News Ticker >
[ October 17, 2017 ]

The Duplicity of Moderate Muslims

[ October 17, 2017 ]

“Moderate” Algerian Journalist: ‘Our Dispute With The Jews Is A Religious One’

[ October 17, 2017 ]

GRAPHIC Video: Muslim teen who deliberately mowed down sidewalk pedestrians GUILTY — vehicular jihad in...

[ October 17, 2017 ]

More victimhood propaganda: Muslim claims his wife won’t leave home alone because of “Trump’s anti-Muslim...

[ October 17, 2017 ]

Jihad in Togo: Several dead after imam who called for violence and murder arrested, victims...

[ October 17, 2017 ]

How Islam Can Help Prevent More Sexual Abuse Scandals

[ October 17, 2017 ]

Security guard in Las Vegas massacre missing

[ October 17, 2017 ]

Donald Trump: Wall Funding Will Be Part of DACA Deal With Democrats

[ October 17, 2017 ]

Muslim driver hails cab as he abandons doomed passenger in blazing car on Brooklyn highway

[ October 17, 2017 ]

At least 276 killed in Somalia’s deadliest jihad attack on record

Pamela Geller, Breitbart News: Anti-Sharia Ads Censored On London Transport


We filed our lawsuit yesterday. I’ve run thousands of ads in scores of cities, but this is a first.

Need proof the Brits are living under the sharia? They run Islamic supremacist propaganda  garbage like this (below) “Allah is greater [than you god],” but they won’t run Mo’s actual quotes:


These bus ads were the impetus for us to create and run a campaign of Muhammad quotes.

“Pamela Geller: Anti-Sharia Ads Censored On London Transport,” Breitbart, August 24, 2016:

This week my human rights organization, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, filed suit in the United Kingdom – again. We are fighting for freedom there harder than most Brits.

Back in June I reported that we were starting a new ad campaign to run on London taxis. It consisted simply of quotes from Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, such as “I have been made victorious through terror.”

I was told by John Kehoe, a representative of Media Agency in London that the London buses would not accept my ads, despite the fact that the buses were running ads proclaiming the greatness of Allah. It was Media Agency that suggested I run the ads on taxis instead. I agreed.


london taxi mo

I had signed contacts and paid in full on May 13. On that day, we released an announcement: AFDI- Taxi Supersides Contract Between Media Agency Group and Pamela Geller is Signed and Filed!

On June 27, I wrote to John: “John, Please confirm that the ads are up and running today.” On June 28, I receive this email from Gabrielle Conneely of Transport Media:

Hi Pamela,

Apologies for the delay in getting back to you, john did pass me your email last night to give you an update,

All taxis are now posted and on the road J



But here’s the thing: the ads never ran.

Transport Media lied. They said that hundreds of our ads were running on London taxis. When I asked for proof of placement – environmental shots of taxis bearing the ads on London streets – they stopped answering my emails.

If the ads had been running, there would have been an uproar in the dhimmi British media. The Guardian would have been furious that we dared to insult Muhammad by quoting his exact words.

Also, don’t you think that if the ads had been running, every Muslim cabbie in London (i.e., every cabbie in London) would have been on strike and up in arms (some literally) and refusing to drive, or peeling off the ads, etc.?

But there was nothing. Not one word.

The ads never ran. These perfidious Albionites to lie to you and take your money. They never ran the ads.

Can you imagine what would happen if they tried to pull this on jihad or Sharia groups?

On June 28, I wrote the following to Kehoe and Conneely, as well as to my attorneys in Britain:

Please immediately supply environmental (street) photos of these taxis featuring our ads running around London. Despite your assurances that they are running, we have received no reports from our numerous contacts in the city of any sightings of these taxis. There has been no discussion of them, either pro or con, in social media or in the British press. Given the highly controversial nature of the ads in light of the British political scene today, it is virtually inconceivable that these ads would run without either a murmur of dissent or one single affirmation of support.

We can only conclude that your assertions that they are running are not accurate, and unless we receive atmospheric photos forthwith, we will be undertaking discussions with our British attorneys (cc’d here) about possible legal action.

And so this week, we filed suit, through my British law firm, Taylor Rose.

These ads should have run, and the British police should have been poised to defend the freedom of speech. After the Muslim mayor banned advertisements on buses and subways of bikini-clad women, what would have been more appropriate (or needed) than our new ad campaign?

This is yet another example of the crushing imposition of Islamic law in Britain — from my being banned from entering the country for the crime of opposing jihad, while the most vicious Islamic preachers who incite to violence and murder are routinely allowed in, to the new Muslim mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, banning advertisements featuring women in bikinis and promising more Sharia enforcement against so-called “anti-Muslim hate speech” – while his transit authority is stealing tens of thousands of dollars from those of us who are fighting for our most basic freedoms.

Please donate to our campaign and lawsuit expenses here.

Pamela Geller is the President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), publisher of and author of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance. Follow her on Twitter here. Like her on Facebook here.

