News Ticker >
[ September 22, 2017 ]

A Stella Open Thread

[ September 22, 2017 ]

Vanity Fair: “Milo Yiannopoulos’s Fyre-Festival Free Speech Week Is Canceled, Says Everyone but Milo”

[ September 22, 2017 ]

Czech President Zeman: Islamic Refugees are a Trojan Horse Phenomenon

[ September 22, 2017 ]

Belgium: 119 Islamic Institutions Investigated for “Extremism” in 2016

[ September 22, 2017 ]

In Pamela Geller beheading plot, Muslims ‘hoped to achieve martyrdom’

[ September 22, 2017 ]

Britain First leaders charged with harassing Muslim rapists

[ September 22, 2017 ]

Iran President Hassan Rouhani: Security for Israel ‘Not Possible’

[ September 22, 2017 ]

Muslims who plotted to behead Pamela Geller “laughed wildly about beheadings”

[ September 22, 2017 ]

Viktor Orban Calls George Soros a ‘Public Enemy’

[ September 22, 2017 ]

ACLU, Speakers Distance Themselves From UC Berkeley’s Free Speech Week

ACLU Lawyer Says Travel Ban ‘Could Be Constitutional’ if Enacted by Hillary Clinton


The ACLU and its Muslim lawyer Omar Jadwat are not interested in enforcing the law, which grants the President the right to restrict immigration, and they have no interest in defending the United States. They just want to destroy President Trump. If the executive order is constitutional, it is constitutional no matter who enacts it.

“ACLU Lawyer Says Travel Ban ‘Could Be Constitutional’ if Enacted by Hillary Clinton,” NTK Network, May 8, 2017:

ACLU Lawyer Omar Jadwat, arguing against President Trump’s travel ban before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday, admitted that the same exact travel ban “could be” constitutional if it were enacted by Hillary Clinton.

Jadwat argued that Trump’s campaign animus motivated the order, making it illegitimate. This claim was challenged by the Fourth Circuit’s Judge Paul Niemeyer.

“If a different candidate had won the election and then issued this order, I gather you wouldn’t have any problem with that?” Niemeyer asked.

Jadwat dodged on directly answering the question at first, but Niemeyer persisted, asking the question again.

Jadwat again tried to avoid the question, asking for clarification on the hypothetical, but Niemeyer once again demanded an answer.

“We have a candidate who won the presidency, some candidate other than President Trump won the presidency and then chose to issue this particular order, with whatever counsel he took,” Niemeyer said. “Do I understand that just in that circumstance, the executive order should be honored?”

“Yes, your honor, I think in that case, it could be constitutional,” Jadwat admitted.

Jadwat also denied that presidents’ actions should be nullified by campaign statements, despite the fact that his entire argument seemed to rest on that claim….

  • Mahou Shoujo

    muslims for hatred, that is the bottom line of every grunt and chirp from cair. They, of course they fully support hillary and the democrats as the same arab holding company that owns cair, also owns the democrats and hillary. The aclu are clearly a special interest exclusive bigoted origination that preys on the American sense of fair play. Note. shari’a does not share any values of mercy or forgiveness with anyone, including itself.

    • JacksonPearson

      Forgiveness is NOT a Muslim value.
      You can take the savages out of the Middle East, but you can’t take Islam out of the savages.

    • marlene

      Yes, the ACLU most certainly IS a special interest – their lawyer is muslim!

  • Suresh

    They know Hillary will never ban muslims , all she cares how much she gets from saudi/qatar and she will allow all jihadis into America while keeping out christian refugees.

    Dems including Obama have not only denied refugees status to
    christians from middle east who are real refugee but even have deported christians back to ISIS territory to be slaughtered by ISIS

    Not one media covered it !

    • knightsstrength

      Do not miss the issue, even if Hillary does not ban refugess, it is what he said that he would back the ban if Hillary banned refugees.

      You cannot have same ban by a different President, but same ban by another Prseident. The case shiuld have been ruled in favour of Prseident Trump

    • karl59

      Hillary Clinton has been in the hip pocket of Saudi Arabia for years.

  • Mark Steiner

    Fact of the matter is – if Hillary were president, an executive order banning Muslims would not be issued.

    It should be clear – the obvious, total association and commitment of the Demoncratic Party and Islam. If it is not – what planet do you live on?

    It is an association bent on the destruction of human government and humans.

    • marlene

      Which is why the lying deceitful ACLU picked hillary, because they knew she wouldn’t do it. They could have picked satan himself for the same reason.

  • NotTheMama

    Typical Muslim. Totally devoid of any logical thinking.

    • Doloresjlugo

      Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj233d:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash233ShopBusinessGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj233d..,….

  • JacksonPearson

    The anti-American ACLU should be declared a terrorist organization.

    • Dave from San Antonio

      Now that…I’ve said for many years…along with the SPLC.

    • marlene

      It is – their lawyer is a muslim who defends terrorists!

  • knightsstrength

    He should be deported for not recognising President Trump Executive Order on banning Refugees but would with another President.

    You canmot deny one and accept another that offers the same ban by another President so his arguments are false, deport the scum. Throw the scum out of court.

  • Steve

    This Is the proverbial “you can’t make this stuff up”. If a person didn’t know any better you could imagine this being some sort of comedy. The only problem is that aclu guy’s serious.

  • KimWilde

    Save America, deport moslums.

  • Drew the Infidel

    Maxine Waters (D-CA) is out on the stump saying Trump’s Executive Order is unlawful but had Hillary won the election, it would be acceptable. If not for the double standard, the commiecrats would have no standards at all.

    • Robert Batchelor

      So true!

    • Dave from San Antonio

      Very true…and anything immoral…is part of their ‘standards’ for behavior.

  • Alleged Comment

    Proof Demoncraps and their supporters have NO morals or ethics at all. They just want YOU DEAD!

    By any means necessary but all the same thing – GENOCIDE of the white race. Via abortion, destroying your Christianity, illegal immigration, a white hating sodomite Nerogro (still active with his hatred), and a white man-hating woman called Hillaryous.

  • AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020

    ACLU Lawyers Say Any Laws Broken by Hillary Clinton, are NOT really Laws !!!


    Every day that muslims are here is one more day freedom is weakened.

  • az

    wait, so the word of your favorite crooked vagina is legit, only because it serves your own twisted personal agenda?
    Muslim stupidity (in action or words) is really boundless…


    Apparently the excuse being used to stop President Trump’s ban is because he used the words, “Muslim ban” sometime in the past. This phrase is considered discriminatory by the judge, even though the phrase is not used in the wording of the ban. If Hillary Clinton used the exact same wording of the ban, it would be OK, because she had not used the phrase, “Muslim ban” in the past. This is over reach on the judge’s part, and I bet a good lawyer could find the loophole.

    • marlene

      The judge has already overstepped his constitutional powers and made an unconstitutional decision which should be nullified for that reason.

  • Dave from San Antonio

    And thus the double-standard of liberals is exposed…again.

  • marlene

    WRONG. WRONG. WRONG. Our Constitution already BANS muslims from even entering our country! The lying deceitful ACLU picks hillary because they know she wouldn’t do it. They could have picked satan himself for the same reason!

Pin It on Pinterest