News Ticker >
[ October 22, 2017 ]

‘Underwear bomber’ files lawsuit over prison treatment, says Muslims harassed

[ October 22, 2017 ]

WATCH: Gavin McInnes Interviews Pamela Geller

[ October 22, 2017 ]

Wherever There Are More Muslims There Is More Terror: The Connection Between Demographics and Terrorism

[ October 22, 2017 ]

Europe’s Next World War Begins in France

[ October 22, 2017 ]

In Minnesota, They’re “Kind of” Committed to the Freedom of Speech

[ October 22, 2017 ]

Memphis imam Yasir Qadhi called for killing of gays and blasphemers, to speak in London

[ October 22, 2017 ]

Italy: Muslim migrant slits non-Muslim’s throat, victim’s family warns against “racism”

[ October 22, 2017 ]

Australia: Muslim preacher OK’s wife-beating, says “Beat her in a way that doesn’t turn her...

[ October 21, 2017 ]

Saturday Night Cinema: Kiss Tomorrow Goodbye

[ October 21, 2017 ]

Videos and Photos: Protest Hiring Anti-Israel CEO David Myers At Center For Jewish History

Elite Media Insist Jihadis “Hijacked” and “Perverted” Islam. How, exactly?

58

As I have so often lamented, in the wake of horrific jihad terror comes the post-jihad dawah (proselytizing for Islam). While jihadis scream “allahu akbar” and “takbir,” elites in the media and academia assure us it is not about Allah or Islam. It’s demented.

Jihadis have “perverted” and/or “hijacked” Islam? How? How have they perverted it? They cite Quranic texts and teachings chapter and verse. They follow the hadith, Muhammad’s example.

Harun Khan, who leads the Muslim Council of Britain, said, “I am appalled and angered by the terrorist attacks at London Bridge and borough market, in my home city. These acts of violence were truly shocking and I condemn them in the strongest terms.” Is that so. What have Khan and his co-religionists who allege that this is a  misunderstanding of Islam done to combat it? There is, for example, not a single program in any mosque or Islamic school in the UK (or the UK) to teach young Muslims to reject the Islamic State’s understanding of Islam. With the Islamic State energetically recruiting young Muslims in the US, that is a significant omission.

The Sun says Ramadan is meant for devotion and peace. Since when? A jihad group explained it back in 2012: “The month of Ramadan is a month of holy war and death for Allah. It is a month for fighting the enemies of Allah and God’s messenger, the Jews and their American facilitators.” Referring to a jihad attack that happened at that time, the message continued: “One of our groups aided by Allah managed to bomb a bus full of Jewish tourists, plunderers of holy lands, after careful tracking. The holy war is not confined to a particular arena and we shall fight the Jews and the Americans until they leave the land of Islam.”

Robert Spencer explained here, “Islam’s core beliefs make it clear that the latter statement is closer to the truth. During Ramadan, Muslims are exhorted to renew and deepen their devotion to Allah. Hence it is a time when they’re supposed to grow more generous and kind toward their fellow Muslims. However, the Qur’an says: ‘Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are with him are severe against disbelievers, and merciful among themselves’ (48:29). If the Ramadan imperative is to become more devout, the Muslim who applies himself diligently to the Ramadan observance will simultaneously become more both merciful to his fellow Muslims and more severe against the unbelievers.

“Murdering infidels thus doesn’t contradict the spirit of Ramadan; it embodies it. The Kavkaz Center, a website operated by Chechen jihadists, explained in a 2010 article that the idea of Ramadan as a time for warfare against infidels went back to Muhammad’s time: ‘The month of Ramadan in the life of the Prophet (pbuh) and the righteous ancestors was a month of forthcoming. The greatest battles during the lifetime of the Prophet (pbuh) occurred in this blessed month, the month of jihad, zeal and enthusiasm.’”

Look at the dhimmi tripe the British media is running as their country men lay dead and dying in Islamic terror attacks.

TWISTED PERVERSION How Jihadists twist the true meaning of Ramadan to brainwash their twisted supporters

IT is a time meant for complete religious devotion and peace.

The Sun, June 4, 2017:

But Ramadan has been commandeered by Islamic extremists, with the month-long celebration for Muslims threatened by those preaching fear-mongering and violence.

Ramadan starts in May and marks the start of a month of fasting and religious devotion

Reuters

So why do jihadis choose the holy celebration, meant to encourage peace and friendship, to conduct their horrific terror attacks?

According to the fasting celebration, this year held from May 26 to June 24, Muslims are required to fast from dawn until dusk, while also refraining from any violent behaviour.

With it designed to mark the first revelation of the Quran to Muhammad, Muslims are required to pray more and improve self-discipline.

Harun Khan

Harun Khan, who leads the Muslim Council of Britain, condemned last night’s attack

Muslims believe the spiritual rewards for their actions will be multiplied during the month but jihadis have high-jacked the concept for their own perverted beliefs.

