News Ticker >
[ October 22, 2017 ]

‘Underwear bomber’ files lawsuit over prison treatment, says Muslims harassed

[ October 22, 2017 ]

WATCH: Gavin McInnes Interviews Pamela Geller

[ October 22, 2017 ]

Wherever There Are More Muslims There Is More Terror: The Connection Between Demographics and Terrorism

[ October 22, 2017 ]

Europe’s Next World War Begins in France

[ October 22, 2017 ]

In Minnesota, They’re “Kind of” Committed to the Freedom of Speech

[ October 22, 2017 ]

Memphis imam Yasir Qadhi called for killing of gays and blasphemers, to speak in London

[ October 22, 2017 ]

Italy: Muslim migrant slits non-Muslim’s throat, victim’s family warns against “racism”

[ October 22, 2017 ]

Australia: Muslim preacher OK’s wife-beating, says “Beat her in a way that doesn’t turn her...

[ October 21, 2017 ]

Saturday Night Cinema: Kiss Tomorrow Goodbye

[ October 21, 2017 ]

Videos and Photos: Protest Hiring Anti-Israel CEO David Myers At Center For Jewish History

“Progressive” Radio Station KPFA CANCELS Atheist Richard Dawkins Speech Because He Criticized Islam


Anyone who has followed the free-speech wars in America over recent years will know that by now, basically, nobody can speak anywhere…

Ghastly but true. And to think this is now widely understood to be in international circle. America – land of the free and home of the brave — crippled and shackled by sharia.

Richard Dawkins criticizes Judaism, Christianity, and all religions, and the left applauds. But when he criticizes the most violent and misogynistic belief system on the face of the earth, that crosses the line as far as the left is concerned. And so “progressive” KPFA joins the other cowards and subversives in the U.S. who are submitting to sharia blasphemy laws.

“Atheist’s Speech At Christian Church Cancelled Because He Has Condemned Islamic Violence”, Daily Caller, July 22, 2017:

A progressive radio station in Berkeley, California has cancelled a scheduled appearance by Richard Dawkins, the evolutionary biologist and atheist, because he has previously criticized fundamentalist Islam as oppressive to women and generally violent.

The appearance by Dawkins had been scheduled for Aug. 9 at the First Congregational Church of Berkeley.

Listen up! Richard Dawkins will be in the San Francisco Bay area on Aug 8th. Don’t miss this one-time event: — Richard Dawkins FDN (@rdfrs) July 12, 2017
The radio station, KPFA, had invited Dawkins to the United Church of Christ-affiliated church to discuss his new latest book, “Science in the Soul: Collected Writings of a Passionate Rationalist.”

KPFA had described the 76-year-old British scientist’s new book as “excellent,” according to Berkeleyside, a local news website.

However, on Thursday, the listener-funded progressive radio station — 94.1 on your FM dial — rescinded its speaking invitation to Dawkins because of some tweets and statements the atheist scientist has issued which have been critical of Muslims he describes as militant and radical.

“We had booked this event based entirely on his excellent new book on science when we didn’t know he had offended and hurt — in his tweets and other comments on Islam, so many people,” KPFA told ticket buyers in the email.

“KPFA does not endorse hurtful speech,” the email also said. “While KPFA emphatically supports serious free speech, we do not support abusive speech. We apologize for not having had broader knowledge of Dawkins views much earlier.”

University of Chicago evolutionary biologist Jerry Coyne published the email and said KPFA sent it without ever informing Dawkins that was no longer invited to speak.

Coyne called the cancellation “a terrible blow for free speech.”

“I’m sure that some of the Perpetually Offended, with perhaps Muslims among them, complained to the radio station, and KPFA caved,” Coyne charged.

When Dawkins found out his speech had been canceled, the militant atheist fired back with a statement of his own.

“The idea that I have engaged in abusive speech against Islam is preposterous, which even the most rudimentary fact-checking by KPFA would have made clear,” Dawkins said in a statement released on Friday by the Center for Inquiry.

