News Ticker >
[ September 21, 2017 ]

Exposed: The relationship between al-Qaeda and Iran

[ September 21, 2017 ]

New Hampshire: Muslim “refugee” sexually attacks several little girls as young as 7

[ September 21, 2017 ]

Oklahoma trial of Muslim who BEHEADED co-worker: “Slave to Allah” said he did it because...

[ September 21, 2017 ]

VIDEO: Muslim “refugees” go on sex assault spree at church festival

[ September 21, 2017 ]

4 Muslim youth gang-raped Hindu teenage girl for 10 days, forced to convert

[ September 21, 2017 ]

Muslim cleric says fathers can marry off their newborn daughters

[ September 21, 2017 ]

Defense attorney: Muslim who plotted to behead Pamela Geller an “idiot,” not guilty

[ September 21, 2017 ]

Mayor of Lampedusa says his island is ‘collapsing’ because of Muslim migrant violence and crime

[ September 21, 2017 ]

Buy-Bye: Convicted Terrorist Rasmea Odeh Officially Off U.S. Soil

[ September 21, 2017 ]

90 Percent of Asylum Seekers in Austria End Up On Welfare

UK: NHS Records More Than 1,000 FGM Cases In Just Three Months

89

It’s here in America, too. How bad? It’s anyone’s guess. But it’s prevalent in Muslim communities. According to one human rights activist, it’s a crisis.

Back in 2010, I reported that here in America, the Academy of Pediatrics suggested that American doctors be given permission to perform a “nick” on girls from Islamic cultures. The norming of savagery. Because of our opposition to their “well-intentioned” abomination, the Academy of Pediatrics withdraw its “2010 Policy Statement on Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) that Endorsed Pediatricians’ ‘Nicking’ of Girls’ Genitalia.”

In one particular case in Australia, defense lawyers tried to slither out of conviction by trying to argue the girls were not victims of female genital mutilation because they only received a “nick” to their clitoris.

They were unsuccessful with that outrageous defense, but as the norming of the sharia becomes more commonplace in the West, that kind of cultural equivocation will be sanctioned.

Dissemblers and deceivers claim that FGM is cultural phenomenon, not religious. But the fact is that it is an Islamic cultural phenomenon.

The more Muslims immigrate to Western countries, the more clitoridectomies will become horrifyingly commonplace.

“NHS Records More Than 1,000 FGM Cases In Just Three Months,” by Sarah Ann Harris, The Huffington Post UK, September 23, 2015 (thanks to TheReligionofPeace.com):

More than 1,000 cases of female genital mutilation (FGM) were recorded in just three months in the UK, it has been revealed.

For the quarter April to June this year, there were 1,036 newly-recorded cases of FGM in England, with a total of 1,159 attendances for FGM, according to the Press Association.

Nine of the individuals were aged under 18 when they were first seen, the data from the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) revealed.

The shocking figures have been made public after the health service began recording incidences of FGM for the very first time.

Much of the FGM reported may be historic, as the abuse is normally carried out on infants and young teenagers. The NHS data did not specify whether it was carried out in the UK or abroad, as is the case in many instances of FGM.

Tanya Barron, chief executive of global children’s charity Plan UK, which works to combat FGM worldwide, said: “It’s shocking to see the extent of FGM here in the UK.

“We’ve seen hugely increased attention on this problem in the past few years and we are now waking up to the scale of this terrible practice.

“What we must always keep in mind though is that this is not specifically a British problem.

“FGM is a practice with an inherently global dimension.

“And while it’s vital that we do everything we can to stop FGM here in the UK, as well as to support the girls and women affected by it, the reality is that this practice won’t end in the UK until it is ended worldwide.”

FGM is illegal in the UK. It is also illegal to take a female abroad for the purposes of FGM.

The maximum jail term for carrying out or enabling FGM is 14 years.

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), FGM is carried out for social and religious reasons and is an “extreme form of discrimination against women”.

