News Ticker >
[ January 23, 2018 ]

Canada: Muslim charged in multiple shootings of 4 year-old girl and other random strangers at...

[ January 23, 2018 ]

Lawsuit: FBI “Green-Lighted” Attack in Garland, Texas

[ January 23, 2018 ]

Outrage as multiple properties in London are only offered to Muslim occupants

[ January 23, 2018 ]

EU Reiterates Support for Future ‘Palestinian’ Capital in Eastern Jerusalem

[ January 23, 2018 ]

“Moderate” Indonesia: Christian man whipped 36 times for selling alcohol and violating Sharia law

[ January 23, 2018 ]

Female “Palestinian” university students taught to view jihad terrorist Dalal Mughrabi who led murder of...

[ January 23, 2018 ]

Media Lies: Turns Out, Trump Immigration Plans Score High With Hispanics, Blacks

[ January 23, 2018 ]

Diversity Visa Lottery Winner Offered to Kill Obama for ISIS

[ January 23, 2018 ]

Israel Only ‘Free Country’ in Mideast, Turkey No Longer ‘Free’: Report

[ January 22, 2018 ]

Germany: Iranian Spy Network Targeted Jewish Institutions for Strikes

London, Ontario bans anti-Islamization rally: “Ideologies contrary to City of London not permitted in civic spaces”


The freedom of speech is under ferocious assault all over the West, from both Muslims and leftists. The city of London, Ontario has now banned “activities of organizations whose ideologies is [sic] contrary to the City of London.” So only if the city authorities agree with what you’re saying will you be allowed to operate. Incredible. This is authoritarianism, and the death of free society. And it’s happening rapidly, right under our noses.

“Policy advocate criticizing London council’s emergency motion as an ‘attack on free speech,’” by Liny Lamberink and Matthew Trevithick, AM980, August 23, 2017:

London City Hall is coming under fire for what some are calling an “attack on free speech”, after unanimously passing an emergency motion Tuesday night to stand against hatred and racism.

It comes in response to an anti-Islam rally scheduled on Saturday by the Canadian chapter of the German nationalist and far-right political movement Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamization of the West, or PEGIDA in its German abbreviation.

London Institute Executive Director Amir Farahi has accused council of making a “knee-jerk” reaction by condemning the activities of organizations whose ideologies are contrary to the city’s.

“[Mayor Matt Brown] said there’s no place in London for racism, bigotry, and hatred. Okay, I agree with you… but there certainly is a place for us to free assembly and for us to freely express ourselves,” Farahi said Wednesday on AM980’s The Andrew Lawton Show.

The motion is as follows: “That civic administration be directed to prepare the necessary formal council policy to confirm the prohibition of activities of organizations whose ideologies is [sic] contrary to the City of London are not permitted in civic spaces, and/or facilities and spaces.”

Farahi has launched a petition, calling on Mayor Matt Brown to repeal part of the motion.

“I’m quite disgusted by the fact that our fundamental rights, our constitutional rights here in Canada, in London, are basically being taken away from us under the guise of political correctness.”

He points out that victims of hate speech are already protected by hate speech laws, and violators face the full extent of the law….

Mayor Matt Brown has now committed to attending the counter-protest, despite saying in a radio interview this month that it would be inappropriate for him to attend and give unneeded attention to the anti-Islam group.

“I didn’t want to throw fuel in the fire,” he explained on AM980’s The Craig Needles Show.

“I’ve seen a ground swell of people moving toward attending the anti-hate rally, which I think is very positive. So I’ve moved my schedule around, and I want to join London and stand together, and just express that the vast majority of Londoners don’t accept hate.”…

Pamela Geller's shocking new book, "FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA" is now available on Amazon. It's Geller's tell all, her story - and it's every story - it's what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

  • Jim

    Canada has never had free speech… It’s not free speech unless someone is offended.. They even have a 2 year prison term for blasphemy…

  • Kropotkin

    “whose ideologies is [sic] contrary to the City of London”

    What are the City of London’s ideologies?

    • Mahou Shoujo

      Repression of all opinions that are not muslim.

    • guymacher

      One of the ideologies is adultery between the mayor and deputy mayor.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        From the local media “Yes, indeed, the mayor of London, Ontario, made the admission late yesterday evening that he and his deputy mayor had a “brief” period where they were not just working together, but also fucking each other. In the wake of the announcement, Deputy Mayor Maureen Cassidy has resigned her position, and Matt Brown—the actual mayor—is taking a leave of absence”.

    • James

      Antichrist Atheism aka Marxism and ISLAM, the place is INFESTED with the scum.