The terrorists twist the heightened rewards promised during Ramadan for their own purpose, believing they will receive more praise should they unleash terror in the four week time period.

Under twisted jihads, 149 people have been killed during Ramadan from three separate attacks this year alone, according to the Daily Caller.

The major attacks include a car bombing in Baghdad, with crowds outside an icecream truck targeted, while a casino hotel was also stormed by a gunman – and ISIS later claiming responsibility for the attack.

The Quran’s violent teachings (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

QuranQuran (2:191-193)“And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing… but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun(the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)” (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The verse prior to this (190) refers to “fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you” leading some to claim that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families.  The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries.  In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did).  Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah’s rule (ie. Muslim conquest).  The use of the word “persecution” by some Muslim translators is disingenuous – the actual Arabic words for persecution (idtihad) – and oppression are not used instead of fitnaFitna can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation.  A strict translation is ‘sedition,’ meaning rebellion against authority (the authority being Allah).  This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned “until religion is for Allah” – ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.  [Editor’s note: these notes have been modified slightly after a critic misinterpreted our language. Verse 193 plainly says that ‘fighting’ is sanctioned even if the fitna ‘ceases’.  This is about religious order, not real persecution.]Quran (2:244)“Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things.”Quran (2:216)Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.” Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.Quran (3:56)“As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”Quran (3:151)“Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”. This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be ‘joining companions to Allah’).Quran (4:74)“Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward.” The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today’s suicide bombers.Quran (4:76)“Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…”Quran (4:89)“They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.”Quran (4:95)“Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home).Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward ” This passage criticizes “peaceful” Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah’s eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that “Jihad” doesn’t mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man’s protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle).Quran (4:104)“And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain…” Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?Quran (5:33)“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”Quran (8:12)“I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them” No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.  The targets of violence are “those who disbelieve” – further defined in the next verse (13) as “defy and disobey Allah.” Nothing is said about self-defense.  In fact, the verses in sura 8 were narrated shortly after a battle provoked by Muhammad, who had been trying to attack a lightly-armed caravan to steal goods belonging to other people.Quran (8:15)“O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey’s end.”Quran (8:39)“And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah” Some translations interpret “fitna” as “persecution”, but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj. Other Muslims were allowed to travel there – just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, as it was Muhammad’s intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until “religion is only for Allah”, meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that “Allah must have no rivals.”Quran (8:57)“If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.” Quran (8:67)“It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land…Quran (8:59-60)“And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah’s Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy.” As Ibn Kathir puts it in his tafsir on this passage, “Allah commands Muslims to prepare for war against disbelievers, as much as possible, according to affordability and availability.”Quran (8:65)“O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight…”Quran (9:5)“So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.” According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence at the time of Muhammad was to convert to Islam: prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion’s Five Pillars. The popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.[Note: The verse says to fight unbelievers "wherever you find them". Even if the context is a time of battle (which it was not) the reading appears to sanction attacks against those "unbelievers” who are not on the battlefield.  In 2016, the Islamic State referred to this verse in urging the faithful to commit terror attacks: Allah did not only command the ‘fighting’ of disbelievers, as if to say He only wants us to conduct frontline operations against them. Rather, He has also ordered that they be slain wherever they may be – on or off the battlefield. (source)]Quran (9:14)“Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people.” Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even “heals” the hearts of Muslims.Quran (9:20)“Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah’s way are of much greater worth in Allah’s sight. These are they who are triumphant.” The Arabic word interpreted as “striving” in this verse is the same root as “Jihad”. The context is obviously holy war.Quran (9:29)“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” “People of the Book” refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam “superior over all religions.” This chapter was one of the final “revelations” from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad’s companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.Quran (9:30)“And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!” Quran (9:38-39)“O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place.” This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.Quran (9:41)“Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew.” See also the verse that follows (9:42) – “If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them” This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and – in this case – on Christian soil, according to the historians).Quran (9:73)“O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination.” Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It explains why today’s devout Muslims generally have little regard for those outside the faith.  The inclusion of “hypocrites” (non-practicing) within the verse also contradicts the apologist’s defense that the targets of hate and hostility are wartime foes, since there was never an opposing army made up of non-religious Muslims in Muhammad’s time.  (See also Games Muslims Play: Terrorists Can’t Be Muslim Because They Kill Muslims for the role this verse plays in Islam’s perpetual internal conflicts).Quran (9:88)“But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper.” Quran (9:111)“Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme.” How does the Quran define a true believer?Quran (9:123)“O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness.” Quran (17:16)“And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction.” Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is “utter destruction.” (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).Quran (18:65-81) – This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with “special knowledge” who does things which don’t seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would “grieve” his parents by “disobedience and ingratitude.” He was killed so that Allah could provide them a ‘better’ son. [Note:[Note: This parable along with verse 58:22 is a major reason that honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia. Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.12).]ss="pages" href="http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/noble/sura21.html#44" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Quran (21:44) – “We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?” Quran (25:52)“Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness with it.” – The root for Jihad is used twice in this verse – although it may not have been referring to Holy War when narrated, since it was prior to the hijra at Mecca.  The “it” at the end is thought to mean the Quran.  Thus the verse may have originally meant a non-violent resistance to the ‘unbelievers.’  Obviously, this changed with the hijra.  ‘Jihad’ after this is almost exclusively within a violent context.Quran (33:60-62)“If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter.” This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered “merciless” and “horrible murder” in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to “fight in the way of Allah” (3:167) and hence don’t act as Muslims should), those with “diseased hearts” (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and “alarmists” or “agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad’s biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today’s terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah’s eternal word to Muslim generations.Quran (47:3-4)“Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord… So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)… If it had been Allah’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost.” Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad. The wounded are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn’t do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test.Quran (47:35)“Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: “have the upper hand”) for Allah is with you,” Quran (48:17)“There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom.” Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means ‘spiritual struggle.’ If so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.Quran (48:29)“Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves” Islam is not about treating everyone equally. This verse tells Muslims that there are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status. Also the word used for ‘hard’ or ‘ruthless’ in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as ‘painful’ or severe’ to describe Hell in over 25 other verses including 65:10, 40:46 and 50:26..Quran (61:4)“Surely Allah loves those who fight in His cause” Religion of Peace, indeed!  The verse explicitly refers to “rows” or “battle array,” meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict. This is followed by (61:9), which defines the “cause”: “He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist.” (See next verse, below). Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.Quran (61:10-12)“O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of’Adn- Eternity [‘Ad[‘Adn(Edn) Paradise] is indeed the great success.” This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see verse 9). It uses the Arabic root for the word Jihad.Quran (66:9)“O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey’s end.” The root word of “Jihad” is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include “hypocrites” – those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such. Other verses calling Muslims to Jihad can be found here at AnsweringIslam.org

