News Ticker >
[ August 21, 2017 ]

EXCELSIOR! PAYPAL RESTORES AFDI

[ August 21, 2017 ]

Media ignores that Florida cop killer is a Muslim, emphasizes that he’s a former Marine

[ August 21, 2017 ]

PAYPAL SUSPENDS PAMELA GELLER’S ORGANIZATION AFDI

[ August 21, 2017 ]

Officials from largest US Islamic charity promote anti-Semitism on social media

[ August 21, 2017 ]

Barbie BOMB: ISIS Plot To Blow Up Aussie Plane With Barbie Doll Foiled

[ August 21, 2017 ]

Barcelona jihadi Younes Abouyaaqoub ‘shot dead’ by Spanish cops while wearing suicide vest after killing...

[ August 21, 2017 ]

Report: Bannon Urged Trump to Move U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem — Was Blocked by Jewicidal...

[ August 21, 2017 ]

MGM Resorts International will match employees’ donations to “civil rights groups,” including Hamas-CAIR, SPLC, and...

[ August 21, 2017 ]

Robert Spencer: UK Gets Tough On Terror

[ August 21, 2017 ]

KIndergarten children “radicalized” in Belgium

What Is Sharia Law And Why You Should You Be Scared

96

Once again, the Puff Hos carry water for the most vicious and brutal ideology on the face of the earth. Modern Muslima Maryam Khan Ansari, who is identified as an “attorney and writer,” published a ridiculous piece in the Huffington Post Saturday: “What Is Sharia Law And Should You Be Scared? Why is Sharia such a scary word?”

Sharia is a scary word because sharia is scary.

Sharia in the last 24 hours:

Moderate Algerian Christian gets maximum sentence for ‘blasphemy’

Muslim cabdriver “laughed and laughed” as he stabbed shopkeeper to death  for ‘disrespecting the prophet Muhammed’

Armed Muslim gang destroys village over rumours church was being built, “No god but Allah, Christians the enemies of Allah”
Killer of Peaceful Muslim Praised by Supporters in Britain…

EU Muslims Demand Polygamy: ‘Since Gay Marriage is Legal’…

Famed Islamic Preacher Charged with ‘Unlawful Activities’…

CAIR Files Suit for Stewardess Who Put Sharia Before Job…

Austrian Town Mayor: We’ve Reached Our Limit on Muslim Migrant Sex Attacks

Germany Stops Religion of Peace Plot to Attack Soccer Match…


islam democracy

No Muslim country under sharia law is benevolent, just or free. Not one.

Gays being hanged under sharia:

Iran-Gays_Hanging2

Woman being whipped under sharia for standing too close to a man not her husband or father.

christian

60-Year-Old Christian Woman Flogged For Selling Alcohol In Indonesia

charlie-hebdo-crime-scene

The staff of a French weekly slaughtered in their offices for insulting Islam.

garland

Devout Muslims in Texas open fire on a free speech event in violation of Islamic law.

Yes, be afraid.

HuffPo Columnist Lies, Downplays Sharia Law to Make It Acceptable
By Pamela Geller, Breitbart News, August 9, 2016:

Maryam Khan Ansari, who is identified as an “attorney and writer,” published a ridiculous piece in the Huffington Post Saturday: “What Is Sharia Law And Should You Be Scared? Why is Sharia such a scary word?”

Sharia is a scary word because sharia is scary.

The supremacist tenets of sharia law inform the creed apartheid, gender apartheid, Islamic Jew-hatred, codified bigotry, misogyny, free speech prohibitions and homophobia inherent in Islamic law. Sharia is scary because it is punitive, supremacist, racist and misogynist.

But Ansari says it’s scary because “for starters, it’s short and easy to pronounce. When you add the word ‘creeping’ in front of it, it starts to look even creepier. Especially since American people know very little, or nothing, about Islam, according to a Pew Research Poll.” She adds: “The word ‘Sharia Law’ has Americans conjure up images of guys with turbans.”

No, sharia law conjures up the images of girls murdered in honor killings, beheadings, slaughters of gays, non-Muslims, apostates, and secular Muslims, whippings, floggings, amputations, and public hangings commanded in Islamic law. “Guys with turbans”? Hardly.

It further erodes Ansari’s argument that she evokes the Sikhs. Sikhs have been brutally persecuted under the boot of Islam. Her article includes a picture of the actor and fashion designer Waris Ahluwalia, who is not a Muslim and follows a different religion called Sikhism. Waris is Sikh. I repeat, Waris is not Muslim, he is Sikh. But he wears a turban, so for Ansari’s purposes he must be Muslim, and he probably follows Sharia Law. Except that again, he is Sikh, not Muslim.

It gets worse. Ansari goes on: “But wait a minute― does anyone actually know what Sharia Law even is? I’m a lawyer and I’m Muslim, so people think I’m supposed to know Sharia Law. I bet many people probably think I follow it, simply because I’m a Muslim.

So, I thought I’d take the opportunity to set the record straight on Sharia Law. After all, who better to explain it than a Muslim lawyer?”

After that build-up, you would expect her to do what she promised to do: “set the record straight on Sharia Law.” Instead, she says: “I don’t know squat about Sharia Law. I don’t think many Muslims do. Yeah, you heard me. I’m a lawyer, I’m Muslim… And I still couldn’t tell you what Sharia law is all about.”

