News Ticker >
[ October 16, 2017 ]

More London TERROR: One Dead, 2 Wounded in Stabbing ANOTHER Attack at Parsons Green Station

[ October 16, 2017 ]

WATCH The Milo Show: Pamela Geller Under Fatwa

[ October 16, 2017 ]

Traitor Hailed As American Hero By Obama Administration Pleads Guilty To Desertion

[ October 16, 2017 ]

Shut Up or Die

[ October 16, 2017 ]

Hugh Fitzgerald: Erdogan and Kurdish Independence

[ October 16, 2017 ]

Exclusive: Man who knew Garland jihadi Nadir Soofi says “he took his religion very seriously”

[ October 16, 2017 ]

New Jersey Muslim GUILTY ON ALL 8 COUNTS in New York City Jihad Bombing

[ October 16, 2017 ]

Las Vegas: The profile of older converts to Islam, “Salafism is most attractive to new...

[ October 16, 2017 ]

‘Un-Islamic’: Pakistan Senate body rejects bill seeking ban on child marriage

[ October 16, 2017 ]

Muslim Accused of Rape Said ‘Allah’s Going to Get You’

US LOST TRACK of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of guns in Iraq and Afghanistan

14

Your taxpayer dollars, arming those who have vowed to destroy us.

jihadis in USAid tent

“How Many Guns Did the U.S. Lose Track of in Iraq and Afghanistan? Hundreds of Thousands.,” by C. J. Chivers, New York Times, August 24, 2016:

…Since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the United States has handed out a vast but persistently uncountable quantity of military firearms to its many battlefield partners in Afghanistan and Iraq. Today the Pentagon has only a partial idea of how many weapons it issued, much less where these weapons are. Meanwhile, the effectively bottomless abundance of black-market weapons from American sources is one reason Iraq will not recover from its post-invasion woes anytime soon….

In all, Overton found, the Pentagon provided more than 1.45 million firearms to various security forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, including more than 978,000 assault rifles, 266,000 pistols and almost 112,000 machine guns. These transfers formed a collage of firearms of mixed vintage and type: Kalashnikov assault rifles left over from the Cold War; recently manufactured NATO-standard M16s and M4s from American factories; machine guns of Russian and Western lineage; and sniper rifles, shotguns and pistols of varied provenance and caliber, including a large order of Glock semiautomatic pistols, a type of weapon also regularly offered for sale online in Iraq.

Many of the recipients of these weapons became brave and important battlefield allies. But many more did not. Taken together, the weapons were part of a vast and sometimes minimally supervised flow of arms from a superpower to armies and militias often compromised by poor training, desertion, corruption and patterns of human rights abuses. Knowing what we know about many of these forces, it would have been remarkable for them to retain custody of many of their weapons. It is not surprising that they did not.

As an illustration of how haphazard the supervision of this arms distribution often was, last week, five months after being asked by The New York Times for its own tally of small arms issued to partner forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, the Pentagon said it has records for fewer than half the number of firearms in the researchers’ count — about 700,000 in all. This is an amount, Overton noted, that “only accounts for 48 percent of the total small arms supplied by the U.S. government that can be found in open-source government reports.”…

One point is inarguable: Many of these weapons did not remain long in government possession after arriving in their respective countries. In one of many examples, a 2007 Government Accountability Office report found that 110,000 Kalashnikov assault rifles and 80,000 pistols bought by the United States for Iraq’s security forces could not be accounted for — more than one firearm for every member of the entire American military force in Iraq at any time during the war. Those documented lapses of accountability were before entire Iraqi divisions simply vanished from the battlefield, as four of them did after the Islamic State seized Mosul and Tikrit in 2014, according to a 2015 Army budget request to buy more firearms for the Iraqi forces to replace what was lost.