“I have indeed strongly condemned the misogyny, homophobia, and violence of Islamism, of which Muslims — particularly Muslim women — are the prime victims. I make no apologies for denouncing those oppressive cruelties, and I will continue to do so,” Dawkins also said……

Pamela Geller's shocking new book, "FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA" is now available on Amazon. It's Geller's tell all, her story - and it's every story - it's what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

  • Mark Steiner

    Elementary, my dear Dawkins. You are finally starting to wake up …

  • shirley versace

    one establishment stooge spurning the other… who cares. Dorkins is a low brow, pseudo-scientist.

  • taxpayer22

    Ayaan Hirsi Ali : Political Islam ‘Incompatible with the U.S. Constitution’.

    • felix1999

      She TESTIFIED to that fact and they YAWN and move on as if it never happened.

      • Marylgribble

        Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !pa219d:
        On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash219SportCoolGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!pa219l..,…

  • taxpayer22

    The ultimate goal of dawa is to destroy the political institutions of a free society and replace them with strict sharia. Islamists rely on both violent and nonviolent means to achieve their objectives.

  • taxpayer22

    Hijrah is an Islamic tactic .. Dawa is the Jihad propaganda… Waiting for condemnations of terrorism by Muslims.

    • Suresh

      It just shows how powerful jihadis and their Left collaborators have become. Unless there is a concerted attempt to go after those who try to suppress Free Speech, America will go the way Europe is going….into a islamic Hellhole.

      Sweden : Police begging for help, legal system collapsing

      And now swedish police is so overworked, outnumbered that the Police chief is begging for help from his own govt

      But they are too busy bringing in more jihadis and dumb Left/liberal women I heard are allowing themselves be their sex slaves so they won’t be killed !

      • taxpayer22

        There is nothing else which better exposes the modern Left’s rank hypocrisy, their disregard for the facts, and their hatred for the West and all it stands for than their attitude to Islam.

        Every noble principle the Left claims to uphold, from rights for women to gay liberation, even diversity itself, dies on the altar of its sycophantic defense of Islam.

        • AE3

          I HAVE NOT HEARD A BETTER DESCRIPTION of why the leftist defends ISLAM THAN THIS!!! They are hypocrites IN EVERY SENSE OF THE WORD!!!

    • Mustafa Curtess

      That can only happen when the USA stops its campaign of State Terrorism against Muslim countries (Somalia, Afghanistan, and Iraq already totally destroyed, Syria and Yemen in the preliminary stages, and Iran planned and awaiting the “Commence Firing” command.)

      • taxpayer22

        Note what happened to the Jews of Medina in the 7th Century.

        • Mustafa Curtess

          There was a good reason for that (anybody would have done the same under the circumstances, and the Jews never have been very good about getting along with ANYBODY – before or since.)
          At any rate: It has nothing to do with today. If you want to go back in history – learn what the Christians did to the natives of Central and South America in the 16th and 17th centuries. (Exterminated entire cultures “In Jesus’Name”) That has nothing to do with today, either – but let’s keep the record straight.
          Maybe you don’t want to think about it – but this BS will go on as long as ANY religion exists ANYWHERE. I really don’t have a dog in this fight – but I still challenge nonsense wherever I find it. Europe and America (and the established resident Muslim community everywhere) are having a traumatic
          experience with the tsunami of “Muslim refugees” these days – and it is appropriate to point out WHY those refugees even exist. They are being generated by the U.S. Dept. Of State and the Pentagon – and NOWHERE ELSE.

          • IzlamIsTyranny

            Bullshit, the vast majority of deaths in South America were because of the diseases the Europeans brought w/them to which the South Americans were NOT immune — unlike muslums who slaughtered/enslaved some 80 million Hindus in the Indian sub-continent.

          • Mustafa Curtess

            That, too. But it was primarily the Spanish Inquisition – that ordered them to be converted or killed. That doesn’t even consider the hundreds of thousands that died as slaves in the gold and silver mines. (Some of whom were “converts” – they were still considered “sub-human”.)