A Muslim who doesn’t “know squat about Sharia Law” is hardly fit to write about it, let alone attack those who oppose the most brutal and extreme ideology on the face of the earth. Muslims who don’t practice or “know squat” about sharia law are not the problem. Muslims who seek to impose it are the problem. Muslim countries that enforce are the problem.

Maryam Khan Ansari defending Khzir Khan puts her foot in her mouth, because Khan is a longtime proponent of sharia law and knows a lot about it. Journalist Paul Sperry reports:

In 1983, for example, Khan wrote a glowing review of a book compiled from a seminar held in Kuwait called “Human Rights In Islam” in which he singles out for praise the keynote address of fellow Pakistani Allah K. Brohi, a pro-jihad Islamic jurist who was one of the closest advisers to late Pakistani dictator Gen. Zia ul-Haq, the father of the Taliban movement.

Khan speaks admiringly of Brohi’s interpretation of human rights, even though it included the right to kill and mutilate those who violate Islamic laws and even the right of men to “beat” wives who act “unseemly.”

Ansari keeps piling it on: “Sharia Law is a very complicated body of law (imagine, like, a very difficult to understand Tax Code) and it isn’t something that the average Muslim can understand in depth. And like American law, it doesn’t come from just one book. It comes from many different sources. So like American law, only (some) properly trained legal people can make sense of it.”

Nonsense. Everywhere sharia law is practiced, the penalties are the same: stoning for adultery, death for apostasy, amputation of the hand for theft, death for criticism of Islam. Everywhere sharia is implemented. It really isn’t complicated.

Ansari’s second “myth” is: “All Muslims believe in Sharia Law.”

No one believes all Muslims believe in sharia law. If that were the case, no Muslim who sought to impose it should be admitted into the USA. But we do see sharia being imposed here in America – with speech restrictions (under the guise of restrictions on “hate speech”), the Islamization of the public square, the Islamization of the public school, the Islamization of the workplace, and the Islamization/mosqueing of the neighborhood.

Islamic scholars know what sharia is. Islamic theologians know. And when they don’t, they consult Al Azhar scholars – Sunni Islam’s most prestigious institution. One principal English-language source for the content of Islamic law is Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law. Dr. Alan Godlas, Associate Professor of Religion at the University of Georgia, calls it a “carefully translated manual of the proper practice of Islam (shari’a) according to the Shafi’i mad’hab. It has been an essential book in the library of any serious English speaking Muslim or scholar of Islam since its publication in 1991.”

Ansari also insists that Muslims don’t want to impose sharia in the U.S.:

Now, I’m sure there are some crazies out there who want to impose Sharia Law on everyone. There are a lot of crazy people of all races and religions. But just because they’re nuts, it doesn’t mean that they can actually make it happen. In fact, anyone who thinks that Sharia Law will ever take over the U.S. Constitution is a different kind of crazy. And crazy people, while scary, really can’t make the leadership of a country change.

More lies. Muslims fiercely work to impose the blasphemy laws under the sharia. The Muhammad cartoons are the most obvious example. All over the Muslim world, secular thinkers, poets, writers, journalists, bloggers, and cartoonists have been targeted for death because they were critical of Islam. How many Muslims stood with us in Garland, Texas? Zero.

As a modern Muslim woman, Maryam Khan Ansari should work to oppose the most brutal and extreme ideology on the face of the earth and free the millions oppressed, subjugated and slaughtered under the boot of sharia. Instead, she is a slave to it, advancing gruesome, unforgivable lies in order to disarm the American people in the face of the gravest threat to our freedom that we have ever faced.

Pamela Geller is the President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), publisher of PamelaGeller.com and author of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance. Follow her on Twitter here. Like her on Facebook here.

 