Hadith and Sira

Sahih Bukhari (52:177)Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”

Sahih Bukhari (52:256)The Prophet… was asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The Prophet replied, “They (i.e. women and children) are from them (i.e. pagans).” In this command, Muhammad establishes that it is permissible to kill non-combatants in the process of killing a perceived enemy. This provides justification for the many Islamic terror bombings.

Sahih Bukhari (52:65)The Prophet said, ‘He who fights that Allah’s Word (Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah’s Cause. Muhammad’s words are the basis for offensive Jihad – spreading Islam by force. This is how it was understood by his companions, and by the terrorists of today. (See also Sahih Bukhari 3:125)

Sahih Bukhari (52:220)Allah’s Apostle said… ‘I have been made victorious with terror’

Sahih Bukhari (52:44) – A man came to Allah’s Apostle and said, “Instruct me as to such a deed as equals Jihad (in reward).” He replied, “I do not find such a deed.”

Abu Dawud (14:2526)The Prophet said, Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet…

Abu Dawud (14:2527)The Prophet said: Striving in the path of Allah (jihad) is incumbent on you along with every ruler, whether he is pious or impious

Sahih Muslim (1:33) the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah

Sahih Bukhari (8:387) – Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’. And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally.”

Sahih Muslim (1:30) “The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah.”

Sahih Bukhari (52:73) – “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords’.”

Sahih Bukhari (11:626) [Muham[Muhammad said:]I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to burn all those, who had not left their houses for the prayer, burning them alive inside their homes.”

Sahih Muslim (1:149)“Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and Jihad in His cause…”

Sahih Muslim (20:4645)“…He (the Messenger of Allah) did that and said: There is another act which elevates the position of a man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher), and the elevation between one grade and the other is equal to the height of the heaven from the earth. He (Abu Sa’id) said: What is that act? He replied: Jihad in the way of Allah! Jihad in the way of Allah!”

Sahih Muslim (20:4696)“the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: ‘One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihad died the death of a hypocrite.'”

Sahih Muslim (19:4321-4323) – Three separate hadith in which Muhammad shrugs over the news that innocent children were killed in a raid by his men against unbelievers. His response: “They are of them (meaning the enemy).”

Sahih Muslim (19:4294)“Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war… When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them… If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them.”

Sahih Muslim (31:5917)“Ali went a bit and then halted and did not look about and then said in a loud voice: ‘Allah’s Messenger, on what issue should I fight with the people?’ Thereupon he (the Prophet) said: ‘Fight with them until they bear testimony to the fact that there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his Messenger’.” The pretext for attacking the peaceful farming community of Khaibar was not obvious to the Muslims. Muhammad’s son-in-law Ali asked the prophet of Islam to clarify the reason for their mission to kill, loot and enslave. Muhammad’s reply was straightforward. The people should be fought because they are not Muslim.

Sahih Muslim (31:5918)“I will fight them until they are like us.” Ali’s reply to Muhammad, after receiving clarification that the pretext for attack Khaibar was to convert the people (see above verse).

