News Ticker >
[ September 23, 2017 ]

FATWA! Hunted in America: Pamela Geller’s New Book from Milo’s Dangerous Publishing House

[ September 23, 2017 ]

Berkeley Cancels Free Speech Week: Casus Belli

[ September 23, 2017 ]

Napolitano: Berkeley “Free Speech Week” to feature “controversial and noxious ideas”

[ September 23, 2017 ]

Canada: Muslim bus driver charged with sexually assaulting 15-year-old disabled girl

[ September 23, 2017 ]

Oklahoma Muslim: “I felt oppressed so I beheaded her…That’s what Allah said in the Quran”

[ September 22, 2017 ]

A Stella Open Thread

[ September 22, 2017 ]

Vanity Fair: “Milo Yiannopoulos’s Fyre-Festival Free Speech Week Is Canceled, Says Everyone but Milo”

[ September 22, 2017 ]

Czech President Zeman: Islamic Refugees are a Trojan Horse Phenomenon

[ September 22, 2017 ]

Belgium: 119 Islamic Institutions Investigated for “Extremism” in 2016

[ September 22, 2017 ]

In Pamela Geller beheading plot, Muslims ‘hoped to achieve martyrdom’

Montana Democrats Vote Against Bill Banning Brutal Oppressive Sharia Law, Call It ‘Repugnant’


Well, at least the Dems know how we feel about them and their support for oppression, subjugation, gender apartheid, and Islamic Jew-hatred. Despicable.

The suppression of free speech is first and foremost sharia law, and it is designed to target those brave voices who speak critically of jihad and sharia. Sharia is already here.

The left is evil.

Montana Democrats Vote Against Bill Banning Sharia Law, Call It ‘Repugnant’

By Ben Kew, Breitbart, April 1, 2017:

Democrats in Montana have opposed a bill banning the use of foreign law in its state courts on the grounds that such legislation would target Muslims.

Senate Bill 97, introduced by Keith Regier (R-Kalispell) bans the application of foreign law in Montana’s courts, with the debate particularly focused on Sharia Law, a form of Islamic law typically used in the Middle East.

Although the bill passed on party lines by 56-44, Democrats claimed it was designed to target Muslim communities.

“I think it sends a dangerous message to minority groups both here living in our state and wanting to come visit our state, just merely on the fact that you may be different,” said Rep. Shane Morigeau, D-Missoula, while debating the bill. “I truly believe this law is repugnant. I believe this is not who we are as Montanans.”

Meanwhile, Rep. Ellie Hill Smith (D-Missoula) proposed a failed amendment to the bill to include a ban on both Sharia Law and the Law of Moses, in order to “show the state of Montana that it is not just about Islamic Law.”

“The courts have said that laws that single out certain religions violate the First Amendment,” Smith said, claiming that it was “peppered with anti-Muslim bigotry.”

Another Democrat, Rep. Laurie Bishop (D-Livingston) urged legislators “not to forget the roots of this bill,” adding that “our children are watching.”

Meanwhile, Rep. Brad Tschida (R-Missoula) said the bill was an attempt to push back against a “constitution [that] is constantly under assault.”

Bills specifically targeting Sharia Law have passed in states such as North Carolina, Alabama, Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, South Dakota, and Tennessee. The bill will now be passed on to Gov. Steve Bullock (D) for signature or veto.

  • Craig

    So, are the dumbass montana libtards going to issue acid and a knife so montana folks can correctly abide by the shariah stoneage law? Cowardice and appeasement are the hallmarks of the anti-American democrats and their goosestepping libtard stooges.
    In the first picture above, you can see the dirt shooting up where the bullet went through her brain and hit the ground. Real tough guy.
    islam is a cancer and MUST be excised unless you want this happening to your wives and daughters.

  • Suresh

    Its time to kick out all these Left/Lineral Jihadi/sharia lovers out of colleges/schools.

    Ignorance is No bliss. These jihadis are so vicious they do not even spare Aid workers who help them

    And No, its not happening in pakistan/afganistan , its happening in America.

  • IzlamIsTyranny

    Anti-muslim bigotry is called common sense. The f’ing Dem0rats are nothing but the Ikhwan Lite party now.

    • spfg

      WTF…How stupid are these people? I mean can it get any worse? Political correctness gone mad? Sharia law given the same level of respect as American Constitutional Law. Have Muslims ever returned the favor? These Dems are our enemy and should be voted out of office and hung out to dry…No common sense at all and completely ignorant about the evils of Islam. It should be 100 to 0 in favor of banning sharia law…Democrats are definitely evil…

      • harbidoll

        without muslim $otes the Dem. Party would be nowhere.

  • Voytek Gagalka

    “…such legislation would target Muslims.” So be it. Since only Mohammedans adhere to such barbaric code, obviously it must “target Muslims.” But why WE should shun from condemning those practices if WE find them so truly repugnant?!

    • Mahou Shoujo

      Why would shari’a be the preferred legal system over American law? democrats are sucks to islam, grovelling sucks actually.