    • Fisher German


  • Mahou Shoujo

    When the city council pass a resolution outlawing hate literature, as illustrated by the qur’an, they can say they are supporters of free speech. Next election make sure every one of their council are replaced by persons who value freedom, not the oppression of islam.

    • tatka150

      What they voted for is what they get

  • IzlamIsTyranny

    Candastan… Because islamic Jew hate is AOK, but criticising it is a hate crime.

  • poortaxpayerwindsor

    our politicians and MSM are are all in bed with the islamists
    go ask some of your moslum neighbors their thoughts on killing Jews
    ya -seems they have alot in common with Nazis
    and the moslums hate comes from the koran
    moslums are the Real Nazis

  • AlgorithmicAnalyst

    “We only allows ideologies that is consistent with Islam” :)

    • AshleyMBaughman


      Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family!!!
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash146HomeVille/GetPay$97/Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!ql146t..,…..

  • Joel Busher


  • AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020

    I’ll bet London and British politicians will work to ban makeshift teddy bear and flower memorials to Islamic terror victims !!!
    Soon to be said by any Leftist Politician: ” These horrific memorials to ‘big city’ violence offend our brothers and sisters of ISLAM !! ”

  • Lawrence Tierney
    What is interesting are the groups that Iqra Khalid is gathering to create the definition of ISLAMOPHOBIA. At one such meeting were the following groups and People.

    In attendance Where:

    1. Iqra Khalid;
    2. Ahmed Hussen (Minister of Immigration);
    3. Members of The National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM);
    4. Members of The Muslim Students Association (MSA); and
    5. The Canadian Council of IMAMs (CCI).
    6. Chairing the Meeting was the Senior IMAM of the Canadian Council of IMAMs, Mohammad Iqbal Nadvi (Pictured Below).

    To Note: The NCCM, MSA and the CCI are all Fronts for the Terrorist Organization “The MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD”.

    Mohammad Iqbal Nadvi, is the Senior MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD Commander in Canada. He is responsible for all Canadian MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD Operations.

    The MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD is an Islamic Terrorist Organization whose goal is the Destruction of Western Civilization, The creation of a World Wide Islamic Caliphate, the establishment, the enforcement of SHARIA LAW over the world (ISLAMIC WORLD DOMINATION) and the Eventual Cultural and Physical Genocide of all Non-MUSLIMS.

    The MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD operates throughout CANADA and the UNITED STATES; Using the following Front Organizations. The Council on American-ISLAMIC Relations (CAIR, CAIR-CAN), Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), North American Trust (NAIT), Muslim Student Association (MSA), Canadian Council of IMAMS (CCI), National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM), and the Muslim Association of Canada (MAC), The Canadian MUSLIM Lawyers Association (CMLA), The Windsor ISLAMIC Association (WIA) and others.

    The MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD also owns and controls the majority of the Mosques and so-called Islamic Schools in Canada and the United States, their goal is to promote Extremist Islam. They use these facilities to raise funds for Terrorist Groups such as HAMAS and HIZBULLAH as well as others. The MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD is the parent organization that all other Islamic Terrorist Groups have originated. (HIZBULLAH, HAMAS, AL QUDS, AL QAIDA and others).

    For more information, please refer to the articles Linked Below:

    Please refer to the Mackenzie Institute Article: “The Muslim Brotherhood in Canada: Civilization Jihad” by Tom Quiggin.

    For more information about the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD and their operations in the UNITED STATES, please refer to the Link Below:
    “The MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD in America”

    “Are Canada’s Islamists Calling the Shots”

    “Obfuscating the Islamist threat – Profile of the Canadian Muslim Lawyers Association”

  • Trump can’t ban islam

    Islam belongs in USA now. we must get used to see mosques here and there. Muslims will be america’s new workers, chefs, taxidrivers, cops, politicians, ………. rulers

    • guymacher

      Nice try Mohamed!

    • Cal A. Nomen

      Islam belongs in a deep hole in the desert …

  • Alleged-Comment

    The council is beyond destroying. The are now MOCKING YOU. Something wrong over there. Witnessing the destruction of the West.

  • IzlamIsTyranny

    Alas Canada.

  • Ichabod Crain

    From what I’ve read, London is infested with Muslims on the mega-mosque scale.

    • guymacher

      We are talking about London Ontario not the one in the UK.

      • Ichabod Crain

        So am I. London, ON has evolved to become an Islamic centre in the heart of Southern Ontario. There is a relatively very large Muslim population in the surrounding region. I mention this because it explains the mayor’s reaction, playing up to his constituents.

        • DaveM12

          Huge muslim numbers here in Mississauga, Ontario. The women are always pushing a baby carriage with one in the oven.