These spectacular losses were on top of the more gradual drain that many veterans of the wars watched firsthand — including such scams as Afghan National Army recruits showing up for training and disappearing after rifles were issued. They were leaving, soldiers suspected, to sell their weapons. On the outposts where American troops and Afghan and Iraqi units worked together, the local units were often a fraction of their reported strength and dwindled as ever more national police officers or soldiers disappeared or deserted, vanishing with their firearms. The American arming of Syrian rebels, by both the Central Intelligence Agency and the Defense Department, has also been troubled by questions of accountability and outright theft in a war where the battlefield is thick with jihadists aligned with Al Qaeda or fighting under the banner of the Islamic State.

The recipients were often manifestly corrupt and sometimes had close ties to the same militias and insurgents who were trying to drive out the United States and make sure its entire nation-building project did not stand. It should not have been a surprise that American units in disaffected provinces and neighborhoods, and their partners, could encounter gunfire at every turn.

The procession of arms purchases and handouts has continued to this day, with others involved, including Iran to its allies in Iraq and various donors to Kurdish fighters. In March, Russia announced that it had given 10,000 Kalashnikov assault rifles to Afghanistan, already one of the most Kalashnikov-saturated places on earth. If an analysis from the United States’ Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, or Sigar, is to be believed, Afghanistan did not even need them. In 2014 the inspector general reported that after the United States decided to replace the Afghan Army’s Kalashnikovs with NATO-standard weapons (a boon for the rifles’ manufacturer with a much less obvious value for an already amply armed Afghan force), the Afghan Army ended up with a surplus of more than 83,000 Kalashnikovs. The United States never tried to recover the excess it had created, giving the inspector general’s office grounds for long-term worry. “Without confidence in the Afghan government’s ability to account for or properly dispose of these weapons,” it noted, “Sigar is concerned that they could be obtained by insurgents and pose additional risks to civilians.”…

Pamela Geller's shocking new book, "FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA" is now available on Amazon. It's Geller's tell all, her story - and it's every story - it's what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

  • dba_vagabond_trader

    Don’t worry, they will compensate by grabbing those belonging to we the people.

    • Ruger 1

      They Can Try….. But it Won’t End Well for Them!!!!

  • The real and only Toedeladoki

    CRISIS: Internet to Have Global Governance October 1. Call Congress!

    Better Censorship for Tyrants

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8807/internet-governance

    bvgfrtyuhjnmklo

  • Mahou Shoujo

    That is a nice convienient excuse, like “the dog ate my homework” the white mosque knows exactly where what went and to who.

  • Dr. Doomsay

    Obama, working hard for the other side.. Treaso.. oh I mean: Change you can believe in!

  • Mahou Shoujo

    This same gaggles of democrat dhimmi think they can control guns in America, which has a functioning society and law enforcement? They couldn’t find their collective assss with both hands and a borrowed flashlight.

  • conan_drum

    I always thought that the one thing the military were good at was keeping records!

    • Ruger 1

      @conan_drum…..Not under obama’s watch!!! He has no problem Arming His Fellow MudSlims!!!!

  • Drew the Infidel

    Obhammud and his acolytes flood the world stage with weaponry yet talk of ending private ownership in the US? During WWII the Japanese high command was toying with the idea of an amphibious invasion of the US West Coast. Admiral Yamamoto warned them, “There will be a gun behind every blade of grass.” The idea was abandoned, a direct benefit of private ownership and a “well-regulated militia”, to quote the Second Amendment.

  • ac287149

    “Lost track of” implies that they weren’t meant for Jihadists in the first place- and you should know after 8 years of this that Barack Obama is every jihadists’ bff!

  • Dr. Karl Stalin

    Maybe he should lose his job already…

  • Paul54

    This crap was going on from the very beginning of our occupation of Iraq. My unit was training the new Iraqi security forces in Baghdad in the summer of 2003, and we were reissuing captured AK47s and AKMs to the motley recruits…who would desert with their weapons.

  • joe1429

    Your tax dollars hard at work, lol

  • Michael Clark

    Why, in Gods name, are you not coming to help us? http://www.christ-tsava.international

Pin It on Pinterest