  • Mahou Shoujo

    The only freedom a muslim will ever know is after death, or when living in a non muslim civilized country. The criminally insane who proselytize islam are continuing the brutal subhuman ignorance of the demon worshipping founder of the cult. The huffingfarting post is a bidet,with writers like Maryam Khan Ansari, packing douche’ water.
    Allow me to fill in a few gaps in the ignoramus Maryam Khan Ansari”s obvious lack of education or ability to do simple research: BY ROBERT SPENCER
    16 Thirty Shariah Laws That Are Bad For All SocietiesCan Modern Islam Reform Old Islam?
    by James M. Arlandson, Ph.D.
    This list
    of shariah laws is intended to be read by judges, lawyers, legislators, city council members, educators, journalists,government bureaucrats, think tankfellows, TV and radio talk show hosts, and anyone else who occupies the “check points” in society; you initiate the national dialogue and shape the flow of
    the conversation in society. You are the decision and policy makers.
    As intellectuals, you believe the critics of shariah exaggerate (and maybe some
    are guilty of it). They”re just “Islamophobes.” Ignore them. Islam is a
    worldwide religion, after all. It deserves respect.
    You are also thorough relativists who believe in tolerance for all religions, in all their parts. At first glance, this is a commendable outlook.You like what Thomas Jefferson said, “But it does me no injury for my neighbor
    to say there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my legs.”
    It is true that beliefs that do not harm us monetarily or physically should be tolerated. Shariah has positive aspects to it — or, rather, they do no damage in those two ways. Therefore, parts of shariah should be tolerated in a
    religiously diverse society like America.
    The Five Pillars are examples. They are part of shariah —
    divine Islamic law, which traces its origins ultimately back to the Quran (or Koran) and Muhammad’s example or life, the sacred traditions, which were eventually written down in the hadith. None of those five rituals and policies picks ourpockets or breaks our legs, if the five are done privately or in the mosque. Unfortunately, however, this list is not about the harmless parts in shariah, but the ones that are incompatible with the modern era.
    Even Thomas Jefferson had his limits. He sent the marines to take back captured American merchant sailors and to open up the trade routes that were hampered by the Muslim Barbary pirates in North Africa, who had sold the captives into slavery or demanded ransoms.
    Do the elites have any limits? In some cases, a religion does indeed pick our pockets and break our legs.
    Each item in the list has one or more back-up articles. Readers should click on them to find out that the thirty points come right out of original Islam and are not invented out of thin air. Each back up also has a section on modern Islam, mentioning Muslims — too few — who advocate reform. And if readers would like to see various
    translations of the Quran, they may go to the website quranbrowser.com and type in the references. If readers are in doubt about the meaning of a verse, they may go to the tafsir (commentary) written by Ibn Kathir (d. 1373), one of the most authoritative and highly regarded classical commentators in the Sunni world, at qtafsir.com; or the readers may search through the modern commentary by Sunni Indo-Pakistani religious scholar and politician Sayyid Abul A”la Maududi(d. 1979) at englishtafsir.com.
    Political Islam
    Punishments
    Marital,
    Domestic, and Women’s Issues
    Conclusion
    Political
    Islam
    1. The mosque and state are not separate.To this day, Islamic nations that
    are deeply rooted in shariah, like Iran and Saudi Arabia, do not adequately separate the two realms, giving a lot of power to courts and councils to ensure that legislation does not contradict the Quran (never mind whose interpretation). Most of the laws listed below come from this confusion.
    Back-up article:Mosque
    and State
    2. Jihad may be waged against injustice or an unjust nation, as Islam defines the terms. Classical texts say Islam is justice, and no Islam is injustice. Therefore, a “just war” can be waged against a nation or people who do not
    submit to Islam. Yet we are told in the 1990 Cairo Declaration of Human Rights, which is based on shariah, that humane rules must be followed (Article Three)
    Does that article offer hope that modern Islam can move past old Islam? Maybe.
    However, the Quran, sacred traditions, classical law, and historical Islam contradict or balance out some elements in Article Three.
    Would there be a conflict between the old Islam and modern Islam, if war broke out? Many Islamic clerics issue fatwas
    (religious rulings) to wage jihad.
    Back-up articles: Jihad and Qital and The Early Muslim Community and the Sword.
    3. Jihad may be waged to spread Islam and force conversions — a holy war. Waging jihad to spread Islam and force conversions is a perfect description of “holy war.” See Quran 8:39, 9:5, 9:11-12, 9:14, and 9:29; and then see 9:33; 61:9
    and 48:28. Yet, we have been told for many years now that holy wars and forced conversions were never done in Islam. That’s a myth imagined by Westerners. However, read those verses and click on the back-up articles:
    Back-up
    articles: Jihad and Qital,
    The Mission of Muhammad and the Sword, and The Early Muslim Community.
    4. A captive in jihad may be executed, enslaved, ransomed for money, exchanged for
    other prisoners, or released freely. Quran 47:4 and 33:25-27, 4:24 says those things (and the last option — free release — is positive). Yet we are told that in a jihad today everything must
    be done humanely and justly. However, the back-up article, this fourth item, and the next four items in this list balance out that claim. Would there be a conflict between old Islam and modern Islam, if war broke out?
    Back-up
    articles: Jihad and Qital and Slavery
    5. A
    woman captive of jihad may be forced to have to sex with her captors (now
    owners).
    Quran 4:24 and
    especially the sacred traditions and classical law allow this. The sacred traditions
    say that while out on military campaigns under Muhammad’s leadership, jihadists used to practice coitus interruptus with their female captives. Women soldiers fighting terrorists today must be forewarned of the danger.
    Back-up
    articles: Jihad and Qital and Slavery