          • James

            Exactly the evil Islamic vermin and their Islamic kkk hoods they wear to incite the most vile offense are 100% always on their cell phones while pushing baby carriages. Fucking satanic breeding machines of evil.

        • guymacher

          White Oaks area feels like a foreign land now. God help us!

        • James

          Correct, the vile Antichristian Sharia scum and their Islamic kkk hoods have infested London Ontario turning it into an abomination of satan himself. I live there.

  • Hussars2016

    “[Mayor Matt Brown] said there’s no place in London for racism, bigotry, and hatred.”
    So he will crack down on the Mosques?
    I guess not. Apparently London is under Sharia or Islamic Law.
    I wonder if the Mayor really believes the lies. I think he is just afraid of what the Red/Green axis will do to him if he allows free speech.

  • Stephen Honig

    I’ll reiterate! It’s too little too late. Europe is gone. The coup de grace will be another 20 years maximum. If there will be history books, then it will state that Obama, Soros, Hillary, Axelrod, Merkel and others were responsible for the evil in the world, that brought down a once great country.

    • Fisher German


  • Mickey Oberman

    London Ontario is following in the footsteps of London England.
    There goes freedom of speech.
    Here comes allahu Akbar. Inshallah. Greatly increased rape. Prayers recited by hundreds of people kneeling in busy streets 5 times a day. Unbelievable vandalism. Rapidly growing hatred of anything. A fast decaying education system from kindergarten to university. Untenable demands on the city’s treasury and a shortage of housing along with a fast expanding welfare list.

    You are on the way, Londonostan!

  • drummie

    So it is illegal to not agree with the city government about anything? That is NOT FREEDOM folks, that is tyranny.

  • Mahou Shoujo

    If shari’a law was enforced on female muslims, it would be the most lather and hated thing ever. Right now muslim some, in particular, are doing exactly what the males tell them to. Once shari’a is applied, even on a family law scale there will be much gnawing of tech under the burka as some get nothing in divorce, can be easily divorced and thrown in the street.
    A few lines of shari’a and how it applies to women.

    1. Under Sharia, Wives Can Be Beaten.

    Whereas under Western laws women and men are equal, under Sharia women are not equal to men, but are considered inferior. Women are the object of many disparaging remarks in the earliest Islamic source texts, which form the basis for Sharia. For example, according to Q 4:34, husbands are allowed to beat their wives if they “fear disobedience” (which implies that actual disobedience need not occur for the beating to be justified):

    Men are the managers of the affairs of women for that God has preferred in bounty one of them over another, and for that they have expended of their property. Righteous women are therefore obedient, guarding the secret for God’s guarding. And those you fear may be rebellious admonish; banish them to their couches, and beat them. If they then obey you, look not for any way against them; God is All-high, All-great.

    That wife-beating is permissible given (imagined or real) behavioral misconduct on the part of the wife is also found in Muḥammad’s so-called “Farewell Address” or “Last Sermon,” which has been preserved in Ibn Isḥāq’s Sīra, the oldest and most reliable biography of Muḥammad that we possess.[1]

    2. Under Sharia, Females Enjoy Fewer Rights than Males.

    According to Q 2:282, the testimony of a woman is worth only half that of a man’s:

    And bring to witness two witnesses from among your men. And if there are not two men [available], then a man and two women from those whom you accept as witnesses – so that if one of the women errs, then the other can remind her.

    According to Q 4:11 and Q 4:176, a woman may inherit only half as much as her male brother does. Furthermore, as Professor Samīr Khalīl Samīr, a native Arabic speaker with two doctorates and the former adviser to Pope Benedict XVI on Islam and the Middle East, explains, under Sharia “in a [religiously] mixed marriage [where the wife is non-Muslim], the wife legally loses the right to her husband’s inheritance if she does not convert to Islam.”[2]

    3. Under Sharia, Marriage and Sexual Intercourse with Pre-Pubescent Girls is Permissible.

    According to Q 65:4, sexual relations with females who have not yet had their menstrual cycle (i.e., pre-pubescent girls) are permissible. The verse is found in the sixty-fifth chapter of al-Talāq (Divorce), which begins by stating that “when you divorce women, divorce them when they have reached (the end of) their waiting period (ʿidda); a waiting period or ʿidda is a certain amount of time that a Muslim man is supposed to wait before marrying a divorced woman, so as to make sure that she is not pregnant from her previous husband.”[3] It is in this context that we are to read Q 65:4, which states the following:

    (As for) those of your women who have no hope of (further) menstruation: if you are in doubt, their waiting period is three months, and (also for) those who have not (yet) menstruated” [emphasis added].