      • harbidoll


      • SmithWinston6478

        Ignorance is mortally dangerous.

        • Mahou Shoujo

          That is why islam and muslims must be understood, it is easier to destroy a known enemy.

          • SmithWinston6478

            “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.” ~ Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC

    • spfg

      Yea absolutely…When was the last time Muslims have not targeted Jews and Christians? That’s what they live for. That is their reason for living to promote sharia over freedom…These kowtowing nutjobs democrats are violating their oath to the people…Liars they are and should be permanently banned from serving the people of Montana…I hope they all get voted out…

  • Joe Schmoe

    Of course, the libscum sold their souls to these brutal welfare sucking criminal monsters

  • muddman

    Great info Pam…the name list of the 44 would come in handy come election time or before for a voter recall that should make a full scale comeback…..Comeon Montuckians recall these bad products….

  • DistantEarlyWarning611

    Let me make myself perfectly clear. I HATE every one of you stinking, rat bastard Democrats/Communists……and you traitorous RINO’s making deals with these mthrfckrs, I HATE you too!

    • Craig

      That is becoming a common statement.

      • Pastor C

        They know they’re Communists. They just don’t want us to know. That’s why they renamed themselves ‘progressives.’

        • JeromefromLayton

          Pretty close. The Communist International (Marx, Engles, etc. in Europe) and the Progressive movement (USA, late 1800s, TR, FDA, ICC, etc.) both started in the same time period but independently. This doesn’t mean that they didn’t co-opt each other and have people joining both groups or opposing both of them.

    • Larry Dolney


    • Steve

      Bernie’s living the “dream” where socialism actually works – on paper – but he needs to wake up to the reality that people that work know its not true.

      • JeromefromLayton

        In college, most of those snowflakes major in Liberal Arts, Education, etc. Over in the School of Engineering, it’s different. There, the expression is “There is no free lunch.” This is reinforced many times over each semester where things that don’t “add up” usually don’t work.


          American Family Association has a very interesting statistical picture on the ratio of religion vs volume of professors. Did you know that collegiate professors are amongst the lowest ranking group in the US, as far as christians go. The AFA site appears down for a moment, but hopefully will come back up soon. They’re always under attack from anti christian groups, because they are millions strong. “keep christ in christmas”. That’s the AFA. And if the site does not load, you can just enter the below link path into google for the picture.

          • Steve

            Christ may make some people feel guilty and many times because they have sinned but Allah makes them feel guilty for not abiding by deadly sharia and jihad doing things that are sins in western culture. I believe we are too far apart as cultures to exist peacefully not that the west wouldn’t try but muslamics generally insist on non-assimilation.

        • Steve

          I took liberal arts but I never turned out like many people I met. I guess I survived by using critical thinking. I liked literature, poetry and philosophy and still do but I guess I think about it as a means to a better end that is real not as leftist revolution to serve some lifestyle or government cause. Many really good poets in my opinion fall victim to promoting their often alternate lifestyles by means of their work. I took the good from the classes and books but left the negative many times. One example was lawrence ferlinghetti who wrote great poems about a fragmented society but he threw in many allusions to gay lifestyle being gay himself and he like many others committed the sin he criticized of hypocrisy and judgment. Kids today seem assaulted by an increasingly leftist academia that I’m not sure i could handle. Ben shapiro wrote about academia and estimated about 85% of colleges and universities are liberal. I’ll bet that a large percentage of that is leftist. Just look at berkeley in the news recently!


      United we stand, divided we fall.
      You’re yet another in a long line of useful idiots.
      It must be tough, to live a life under a strict red/blue life filter.

    • Alleged Comment

      Jest change the name to DEMONCRAP and ‘viola! Not a communist anymore!!

  • Hatterasman

    I guess it won’t be long before we see Walmart selling five gallon buckets of rocks for Muslims to buy for stoning their misbehaving wives and daughters. Any Libtard who votes for Sharia Law to be recognized in US courts should be taken out and stoned themselves.

    • mztore

      Anyone who takes sharia law over the constitution should be sent to the area where sharia law IS recognized, and banned from ever returning to the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA……forever.

  • Donna Knaub

    Sharia Law can be practiced in the middle east. Not in the us. We have our laws and constitution already in place and folks from other nations should honor that while they are living in our country.

    • Craig

      In 1996, bill clinton held a eid-el-fitr dinner for islamic terrorists and other POS muzzies. At the end, POS clinton stood up, held up his arms and yelled “allahu akbar!”
      democrats are the enemy.

      • Steve

        Clinton probably got a free pass to the harem for that one!

        • IzlamIsTyranny

          OR a free pass to the Bacha Bazi Dancing Boy Review and love in!

      • IzlamIsTyranny

        I wonder if Billy ‘cigar’ Clinton was the 1st POTUS to host Eid dinners?

    • Semur Jengkol

      when muslims population become majority …can they voice their aspiration to change laws /constitution ?????

      If no ….why ???