Sahih Bukhari 2:35 “The person who participates in (Holy Battles) in Allah’s cause and nothing compels him do so except belief in Allah and His Apostle, will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty ( if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise ( if he is killed).”

Sunan an-Nasa’i (Sahih) “Whoever dies without having fought or thought of fighting, he dies on one of the branches of hypocrisy”

Tabari 7:97 The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet declared, “Kill any Jew who falls under your power.” Ashraf was a poet, killed by Muhammad’s men because he insulted Islam. Here, Muhammad widens the scope of his orders to kill. An innocent Jewish businessman was then slain by his Muslim partner, merely for being non-Muslim.

Tabari 9:69 “Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us” The words of Muhammad, prophet of Islam.

Tabari 17:187 “‘By God, our religion (din) from which we have departed is better and more correct than that which these people follow. Their religion does not stop them from shedding blood, terrifying the roads, and seizing properties.’ And they returned to their former religion.” The words of a group of Christians who had converted to Islam, but realized their error after being shocked by the violence and looting committed in the name of Allah. The price of their decision to return to a religion of peace was that the men were beheaded and the woman and children enslaved by the caliph Ali.

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 484: – “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’”

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 990: Cutting off someone’s head while shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ is not a ‘perverison of Islam’, but a tradition of Islam that began with Muhammad.  In this passage, a companion recounts an episode in which he staged a surprise ambush on a settlement: “I leapt upon him and cut off his head and ran in the direction of the camp shouting ‘Allah akbar’ and my two companions did likewise”.

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 992: – “Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.” Muhammad’s instructions to his men prior to a military raid.

Saifur Rahman, The Sealed Nectar p.227-228“Embrace Islam… If you two accept Islam, you will remain in command of your country; but if your refuse my Call, you’ve got to remember that all of your possessions are perishable. My horsemen will appropriate your land, and my Prophethood will assume preponderance over your kingship.” One of several letters from Muhammad to rulers of other countries. The significance is that the recipients were not making war or threatening Muslims. Their subsequent defeat and subjugation by Muhammad’s armies was justified merely on the basis of their unbelief.

Notes

Other than the fact that Muslims haven’t killed every non-Muslim under their domain, there is very little else that they can point to as proof that theirs is a peaceful, tolerant religion. Where Islam is dominant (as in the Middle East and Pakistan) religious minorities suffer brutal persecution with little resistance. Where Islam is in the minority (as in Thailand, the Philippines and Europe) there is the threat of violence if Muslim demands are not met. Either situation seems to provide a justification for religious terrorism, which is persistent and endemic to Islamic fundamentalism.

The reasons are obvious and begin with the Quran. Few verses of Islam’s most sacred text can be construed to fit the contemporary virtues of religious tolerance and universal brotherhood. Those that do are earlier “Meccan” verses which are obviously abrogated by later ones. The example of Muhammad is that Islam is a religion of peace when Muslims do not have the power and numbers on their side. Once they do, things change.

Many Muslims are peaceful and do not want to believe what the Quran really says. They prefer a more narrow interpretation that is closer to the Judeo-Christian ethic. Some just ignore harsher passages. Others reach for “textual context” across different suras to subjectively mitigate these verses with others so that the message fits their personal moral preference. Although the Quran itself claims to be clear and complete, these apologists speak of the “risks” of trying to interpret verses without their “assistance.”

The violent verses of the Quran have played a key role in very real massacre and genocide. This includes the brutal slaughter of tens of millions of Hindus for five centuries beginning around 1000 AD with Mahmud of Ghazni’s bloody conquest. Both he and the later Tamerlane (Islam’s Genghis Khan) slaughtered an untold number merely for defending their temples from destruction. Buddhism was very nearly wiped off the Indian subcontinent. Judaism and Christianity met the same fate (albeit more slowly) in areas conquered by Muslim armies, including the Middle East, North Africa and parts of Europe, including today’s Turkey. Zoroastrianism, the ancient religion of a proud Persian people is despised by Muslims and barely survives in modern Iran.

Violence is so ingrained in Islam that it has never really stopped being at war, either with other religions or with itself.

Muhammad was a military leader, laying siege to towns, massacring the men, raping their women, enslaving their children, and taking the property of others as his own. On several occasions he rejected offers of surrender from the besieged inhabitants and even butchered captives. He inspired his followers to battle when they did not feel it was right to fight, promising them slaves and booty if they did and threatening them with Hell if they did not. Muhammad allowed his men to rape traumatized women captured in battle, usually on the very day their husbands and family members were slaughtered.

It is important to emphasize that, for the most part, Muslim armies waged aggressive campaigns, and the religion’s most dramatic military conquests were made by the actual companions of Muhammad in the decades following his death.