    6. Property can be destroyed or confiscated during jihad. Quran 59:2 and 59:5 discuss those rules. Sacred traditions and classical law expand on the Quranic verses. Modern Islamic law officially improves on the Quran: see Article Three of the 1990 Cairo Declaration of Human Rights, which is nonetheless based on shariah, but it outlaws wanton destruction of property. Would there be any conflict between old Islam and modern Islam in a war today?
    Back-up
    articles: Jihad and Qital and The Quran and the Sword
    7. Jihad may be waged to collect spoils. Quran 8:1, 8:7, 8:41, and 48:20 show this clearly. Early
    Islam followed the old Arab custom of raiding caravans, but as its military grew, the raids were elevated to jihad. The spoils of war were coveted. Which Islam would prevail in a war today — the old one or the modern one?
    Back-up
    articles: Jihadand Qital and The Quran and the Sword
    8. A second-class submission tax, called the jizyah, must be imposed on Jews and Christians (and other religious minorities) living in Islamic countries.
    Quran 9:29
    offers three options to Jews and Christians: (1) Fight and die; (2) convert to Islam; (3) or keep their religion, but pay a tribute or submission tax, the jizyah, whileliving under Islam. In Islamic history, vanquished Jews and Christians became known as dhimmis. This word appears in Quran 9:8 and 9:10, meaning a “treaty” or “oath,” but it can also mean those who are “condemned” “reviled” or “reproved” (Quran 17:18, 17:22; 68:49). The word “submission” in Quran 9:29 can also be translated as “humiliation,” “utterly humbled,” “contemptible” or “vile.” It can mean “small” as opposed to “great.” Islamic nations today still seek to impose this second-class religion tax. Back-up
    articles: Jihad and Qital and The Quran and the Sword
    9. Slavery is allowed. It is true that freeing slaves was done in original Islam (Quran 5:89 and 24:33), and the Quran says to be kind to slaves (Quran 4:36), but that is not the entire story. In addition to those verses, Quran 4:24, 23:1-7; 33:52 allow the institution. Muhammad owned slaves, even one who was black (so says a sacred tradition). He was militarily and politically powerful during his later life in Medina, but he never abolished slavery as an institution.
    Officially, Islamic nations have outlawed slavery (Article 11, which is still based on shariah). That proves Islam can reform on at least one matter. Can it reform on the other shariah laws? And we are told that “no other nation or religious group in the world treated slaves better than the Muslims did.” The back-up article and next two items in this list contradict that claim. The legacy of slavery still runs deep in Islamic countries even today.
    Back-up article: Slavery
    10. A male owner may have sex with his slave-women, even prepubescent slave-girls. See Quran 4:24 and 23:1-7; but it is classical law that permits sex with prepubescent slave girls and describes them as such. Some Muslim
    religious leaders and others still advocate this practice, taking the slaves as concubines (though sex with prepubescent slave-girls is another matter).
    Back-up article: Slavery 11. Slaves may be beaten. That’s what sacred traditions and classical laws say. See Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism, and Slavery
    Back-up article: Slavery
    12. Apostasy laws, including imprisonment or execution, may be imposed on anyone who leaves
    Islam (an apostate). Normally this is a prescribed punishment, but it is also
    political, since it is about freedom of religion. Surprisingly the Quran does not cover punishing apostates down here on earth, though in the afterlife they will be punished. Does this modern Islam can reform old Islam? Quran 4:88-89,
    9:73-74, and 9:123, read in that sequence, might deal with earthly punishments. Mainly, however, the sacred traditions and classical law permit harsh treatment for anyone who leaves Islam.
    Islamic courts and laws still impose these punishments today, or religious scholars today argue for the law.
    Back-up article: Freedom of Religion
    13. Blasphemy laws, including imprisonment or execution, may be imposed on critics of Islam
    or Muhammad. These verses should be read in historical sequence, for they show that as Islam’s military power increased, the harsh treatment of mockers and critics also intensified, as follows: Quran 3:186, 33:57-61, 9:61-66, 9:73
    and 9:123. Sacred traditions, classical laws, and historical Islam are unambiguous about the punishments, recording the people, often their names, who were assassinated for mocking Muhammad and the Quran.
    Islamic nations and pockets of Islam in non-Muslim countries still impose these punishments
    today.
    Back-up article: Free Speech
    Punishments
    14. Drinkers and gamblers may be flogged. Quran 2:219, 4:43, and 5:90-91, in that sequence, show that
    Islam gradually prohibited alcohol. The last passage also prohibits “gaming” of sorts. The sacred traditions and classical law discuss punishing gamblers and alcoholics. One tradition says to execute unrepentant alcoholics who do not stop. But usually drinkers were flogged forty or eighty times, with garments, palm branches, or sandals in early Islam. Islamic countries can impose these punishments today, or religious and legal scholars still argue for it.
    Back-up article: Muhammad, the Quran, and Prohibition
    15. An injured plaintiff (a private citizen) has the options of forgiving or exacting legal and literal revenge — physical eye for physical eye. Categorized as qisas (like for like), Quran 5:45 is the main verse (and see 2:187-189). Sacred traditions and classical laws spell out which punishments should be inflicted on which offences. Islamic courts, depending on which way the plaintiff directs, today may ask a doctor to surgically remove an eye or disfigure the
    face or body in some other way. Currently, qisas can be applied to children in Iran.The whole purpose of courts is to remove the punishment of wrongs and injuries from the plaintiffs who are private citizens; otherwise, blood feuds and personal revenge make punishments uneven — never mind excessive. Back-up article: Law of Retaliation
    16. The hand of a male or female thief may be cut off. Quran 5:38 imposes this punishment. The traditions and classical law clarify that the theft has to be a valuable item; or mutilation might not be inflicted during a famine,
    But amputation is still done today in Islamic countries and argued for by religious leaders or legal scholars to understand it as if it is still valid. Back-up article: Thieves, Give Muhammad a Hand!
    17. A highway robber may be crucified or his alternate hand and foot cut off.