      • IzlamIsTyranny

        Because the ideology of islum is fascist and inherently and explicitly antisemitic.
        You don’t get to vote out the US Constitution muslum — at least without large numbers of muslums being killed.

        • Dorrie

          The growing population of muzzies is good reason to stay locked and loaded at all times. I carry concealed everywhere I go.

        • Semur Jengkol

          Islam is fascist ??? …. hmmmmm ….

          If truth prevails over falsehood ….. truth will appear like “fascist” ….

          so feel free to call islam fascist ….. hahahahahaha ….

          Islam is inherently antisemitic ??? ….hmmmmm ….

          if that’s the case …why islam invites everybody/all collors/race/ethnics ….including jews to become muslims …. ?? …to live in one brotherhood of ummah ???

          Will antisemite europe do the same by inviting jews to become white aryans ??? ….

          hahahahahaha ….

          • SmithWinston6478

            Ladies and Gentlemen, the above demonstrates stupidity raised to an artform.

          • Duchess of Pork

            “Why Islam invites……” so they can enslave white western women for the brotherhood of course. Muslim men have always lusted after Banu al-Asfar; the yearly excursions by into the Balkans by the Caliphs were always plan B. Which ‘brother’ wants a dowdy old brunette when they’re already married to one back in the Arabian boondocks. But hey we’ve plenty of pink, purple and green haired feminazis that we’re happy to send your way to ‘re-educate’ in your usual style. They’ll welcome the diversity of FGM, daily beatings, household confinement and second class status. Just tell them it’s a little bit of B&D, good for the atheist soul.

          • Semur Jengkol

            Daily beatings ????

            Are you talking about alcoholism imbued domestic violence so common in countries with drinking culture ??

          • Duchess of Pork


          • IzlamIsTyranny

            “Invites” LOL. Yeah an invitation much like the mafia’s offer you can’t refuse.

          • Semur Jengkol

            Like mafia ??

            ..So those poor, minority and marginalize muslim migrants are able to force your local society to follow their demands like mafia ???

            Are so weak, sissy and spineless?? …hehehehehe …

      • Mahou Shoujo

        Because in democracy the majority rules with respect to the minority, a concept of tolerance you ungrateful brain dead muslim subhumans cannot understand.

        • Semur Jengkol

          Respect for the minority ?? …. thats essential surely …

          ….. but tolerance will no longer be a virtue if there is no limit ….

          When those minority demand the state to accommodate their irrational, immoral, depraved, incoherent cultures ……. should the whole society downgraded it’s moral & rational standard to “tolerate” those demand ???

          Can those minority demand that fucking goats lifestyles should be accommodated and legalized …?? ….. hahahahaha ….

          Western philosophers already find justification for this depraved acts ..

          • IzlamIsTyranny

            “Depraved” kinda like the legalized boy buggery that is commonplace in the muslum world? Or the sex slavery? Or both?

          • Mahou Shoujo

            Spend some time reading the qur’an, as a muslim, you sound like a complete idiot with no ability to do anything more than string unrelated words together like some fool of a profit.

  • Montana libtards

    Montana, where men are men and sheep are nervous.
    Sounds like they’ve gone off the libtard deep end.

    • Craig

      I have also heard “Montana, where men are men and the sheep run scared”.

      • spfg

        I think that was in Wyoming but heh it could have originated in Montana…

        • JeromefromLayton

          There’s a place like that in California, too, where “Men are men and sheep are careful.”

          • Mahou Shoujo

            The reason there are a lot of men who wear skirts in caliphoney, is sheep can her a zipper being pulled down.

          • IzlamIsTyranny

            There aren’t many sheep in Caliphornia — except for the taxpayers, who are shorn annually.

          • Mahou Shoujo
    • Mahou Shoujo

      In Montana, men are men, women are women, sheep are kept for democrats and tourists from calipornya.

      • IzlamIsTyranny

        No one liberal from Caliphornia goes to Montana, it’s a fly-over state — unless there’s some sort of ski resorts there.

  • Mahou Shoujo

    Here is a brief description of what shari’a law allows, this is what democrats demand for American law, there are enough fools who are stupid enough agree.

    1. The mosque and state are not separate.To this day, Islamic nations that

    are deeply rooted in shariah, like Iran and Saudi Arabia, do not adequately separate the two realms, giving a lot of power to courts and councils to ensure that legislation does not contradict the Quran (never mind whose interpretation). Most of the laws listed below come from this confusion.

    2. Jihad may be waged against injustice or an unjust nation, as Islam defines the terms. Classical texts say Islam is justice, and no Islam is injustice. Therefore, a “just war” can be waged against a nation or people who do not

    submit to Islam. Yet we are told in the 1990 Cairo Declaration of Human Rights, which is based on shariah, that humane rules must be followed (Article Three)

    Does that article offer hope that modern Islam can move past old Islam? Maybe.

    However, the Quran, sacred traditions, classical law, and historical Islam contradict or balance out some elements in Article Three.

    Would there be a conflict between the old Islam and modern Islam, if war broke out? Many Islamic clerics issue fatwas

    (religious rulings) to wage jihad.