The early Islamic principle of warfare was that the civilian population of a town was to be destroyed (ie. men executed, women and children taken as slaves) if they defended themselves and resisted Islamic hegemony. Although modern apologists often claim that Muslims are only supposed to “attack in self-defense”, this oxymoron is flatly contradicted by the accounts of Islamic historians and others that go back to the time of Muhammad.

Some modern-day scholars are more candid than others. One of the most respected Sunni theologians is al-Qaradawi, who justifies terror attacks against Western targets by noting that there is no such thing as a civilian population in a time of war:

“It has been determined by Islamic law that the blood and property of people of Dar al-Harb [ie. n[ie. non-Muslim people who resist Islamic conquest]s not protected… In modern war, all of society, with all its classes and ethnic groups, is mobilized to participate in the war, to aid its continuation, and to provide it with the material and human fuel required for it to assure the victory of the state fighting its enemies. Every citizen in society must take upon himself a role in the effort to provide for the battle. The entire domestic front, including professionals, laborers, and industrialists, stands behind the fighting army, even if it does not bear arms.”

Consider the example of the Qurayza Jews, who were completely obliterated only five years after Muhammad arrived in Medina. Their leader opted to stay neutral when their town was besieged by a Meccan army that was sent to take revenge for Muhammad’s deadly caravan raids. The tribe killed no one from either side and even surrendered peacefully to Muhammad after the Meccans had been turned back. Yet the prophet of Islam had every male member of the Qurayza beheaded, and every woman and child enslaved, even raping one of the captives himself (what Muslim apologists might refer to as “same day marriage”).

One of Islam’s most revered modern scholars, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, openly sanctions offensive Jihad: “In the Jihad which you are seeking, you look for the enemy and invade him. This type of Jihad takes place only when the Islamic state is invading other [count[countries] in order to spread the word of Islam and to remove obstacles standing in its way.” Elsewhere, he notes: “Islam has the right to take the initiative…this is God’s religion and it is for the whole world. It has the right to destroy all obstacles in the form of institutions and traditions … it attacks institutions and traditions to release human beings from their poisonous influences, which distort human nature and curtail human freedom. Those who say that Islamic Jihad was merely for the defense of the ‘homeland of Islam’ diminish the greatness of the Islamic way of life.”

The widely respected Dictionary of Islam defines Jihad as “A religious war with those who are unbelievers in the mission of Muhammad. It is an incumbent religious duty, established in the Quran and in the Traditions as a divine institution, and enjoined specially for the purpose of advancing Islam and of repelling evil from Muslims…[Quoti[Quoting from the Hanafi school, Hedaya, 2:140, 141.]b>The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the traditions which are generally received to this effect.”

Dr. Salah al-Sawy, the chief member of the Assembly of Muslim Jurists in America, stated in 2009 that “the Islamic community does not possess the strength to engage in offensive jihad at this time,” tacitly affirming the legitimacy of violence for the cause of Islamic rule – bound only by the capacity for success. (source)

Muhammad’s failure to leave a clear line of succession resulted in perpetual internal war following his death. Those who knew him best first fought afterwards to keep remote tribes from leaving Islam and reverting to their preferred religion (the Ridda or ‘Apostasy wars’). Then the violence turned within. Early Meccan converts battled later ones as hostility developed between those immigrants who had traveled with Muhammad to Mecca and the Ansar at Medina who had helped them settle in. Finally there was a violent struggle within Muhammad’s own family between his favorite wife and favorite daughter – a jagged schism that has left Shias and Sunnis at each others’ throats to this day.

The strangest and most untrue thing that can be said about Islam is that it is a religion of peace. If every standard by which the West is judged and condemned (slavery, imperialism, intolerance, misogyny, sexual repression, warfare…) were applied equally to Islam, the verdict would be devastating. Islam never gives up what it conquers, be it religion, culture, language or life. Neither does it make apologies or any real effort at moral progress. It is the least open to dialogue and the most self-absorbed. It is convinced of its own perfection, yet brutally shuns self-examination and represses criticism.

This is what makes the Quran’s verses of violence so dangerous. They are given the weight of divine command. While Muslim terrorists take them literally, and understand that Islam is incomplete without Jihad, moderates offer little to contradict them – outside of personal opinion. Indeed, what do they have? Speaking of peace and love may win over the ignorant, but when every twelfth verse of Islam’s holiest book either speaks to Allah’s hatred for non-Muslims or calls for their death, forced conversion, or subjugation, it’s little wonder that sympathy for terrorism runs as deeply as it does in the broader community – even if most Muslims prefer not to interpret their personal viewpoint of Islam in this way.

Although scholars like Ibn Khaldun, one of Islam’s most respected philosophers, understood that “the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force”, many other Muslims are either unaware or willfully ignorant of the Quran’s near absence of verses that preach universal non-violence. Their understanding of Islam comes from what they are taught by others. Believers in the West are often led to think that their religion is like Christianity – preaching the New Testament virtues of peace, love, and tolerance. They are somewhat surprised and embarrassed to find that the Quran and the bloody history of Islam’s genesis say otherwise.