    Quran 5:33 permit these punishments. Yes, from that verse other punishments can be inflicted, but the point here is that execution for first-degree murder with aggravated circumstances is one thing, but mutilation and crucifixion is excessive. Some Islamic nations can still impose them today, or religious and legal scholars still argue for understanding the punishments, as if they are still valid. Back-up article: Crucifixion and Mutilation
    18.
    Homosexuals may be imprisoned, flogged, or executed. Surprisingly, the Quran is not all that clear on this subject, but the traditions and classical laws are. Islamic nations to this day still impose those punishments, and
    religious leaders still argue for harsh punishments. Back-up article: Homosexuality
    19.
    Fornicators may be flogged. Quran 24:2 says this. The hadith and classical laws can impose additional penalties like exile of the male for a year. Modern Islamic nations still inflict this penalty, and religious or legal scholars still argue for it.
    Back-up article: Adultery and Fornication
    20.
    Adulterers may be stoned to death. The verse that says to stone adulterers to death went
    missing from the Quran, so says Umar, a companion of Muhammad and the second caliph (ruled 634-644). But he left no doubt that this penalty was done under Muhammad’s direction, and the sacred traditions and classical laws confirm it. But a few rules of evidence must be followed, like confession of the adulterer
    or four eyewitnesses. In some interpretations of the law, if a woman is raped, but cannot produce four just and pious men who witnessed it, then she is slandering the alleged rapist (or gang rapists) — never mind that the four just and pious eyewitnesses did nothing to stop it, but stood there and watched it. Some modern Islamic nations still do this, and religious and legal scholars argue for it.Back-up article: Adultery and Fornication
    21.
    False accusers of sexual crimes may be flogged eighty times. Quran 24:1-4 speak of corporal punishment for sexual sins. Verse 4 says that if an accuser cannot produce four eyewitnesses to corroborate his accusation, then he will be flogged (see Quran 24:13). Some modern Islamic nations can still impose the penalty for slander, and religious scholars still argue for it. Back-up article: Adultery and Fornication Marital, Domestic, and Women’s Issues
    Quran 2:228 and 4:34 states that mankind is superior to womankind in a variety of legal and domestic
    contexts. Quran 2:223 says wives are fields, and their husbands can go into them whenever and however they
    like. How does this inferiority work out in the law and society? 22. A woman inherits half what a man does. Quran 4:11 says it, and the hadith (traditions) and classical law confirm it. Modern Islamic nations still do this, and religious leaders still argue for it.
    Back-up article: Women’s Status and Roles
    23. A woman’s testimony in a court of law counts half of a man’s testimony, since she
    might “forget.” Quran 2:282 says it in the context of business law. But the hadith (traditions) explains that
    women’s minds are deficient; classical law expands this curtailment to other areas than business.Modern Islamic nations still do this, and religious scholars still argue for it.Back-up article: Women’s Status and Roles
    24. A man may legally and irrevocably divorce his wife, outside of a court of law, by correctly pronouncing three times “you are divorced.” Quran 2:229 says
    this, and the traditions and classical law explain and confirm it. A judge in a modern Islamic country will ensure that the husband did not speak from a fit of irrational rage (anger is okay) or intoxication, for example. Then the court
    will validate the divorce, not daring to overturn it, since the Quran says so. Sometimes this homemade and irrevocable divorce produces a lot of regret in the couple and manipulation from the husband in Islam today.
    Back-up article: Divorce and Remarriage
    25. A wife may remarry her ex-husband if and only if she marries another man, has sex
    with him, and then this second man divorces her. Quran 2:230 says this, and the traditions and classical law confirm it. Supposedly, this rule is designed to prevent easy divorce (see the previous point), but it produces a lot of pain, in Muslims today.
    Back-uparticle: Divorce and Remarriage
    26. Husbands may hit their wives. Quran 4:34 says it, and the traditions and classical law confirm it. There is a sequence of steps a husband follows before he can hit her, but not surprisingly this rule creates all sorts of abuse and confusion in Islamic society today. Back-up article: Domestic Violence
    27. A man may be polygamous with up to four wives. Quran 4:3 (and 33:50-52) allow this, but only if a man can take care of them. The traditions and classical law confirm it. Modern Muslims still push for this old marital arrangement even in the USA, and many Islamic nations still allow it. But some Muslims are fighting polygamy. The hadith (traditions) paints a picture of Muhammad’s household that was full of strife between the wives. Back-up article: Polygamy
    28. A man may simply get rid of one of his “undesirable” wives. Quran 4:128 says this. The traditions say about the verse that the wife whom Muhammad wanted to get rid of was “huge” and “fat.” She gave up her turn to his favorite
    girl-bride Aisha. He kept the corpulent wife. There is heartbreak in Islam today. Back-up article: Polygamy
    29. A mature man may marry a prepubescent girl.Quran 65:1-4, particularly verse 4, assumes, but does not command, the practice. The hadith says Aisha was six years old when she was engaged to Muhammad (he was in his fifties), and their marriage was consummated when she was nine. The hadith indicate she was prepubescent at nine. She never did bear him any children. Classical law says a father may give away his prepubescent daughter, but she also has a few rights.
    Officially many Islamic nations have raised the legal marriage age, but pockets in the Islamic
    world still follow this old custom. The Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia okays marriage to ten-year-old girls. Work
    is still needed to be done for the rights of girl brides, particularly for their sexual health. Back-up article: Marriage to Prepubescent Girls
    30. A woman must wear a head covering and maybe a facial veil, according to sound traditions and authoritative classical law. Quran 24:31, 33:53 and 33:59 are not as clear about the veil as one might first think. The verses say to dress modestly, but should the head be covered or just the neckline? What about the face (except the eyes)? Thus, modern Muslims are now in a big debate over the veil. However, the traditions and classical law are clearer than the Quran: the veil over the face (except the eyes).