    Back-up articles: Jihad and Qital and The Early Muslim Community and the Sword.

    3. Jihad may be waged to spread Islam and force conversions — a holy war. Waging jihad to spread Islam and force conversions is a perfect description of “holy war.” See Quran 8:39, 9:5, 9:11-12, 9:14, and 9:29; and then see 9:33; 61:9

    and 48:28. Yet, we have been told for many years now that holy wars and forced conversions were never done in Islam. That’s a myth imagined by Westerners. However, read those verses and click on the back-up articles:


    The Mission of Muhammad and the Sword, and The Early Muslim Community.

    4. A captive in jihad may be executed, enslaved, ransomed for money, exchanged for

    other prisoners, or released freely. Quran 47:4 and 33:25-27, 4:24 says those things (and the last option — free release — is positive). Yet we are told that in a jihad today everything must

    be done humanely and justly. However, the back-up article, this fourth item, and the next four items in this list balance out that claim. Would there be a conflict between old Islam and modern Islam, if war broke out?

    5. A

    woman captive of jihad may be forced to have to sex with her captors (now


    Quran 4:24 and

    especially the sacred traditions and classical law allow this. The sacred traditions

    say that while out on military campaigns under Muhammad’s leadership, jihadists used to practice coitus interruptus with their female captives. Women soldiers fighting terrorists today must be forewarned of the danger.

    6. Property can be destroyed or confiscated during jihad. Quran 59:2 and 59:5 discuss those rules. Sacred traditions and classical law expand on the Quranic verses. Modern Islamic law officially improves on the Quran: see Article Three of the 1990 Cairo Declaration of Human Rights, which is nonetheless based on shariah, but it outlaws wanton destruction of property. Would there be any conflict between old Islam and modern Islam in a war today?

    7. Jihad may be waged to collect spoils. Quran 8:1, 8:7, 8:41, and 48:20 show this clearly. Early

    Islam followed the old Arab custom of raiding caravans, but as its military grew, the raids were elevated to jihad. The spoils of war were coveted. Which Islam would prevail in a war today — the old one or the modern one?

    8. A second-class submission tax, called the jizyah, must be imposed on Jews and Christians (and other religious minorities) living in Islamic countries.

    Quran 9:29

    offers three options to Jews and Christians: (1) Fight and die; (2) convert to Islam; (3) or keep their religion, but pay a tribute or submission tax, the jizyah, whileliving under Islam. In Islamic history, vanquished Jews and Christians became known as dhimmis. This word appears in Quran 9:8 and 9:10, meaning a “treaty” or “oath,” but it can also mean those who are “condemned” “reviled” or “reproved” (Quran 17:18, 17:22; 68:49). The word “submission” in Quran 9:29 can also be translated as “humiliation,” “utterly humbled,” “contemptible” or “vile.” It can mean “small” as opposed to “great.” Islamic nations today still seek to impose this second-class religion tax. Back-up

    9. Slavery is allowed. It is true that freeing slaves was done in original Islam (Quran 5:89 and 24:33), and the Quran says to be kind to slaves (Quran 4:36), but that is not the entire story. In addition to those verses, Quran 4:24, 23:1-7; 33:52 allow the institution. Muhammad owned slaves, even one who was black (so says a sacred tradition). He was militarily and politically powerful during his later life in Medina, but he never abolished slavery as an institution.

    Officially, Islamic nations have outlawed slavery (Article 11, which is still based on shariah). That proves Islam can reform on at least one matter. Can it reform on the other shariah laws? And we are told that “no other nation or religious group in the world treated slaves better than the Muslims did.” The back-up article and next two items in this list contradict that claim. The legacy of slavery still runs deep in Islamic countries even today.

    10. A male owner may have sex with his slave-women, even prepubescent slave-girls. See Quran 4:24 and 23:1-7; but it is classical law that permits sex with prepubescent slave girls and describes them as such. Some Muslim

    religious leaders and others still advocate this practice, taking the slaves as concubines (though sex with prepubescent slave-girls is another matter).

    Back-up article: Slavery 11. Slaves may be beaten. That’s what sacred traditions and classical laws say. See Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery

    12. Apostasy laws, including imprisonment or execution, may be imposed on anyone who leaves

    Islam (an apostate). Normally this is a prescribed punishment, but it is also

    political, since it is about freedom of religion. Surprisingly the Quran does not cover punishing apostates down here on earth, though in the afterlife they will be punished. Does this modern Islam can reform old Islam? Quran 4:88-89,

    9:73-74, and 9:123, read in that sequence, might deal with earthly punishments. Mainly, however, the sacred traditions and classical law permit harsh treatment for anyone who leaves Islam.

    Islamic courts and laws still impose these punishments today, or religious scholars today argue for the law.