          • Girtupyourloins

            Boy what a wasted liberal education. The inquisition happened centuries before the settling of America. And at most killed less than 5k people. Indians practiced slavery, like Islam countries have done, right up to today. Mayans performed pagan human sacrifice on an industrial scale. It wasn’t all unicorns, and daisys over here before Europeans arrived

          • IzlamIsTyranny

            Dear allahtard, everyone killed by anyone during the Spanish Inquisition looks like a Sunday school picnic in comparison to what muslum vermin like you did in Bangladesh, to Hindus, in the 1970’s alone.

          • Mustafa Curtess

            Hmmm – I hadn’t heard that one before. How did that happen and the Hindus were always the majority? (Of course – either way, it just supports my conviction that most of man’s inhumanity to man has been the cost of “religion”.) I suggest you study Ghengis Khan – who ruled that part of the world in those days.

          • IzlamIsTyranny

            Please FOAD allahtard. I hope the Hindus of India rise up and pay back your muslum karma w/interest.

          • Mustafa Curtess

            I suggest that you learn some facts about Hindus and Muslims in India before you invent any more stories. Easiest is “Islam in India” in wikipedia. What friction does exist is political – remaining from the partition of India by the British.
            Considering that India (quite aside from Pakistan) has the world’s second largest Muslim population after Indonesia. (14% of the population of India, and fully equal to Hindus as citizens). So if there is any notion about any kind of “revenge” it doesn’t seem to be a problem. Since India and Pakistan seem to have surprising parity in nuclear weapons and delivery system technology – any serious warfare is highly unlikely.
            So your speculation of any kind of religious conflagration – is just wishful thinking.
            Culturally – Hundus and Muslims are near identical male-dominated societies – which also largely share diet and clothing styles. Not much there to entertain your blood-lust.

          • Girtupyourloins

            Leftist lies and propaganda. The mass death of the American Indian was caused by disease. Europeans packed in tight communities, surviving the numerous plagues developed immunities. Indians living in an open air environment had no resistance to these diseases. Christianity where ever it goes brings, education, art, music, medicines, enlightenment. Islam brings only misery and death. Ive read the Koran. A foundation for a death cult. Bush was an idiot to think he could bring democracy to an eternaly fractured-hated filled people. Churchill had it right.

          • Mustafa Curtess

            Wherever Christianity (or any other religion) goes – it merely enslaves minds and discourages mankind from realizing its full potential.
            “Bringing democracy” was the furthest thing from NWO Bushs’ minds. It was about getting Arab oil into the hands of the USA – and NOTHING else.
            I very much appears that in the process – that same “democracy” has been jeopardized everywhere. Maybe there wasn’t really enough of it to be shared so generously?)
            There seems to be some concern for the direction your “education” is taking in the “Christian” world, your “arts” (including “music”) have never contributed anything to the feeding and sheltering of a rapidly expanding population, and control over our “medicines” has been allowed to fall into the hands of corporate monopolies – and available only to those wealthy enough to afford them (without the benefit of some highly “socialized” programs – that conservatives are dedicated to ending.)
            At any rate – none of all those wonderful things are to be found anywhere in the four Muslim countries the USA has destroyed – so you really have nothing to brag about. (And the real “kicker” is – that all of those countries are now more radically Muslim than they ever were!) Way to GO! – Bible-Thumpers!

          • Girtupyourloins

            Wow all that dope smoking at Bernie rallies really fuuks you people up. I will not defend or make excuses for the post modern or post judeo/Christian world you progs have salivated to bring about. In the post Christian Hun world, dogs and horses are defended over the poor girls that are forced to sex with them. In the “Christian world” the cry on deck in 1914 was “women and children” first. Rich, powerful WHITE men perished a tortuous death. Compare THAT with the 21st century “Farkhunda beating” in a muslim country OR the Ukraine under atheist Stalin. We have MidEAST refuges because of ONE waif-est, half white Kenyon b astard. And lastly, five men: Beethoven, Angelo, Newton, Boyle, Faraday. All gave us knowledge and beauty. All christian. The last three gave us every modern convenience imaginable. Now be a man, put down your Christian gifts of technology, get your arse to the Serengeti and STFU!

          • Mustafa Curtess

            Not going to STFU. I’m going to stay right here where I have every right to be – telling it like I see it – and you can’t do a damned thing about it.
            I voted for Trump and glad that I did. Nobody could have dragged me to a gun-grabber Bernie rally. Not even for the dope – so your batting-average sucks.