    Respected Quran scholars in the past interpreted verse 4:34 with impressive candor. Tabari said that it means to “admonish them, but if they refused to repent, then tie them up in their homes and beat them until they obey Allah’s commands toward you.” Qurtubi told wife-beaters to avoid breaking bones, if possible, but added that “it is not a crime if it leads to death.” (source)
    Muslim (4:1039) – “A’isha said [to Muhammad]: ‘You have made us equal to the dogs and the asses'” These are the words of Muhammad’s favorite wife, complaining of the role assigned to women under Islam.

    • lato_sensu
    • Honkingoose.

      Fantastic info. Anyone who can read that and still want sharia needs the ‘tres haute vitesse’ 9mm mineral injection therapy.

      Like the new avatar btw.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        If more people knew what shari’a is, they would beat everyone proposing it with a stick. My avatar sort of describes me, minus the rack. Anthracite blond, oriental tan upholstery.

    • Robert Batchelor

      Excellent article! I actually learned something from your article. Can’t say the same for the supposed Muslim lawyer above.

      • Toro Huaman

        fear is not a good adviser in front of islam and sharia, as mamma merkel said. About 1% of the US population is already muslim. Just the last month two thousands of muslim refugees have entered the USA, and they don’t even know what sharia is. They just want to live in USA according to the goals of islam and teachings of mohammad

        • Craig

          All we want to do is arrange the meeting for them and their”allah”. So…it all works out. Eat some more pig, Toro.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        Any muslim presenting a “professional” qualification has to be checked out very carefully, as what passes for an education in islamic countries is a photocopy of a forgery in the real world.

    • Steve

      Thank you! You put aa lot of effort into this and I will have to read more of it tonight instead of trying while I’m at work.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        It will be easier to prevent islamification, then cure it.

        • lato_sensu

          Charles the Hammer

          • Mahou Shoujo

            Charlie Martel, “The Hammer” had the right idea when dealing with muslims. He did not use flowers to drive the muslims off the property.

          • lato_sensu

            20,000 Turkish bodies displayed on stakes on the road to Targoviste put Ottoman Sultan Mehmed II retreating back to Constantinople.

          • Mahou Shoujo

            When dealing with muslims, one must use language they understand.

    • aebe

      Islamites would have the world as its dog and pony show .

  • lato_sensu

    she says: “I don’t know squat about Sharia Law.
    well here is all you need to know – islamcomicbook.com – believe it or else – page 15 will help you ‘wash’ it down

    • Mahou Shoujo

      For allegedly a lawyer and muslim she is dumb as a stump.

      • lato_sensu
        • Mahou Shoujo

          Not ulike muslim lawyers.

          • lato_sensu

            all the ‘good’ muslims are dead —

          • Mahou Shoujo

            All dead ones are good.

          • lato_sensu

            good and dead —
            Muhammad…
            A cask by losing centre-piece or cant
            Was never shattered so, as I saw one
            Rent from the chin to where one breaketh wind.
            Between his legs were hanging down his entrails;
            His heart was visible, and the dismal sack
            That maketh excrement of what is eaten.

          • Mahou Shoujo

            That is the only way of getting some people to accept a differing opinion.

  • Honkingoose.

    Sharia is only for antisocial undemocratic thugs and criminals and backward inbreeds who seek validation for their urges to murder and rape and justification for their inbred regressive tribalism.

    We don’t want that putrescence here in civilisation. The reason so many lesser cultures are desperate to come to western countries is BECAUSE we don’t have the shatrina here and our countries are better than where they come from.

    How many Canadians Australians Americans Swedes French etc are moving TO Pakistan Somalia Morocco Afghanistan or Syria??? NONE! And there’s the pudding in which the proof resides. Our way is far far better in many demonstrable ways…health, education, welfare outcomes, life expectancy, average wealth, car ownership….The sharia is vile backward antiquated and anachronistic.

    • Toro Huaman

      fear is not a good adviser in front of islam and sharia, as mamma merkel said. As deportation of mexicans will rise, immigration of legal muslim labor will increase. About 1% of the US population is already muslim. Just the last month two thousands of muslim refugees have entered the USA, and they don’t even know what sharia is. They just want to live in USA according to the goals of islam and teachings of mohammad

      • wilypagan

        Who cares what they want? They will be gone soon enough. Americans are tired of sacrificing our liberties because you savages aren’t fit to live in a civilized society. All islam brings is oppression and death. You have been dying in your own countries by the millions. Expect it to accelerate as your “lions” (actually little pussy cats) mass murder more innocents. The patience of the civilized world is not unlimited.