    13. Blasphemy laws, including imprisonment or execution, may be imposed on critics of Islam

    or Muhammad. These verses should be read in historical sequence, for they show that as Islam’s military power increased, the harsh treatment of mockers and critics also intensified, as follows: Quran 3:186, 33:57-61, 9:61-66, 9:73

    and 9:123. Sacred traditions, classical laws, and historical Islam are unambiguous about the punishments, recording the people, often their names, who were assassinated for mocking Muhammad and the Quran.

    Islamic nations and pockets of Islam in non-Muslim countries still impose these punishments



    14. Drinkers and gamblers may be flogged. Quran 2:219, 4:43, and 5:90-91, in that sequence, show that

    Islam gradually prohibited alcohol. The last passage also prohibits “gaming” of sorts. The sacred traditions and classical law discuss punishing gamblers and alcoholics. One tradition says to execute unrepentant alcoholics who do not stop. But usually drinkers were flogged forty or eighty times, with garments, palm branches, or sandals in early Islam. Islamic countries can impose these punishments today, or religious and legal scholars still argue for it.

    15. An injured plaintiff (a private citizen) has the options of forgiving or exacting legal and literal revenge — physical eye for physical eye. Categorized as qisas (like for like), Quran 5:45 is the main verse (and see 2:187-189). Sacred traditions and classical laws spell out which punishments should be inflicted on which offences. Islamic courts, depending on which way the plaintiff directs, today may ask a doctor to surgically remove an eye or disfigure the

    face or body in some other way. Currently, qisas can be applied to children in Iran.The whole purpose of courts is to remove the punishment of wrongs and injuries from the plaintiffs who are private citizens; otherwise, blood feuds and personal revenge make punishments uneven — never mind excessive. Back-up article: Law of Retaliation

    16. The hand of a male or female thief may be cut off. Quran 5:38 imposes this punishment. The traditions and classical law clarify that the theft has to be a valuable item; or mutilation might not be inflicted during a famine,

    But amputation is still done today in Islamic countries and argued for by religious leaders or legal scholars to understand it as if it is still valid. Back-up article: Thieves, Give Muhammad a Hand!

    17. A highway robber may be crucified or his alternate hand and foot cut off.

    Quran 5:33 permit these punishments. Yes, from that verse other punishments can be inflicted, but the point here is that execution for first-degree murder with aggravated circumstances is one thing, but mutilation and crucifixion is excessive. Some Islamic nations can still impose them today, or religious and legal scholars still argue for understanding the punishments, as if they are still valid. Back-up article: Crucifixion and Mutilation


    Homosexuals may be imprisoned, flogged, or executed. Surprisingly, the Quran is not all that clear on this subject, but the traditions and classical laws are. Islamic nations to this day still impose those punishments, and

    religious leaders still argue for harsh punishments. Back-up article: Homosexuality


    Fornicators may be flogged. Quran 24:2 says this. The hadith and classical laws can impose additional penalties like exile of the male for a year. Modern Islamic nations still inflict this penalty, and religious or legal scholars still argue for it.


    Adulterers may be stoned to death. The verse that says to stone adulterers to death went

    missing from the Quran, so says Umar, a companion of Muhammad and the second caliph (ruled 634-644). But he left no doubt that this penalty was done under Muhammad’s direction, and the sacred traditions and classical laws confirm it. But a few rules of evidence must be followed, like confession of the adulterer

    or four eyewitnesses. In some interpretations of the law, if a woman is raped, but cannot produce four just and pious men who witnessed it, then she is slandering the alleged rapist (or gang rapists) — never mind that the four just and pious eyewitnesses did nothing to stop it, but stood there and watched it. Some modern Islamic nations still do this, and religious and legal scholars argue for it.Back-up article: Adultery and Fornication


    False accusers of sexual crimes may be flogged eighty times. Quran 24:1-4 speak of corporal punishment for sexual sins. Verse 4 says that if an accuser cannot produce four eyewitnesses to corroborate his accusation, then he will be flogged (see Quran 24:13). Some modern Islamic nations can still impose the penalty for slander, and religious scholars still argue for it. Back-up article: Adultery and Fornication Marital, Domestic, and Women’s Issues

    Quran 2:228 and 4:34 states that mankind is superior to womankind in a variety of legal and domestic

    contexts. Quran 2:223 says wives are fields, and their husbands can go into them whenever and however they

    like. How does this inferiority work out in the law and society? 22. A woman inherits half what a man does. Quran 4:11 says it, and the hadith (traditions) and classical law confirm it. Modern Islamic nations still do this, and religious leaders still argue for it.

    23. A woman’s testimony in a court of law counts half of a man’s testimony, since she

    might “forget.” Quran 2:282 says it in the context of business law. But the hadith (traditions) explains that

    women’s minds are deficient; classical law expands this curtailment to other areas than business.Modern Islamic nations still do this, and religious scholars still argue for it.Back-up article: Women’s Status and Roles

    24. A man may legally and irrevocably divorce his wife, outside of a court of law, by correctly pronouncing three times “you are divorced.” Quran 2:229 says

    this, and the traditions and classical law explain and confirm it. A judge in a modern Islamic country will ensure that the husband did not speak from a fit of irrational rage (anger is okay) or intoxication, for example. Then the court

    will validate the divorce, not daring to overturn it, since the Quran says so. Sometimes this homemade and irrevocable divorce produces a lot of regret in the couple and manipulation from the husband in Islam today.