          • Girtupyourloins

            Well mi amigo I stand corrected. But understand this..Trump is unabashedly western civ and unabashedly Christian. He stands against the enviro fascist, muslim fascist and cultural fascist. His preeminist position means western civ has NOTHING to apologize for.

          • Mustafa Curtess

            I have no problem with Trump or his policies. I am delighted by his response to “enviro fascism”. I especially approve of his demands to exercise control over immigrants – which is clearly his right (obligation) under the Immigration Acts.
            Altho I no longer have personal contact with the American Muslim community – those who I know from many years previously are all good people and good U.S.citizens, and who may be inconvenienced and threatened by the importation of so many Muslim refugees who are not “good people”, are incapable of ever being good citizens, and their presence reflects badly and unfairly on the established resident Muslim community. I would support their removal, and the importation of any more can only have further negative consequences. I hope that Trump will halt the inflow of Muslim refugees permanently (or at least until some means can be established to deny entry to those who can only be a social and criminal liability.) That is so impractical and unlikely that for all purposes it is impossible.
            My small effort to avoid yet further (un-necessary and un-justified) friction and resentment – consistently results in the charge that I am some kind of an “apologist” for Islam. (Nothing to apologize FOR). If that “comes with the territory”, I accept it. No harm or inconvenience can come to me as a result of it.
            That explains my position and attitude. Take it or leave it.

        • IzlamIsTyranny

          MuhamMUD the prophet did an excellent job sandbagging them w/his fake peace treaty. But perhaps even worse was the fact the Jewish tribe surrendered to muhamMUD in the expectation they would receive fair treatment AFTER muhamMUD attacked them under the auspices of that peace treaty.

          • Mustafa Curtess

            Depends on who wrote the history that you prefer.

          • IzlamIsTyranny

            It’s spelt out in your holey books allahtard.

          • Mustafa Curtess

            There was only one book for me, and I haven’t seen it for years. I’m hearing such a great deal that sounds like a gross mis-interpretation of all that I read and discussed with other Muslims.
            I’m going to have to end our conversation since it has never been anything more than an opportunity for you to show off your abusive attitude and not-so-clever language.
            Meanwhile – have fun trying to eliminate about 1/4 of earth’s population.

          • IzlamIsTyranny

            Islum needs a nuclear enlightenment allahtard. Si se puede.

      • taxpayer22

        Islamic headscarf is a shroud of death for a free society, says former radical Feminist Zana Ramadani.

        Being born a Muslim herself, Ramadani is fearful of her life after receiving countless death threats from Muslims in Germany..

      • balafama

        sure blame everyone for problems in islamic countries ,how typical .

        • Mustafa Curtess

          Not “blaming everyone” – only those directly responsible for bringing the mess HERE.
          “Problems in islamic countries” are the keywords. We had the cost-free option to continue to ignore those problems and LEAVE them where they were (and still are). They been causing and settling their own problems amongst themselves for centuries. Why try to change it? China does (very profitable) business with them without getting involved – and Russia is only there to counter the USA’s geopolitical aspiration of empire. (But without invading and destroying anything, or determined to destroy the people’s 1500 year-old culture – including many traditions much older than that.) It’s OUR arrogance and war-mongering – and many of us are blaming the VICTIMS.
          LOL! Some of them still hate each other – but now ALL of them hate us WORSE. (And for very good reason.)

  • Chris Wolf

    Forgive me, but gawd is Judy Miller obnoxious.
    She can’t stop shaking her head when her opponent is making good points that are obviously true against the fake news media, until she finally can’t hold her tongue another second and interjects that, “the number one rule” of the White House press corps is “don’t lie to us.”
    She forgets to add, …unless you’re barack hussein obama, in which case we will bend over backwards and disgrace ourselves and our Constitutional charge to collaborate against the country, the truth and our own presumed integrity, since we’re the ones who will judge, after all, as in the case of her Pulitzer for Iraq’s aluminum tubes…
    It’s their story and they’re sticking to it.
    As for Dawkins, he’s the disease that has made us vulnerable to the obama/islam infection.
    We’re much better of without allies like him.