Babies born to women who have undergone FGM suffer a higher rate of death compared with those born to women who have not undergone the procedure.

Women with FGM also have increased risk of stillbirth, infants that need resuscitation and low birth weight babies.

FGM is estimated to lead to an extra one or two baby deaths per 100 deliveries worldwide.

An estimated 130 million women and girls around the world are through to be living with FGM.

An international day of zero tolerance of FGM took place earlier this year, with a number of measures, including NHS recording, outlined to help to end the horrifying practice.

This included better training for frontline health workers on how to communicate with patients about the highly sensitive issue, allowing clinicians to note on a child’s health record if they are at risk of FGM and an additional £2million for a programme backed by Barnardos and the Local Government Association to create a specialised team of social workers.

  • Bradley Lexvold

    Start castrating the men who do this. Will end it promptly!
    British in India seen live women being thrown on the fires of their dead husbands and they stopped it by killing those responsible. I’m sure someone can elaborate on this better than I can, but when you let other people’s limitations and inabilities become your own, your done, you just haven’t realized it yet.

    • Tim Ireland

      Cultures who cut their girls – also cut their boys.
      If we end non consensual MGM, suddenly FGM will disappear.

      Let’s be honest, FGM NEVER occurs in cultures where men are left intact.

      • Susan

        On a scale of 1-10 Female mutilation 10.
        Male circumcision 1. Let’s not compare apples to oranges.

        • loadnabox

          Bzzzzzzt, please try again

          Circ removes 90% of the specialized nerve receptors on the male. The most common form of circumcision is much more invasive and destructive than the most common type of female cutting (Type 1 a simple nick to the clittoris or type 2 removing the entire clittoral hood) Male circ is on par with type 4 FGM removing ~30,000 specialized sexual nerve receptors.

          Further, FGM is most commonly done in the world in a sterile environment by doctors, not with the crude tools shown (Check info on sunnat in the Philippines )

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Total BS.

            If male circumcision is equivalent to FGM, then why are Muslim men so rape crazy?

            Why is there a drawing of a vagina in the middle of the flag of fascist iran???

            http://iranian.com/data/images/yy0rx7cdb6c.jpg

          • Tim Ireland

            Thanks for posting that picture of Maryam Namazie. Maryam also believes male circumcision is savage barbarity.
            GENITAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL!! WOO !

          • IronMaiden

            Our suggestively named “loadnabox” argued MGM was worse than FGM….another great point re the flag by the way lol!

          • frmatthew

            The truth is that the foreskin is a very problematic and vestigial part of the human body. One in ten men will suffer, at some point in their life, a very serious and painful phimosis, when the infected sphincter at the end of the foreskin will not relax. A large proportion of those men will actually suffer an even more painful tear, and the foreskin will have to be removed anyway. One in ten is extraordinarily high. No other part of the body is that prone to failure.

          • Mary Zaba

            Exactly. Accepted medical (men) proof versus stadistic sick control and subjugation with no known medical benefits (women). Pretty simple to see u less you close your eyes on purpose.

          • dan

            Hi Mary Zaba,

            FGM is NOT an approved practice in Islam

            What about female circumcision?
            Female circumcision is allowed in Islam and is an even less extensive procedure as compared to male circumcision, because it involves just a small trimming of the clitoral hood (which looks like a rooster’s comb), which is the prepuce or “foreskin” of the clitoris (15) (17). (This procedure is not to be confused with female genital mutilation or FGM, which is a totally different procedure involving the removal of the clitoris or altering of the genitalia and is NOT an approved practice in Islam). Recovery is even quicker and there are hardly any short term or long term complications. The benefits with references to medical sources (12) may include improved hygiene, reduced UTI incidences and lower infections of the reproductive systems. It will be interesting to know that in Malaysia, where female circumcision is performed extensively by the Malay-Muslim community, the incidence of cervical cancer in Malay women is lowest amongst the 3 major race groups (Indians, Chinese and Malays). (18)(19) Another study shows that Malay women are at lower risk of orgasmic sexual dysfunction as compared to non-Malays. (20)

            http://www.islamnewsroom.com/news-we-need/1827-priests-a-preachers-enter-islam-list