        • Steve

          One way or another they will be gone. If Trump doesn’t get in to fix the problem the people will fix it. The true islamists will be dealt with by the people.

          • IzlamIsTyranny

            There’s no such thing as an “islamist” it’s a made-up word like islamophobia and both words are designed to obfuscate the fact islum is a totalitarian, fascist ideology.

        • Mahou Shoujo

          The swine of islam will devour each other. The applause will be heard around the planet.

          • Ron Cole

            Perhaps Satan will be happy then.

          • Mahou Shoujo

            That is why they exist, to appease their weak crazy demon.

      • Craig

        Toro the pig eater, you forgot that muslims want to rape, rob and murder in the United States as well as instill sharia. Well, goat-screwing Toro, that may work in the big cities, but in the west, we all carry firearms and will GLADLY arrange a visit with their “allah” just as quickly as possible.

      • sophiepeaches

        Not if we can help it. The most retrograde force on the planet, indeed. A seventh century death cult that has NO place among civilized people.

    • Steve

      Hell, you can’t even drink a beer in one of their taxis or bring a seeing eye dog without risking peril. it’s f****** culture clash at the max with islamists. All these little things will continue to add up until everything in our society that is western will be subjugated to this backwards barbarian culture.

  • conan_drum

    Who reads the Huffington rag? They have even published an article blaming terrorism on islamofauxbia by Christians

    • Mahou Shoujo

      Brain dead liberals read the huffarting post, as they are about as smart as a post to start with.

  • Drew the Infidel

    Since sharia is contrary to the US Constitution several states have passed legislation specifically banning its use in court cases, civil and criminal. It may be more closely compared with cancer, about which there are no positive attributes.

  • teutonicman

    What will be that slave to Islam’s comeback to Pams fine article here be I wonder?
    Oh yes, I forgot the muslima must ask cair what to write, think, how to dress etc. first.

  • lajaw

    All Muslims desire to live under Sharia law. Muslim terrorists are not
    hijacking Islamic Sharia law when they engage in jihad. They are
    executing it. Nor are they twisting the foundational principles of Islam
    as codified in each and every authoritative Islamic source. They are exemplifying it.

  • Midniterider

    Muzlims can have ALL the sharia BS they can stomach IN THEIR OWN COUNTRIES,where they are cordially invited to stay.
    DON’T try to impose that load of horseshiite on “We the People” cuz it’s gonna end badly,and not for “We the People”.
    mohammed was a lying,thieving,murdering,misogynist baby raper.ANYTHING to do with his BS so-called “religion” is giving place to satan his very own self.
    Semper Fi
    http://www.silverbulletgunoil.net

  • shashumna

    Sharia has literally murdered and killed hundreds of millions. Pamela Geller is a warrior in every nobel sense of the word, and she has more then earned our deepest gratitude. Thank you Lady Geller for this excellent post and all you do.

  • Michael Copeland

    SHARIA LAW.

    WHAT IS IT?

    Stoning, flogging, amputation,
    Schoolgirl genital mutilation,
    Shootings in public, and hangings too,
    The slitting of captives’ throats to view.

    No freedom of conscience or freedom of speech,
    Beheading for blasphemy happens for each.
    Those who defect may be openly killed
    By anyone else, and the law is fulfilled.

    and more…..

    See “Your Easy Guide to Sharia Law” at LibertyGB
    http://www.libertygb.org.uk/news/your-easy-guide-sharia-law

    • lato_sensu

      islamcomicbook.com believe it or else

  • Michael Copeland

    .Impose Sharia Law on All Mankind – I.S.L.A.M.
    “Non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules …
    they are forbidden … to ring church bells or display crosses”,
    Manual of Islamic Law, “Reliance of the Traveller”, o11.5(6).
    The Manual is available as a free download.

  • accipehoc2016

    eliminate or deport as many as possible/ closely watch the rest/ avoid at all times

  • Fred

    Hey savages- take your sharia out of MY COUNTRY and go hump a goat with it.

    Death to sharia and death to radical Islam!

    • Toro Huaman

      It’s their country too. Muslims are US citizens and legal immigrants

      • Fred

        GF YOURSELF. Better yet, you’re used to a goat

        death to sharia!

        Anyone tries to impose that crap on me would be making a huge mistake.

        There is one only GOD and his Son is Jesus Christ.

        • Craig

          Yes, not some child-raping lying sadistic turd called Muhammad.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        And you are still an idiot.

        • Ron Cole

          To paraphrase my hunting camp cook Bubber,
          “An idiot is an idiot is an idiot”.

          • Mahou Shoujo

            One thing about that particular idiot, is consistency.

      • lato_sensu

        so you just can not wait to hump your dead mommy —

    • lato_sensu

      would that be a live or dead goat? or would it prefer a dead mommy –
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Er5IHO5oQTw

  • Toro Huaman

    fear is not a good adviser in front of islam and sharia, as mamma merkel said. About 1% of the US population is already muslim. Every month two thousands of muslim refugees enter the USA, and they don’t even know what sharia is. They just want to live in USA according to the goals of islam and teachings of mohammad

    • Craig

      Crawl back into your goat-turd filled hole, scum Toro. You can’t even spell your child-raping prophets name correctly, it’s Muhommad. You are a lying moron fake. ESAD.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        It used to be “Morehammered” until the feds broke up his whisky still.