  • kh

    To win the civilizational war, it is not required to physically castrate the enemy civilization. It is required to psychologically castrate the enemy civilization.

    By adapting the mentality of equal rights, no-discrimination, and religious freedom for all, the western civilization has psychologically castrated its own self. Because of this mentality, no matter how much, and for how long muslims sabotage us, we will forever keep protecting them and their faith through our own laws.

    Islamic civilization will win the war without the need to neuter us, for we have willingly done this to ourselves.

    • cypressswamp

      I respectfully disagree. Equal rights, nondiscrimination and religious freedom does not castrate the western civilization. However, the refusal to discern their is a variance in quality, compatibility and a level of tolerance that should be allowed (common sense if you would prefer) is castrating western civilization. Religious freedom does not mean social freedom and the Progressives are trying to equate the two in order to remove any type of definition for Western Civilization.

      • Poppey

        An intelligent point well stated.

        Several years ago I coined this, “Freedom is not the right to do as you want, it’s the opportunity to do as you ought”.

        As soon as you try to live up to that statement, you realise you need self restraint and a degree of reflection in your doings.

        • cypressswamp

          The founding fathers said our nation could only last as a moral nation. The father of capitalism stated that capitalism requires a moral nation. The context of both was Christian morals as observed in their respective times and regions. It will be interesting to see if the experiment survives or succumbs to ineptitude and lack of morals that drives DC and the state governments.

        • crv547fv

          Read the reply to that comment above by me. I suggest you not let your conditioning cloud your judgement.

      • Raymond of Canada

        Absolutely agree! Thank God our ancestors had the moral fortitude and desire to rid the world of Nazism. Not all Nazis killed Jews but the cancer had to be rooted out and eradicated in order to save the whole. When Christians get a backbone and stop the entertainment, something might happen.

        • cypressswamp

          Faith is a two edged sword. Faith can give you incredible strength but it can also allow you to allow problems to fester long past the point of tolerance because we want to believe in our fellow men and women.

      • crv547fv

        Incorrect. And here’s why –

        What are our values? Pay close attention to the first word of the following sentences

        – All are equal
        – Everyone should have the right to practice their faith.
        – Everyone must have equal rights
        – No one should be discriminated against

        See the first words above? Where do you think there is room for distinguishing between the harmless and the harmful, when the words are – All, everyone, no one ?

        If you had the intellectual capability, you would have realized that as it stands, our mentality has no room for “variance” as you put. There is no room for exception, no place for singling out any group, or any faith.

        Had there been a stipulation, as in – Insofar as……then, and only then, you could make your claim and it would be valid.

        But as it stands, you are injecting your own perception, and supporting the flawed mentality with the same. Get it?

        The claim of “refusal to discern” as you put, could only be made, if there ever was room for refusal . But as it stands, there isn’t. We have to, willy-nilly, absolutely consider everyone and every group equal – No matter what.

        See the point now? There is no provision, no prerequisite, no precondition and no qualification. And thus we see, that this mentality of – Equal rights, no-discrimination and religious freedom, is the cause of our psychological castration.

        • cypressswamp

          agree to disagree. Sorry you see no capacity for variance of thought and feel comfortable starting insults out of the box with someone trying to have a respectful disagreement. Take care.

          • crv547fv

            To even the simpletons that agreed with you, it would be patently obvious that you are doing a cut-and-run in order to deflect from the fact that you can not refute the argument through logic. Point proven. Also, there wasn’t any real insult in my post actually.

            Take care.

    • Mustafa Curtess

      So you have just given up on the democratic process – that should limit the political influence of the 1% of our population that is Muslim? That is where the “fight” must be (at the ballot box),- and it should be a slam-dunk for our vast Christian majority.
      But — Oh! Wait! It is too distracted by who gets an abortion, who marrys whom, “getting Christ back into the classroom”, the war on just about anything that people find pleasant – and all that stuff that is “more important” than the Constitution.
      They want it ALL so badly – that they will be lucky to get ANYTHING. (And that possibly only at the cost of unnecessary bloodshed.)

  • Doctor Who?