            Priests & Preachers To Islam (List)

            Many Come To Islam

            Faith – Belief – Salvation: All topics discussed by preachers of all faiths and many people change from one faith to another on a daily basis. Yet, the real question should be, “Why do so many knowledgeable religious leaders – GO TO ISLAM?
            The report estimated around 5,200 men and women have adopted Islam over the past 12 months, including 1,400 in London. Nearly two-thirds were women, more than 70 per cent were white and the average age at conversion was 27.

            The number of Muslim converts in Britain has passed 100,000, fuelled by a surge in young white women adopting the Islamic faith.

            The figure has almost doubled in ten years – with the average convert now a 27-year-old white woman fed up with British consumerism and immorality.

            The survey, conducted by Kevin Brice from Swansea University, asked converts for their views on the negative aspects of British culture.

            They identified alcohol and drunkenness, a ‘lack of morality and sexual permissiveness’, and ‘unrestrained consumerism’.

            Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1343954/100-000-Islam-converts-living-UK-White-women-keen-embrace-Muslim-faith.html#ixzz3jo173Aw4

            May God Bless You and Give You Guidance..worship only the almighty god without any partner

          • Tim Ireland

            You are a disgusting SOB.
            Any form of genital cutting on any non consenting human is mutilation.

            Albeit, what you saying is completely correct as ahadith does not distinguish between male or female circumcision.

            Hence, you are insane. You are disgusting.
            You are a perfect muhammadan. I will gladly go to hell to be as far away from you with your virgins and pearl boys.

            I feel like bacon :-)

          • loadnabox

            LOL, not vestigial at all. It provides many function during sex and your repeated 1:10 number is total bullshit.

            https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201109/more-circumcision-myths-you-may-believe-hygiene-and-stds

          • frmatthew

            Not surprising that this article is being written by a Ph.D. rather than an M.D. and is being run in a pop journal of PSYCHOLOGY. There are numerous factual errors in this article like the idea that the foreskin at certain stages of development does not retract. Utterly and completely false. I suggest you consult information that is produced by experts in medicine and related fields (not social sciences). This was truly ridiculous.

          • Tim Ireland

            Doctors across Europe do not recommend circumcision, nor do doctors in Australia or Japan. Japan has some of the oldest living people in the world!
            Only 30% of males in the world are circumcised – the overwhelming of these are muslims. Thus, circumcision is a barbaric and sadistic religious practice, not medical.
            Any doctor who states routine circumcision on all males is a quack – it is they who need to see a shrink.

          • loadnabox

            Even the AAP guidelines state when the median age of retraction is.

            I even started providing links that back me up, you dismiss them and give no articles to back your own claims up.

            You are obviously just not willing to check your own facts

          • Tim Ireland

            1/10?? If that were the case – circumcision clinics would be all over my country, performed by all doctors!!

            Wait… why in America where there are circumcision clinics and doctor$ who are trained to cut to OVERWHELMINGLY perform this on babies? Is it because babies can’t talk? Is it to look like daddy?

            Come on mate – equal rights for all on this issue :-)

          • IronMaiden

            Your focus is entirely on the number of nerve receptors removed as a comparative basis for arguing MGM is worse than FGM? FGM is often much more complicated, with lifelong effects that are not comparable. As I mentioned in a prior post, in some types of FGM the labia are also cut and stitched, creating a pouch that becomes a high risk area for infection, as urine and menstrual product can collect therein. This labial mutilation also leads to dreadful pain and potential injury during sexual intercourse and of course, childbirth.

            To be honest I can’t tell whether you are deliberately trying to be deceitful or simply lack knowledge in this regard? Or do you have an sexist or religious agenda that blinds you to the greater risk and complications that young girls and women may suffer, depending on the degree and sterility of this procedure?

