News Ticker >
[ October 19, 2017 ]

UK: Straight-A Muslim student wanted to carry out jihad massacre, bring “taste of immense pain”...

[ October 19, 2017 ]

Boston Herald: “Activist Pamela Geller applauds conviction of her would-be jihadi beheader”

[ October 19, 2017 ]

Public Schools Force Student Participation in “Muslim Submission to Allah” Pilgrimage Simulation

[ October 19, 2017 ]

What really happened at Fort Jackson?

[ October 19, 2017 ]

Hamas-Tied CAIR Conducted “Islamophobia” Sensitivity Training for Philadelphia Teachers

[ October 19, 2017 ]

Spear of Jihad

[ October 19, 2017 ]

Bangladesh Child Marriage: New Law Will ‘Reduce Minimum Marital Age to Zero;’ Critics Say Loophole...

[ October 19, 2017 ]

Canada: Muslim says he tried to murder woman because “I started listening to the Koran”

[ October 19, 2017 ]

French officials gave preferential treatment for public housing to mother of jihad murderer at Toulouse...

[ October 19, 2017 ]

Muslim Citizen of Jewish State: Israel Is not an Apartheid Nation, I’m Proud to Speak...

‘ISIS in America’ Cases on the Rise: Feds Call for Vigilance


Talk about burying the lead.

Way at the bottom of a Reuters story on recent statistics of ISIS-tied prosecutions in America was this tidbit:

“The Department of Justice charged 60 people last year with supporting or committing crimes because of their sympathies to Islamic State, the largest annual figure on record.”

Catch that? “The largest annual figure on record” means the number of ISIS terrorists and ISIS wanna-be terrorists has risen under President Obama, to levels never before seen.

As if for comfort, Reuters then adds this:

“The number arrested this year has been less than last year’s figure.”

But here’s the real question to ask: Why are terrorists and terrorist-wanna-bes sneaking into America and roaming suburban communities in the first place?

Common sense says a combination of open borders and the present administration’s habit of drawing a moral equivalence between America and all-things-Sharia is part of the problem. But U.S. Assistant Attorney General John Carlin, speaking to reporters at the Justice Department this week, seems to suggest the American people might be to blame, at least in part, and the U.S. Constitution, in other part.

Read this, from the same Reuters story:

“U.S. Assistant Attorney General John Carlin said on Monday that more than 110 people have been publicly charged in federal court since late 2013 on counts related to the Islamic State militant group that has overrun much of Syria and Iraq.

“Carlin said the U.S. Justice Department needs the American public to be more proactive about alerting federal authorities when they witness someone showing support for foreign terrorist organizations, such as Islamic State, in remarks to reporters at the U.S. Justice Department.

“In more than 80 percent of the Islamic State cases that have been prosecuted since 2013, someone in the community of the accused person believed they had witnessed the activity for which the person was ultimately charged, according to Carlin. In more than half of those cases, the witnesses did not report anything to law enforcement authorities until after the charges were made.

“Many of the Islamic State supporters prosecuted since 2013 have been charged under ‘material support’ statutes that prohibit supporting designated foreign terrorist organizations … Carlin said he is open to considering whether affiliation with a domestic extremist group could ‘warrant a special penalty’ for people already charged with committing a violent crime. Simply supporting a domestic group where some of the members have committed crimes should not be prosecuted, Carlin said, because it ‘runs into our Constitution and our values.'”

The figures and findings are alarming enough. But read between the lines, and it gets even more alarming. What’s Carlin saying, exactly?

On one hand, it appears he credits the American people with reporting suspicious behaviors, leading to prosecutions of ISIS-tied individuals. But on the other, he’s calling on Americans to be more proactive in reporting suspicious behaviors, while saying the Constitution does not allow for feds to take proactive action themselves.

But this is simply a red herring argument – and one that doesn’t exactly assure the White House is going to fight terrorism in any sort of successful way.

The real problem is this: America’s borders are porous and Obama’s policies are weak. And until those factors are properly addressed, hopefully by the incoming administration, America’s safety from terrorism is far from secured.

Pamela Geller's shocking new book, "FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA" is now available on Amazon. It's Geller's tell all, her story - and it's every story - it's what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

  • Craig

    Feds call for vigilance while simultaneously pushing to destroy Second Amendment to disarm Americans.
    Feds call for vigilance while purchasing machine guns and hollowpoint bullets for DHS to use against Americans.
    Feds call for vigilance while rat obama pushes more unvetted muslims into America.
    Feds call for vigilance while rat obama increases size of his security detail.

    Votes have consequences.

  • Pray Hard

    Feds call for vigilance. The feds are a reeking joke.

  • Mark Steiner

    What disgusts me is the seeming casual way Reuters reported this buried piece. Almost like, “do we really want to include this story in the “snooze”?

    • HaplessChild

      They’re the rat-bast*rds who cut the feed of Mr. Trump at the Black church.
      Herr Goebbels would have been pleased.

  • TexasStomp

    Would that be the same Fed gov’t that opened the flood gates, threatened to prosecute any state that tried to refuse them, and whose president, after letting in a hundred thousand this month is promising to let in hundreds of thousands more?

    When every single member of gov’t FIRES their security guard, uses a personal car or public transportation and walks the same streets we the people walk THEN we’ll talk. Until then they can all go sth and whistle.

  • Mahou Shoujo

    Another reason why the lame stream media is loosing credibility and advertising, soon, it will be losing more readers. As the lame stream media outlets go bankrupt, there will be much rejoicing as the “niche” media who are much more inclined to honesty and neutrality will take over.

    • Dorrie

      Yep, but WHEN! Real journalism in America is DEAD.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        This may take a while, people are used to the advertising of where soap is on sale this week, that is the only thing that keeps the lame stream media going now. As soon as the advertisers realize they are not getting a return on their advertising dollar, they will reallocate it to something that pays.

  • screamingmimi

    I now have a mosque across the street from where I live. Think I’m not a bit leery?

    • kikorikid

      Screw the “bit” part, be totally leery. Mosques are the “Designated”
      refuge of the Mujahideen, Jihadist. They may live, eat,train, and Arm
      from a Mosque. After the “attack” they may return to rest and heal in
      anticipation of the obligatory next attack. 80% of the ‘present-day’
      Mosques in the US have been built since 9/11,

  • AlgorithmicAnalyst

    Ban Muslim immigration …

  • joker

    The bottom line of this whining is that no-one in the U.S.A dared to assassinate the traitor Obama. The Americans can only blame themselves. Obama ought to be the number one target, even before November elections. He has to know the lesson and learn. Well it will be a funeral.

  • Steve

    It sounds like the government telling the people you’re on your own and we aren’t going to help unless you stick your necks out and run the risk of being hassled or worse for “profiling”. I guess the government stands behind us-literally-on this one! Maybe this is one area that needs some budget cutting when trump wins.

Pin It on Pinterest