    Sayyid Qutb, the late prominent theoretician of the Muslim Brotherhood, explains in his renowned commentary on the Qur’ān (In the Shadow of the Qur’ān) that [Q 65:4] is referring to “women who are past the menopause and those who do not as yet have a menstrual cycle because they have not attained puberty or because of a malfunction in their system” [emphasis added].[4]

    Thus, in the context of this Qur’ānic chapter on divorce, it seems that this verse is stating that Muslim men (or husbands) are to wait three months before divorcing pre-pubescent girls (for the reason of making sure that young and apparently borderline post-pubescent girls are not pregnant; cf. Q 2:228). This is not just some interpretation that modern Islamists like Sayyid Qutb came up with; rather, such an interpretation of Q 65:4 is mentioned at least as far back as al-Tabarī (839 – 923), one of our oldest and most important sources of early Islam.

    Furthermore, the Andalusian Malikī jurisprudent and philosopher, Ibn Rushd (1126 – 1198), known to the West as “Averroes,” confirms the permissibility of having sexual relations with pre-pubescent girls in his legal handbook, Bidāyat al-Mujtahid wa Nihāyat al-Muqtaṣid (literally, “the beginning for him who interprets the sources independently and the end for him who wishes to limit himself”). In this work, and under the section entitled “the Waiting Period for Wives,” he states the following: “the divorced woman whose marriage stands consummated may or may not be one who menstruates. If she does not menstruate, she may be a minor or beyond the age of menstruation.[5]”

    It should be noted here that one of the most renowned Muslim figures of all times is unequivocally implying that marriage and sexual relations with pre-pubescent girls in Islam are licit.

    4. Under Sharia, Wives do not Share the Same Divorce Rights as Their Husbands.

    Under Sharia, a husband can divorce his wife simply by stating, “you are divorced” three times in the presence of two adult mentally sound males, without even having to justify his decision, and he will retain custody of any children. In this connection, Professor Samir states that “the most absurd thing is that if the husband later repents of his decision [of divorce] and wants to ‘recover’ his wife [for the third time], she must first marry another man who in his turn will repudiate her (Q 2:229-30).”[6] By contrast, no such power is given to the wife.

    5. Under Sharia, Female Rulers are Frowned Upon.

    Sharia frowns upon female rulers. This originates from a ḥadīth in Sahih al-Bukhari, the most trusted Muslim aḥadīth , where Muhammad, upon hearing the news that the people of Persia had made the daughter of Khosrau their Queen, states: “Never will succeed such a nation as makes a woman their ruler.”[7] Indeed, this is one of the reasons that is often cited for why women cannot be caliphs.[8] Although this is what Sharia teaches in theory, the practicalities of life give rise to some exceptions. In the Muslim world you did occasionally have female rulers like Shajarat al-Durr (d. 1257) who ruled Egypt in Medieval times. In more recent times, Benazir Bhutto won the elections in Pakistan and became Prime Minister of that country for two non-consecutive terms (1988-90, and 1993-96). So did Shikha Hasina, who won elections three times and is currently the Prime Minister of Bangladesh.

    6. Under Sharia, Wives Should be Subservient to their Husbands.

    Under Sharia, a husband has absolute authority over his wife. As Professor Samir remarks: “A man can forbid his wife to go out from the home, even to go to the mosque, since in a ḥadīth Muḥammad tells a woman that her prayer has no value if it is done without her husband’s permission.”[9] This is confirmed by The Reliance of the Traveler, an authoritative fourteenth-century Shafiʿī legal manual written by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misrī (1302 – 1367). The manual states that “a woman may not leave the city without her husband or a member of her unmarriageable kin….accompanying her, unless the journey is obligatory, like the hajj. It is unlawful for her to travel otherwise, and unlawful for her husband to allow her.”[10]

    Furthermore, under Sharia, polygyny is allowed, for Q 4:3 explicitly permits Muslim men to marry “what seems good to you of the women: two, or three, or four.”[11] Because of this verse, till this day in many Muslim countries it is permissible for a man to marry more than one wife.

    Regardless of whether this custom was deemed to be socially acceptable by the seventh-century standards of Arabia, today only the very rare wife would find it permissible for her husband to marry another woman, let alone two or three more, even if she keeps her status as first wife.