            I am also affronted that you would ask the readers her to suspend their disbelief and simply accept your Philippine factoid as sufficient evidence for the safety of the procedure on a global level? This makes me all the more suspicious that you are an ideologue and like all of your ilk facts be damned!

          • loadnabox

            Nope, I suspect you’re guilty of cultural bias. Claiming it’s bad when another culture does it to it’s children but we’re OK when we do it to ours.

            Circ also has men lifelong issues not known until the man reaches adulthood.

            90% of the worlds circumcised men live in the US and Israel and together we use 80% of the worlds viagra supply.

            Cut men are associated with drier sex, have a greater chance of sexual dysfunction in adulthood (ED), tight painful erections and many other serious side effects. Perhaps you should go do some research instead of assuming there’s zero side effects to amputating a body part?

          • IronMaiden

            Thanks for raising the issue of cultural bias which I suspect you are possibly guilty of yourself…if not that then a strong ideological bias, which is evidenced by your evasive answer and unfounded assertion that circumcision leads to erectile dysfunction as evidenced by sales of viagara in Israel and the US!??? Are you serious? On the other hand there is a strong association between pornography and erectile dysfunction, with some excellent empirical studies readily available if you choose to inform yourself instead of putting up these specious arguments.

            As to my alleged cultural bias I submit my concern is more a matter of professional duty of care, given I am a registered health practitioner. Secondly I note you completely ignored my prior posts where I made clear I do not advocate MGM so let me make it clear for you …..I OPPOSE BOTH MGM and FGM. Backed up by the FACT that I chose NOT to circumcise my male children!

          • Tim Ireland

            Well, the life long effects of males being circumcised is first
            Keratinization – where the glands which are supposed to be internal and
            protected by the foreskin become tougher due to the exposure of air.
            Second, due to keratinization and the loss of the gliding mechanism
            foreskin naturally provides – couples have to resort to use of
            lubricant.

            Ironically and so sadly, society blames women for
            becoming ‘dryer’ as they age- well, actually it is because the man is
            cut, meaning there is no natural gliding mechanism AND because the
            corona ridge being completely exposes during intercourse – all remaining
            moisture is being extracted.

            Come on – equal rights for all !!

          • IronMaiden

            Are you clowns actually reading what I’ve posted???

            I oppose both FGM and MGM! Ponder that and let it sink in…..

            Then consider what I actually wrote….or don’t and just keep waving this ridiculous banner of ‘equal right’s’? What the hell has that got to do with it? Equal rights to mutilation?

            As for women becoming drier as they age here’s a FACT….they do!

            By the way when I say that I am not denying what happens to men’s circumcised penises but I am strongly urging you not to make false claims to argue a point!

            Menopause….key word here.

          • bwark

            Not to worry, these are people that wish to comment because it is an issue that doesn’t really affect them. If their daughter had this happen, then they would be concerned. It’s interesting to see how someone will find the best information to try to debate. I wonder if they also found the horror stories?

        • Tim Ireland

          Both involve cutting in the genital region.
          How do you fail to see the sadistic and disgusting behaviour?
          There are no cultures where men are left the way they are born who cut their girls.
          Cultures who cut their girls – ALSO cut their boys.

          • bwark

            A male circumcision isn’t close to fgm. If I cut the foreskin from the penis, then stitched the top of the penis closed, so only small drips of urine could be released — stitched the flaccid skin so that it was taught, not allowing for erection, and performed this surgery on a 10 year old boy with no anesthetic with a rusty razor blade, THEN we can compare the two!

          • Tim Ireland

            I’m not saying the procedure is exactly same, but both STILL require cutting in the genital region. Both are a violation of bodily autonomy. Everyone should have the individual right to decide the aesthetics of their genitals.

            Why do you have such a problem with equal rights for both? Please explain

      • mjazzguitar

        It’s dishonest to say they are both the same.