    25. A wife may remarry her ex-husband if and only if she marries another man, has sex

    with him, and then this second man divorces her. Quran 2:230 says this, and the traditions and classical law confirm it. Supposedly, this rule is designed to prevent easy divorce (see the previous point), but it produces a lot of pain, in Muslims today.

    26. Husbands may hit their wives. Quran 4:34 says it, and the traditions and classical law confirm it. There is a sequence of steps a husband follows before he can hit her, but not surprisingly this rule creates all sorts of abuse and confusion in Islamic society today. Back-up article: Domestic Violence

    27. A man may be polygamous with up to four wives. Quran 4:3 (and 33:50-52) allow this, but only if a man can take care of them. The traditions and classical law confirm it. Modern Muslims still push for this old marital arrangement even in the USA, and many Islamic nations still allow it. But some Muslims are fighting polygamy. The hadith (traditions) paints a picture of Muhammad’s household that was full of strife between the wives. Back-up article: Polygamy

    28. A man may simply get rid of one of his “undesirable” wives. Quran 4:128 says this. The traditions say about the verse that the wife whom Muhammad wanted to get rid of was “huge” and “fat.” She gave up her turn to his favorite

    girl-bride Aisha. He kept the corpulent wife. There is heartbreak in Islam today. Back-up article: Polygamy

    29. A mature man may marry a prepubescent girl.Quran 65:1-4, particularly verse 4, assumes, but does not command, the practice. The hadith says Aisha was six years old when she was engaged to Muhammad (he was in his fifties), and their marriage was consummated when she was nine. The hadith indicate she was prepubescent at nine. She never did bear him any children. Classical law says a father may give away his prepubescent daughter, but she also has a few rights.

    Officially many Islamic nations have raised the legal marriage age, but pockets in the Islamic

    world still follow this old custom. The Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia okays marriage to ten-year-old girls. Work

    is still needed to be done for the rights of girl brides, particularly for their sexual health. Back-up article: Marriage to Prepubescent Girls
    30. A woman must wear a head covering and maybe a facial veil, according to sound traditions and authoritative classical law. Quran 24:31, 33:53 and 33:59 are not as clear about the veil as one might first think. The verses say to dress modestly, but should the head be covered or just the neckline? What about the face (except the eyes)? Thus, modern Muslims are now in a big debate over the veil. However, the traditions and classical law are clearer than the Quran: the veil over the face (except the eyes).

    Respected Quran scholars in the past interpreted verse 4:34 with impressive candor. Tabari said that it means to “admonish them, but if they refused to repent, then tie them up in their homes and beat them until they obey Allah’s commands toward you.” Qurtubi told wife-beaters to avoid breaking bones, if possible, but added that “it is not a crime if it leads to death.” (source)

    Muslim (4:1039) – “A’isha said [to Muhammad]: ‘You have made us equal to the dogs and the asses'” These are the words of Muhammad’s favorite wife, complaining of the role assigned to women under Islam.

    York MSA Female students wearing hijab and niqab, who manned the Info Booth at the Central Square of York University, handed out to students the book “Women in Islam & Refutation of some Common Misconceptions,” authored by the Saudi scholar Dr. Abdul-Rahman al-Sheha and printed by the Saudi Dawah organization Muslim World League (رابطة العالم الاسلامي).

    “Although beating of women is generally forbidden, Islam permits the beating of wives in a restricted and limited sense only as a final solution and acceptable valid reason when all else fails… Allah deals with the case of a wife who behaves immorally towards her husband’s rights. The treatment of this extremely sensitive issue comes in gradual stages… Third and final stage: Beating without hurting, breaking a bone, leaving black or blue marks on the body, and avoiding hitting the face or especially sensitive places at any cost. The purpose of beating her is only to discipline… This treatment is proved to be very effective with two types of women… The first type: Strong willed, demanding and commandeering women… The second type: Submissive or subdued women. These women may even enjoy being beaten at times as a sign of love and concern… Beating, according to the Islamic teachings, is listed as the last and final stage of disciplining methods.”

    Sura 8 of the Koran is entitled “The Spoils,” which refers to the booty that shall be taken from the infidels. Al-Awlaki says that taking money by force from disbelievers as booty is the “best and purest form of income.” The basis for his statement comes from the Hadith Sahih Bukhari, when Muhammad said, “the spoils of war are made halal for me” (see Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331).

    Al-Awlaki also cites a Hanafi scholar who says stealing from people in the dar al-harb “is considered mubah (permitted) just like hunting or wood gathering.” Al-Awlaki references other traditional Muslim sources who say that theft and embezzlement are different from booty because they are taken by deception or trickery rather than by force, but that such theft and embezzlement is still legal. Al-Awlaki’s full “ruling” is available at Jihadology.