    • Mahou Shoujo

      Live according to islam, die according to decency.

      • Ron Cole

        Speaking of decency I am not sure that your new avatar will work for my beddy bye sleep aid.

        • Mahou Shoujo

          O all right… back by popular demand…

    • lato_sensu

      you have had to much camel pee —
      http://islamcomicbook.com/15.htm

  • Abeland Solomon

    New Article; Sharia and Human Rights

    Here is a direct comparison between the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the relevant provisions of Sharia Law, Article by Article.

    1. Article One declares that all human beings are free and equal, but Sharia recognizes and condones slavery, for example, (K2:221) “A slave…is better than a free unbeliever..” and it also denies equality as in (K4:34) which says “men are in charge of women…”, Ibn Kathir’s commentary on the Koran explains; “Men are superior to women, and a man is better than a woman”.

    2. The Second Artcile states that there should be no discrimination against anyone on grounds of status, but Sharia discriminates on many bases, religion, gender, sexual preferences; for example under Sharia charities must not help non-Muslims and must donate some to fund jihad (K28:86; “never be a helper to the unbelievers”/ “Umdat al Salik; Reliance of the Traveller” H8.7,H8.17,H8.24).

    3. The right to life, liberty and security is also negated by provisions of Sharia, being gay is subject to a death sentence pursuant to the rule (HAD 38:4447-8) “kill the one who does it, and the one to whom it is done”. The Sharia crimes of leaving Islam and blasphemy, which include criticizing the religion, the Prophet, or Allah, also give rise to the punishment of death.

    Read more here;- http://abelandsolomon.simplesite.com/424567656

  • marblegranite

    Do you want to re-institute slavery? Repeal the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution by imposing sharia.

    • Steve

      Its incredible how the black population is being taken in by this leftist criminal gang of socialists that pretend their allegiance and that have been infiltrated by the islamists for the very purpose of imposing sharia not only on blacks but on all of us in the west!

  • Mahou Shoujo

    Maryam Khan Ansari is a fine example of a practicing muslim. What more people need is to see are these “muslims” describing the life and crimes of being a brain dead submissive islamic dork.

  • Steve

    The true islamists will be dealt with by the people.

    Islamist is defined by several sources including http://www.thefreedictionary.c
    http://dictionary.cambridge.or

    and some are even trying to control us with pc including the media –

    http://www.slate.com/blogs/the

    I wonder why they would try to limit the truth?

  • amongoose

    Paris, San Bernardino, Orlando, London 7/7, WTC 911, Fort Hood, Chattanooga, and the list goes on and on.
    I think we know all we need to know about the “religion of peace”.

  • All 1252 pages of Umdat al-Salik may be downloaded as a no-cost PDF from http://www.ieproject.org/projects/shariamanual.html

    This site is an excellent source for no-nonsense direct and factual data exposing the lies of islamaphiles, presented in a visual style and language that even your grandchildren will be able to easily assimilate and comprehend.

    I have The RoT on DropBox so it’s with me wherever I go . . . so, just dare to call me an islamaphobe, any of you ignorant peasant dhimmiwits!!!

    Hard copy still available ex Amazon for <$30.

    [PS] Unfortunately, unless one can read Arabic even this manual, as translated, is suspect, as it is a translation basically for Western Scholars, and subject to the deception of kitman.

    http://gatesofvienna.net/2015/05/addendum-to-the-reliance-of-the-traveler/

  • aebe

    Nope , no sharia . Our Constitution is in little enough use , as it is .

  • LightMirror

    Pamela, this is why we should REALLY be scared —-
    “How Israel’s Partisans [Geller and other rabid neocon followers of Israel, otherwise known as Israel-firsters] Have Worked to Create Fear and Hatred of Muslims” See:
    http://www.ifamericansknew.org/media/islamo.html

  • LightMirror

    According to Geller and Zionist indoctrination for America, Sharia Law teaches Palestinian parents to hate their own children —-

  • LightMirror

    According to Geller and Zionist indoctrination, Islam teaches the killing of all ‘infidels’ and the supremacy of Islam. Here, in the Ashtiname of Muhammad, a charter ratified by the prophet Muhammad, he grants protection and other privileges to Christian monks of St. Catherines —-

  • LightMirror

    According to Geller and Zionist indoctrination, Islam is antithetical to exceptional achievement and making contributions to society, such as those of Dr. Ahmed Zewail, who died Aug. 3, 2016.

  • AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ 2016

    ALL Women should learn how to please their arranged marriage husband,.. oddly Women are not allowed to learn under Sharia !!!

  • AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ 2016

    Sharia has other benefits as well !!!
    SHhhhhh ….. it’s a secret that only Liberals know !

  • Behind every blade of grass!

    This is the problem .. we are allowing this muslim traitor in the WH to bring in people who 1st. could care less about America or her culture. Secondly, practices under Sharia law that has no place in America Thirdly, are not nor, will they ever be aligned with this country, its culture, it people!! SO WHY ARE WE ALLOWING something into this country that 99.9% of the people don’t understand nor should they be forced to understand since, these people have no business on our soil, PERIOD!!

Pin It on Pinterest