        • loadnabox

          Why not? Both remove sexual pleasure, both have no benefits (completely cosmetic) both alter the genitals of a child before they can make a decision

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Sexual pleasure like the afghans raping boys in Afghanistan, to the shock of American soldiers who are ordered to ignore the cries of the boys being raped?

            http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/24/world/asia/ashraf-ghani-afghan-president-vows-to-crack-down-on-abuse-of-boys.html

          • loadnabox

            Muslims are one of the few other cultures who regularly circumcise, so if anything it would sy being circumcised causes this(which it doesn’t) Nor do I support the practice mentioned in the article, it’s disgustng as well…

            I fail to see your point

          • frmatthew

            No. Male circumcision is not purely cosmetic. One in ten men at some point in their life will suffer a painful phimosis (when the sphincter at the end of the prepuce becomes infected and will not relax), many of those men will actually have the skin tear, in which case the prepuce has to be removed anyway.

          • loadnabox

            bzzzzt again.

            #1Phimosis is incredibly rare and usually mis-diagnosed. It can easily be treated with creams not cutting.

            #2 Further, an amputation of part of the genitals without -immediate- medical need, but as a prophylactic measure is ludicrous. The lifetime chances of a medically indicated circumcision are 1:10,000 and the chances of your baby dying as a result of circumcision are 1:16,667

            #3 There are medical studies that show benefits to female circumcision, would you support FGM being done if there are medical benefits?

          • frmatthew

            Once again, you need to consult people who are experts IN MEDICINE, not social sciences. This information is FULL of factual errors.

      • Julia

        I can’t believe anyone would compare circumcision to female genital mutilation. In no fundamentalist culture is male sexuality treated with the same contempt as female sexuality. Male sexuality is often praised while female sexuality is treated with contempt, hence the emphasis placed on female sexual purity but not male. Comparing male circumcision to female genital mutilation is like comparing someone having their little pinky toe cut off to someone having both eyeballs cut out. Female genital mutilation utterly cripples women. Their sexual needs build up like a pressure cooker with no ability for the release of orgasm. They are denied the ability to experience the greatest physical pleasure possible. Meanwhile they are impregnated over and over and left to deal with the hell of childbirth. So they get all the negative without the positive. Male circumcision is done for cleanliness and health and/or as a covenant, where female genital mutilation is done to oppress women and show them that they are not entitled to intense pleasure like men are. If you don’t mutilate women, there is still such a heinous disadvantage. The male role in reproduction is only intense pleasure, while the woman may or may not experience intense pleasure but is likely to suffer intense pain and possibly death in childbearing. This being in addition to the fact that men are big and rough and tough and women are physically and emotionally more delicate. A sane person would look at things and realize what a bad deal women got in biology, being weaker and more delicate AND suffering pain and danger in childbearing. This sane person would see the importance of her pleasure in a marriage and sexual satisfaction being a two-way street. But savage criminals like Muslims hate women and resent the fact they can enjoy sex, so they cut their clitorises off so they can’t be sexually satisfied but still suffer all the negative of childbirth. For most men, having their sexual needs met is extremely important. Many men also say that if it were up to them to give birth there would be very few children in the world. So leave it to a bunch of misogynistic Muslims to impose on women what they would hate for themselves.

        • Tim Ireland

          Hi Julia, thanks very much for the time you spent replying to me.
          In regards to control of male sexuality, Moses Marmonities stated:

          ‘with regard to circumcision, one of the reasons for it is, in my opinion, to bring about a decrease in sexual intercourse and a weakening of the organ in question’.

          John Kellogg made a similar statement, however he believed circumcision was a cure for masturbation – which was believed then to be a symptom of mental illness, as such Kellogg recommended that circumcision be performed:

          ‘Without administering an anesthetic, as the pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect on the mind, especially if connected with the idea of punishment’.

          In regards to cleanliness –> take a bath!