    Liberals like Douglas Murray and Sam Harris have also been banned for exposing the evils of Islam.

  • Voice Of Reason

    It gives me great Joy to watch the Liberals/Progressives slowly burn their house down. Its like watching a snake start devouring itself by latching on to its tail and begin consuming itself to prove nothing other than it can. Chuckles Shumer thinks they (the Dems), have a chance to take over the Senate……No Chuckles, your Party is collapsing and will soon be heaped on the trash pile.

    Gay Group protesting against Sharia Law that advocates killing Gays is shunned by another LGBQT for observing the Orlando Night Club Shooting.

    Gay “Jewish” Group banned from Marching in a “Pride” week parade by other Gay Groups over flying Gay Rainbow Flag with Star of David.

    Atheist Professor banned by “Progressive/Liberal” Radio Station for calling out Islams treatment of other Religions, Women, and Gays.

    Mainstream Media Ignores Foreign Immigrant criminal activities in Democrats IT Hacking. Female Mutilations a nd the list goes on!

  • Poppey

    Richard Dawkins is one man in Britain I have no doubt would coolly take on and defeat any apologist set up against him in a cold rational debate on the nature of Islam and it’s visible consequences in Britain or elsewhere.

    Being an atheist academic means he’s no Robert Spencer or Richard Wood when it comes to understanding the koranic mandate, but he IS coldly analytical while bearing no “racist” or “right wing” label which would be enough to disbar him from televised forums in the UK.

    His very rejection by that church and radio station will do him no long term harm, others will wish to hear him in due course. While he and I are worlds apart on Christianity, I support his views on Islam and Darwin’s theory on evolution, which sadly for them, too many American Christian evangelicals reject outright, in my view, they make themselves look foolish when they do. That is an old arguement settled elsewhere many years ago.

    A middle aged “Milo” he may not be, but he is good at what he does to Islam.

  • NickandLynds

    Recently, a man who had stood outside a local mosque in my town and screamed that he had killed Muslims while serving in Iraq was sentenced to 90 days in jail and psychological counseling for “hate speech.” This sentence was well above the state sentencing guidelines for such a “crime.” Despite that fact, the local Muslim community cried “racism” because they thought the sentence was too short; in addition, they claimed the man should remain jailed longer simply because the “no longer felt safe in the community.”

    It was shocking how many idiots “stood with” the Muslims, demanding that the man stay in jail for an indefinite period of time. I’m am really heartbroken that so many people in my community no longer value our God-given right of free speech or the 8th Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. The man should never been have sentenced to jail in the first place simply simply for speech, let alone have to serve 90 days…or longer.

    While the judge stood firm on the sentence (good for him), the Muslim community milked the situation to its advantage: the community set up a fund to help them build a security fence around the mosque and several local women are campaigning for a “Wear a Hijab Day” for local women to stand with the women of the Muslim community.

    • IzlamIsTyranny

      Hate speech is the disguise under which islamic blasphemy and heresy laws are being enforced.

  • the_dhimminator

    In the alternate universe that is today’s media reality, I find myself agreeing with Richard Dawkins… Yes truth _is_ the new hate speech!

  • AlgorithmicAnalyst

    Stalinist radio, been at this a long time (since 1949) …

  • felix1999

    Even an ATHEIST gets it!
    You do that:
    “I have indeed strongly condemned the misogyny, homophobia, and violence of Islamism, of which Muslims — particularly Muslim women — are the prime victims. I make no apologies for denouncing those oppressive cruelties, and I will continue to do so,” Dawkins also said……

  • Mustafa Curtess

    Why would an Atheist speak at a Christian church? (I wouldn’t even consider it). And why would a Christian church even allow him to speak? Is it even possible to make Christians hate Islam more than it always has? So what did Dawkins hope to accomplish there?

    • IzlamIsTyranny

      LOL, allahtard. Any one of the kafir al najjis should despise muslums and islum and no one has to look far to find evidence of WHY.

    • Jeff

      Free speech perhaps

  • IzlamIsTyranny

    Bbbbbbbbut, Christianity is just as bad as islum (gag, choke, cough).

Pin It on Pinterest