    • IzlamIsTyranny

      Interesting. Disgusting, but interesting.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        There is nothing about islam that is not disgusting.

        • IzlamIsTyranny

          I wonder if anyone in Nihon knows as much as you do about islum? They’re probably fed nothing but propaganda.

          • Mahou Shoujo

            The Japanese I know are remarkably well informed on many subjects. The ones who need education are the western europeans, as there is mounting evidence that they collectively, are dumb as stumps.

    • Hardrock

      Great write up of information Mahou. I ran off a copy, I will add it to my growing file. Thanks so much.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        shari’a looks worse the more that is found out about it, as is all of islam, it starts out looking like it may have a few good points, but when the actual practice of islam and interpretations of the qur’an and other defining laws of islam are learned, they are disgusting for their ignorance, perversion, dishonesty and violence.

        • Steve

          God help those who allow it to get its feet in their doors. I can see it soon “public stoning or hanging” in some secluded muslamic mob-mmunity.

    • SmithWinston6478

      Thank you, my friend. That went directly into the database.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        The more that is known about isms, the uglier islam is revealed as being.

        • mztore

          Thanks for the share. Hope it is OK that it was copied and sent to my brother in CO. I’ve told him several times of the 2 sites that I frequent, but don’t know if he has had time to look at them. Again, thanks.

          • Mahou Shoujo

            The more information that gets out, the filthier islam looks, the more decent people will do to eliminate it.

    • Pastor C

      Thanks for sharing. Duly noted…

    • Steve

      Well stated and documented. The west cannot keep turning its back on this conspiracy of muslamics with leftists as if it is “just going to work out”. It will not and we have to hold our leaders accountable.

      One big reason the left in the U.S. hates Trump is he is a leader that is holding the others accountable. The swamp is deep though and there are many muslamics there doing these things you state. Some positive things seem to be happening but the msm like to spin about the truth.

  • Richard

    Forgive me, but don’t we have American law in this country, based on the U.S. Constitution which, the last time I checked, is the one and only law of the United States?

    • spfg

      Dems in Montana..(Evil as they are) are trying to change all of that and put sharia on level ground worthy of equal consideration and respect to American law…God help us all before it is too late…

  • AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020

    Montana State going to be economically extorted, boycotted and Blackmailed by Hollywood, NFL, NBA, Starbucks, Target and dozens of others in 4,.. 3,.. 2,..

  • Don Wood ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ

    Do you believe in: (1) Beating of women? Qur’an 4:34. (2} Muhammed said, wife beating is part of the doctrine of Islam. Dawud 21:42. America objects to wife beating and all of our laws prohibit it. Americans don’t want people coming here who will live their lives outside our law. This is only one reason to object to sharia law.

    Islamic doctrine supports slavery, torture, submission of Kafirs (people who don’t believe in doing all these things), wife beatiing and political assasination. I do not reject Muslims, not at all! So, I ask: (1) Do you support wife beating and political assasination? If you say, “No!” I must ask why you support Islam that contains those elements? No one needs to say they aren’t skilled in the Sira, Qur’an or Hadiths to determine these things. All you need to do is consult with Imam Google! Just try Googling, “Islam wife beating.” So, I’m not bad mouthing Muslims or even Islam. What I AM badmouthing is wife beating, inferiority of women, killing of Kafirs and political assinations and I don’t want any of those kinds of “imigrants” in my country. I can also say that I condemn the Sunna of Muhammed, the Qur’an, the Sira and Hadiths, and they are WRONG about the elements of wife beating, inferiority of women, killing of unbelievers or apostates or other political assisnations. I want none of this in my country of which I am a citizen.

    My Muslim friend, do YOU agree with these elements that I am opposed to? Do you CONDEMN the Sira, Sunna, Sharia, Qur’an and Hadiths that approve of such customs?

  • anthony edwards

    Montana Democrats by Voting Against Bill Banning Brutal Oppressive Sharia Law ARE ‘Repugnant.’

    Destroy leftism and Islamicism before they destroy western civilization.

  • fedup taxpayer

    loony left is all sharia needs to crush freedom

  • David E Brown

    I move that we Make It known in an amendment to the Constitution banning sharia law. That we hold sharia law to be Invalid. Just to be very clear on the subject.

  • Alleged Comment

    Everyone knows Demoncraps are misogynist. Would love to rape all women and put them in their place. Bill Clinton raped at least one we know of.

    The sodomite Barry does not like women. Preferring men or goats. The Virginia governor won’t arm women under protective disorder of their mates.

  • Toy Pupanbai

    It is essential that all countries wishing to preserve their heritage and cultural identity, must first LEGALLY refuse recognition of the tyrannical Theocratic Ideology, Islam/Mohammedanism, as a RELIGION!
    Italy has wisely refused a RELIGION status to this cult.

  • usn

    Boy these democrats are moving themselves right out of the picture.

  • santashandler

    All who voted against that bill, should have been publicly removed from office and escorted to a waiting plane, where they would hand over their passports and flown to the most repressive regime of their choosing.