          Male circumcision perverts natural sex. The foreskin and the frenulum are a highly erogenous parts for men; similar to the clitoris and the surrounding labia. Circumcision removes the foreskin and either removes or damages the frenulum.
          You may believe that men are not affected by this as they still can climax, though this may have to be assisted by artificial lubricants and high level of thrusting.
          PLEASE NOTE: American society blames women as they age for the need to use lubricants – yet they fail to see the connection of circumcision and the removal of the foreskin which is destruction of the natural gliding mechanism of the penis.
          So much for feminism in the 2010s :-(

          It’s very important in life to know what you like. But please don’t inflict your preferences onto your children. Let them make their down decisions. They will thank you for it. Believe me, I’ve thanked my parents for making the decision they did when I was born – a simple but very wise and humane decision – do nothing at all.

          Breast feeding for all – CIRCUMCISION FOR NONE.

    • Harry Wookiee

      Women, not men, cut the clits off girls.

      • Susan

        Not always true, but the problem is islam, which fears female sexuallity.

      • Cuda

        Harry you’re just being an ass, the culture is controlled by men and the penalty for not doing it ( by the women or other) would be death and then it would still be done. To say it is carried out by women shows you aren’t knowledgeable enough to comment on the topic

        • Tim Ireland

          No, Harry is correct. FGM (except among Shaf’i Muslims) is not a man’s ‘subjugation’ against women – rather it is part of the sadistic generation genital mutilation cycle.
          Women want their girls to look like mommy, just as men want their boys to like daddy. Then sadly, everyone believes being cut is ‘normal’ and genital cutting pervades generation after generation.
          It’s disgusting and sadistic behaviour which needs to be eradicated.

          • Mary Zaba

            Fine. Then just replace the word “men” with the word people in bradley lexvold’s original statement. Problem solved

          • Tim Ireland

            I don’t understand? You are promoting savagery. Genital cutting and castration are very similar. In fact Anna Freud found that circumcision performed in young children is akin to them psychologically experiencing castration.

          • leopold

            Tim, clitoris is equal with the male gland on the TOP OF THE PENIS … Nobody seems to know this… dumb asses.

          • Tim Ireland

            So what, the foreskin is the equivalent of a clitoral hood.

            What is your problem with the natural penis?
            Why are you body shaming men.

            Men do cry. Genital cutting hurts both females and males, it both leaves a scar and they are both permanent.

            Equal rights for all.

          • bwark

            No Tim, this is done by both males and females, and it is not done so that the girls can look like mommy. It is and has been done as a way to control the female for hundreds of years. We would hope that we have moved past the barbaric practices though. Of course, when you look at the men wearing dresses, gouging out eyes, and chopping off hands, hear one of their scholars tell that “the world is flat” you realize that these mongrels haven’t made it into the year 1500 yet!

          • Tim Ireland

            Well, do you think it’s okay to cut boys to look like daddy?

        • Betty4440

          YOU ARE RIGHT i SAW A VIDEO WHERE THE MAN WAS DOING IT ON A GIRL 10 OR 12 CAN’T REMEMBER. AND THE GIRL WAS SCREAMING NO DADDY NO DADDY. SO DON’T TRY TELLING JUST WOMEN DOES THE BUTCHERING.

        • donemyhomework

          Cuda, I have read where women, generally a grandmother of the tribe was the one who did the deed. Those events transpired in North and Central Africa in this century. According to what I read, the reason Muslims do FGM is because they believe the girl is made pure by the act and insures virginity. It sounded screwey to me but that’s what Muslims claim. After all, Muslim men “buy” their wives…it’s a kind of dowry thing. That’s why many Muslims marry within the family, to keep the money “in the family”. Strange customs.