Others simply accept the violence. In 1991, a Palestinian couple in America was convicted of stabbing their daughter to death for being too Westernized. A family friend came to their defense, excoriating the jury for not understanding the “culture”, claiming that the father was merely following “the religion” and saying that the couple had to “discipline their daughter or lose respect.” (source). In 2011, unrepentant Palestinian terrorists, responsible for the brutal murders of civilians, women and children explicitly in the name of Allah were treated to a luxurious “holy pilgrimage” to Mecca by the Saudi king – without a single Muslim voice raised in protest.

The most prestigious Islamic university in the world today is Cairo’s al-Azhar.  While the university is very quick to condemn secular Muslims who critique the religion, it has never condemned ISIS as a group of infidels despite horrific carnage in the name of Allah.  When asked why, the university’s Grand Imam, Ahmed al-Tayeb explained: ” Al Azhar cannot accuse any [Musli[Muslim]ing a kafir [infid[infidel]ong as he believes in Allah and the Last Day—even if he commits every atrocity.

For their part, Western liberals would do well not to sacrifice critical thinking to the god of political correctness, or look for reasons to bring other religion down to the level of Islam merely to avoid the existential truth that this it is both different and dangerous.

There are just too many Muslims who take the Quran literally… and too many others who couldn’t care less about the violence done in the name of Islam.

Pamela Geller's shocking new book, "FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA" is now available on Amazon. It's Geller's tell all, her story - and it's every story - it's what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

  • AlgorithmicAnalyst

    Disgusting creatures.

  • The assumption in much of Western society that Islam is fundamentally “peaceful” is a deeply flawed and erroneous one. Most people who defend Muslims have probably never opened a Quran in their lives.

    • Mahou Shoujo

      The way islam is the religion of peace is only after every non muslim is murdered.

    • Mark Steiner

      The New World Order/internationalists/Soros bunch have opened the Quran. They see in Islam as a means to accomplish something they haven’t the guts to do themselves – use Islam to decimate a population, stand on the sidelines until the time is right, then crush Islam to complete their goal of world conquest on their own terms.

  • taxpayer22

    No such thing as moderate Islam . Islam is Islam, – leader of Turkey, Erdogan.

  • taxpayer22

    Pat Caddell : the Media is now the enemy of the American people

    • OrangeEnt

      Now?

    • tn76f
      • Janet

        That’s a riot! LMAO!

        • Barbarawbratcher

          Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj103d:
          On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
          !mj103d:
          ➽➽
          ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash103ShopSpeedPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj103d..,.

    • Keith1941

      Pat Caddell is the last of the democrats to say it like it is. (if he still is a democrat)

    • Michael Jacobs

      The media are not the enemy. Ms. Geller is part of the media. The constitutional guarantee of a free press in the US is one of our strongest protections of our other freedoms. The countries that support jihadism, and the Palestinian Authority, do not have a free press — they IMPRISON journalists who dare to speak against the government. And you want to follow their example?!?

      • IzlamIsTyranny

        LOL, defending the enemedis is like defending Pravda comrade.

        • Michael Jacobs

          Sometimes I wonder why I bother trying to be the voice of reason, around here. The ironic thing is, conspiracy theories have been used against Jews for centuries, and are generally hogwash, created from whole cloth simply to provide a convenient scapegoat to hide the failings of the ones touting the theory. Too bad that Ms. Geller’s website, an otherwise fine counter-terrorism and pro-Zionism info source run by a proud Jew, should attract so many conspiracy theories about media bias in discussing matters relating to terrorism, Islam, Israel, or the Middle East in general. There’s no conspiracy. They’re just biased and stupid on these issues, like much of the rest of Western society, but that is not to deny that the media play a vital role in keeping the public informed and warned. The solution isn’t to condemn the media, but to educate them.

  • Mahou Shoujo

    Even a casual perusal of the qur’an will clearly indicate it is pure hate of every non muslim, which leads to hate of self. There is no value in donkey dancing around the root cause of islamic terrorism. It is islam.

    • AlgorithmicAnalyst

      lol, “donkey dancing”. Good one, I’ll have to remember that one and use it some time :)

      • Mahou Shoujo

        Having seen donkeys dance, and watch democrats… they have the same jerky gyrations and incredibly clumsy moves.

  • Richard

    “Elite Media Insist Jihadis “Hijacked” and “Perverted” Islam.”
    Fucking lying bastards
    This explains so clearly with reference to Islamic texts why believing Muslims kill during Ramadan:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdDCpz_8zMo

    • Richard

      CNN chief apologist for Islam “But when Khan [London Mayor] said in a statement that there was no cause for alarm, he was referring specifically to a visible increase in police activity on the streets of London in the wake of the attack.
      “Londoners [Muslims] will see an increased police presence today and over the course of the next few days. There’s no reason to be alarmed,” he said.http://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/03/politics/donald-trump-london-travel-ban/index.html
      Of course because they will not shoot them. However non-Muslims have reason to be alarmed because [some] Muslims are out to kill them in accordance with the instructions of their religion. What is the connection between the slaughter in different parts of the world by Muslims, specially during Ramadan? The teachings of Muhammad is the connection.