    7. Under Sharia, Women are Deemed Lacking in Faith and Intelligence.

    As students of Islam know very well, Sharia does not just draw from Qur’ānic verses for its oppressive view of women. For it also draws on the aḥadīth (the so-called sayings of Muḥammad). In one such hadīth from Sahīh Al-Bukhārī, the most authoritative Sunni collection of ahādīth, Muḥammad states that the majority of the dwellers of hellfire are women, that women curse frequently and are ungrateful to their husbands, and, famously, that women are “deficient in intelligence and religion.” The full hadīth is as follows:

    Once Allah’s Messenger [i.e., Muḥammad] went out to the Muṣalla [place of prayer] (to offer the prayer) of `Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, “O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women).” They asked, “Why is it so, O Allah’s Messenger?” He replied, “You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you.” The women asked, “O Allah’s Messenger! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?” He said, “Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?” They replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?” The women replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her religion [emphases added].”

    Fundamentalist Muslims the world over insist on accepting this ḥadīth, which is virtually universally accepted as authentic or ṣahīh by even moderate Muslim scholars (who generally view just about everything in the collection of al-Bukahrī as authentic). Such aḥadīth have been a source of great injustice to women living in majority-Muslim countries.

    8. Under Sharia, Raping Female Captives is Permissible.

    What is particularly egregious in Sharia is that warriors are permitted to capture the women of “infidels” and use them for their sexual gratification. According to Q 4:3, Q 4:24, Q 23:5-6, Q 70:22-30, having female slaves, “those whom your right hand possess” (ما ملكت ايمانكم, transliterated as ma malikat aymānikum), is permissible.

    Furthermore, interpreting ma malikat aymānikum as “female slaves” is not something that, pace Western-Muslim apologists, is only advanced by so-called Islamophobes. Our earliest tafsīr (Qur’ānic exegesis), the tafsīr of Muqātil Ibn Sulaymān, states that ma malikat aymānikum means walā’id (ولائد), which denotes female slaves.[12] This view has been held by many mufasirīn (exegetes) since medieval times, and A.J. Droge’s recent 2013 scholarly translation of the Qur’ān, which is, in my opinion, the best English translation around, explains the phrase “those whom your right hand possess” as straightforwardly referring to female slaves.

    Having female slaves, Droge explains, is permissible even when the (Muslim) male is married.[13] Indeed, the Qur’ān contrasts female slaves with married women a few times, clearly demonstrating female slaves were not considered to be wives. There can be no doubt that in using the term ma malikat aymānikum, the Qur’ān is here referring to females who have been captured during war for the sexual gratification of their male captors. Indeed, reading Ibn Iṣhāq’s Sīrat Rasūl Allāh, we can discern that Muhammad himself took female concubines and permitted his warriors to do likewise as well.

    Ibn Iṣhāq tells us that after Muhammad had 600 to 900 adult Jewish men of the tribe of Banu Qurayẓa beheaded and thrown into trenches for alleged treason, he “divided the property, wives, and children of b. Qurayẓa among the Muslims.” Ibn Iṣhāq further relates that “the apostle sent Saʿd b. Zayd al-Anṣār brother of ‘Abdu’l-Ashhal with some of the captive women of B. Qurayẓa to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons [emphasis added].”[14]

    Hence, according to Ibn Isḥāq, Muhammad enslaved women and sanctioned their being sold off (not much different from what ISIS militants are doing today with Yazidi women, no doubt modeling themselves after the Muhammad of the early Islamic sources). Furthermore, Ibn Iṣhāq tells us that “the apostle had chosen one of [the women of the tribe of B. Qurayẓa] for himself.”[15] In other words, Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, was himself taking female captives for his own sexual gratification.

    • IzlamIsTyranny

      I love the circular reasoning used to justify why women are deficient in islum.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        All of islam is a continuously circular illogical hallucination. The sum of islam is “It is true because it is written in the qur’an, why is the qur’an true. because it is written in the qur’an” The muslim brain can accept that, as it is incapable of thinking outside the loop.

        • IzlamIsTyranny

          Islum is a crazy as putting a screen door in a submarine.

  • James

    London Ontario has been taken over by the most Satanic vile marxist atheists and Muslims you can ever imagine. The only solution for Canada is outright war to expel or kill all these traitorous scum. But that will never happen. Canada is absolutely lost to Satanic atheism and Islam and will never be saved ever again because its citizens have given themselves over to Satan. It is now one of the most wicked countries in all the history of the world.

  • James

    Antichrist atheism (Marxism) and Islam will ALWAYS be united because they both serve the same devil and his Antichrist black evil agenda. You will never in your life find a Marxist who does not support Islamics in the west.

  • Andrew

    Is it not hateful and intolerant to not accept hate and intolerance? Arent we just going in circles? Are we not citizens who’s views and beliefs are equally valid? Will they crack down on hateful speech with loving violence? When and how will this come to an end?

Pin It on Pinterest