Pamela Geller's shocking new book, "FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA" is now available on Amazon. It's Geller's tell all, her story - and it's every story - it's what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

  • lbv

    Why do some non-muslims defend muslims?

    The majority/minority principle – Let us say there are a group of children who see a particular people attached to a belief system. In order for them to develop an opinion about it, most of the folks attached to this belief have to act a particular way. This is because in order for a person to form a notion regarding something, most people associated with this thing have to behave a certain way. So if these children see the majority of muslims not committing terrorism, they associate ‘non-terrorism’ with islam and its followers and hence if someone opposes those who do not commit terrorism, these children defend them.

    Now, if these children were explained that the majority/minority principle should not be applied here because of 6 reasons –

    – Terrorism is mandated in islam.
    – The majority of muslims, just like the minority of terrorists, are also against female equality, kill/imprison homosexuals, kill/imprison apostates, oppose secular democracy et al.
    – A substantial number of this majority support or approve the minority of terrorists.
    – Just because they are not commiting terrorism themselves, does not mean they are against the very principle of it.
    – The prophet of this majority himself was a terrorist. And to emulate the prophet is required in islam. And muslims take their prophet and their religion seriously.
    – Both the majority and the minority belong to the same ethos – The islamic ethos. They have the same islamic values, culture and beliefs.

    Therefore, it is a mistake to apply the simplistic majority/minority principle when it comes to muslims. The muslims who do not commit terrorism, must also be opposed, and not supported. Many children might understand this and change their opinion. Many may not understand it. Those who do not understand this, can be forgiven, because well, they are children.

    But the muslim apologists we are talking about are not children – They are full-grown adults. They cannot behave like children. They are imperiling our entire civilization. In an ideal world, they would be in prison. We must hold them accountable for their actions.

  • RalphB

    The link to Paypal: “Please donate to our campaign and lawsuit expenses here.” fails.
    I tried it from two different browsers and got “Sorry — your last action could not be completed.”

    This should be fixed — however the “Donate” link in the right sidebar still works so you can use that one to support this important fight for freedom of speech.:

    donate to our campaign and lawsuit expenses here. – See more at:
    donate to our campaign and lawsuit expenses here. – See more at:

  • Craig

    YES!!! We must not speak ill of our murderers, says rat obama and the baby-eating Hillary.

  • Ben Hur

    That’s it, I’m enlisting in the Royal Marines. I’m going to London to join Britain First and I’m going to be an activist.

  • Mahou Shoujo

    The indigenous peoples of britain vote muslims into public office knowing full well that islam and government are not separate, Why are we throwing time, effort and money into a nation that votes for shari’a? There are not enough muslims in the british isles to control the vote, a lot of people agree with them voting for for sharia’a.

    • Keith

      The problem is many Brits are ignorant of how Islam works. They genuinely believe that it is just a religion along the lines of Christianity, Judadism, Hinduism and others. What is worse though is that they refuse to do any research about it. They will ask for evidence of what is said about Islam but refuse to even look at that evidence. Many people deny that the muslim rape gangs in a minimum of 28 British towns and cities were nothing more than people behaving in a criminal manner.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        The british cannot see islam because of the muslims, you are right, they are naive and guidable to an absurd degree.

  • buck

    It consisted simply of quotes from Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, such as “I have been made victorious through terror.”

    Genius!! Pure genius Pamela! Puts them in quite a pickle doesn’t it. You are merely printing the “prophets” own words to show how evil he was.

    If they call it hate speech then you answer, “YES! THAT IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN SAYING FOR YEARS, SO YOU HAVE TO BAN THE WORDS (aka Quran)!”

    If they refuse to run the words because it would offend muslims your answer? “REALLY? THE “PROPHET’S” WORDS OFFEND MUSLIMS??!! THEN YOU HAVE TO BAN THE OFFENDING WORDS (aka Quran)!”

    • IzlamIsTyranny

      LOL, excellent observation.

    • Mahou Shoujo

      muslims are offended when the profit, police beat upon him, is quoted directly. Especially his abrogated lies.

  • IzlamIsTyranny

    Coming to the USA soon…oops, it’s already here.

  • Super Geek

    Soon English Christians will have to ask for permission to leave the house.

    • Skydive5

      OK, provided they have a man excort them. I mean, if they can find one.

  • Robert Batchelor

    Europe is lost. We’re going to have to fight like hell to save America. If Hillary gets in, we’re doomed! Sharia will be coming to a neighborhood near you.

  • Drew the Infidel

    Typical ragheads. This is what they did in our “nation building” efforts in Iraq and “Dumbf*ckistan”, take the money and run.

    • itchy

      I think you will find the globalists take the money and run, leave us with the crap to sort out. soros and his followers (hillery) merkel etc want chaos

  • SocratesWept

    Pamela Gellar / webmaster- your PayPal donation link in the London Taxi story does not work.

  • hereward

    The donate link does not work ?

  • None are so blind as those who refuse to see…and none are so stupid as those who support those that could, eventually might, kill them: Islam and Sharia Law.