  • hal8196

    Gee, that is really stupid…I did want to visit Montana one day, but obviously there must be something in the water that causing you to lose brain cells.

  • enubus

    Hopefully, they will be the first to be beheaded. Fools always go where angels fear to tread!

  • RayG1

    Would Bullock veto what the majority votes for? Of course he will! He’s a liberal!

  • Ruger 1

    These Phucking POS politicians Need to Take Their Asses, Their Wives and Daughters and Move the Hell Out of the United States…. Preferably to a Sharia Infested Country of Their Choosing!!!! If They Hate Our Bill of Rights and Our Constitution then GTFO!!!!!!!! 🖕

  • Sunshine Kid

    Idiots vote for foreign laws. I say revoke their citizenship and force them to move to where they have laws they prefer. One does not saddle a porcupine to ride comfortably, and the USA is that porcupine – it will not accept a saddle.

  • Robert Batchelor

    Thank goodness there were enough Republicans to pass the Bill. As for the traitors called Democrats, they’re more than welcome to move to a country where Sharia is the law of the land.

    • old003

      The dempcrap governor will veto it.

  • SmithWinston6478

    Are there any femnists in Montana? Are they all just ignorant hogs? Talk about self-defeating! Wow! How ’bout gays?
    “When was the last time you heard a muslim called homophobic?” ~ Kevin Jackson

  • Kaitlyn Thomas

    I don’t understand how the democratic party could ever allow this kind of cruel law and inhuman treatment of women into our great country. We as Americans have come a long way in the fight of women’s rights and after all the battles we’ve fought and victoriously won and now the democrats vote against banning Sharia Law in Montana. its a shocking reality and a real eye opener of how democrats govern and why they would allow this cruel law against women? In reality, I suspect its all about votes they’re selling our country out and going back to the dark ages!

  • Steve

    Wait til they get a load of the headlines – montana or anywhere “sharia public stoning on private property”. We’ll see how that goes down!

  • Pastor C

    Either we support, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States or Sharia law. We cannot do both. They are, in both principle as well as practice, diametrically-opposed to one another.

    • Dorrie

      I agree, HOWEVER … more than 50 U.S. courts have ruled on the side of Sharia in the past 6 years.

      • Pastor C

        Thanks for the info, Dorrie. I didn’t know that. But since nothing has been done to hold any accountable, it only confirms what I’ve said all along. The American Empire will crumble, at our own hands, from within. We are watching its decimation unfold before our very eyes on every level imaginable. God help us.

        • Dorrie

          ALL empires crumble, and most of them within about 200 years. But you know, as well as I that we are in the last of the last days. Prophecy is coming to pass at an incredible speed.

          • Pastor C

            That, I clearly understand. We are long overdue. It’s just so difficult to witness it occur on our watch. I’ve got 8 grandchildren…but all them, thank God, are saved.

          • Dorrie

            Make sure they STAY saved! I’ve seen numerous Christians commit spiritual suicide, all the while thinking they were “safe.”

            And you’re right about it being difficult to witness. I truly never thought I’d live to see what is happening so quickly now.

  • Grant Woodside

    The more Islam demands and expects
    The more Islam is in the spotlight
    Each time, more and more normal people become aware
    If muhammadians were truly intelligent
    They would shut up and go home
    To a place where the great pervert prophet muhammad
    Will accept their sickness 5 times a day
    And on Special Friday
    You can plan a weekend of fun together
    Of fighting, murdering, raping, each other

    • Mahou Shoujo

      To follow the cult of islam
      On the floor your head you must slam
      Then murder and rape
      like every muslim ape
      When extinct no one will give a dam.

      • Grant Woodside

        That is so funny, priceless
        You may have solved the centuries old mystery
        As to why some Muslims are so friggin stunned
        Slamming their heads repeatedly into hard surfaces
        And to ensure Muhammad’s blessed sickness remains
        They are called 5 times a day
        For more repeated head slamming reinforcement

  • It is all of our duties to push anti islamic bills through with haste. The 1400 year old secret, why we’re afraid of islam, is one of the most informative videos you’ll ever watch on the historical evolution of this cult labeled as religion. Based on the good doctors suggestions, thousands of US citizens have compelled and tried to compel their legislatures to protect them from certain future abuses of muslims against christians here in the USA. It is an inevitable fact that the muslims will abuse the privileges of law, to oppress christians.

  • Mary Seres

    Honestly I think that the Democrats and Democratic party has lost all sense of intelligence, brain matter, or just plain common sense. Why don’t they all go over and take their wives and spend a month or two just driving around and seeing the sights in Saudi Arabia or Iran and then report back to us.
    The Democrats are totally nuts.


      More red blue? Rebloodlicans and Criptocrats unite.

    • SmithWinston6478

      You’re just being nice. It’s more sinister than that.

  • joe1429

    The demorat Gov wont sign it.. Guaranteed… dems need the sharia vote, lol

Pin It on Pinterest