      • Deplorable Kulak

        Who would be afraid of police action other than muslim terrorists, common criminals, and like riffraff?

    • IzlamIsTyranny

      Ramadan Bombathon? Shouldn’t Mr. Woods be crediting Ms. Geller?
      Daniel Greenfield wrote an article suggesting that the lie that Islam is a religion of peace has become too big to deny.

      • Richard

        It’s from the Religion of Peace, but David Wood explains it very well.
        This is also worth watching – Squatting Slav TV: Mighty Poland will not bow to Islam/EU. Poland says FU to the EU and Islam
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B38MvwjN_g

        • IzlamIsTyranny

          I believe Poland is resisting islum when they outlaw islum and/or deport the muslum vermin already infesting their country.

  • Rog Stresman

    What’s so difficult to understand? The maniacs weren’t screaming “this is for bombing Syria” or anything to do with world politics, but “this is for Allah”. In other words, it’s about religion, about Islam, and nothing else. Period.

    • Mahou Shoujo

      Very astute observation.

    • Guatemalan housekeeper

      It is now about expelling them. Talk is cheap.

  • Halal Bacon

    Why call them elite, that makes no sense, they are talking heads looking for click bait and 15 seconds of fame at a time, nothing more – they are far from elite!

    Elite; a select part of a group that is superior to the rest in terms of ability or qualities.

    nothing about them sets them apart other than stupidity, and that is not an elite quality.

  • thinkwell

    Islam is an illegitimate religion (it’s a cult of conformance or death). The solution is clear. Have ZERO islam. Ban it and eject all who adhere to islam.

  • taxpayer22
  • Gitmo Gary

    They have come to the lands of the Crusaders, as they often say, now it’s time to give them a new Crusade. The psycholibs say we must not paint all Muslims with a broad brush, but as noted in the article here the jihadi’s co-religionists do nothing to counter the terror. We should therefore paint them with a broad brush. Talk will do nothing. They will have to be physically removed from the land. Allow them to leave peacefully. Use force as necessary.

    • Gene

      A strong English woman who gets it. Plain talk and common sense. Shocking to the Lefties…..

      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NA_ibC7_2Mg

      • Gizmo

        Refreshing to hear some Brits who want to take action.

        • Deplorable Kulak

          There isn’t much hope for a people who won’t even arm their own guardians, let alone themselves.

      • Surak

        Um – Saturday April 1? Something is wrong about the date.

  • kreuz

    The even larger danger in our midst are the clueless liberals who want desperately to believe that all cultures and religions can coexist peacefully because their adolescent delusions of reality inform them so. Defeat liberals in the west and the defeat of jihad would b a mild task.

  • IzlamIsTyranny

    Who cares what a f’ing muslum condemns? Talk is cheap.

  • David Earl-Graef

    Satanic cult of death. Get ready because it is closer than you think.

  • soundclick.com/Globalfirm

    Mafia of lies.
    If media, government-officials & the Muslim spokesmen condemn Islamic terror why don’t they condemn sadist theist psychopath mass-murderer, inventor of enslavement of Africans Muhammad’s incitements to terror & unjust rule?
    Time to clear the Army of Islamic ideology & take back Mecca & all other places!
    [Note to the Notes: The 2. world war holocaust was also Islamic slaughter, led by Amin Al-Husseini.]
    #Ban Islam, save lives worldwide & free the African slaves from Saudi Arabia to Mauritania, the Biafra-leader, the Leavenworth 10, Israeli soldier Azaria, Salim Masih & so on.

  • puhiawa

    No doubt projecting the MSM’s perversion of journalism.

  • David Earl-Graef

    Islam is the “religion of peace” when every infidel is murdered and or brought in to total subjugation. Do not tell me I do not know what I am talking about as I have seen it first hand in Saudi and other Islamic countries I have been in.

  • IndigoRed

    Islam without violence and killing cannot exist.

    • Michelle

      Islam cannot exist without a host to parasitize. Once the Barbary Pirates were forced to stop, all four Barbary states collapsed within 30 years. If you believe in a god then show him some disrespect as NOW was only possible thanks to oil and western largesse.

      • IndigoRed

        Al’lah is not a god.

  • Deplorable Kulak

    Mohammed claimed debauchery to be the supreme religion. Islam owes its success to the basest instincts of men. it claims the vices of men to be virtue, so long as conducted in the service of “Allah”.

  • Janet

    How come when they talk about Muhammad they always add “peace be upon him” I’m not talking about Muslims but people like Pamela or Robert Spencer or other people who are explaining the true nature of Islam? Why the heck would we want to say peace be upon him? I like Mahou’s words much better. “Police beat upon him” I don’t wish any peace upon that savage!