  • joe1429

    Wow , first they banned ads on buses, now the taxis?? This is total bs, and the muzrat mayor imposing sharia

  • Badger

    I am ashamed to be English. But I promise you, changes will come.

    • Mahou Shoujo

      The decent people of the world wait and encourage you in your efforts.

  • Merrill Meikleham
  • Canadian Patriot

    I know that there are many Brits outraged by this ugly mess, but as I say to fellow Canadians who are angry, YOU MUST SPEAK UP! The futures of all of us are at stake. Brits, Americans and Canadians cannot sit back and let the Islamic/socialist, progressive/Marxist axis steamroller run loose. Our politicians have lost all objectivity, all decency, and attack western culture and civilization at will. It is time for all of us “average” citizens to stand up and fight. We cannot leave the fight to”others.” Each of us is the other. For the sake of all that we hold dear and so that we do not squander what the lost of two world wars fought to protect, we must continue the battle:

    Take up our quarrel with the foe:

    To you from failing hands we throw

    The torch; be yours to hold it high.

    If ye break faith with us who die

    We shall not sleep, though poppies grow

    In Flanders fields.

    Canadian military doctor and artillery commander Major John McCrae

    • Keith

      Tommy Robinson spoke up and has been persecuted by the police and government ever since. Who is going to put themselves up for that?

      • Canadian Patriot

        Those with the courage of their convictions. The Brits showed their grit in WWII, and Canadians stood right beside them and did what is right. As a great Englishman wrote: “Our doubts are traitors,
        and make us lose the good we oft might win, by fearing to attempt.”

        William Shakespeare,

        Measure for Measure

  • Shabeer Hassan

    FOR WHO?

    Permission to fight is given to those (i.e. believers against
    disbelievers),1)”””’ who are fighting them””””’, (and) because they (believers)
    have been wronged, and surely, Allâh is Able to give them (believers)
    8: 56. They are those with whom you made a covenant, but they 2″”””’break their covenant every time””””” and they do not fear Allâh.
    So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in
    order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a
    58. If you (O Muhammad SAW) fear treachery from any people
    throw back (their covenant) to them (so as to be) on equal terms (that
    there will be no more covenant between you and them). Certainly Allâh
    likes not the treacherous.
    59. And let not those who disbelieve think
    that they can outstrip (escape from the punishment). Verily, they will
    never be able to save themselves (from Allâh’s Punishment).
    60: 9. It
    is only as regards those 3) ”””””who fought against you ””””””on account of religion,
    and have driven you out of your homes, and helped to drive you out,
    that Allah forbids you to befriend them. And whosoever will befriend
    them, then such are the Zâlimûn (wrong-doers those who disobey Allah).
    42. The way (of blame) is only against those 4)””””””’who oppress men and
    wrongly rebel in the earth”””””’, for such there will be a painful torment.
    12. But if they violate their oaths after their covenant, and attack
    your religion with disapproval and criticism then fight (you) the
    leaders of disbelief (chiefs of Quraish – pagans of Makah) – for surely
    their oaths are nothing to them – so that they may stop (evil actions).
    Will you not fight a people 5)”””””””who have violated their oaths””””””’ (pagans of
    Makah) and intended to expel the Messenger, while they did attack you
    first? Do you fear them? Allah has more right that you should fear Him,
    if you are believers.
    4: 75. And what is wrong with you that you
    fight not in the Cause of Allah, and for those weak, ill-treated and
    6)””””””’oppressed among men, women, and children””””””””’, whose cry is: “Our Lord!
    Rescue us from this town whose people are oppressors; and rise for us
    from You one who will protect, and rise for us from You one who will
    5: 33. The recompense of those 7)”””””””’who wage war against Allah and
    His Messenger and do mischief in the land””””””””’ is only that they shall be
    killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the
    opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in
    this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.
    42: 39. And those who, when tyranny strikes them, they defend
    themselves.[ avenge themselves in a just manner, restoring their rights and not
    111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if
    they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will
    not be helped.
    112. Indignity is put over them wherever they may be,
    except when under a covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men;
    they have drawn on themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is put
    over them. This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs,
    evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and
    killed the Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed
    (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s disobedience,
    crimes and sins).
    Dawud :: Book 38 : Hadith 4357
    punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Apostle and
    strive with might and main for mischief through the land is execution or
    Bukhari :: Book 7 :: Volume 63 :: Hadith 210
    Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas:
    pagans were of two kinds as regards their relationship to the Prophet
    and the Believers. Some of them were those with whom the Prophet was at
    war and used to fight against, and they used to fight him; the others
    were those with whom the Prophet made a treaty, and neither did the
    Prophet fight them, nor did they fight him…….
    Muslim :: Book 1 : Hadith 176
    said: By Allah, I would never kill any Muslim so long as a person with a
    heavy belly, i. e., Usama, would not kill. Upon this a person remarked:
    Did Allah not say this: And fight them until there is no more mischief
    and religion is wholly for Allah? Sa’d said: We fought so that there
    should be no mischief, but you and your companions wish to fight so that
    there should be mischief.


Pin It on Pinterest