya for many years justifying bringing in “refugees” . what Dems and corrupt media would not tell you that 98% of these “refugees” were muslims !

    And christians , yazidis who were the real refugees were denied !

    Dems including Obama have not only denied refugees status to christians from middle east who are real refugee but even have deported christians back to ISIS territory to be slaughtered by ISIS http://tinyurl.com/mtc3xch

    Not one MSM media covered it !

  • Mahou Shoujo

    Alrighty then, some room will have to be made for all these imports. This will necessitate the immediate acceleration of deportations, for every new colonist invader from a muslim country deport ten who are here on welfare, not working or with criminal records..

    • 1SugarNoMILF

      Yeah, but the devil is in the detail.

      As soon as possible, you will have to be the first 12 year-old Japanese-American boy in a dress to be elected to the Californian Senate.

      Then it’s easy.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        There is a problems with that, as I am not going to have a sex change to enter politics. Though is muslim “children can be in their 20’s, may the “child” angle could work.

  • Ziggy46

    Our judiciary runs the nation not Presidents; especially Trump. It is said, this is what makes our nation great: plus, it is Constitutional, whether we agree or not. This said, if Obama, hypothetically, had mandated a similar travel ban, I am more than certain the judiciary would not block it. I am not a wagering man; nonetheless, I would wager on Obama getting the judiciary’s nod.

    If, God forbid, this nation were to experience another Jihadi terror attack, Trump would be crucified, not the judiciary. It’s my opinion that the Overlords/Judiciary is not concerned about the Constitution or the nation’s security but to make President Trump’s presidency, Hell.

Pin It on Pinterest