  • harbidoll

    the Koran is 64% about Kufirs (non Muslims), how to defeat & rule over).The Sira is 81% about us!!! They know what they are doing!!!! Good jihad—bad jihad. It took them centuries to completely conquer Spain,

  • Dorrie

    Pamela Geller is absolutely right. Jihadists are doing exactly what their evil book is telling them to do!

  • Drew the Infidel

    Fox News had their go-to resident “moderate muslime” Zudhi Jasser on and over time, no, given time, he has begun to show his true colors by talking that same crap. I only listened to the point he started making excuses and attempting to set himself and like-minded individuals apart from the bloodthirsty crowd while merely demonstrating a distinction without a difference.

  • soundclick.com/Globalfirm

    Muhammad, shame of all Muslims.
    #ChooseAtheism

    • IzlamIsTyranny

      Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot would all agree.

  • Annie

    That Muslim killers have hijacked or perverted Islam is just part of the agenda
    of the Fake News Media.

  • bannedquran20

    The unsuspecting non-muslim will fall for this garbage, hook, line and sinker! With that said, the ramadan scoreboard card of 2017 will easily break the ramadan scorecard of 2016!! With that said, hijack??!! What a clown this…thing is neighbor. These jihadists are indeed following his quran to the letter and some of these verses can be found in their fallible quran….quran 48:29, 4:24, 3:32, 5:33, 9:29, 9:5, 9:73, 43:35, etc. Furthermore, part of quran 2:217 states that muslims (zombies) could fight during ramadan. Finally neighbor, ramadan is not in fact an islam holy month. Not only is it not holy but it did not originate in the reprobate mind of muhammed but by pagan arabs way before (centuries) the reprobate mind of muhammed was born. In fact the pagan arabs this…. ramadan business of observance was to refrained from fighting one another at that time. muslim zombies still think that it’s a good time for surprise attacks as we are witnessing before our very eyes. Furthermore, the unsuspecting-non-musliim think that muslim zombies killing other muslim zombies is a new thing. Wrong. If they research the fallible quran, they will read where 3 of the 4 successors were killed by fellow muslim zombies! For many moons neighbor, hundreds of thousands (possibly more) of muslim zombies have been killed by other muslim zombies. Welcome to the world of islam…islam the enemy of mankind.

  • Timothy

    Pamela Geller is correct. Islam is just what it is, “Islam” read that Quran and determine for yourself exactly what it teaches. I know some former Muslims that denounced Islam and walked away from it over 30 years ago. They’re now peaceful law abiding Americans with no religion at all. I remember Beauchamp telling me that he hated religion, that he believed all 3 Abrahamic beliefs were complete utter B*llS***t…. that none of those religions ever had complete peace at any time in their history. They’ve always ended in War over their beliefs.

    • IzlamIsTyranny

      Communist atheism has slaughtered more people than Judaism and Christianity combined as the victims of Pol Pot, Mao and Stalin play bloody testament to.

  • Michael Jacobs

    Yes, the jihadists find support in Qur’an and Hadith for their terrorist impulses. But what the “media elite” ARE right about is that THIS interpretation of Islam has taken over — “hijacked” and “perverted” — all OTHER interpretations of Islam which used to be far more common and more diverse worldwide. This goes back to the Saudi monarchy funding madrasas and mosques all over the world which exclusively preach the Saudi brand of Wahhabism — a self-consciously medievalist, Salafist, pro-jihad, pro-Caliphate version of Islam that, not surprisingly, offers an entry that leads naive Muslim youth to accept violent terrorism as the only way to be a true Muslim. YES, terrorist jihad is solidly within the mainstream Muslim tradition. But NO, it is not the only version of Islam around — it’s just that Saudi money has displaced almost all the local, more open and tolerant and diverse versions of Islam, the same way Wal-Mart drives all the local mom-and-pop stores out of business when its 800-pound gorilla moves into a community. That is true, and we mock the media reports about Islam being “hijacked” at our own peril. As people on this site well understand, you can’t FIGHT something if you don’t UNDERSTAND it and even refuse to NAME it.

    • IzlamIsTyranny

      Bullshit. Islum has been slaughtering/enslaving/persecuting the kafir al najjis for centuries, just ask the tens of millions of Hindus slaughtered by f’ing muslum over centuries of muslum invasions there.
      Please take your Al Taqiyya and revisionist history and shove them where the sun don’t shine Ahmed.

  • Steve

    I would tell cnn and the rest of the left to watch dr warren’s video but they would rather play pundit putz games.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y

  • John Nosser

    A very good explanation of the basics of Islam and why it is like a cancer and should rightfully be hit with something like chemotherapy and radiation until it is eliminated and disappears from the face of the earth as a system of belief. Thanks for the blog Pamela.

Pin It on Pinterest