      • Miriam Luz

        Men perform this horrible act on their daughters also. I saw it on Youtube

        • dan

          Hi Miriam,

          FGM is NOT an approved practice in Islam

          What about female circumcision?
          Female circumcision is allowed in Islam and is an even less extensive procedure as compared to male circumcision, because it involves just a small trimming of the clitoral hood (which looks like a rooster’s comb), which is the prepuce or “foreskin” of the clitoris (15) (17). (This procedure is not to be confused with female genital mutilation or FGM, which is a totally different procedure involving the removal of the clitoris or altering of the genitalia and is NOT an approved practice in Islam). Recovery is even quicker and there are hardly any short term or long term complications. The benefits with references to medical sources (12) may include improved hygiene, reduced UTI incidences and lower infections of the reproductive systems. It will be interesting to know that in Malaysia, where female circumcision is performed extensively by the Malay-Muslim community, the incidence of cervical cancer in Malay women is lowest amongst the 3 major race groups (Indians, Chinese and Malays). (18)(19) Another study shows that Malay women are at lower risk of orgasmic sexual dysfunction as compared to non-Malays. (20)

  • Tim Ireland

    STOP all forms of genital cutting.
    America –> that starts with YOU !
    The NHS stopped MGM in 1949 following Douglas Gairdners paper ‘The Fate of the Foreskin’ – http://www.cirp.org/library/general/gairdner/

    Labia and foreskin are awesome :-)

    Parents don’t have rights – they have RESPONSIBILITIES.
    + HER BODY – HER RIGHTS +
    + HIS BODY – HIS RIGHTS +
    = Everyone’s right to sex as nature intended it:- http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/

    • mjazzguitar

      Two different issues, they shouldn’t be lumped together like that.

      • loadnabox

        Why are they different?

        Both are taking a knife to the genitals of children.

        This article is talking about a simple nick to the clittoral hood and you don’t support it, yet you’re OK with removing the most sensitive part of the penis.

        Where’s the difference?

    • Cuda

      Tim you are nothing but a distraction and should be ashamed that you dare take any focus from the mutilation of women, it is not the same in any fashion.I am circumcised and it does not prevent me from enjoying sex, it does not increase my chances of infection or passing one to a partner, if you have issues with circumcision start your own thread

      • loadnabox

        Most FGM victims say they can enjoy sex and most say they have a fulfilling sex life. Many can still experience orgasm.

        Circ is NOT cleaner and it does not reduce STD transmission and HPV claims are equally dubious. There is in fact evidence that circ INCREASES the chance of passing STD’s to the receiving partner

      • Tim Ireland

        Distraction? Please explain?

        Cultures who cut their girls ALSO cut their boys.

        There are NO cultures where men are left intact who cut their women.

        LONG LIVE LABIA AND FORESKIN :-)

      • Julia

        Thank you Cuda. And I’ve heard of adult men who were not circumcised going to the doctor of their own volition because the thing was nasty and had issues and drove them nuts. A woman being glad she didn’t have a clitoris so her husband could exploit her body for his own pleasure but deny her orgasms would be like a person saying, “I’m so glad the person next to me gouged my eyeballs out so I can’t enjoy watching this awesome movie like they are enjoying it!”

  • oneworld65

    Can the men get a nick on their dick? Fair is fair right?

    • IronMaiden

      Infibulation of women leads to life long health issues. Not only is the clitoris removed , so there can be little or no sexual pleasure, the labia are also often stitched together leaving a small vaginal hole, that is horribly and painfully torn during sex. The stitched together labia create a pouch where urine and menstrual blood can collect…as it is difficult to clean…leading to bacterial infection. It is nothing like a circumcision…not that I advocate that either. The psychological damage from the trauma of the mutilation and oftentimes lifelong suffering of these women is awful. This truly is a barbaric and savage practice.

      • IronMaiden

        Sorry to be so graphic BTW :(

        • Bradley Lexvold

          Graphic is the best response. Look at the changed perception of sorting out baby parts has done to change minds. What is done behind closed doors needs to be exposed here. Thanks for the clarity on the health issues. If it was ok, they would televise it as any other procedure, leading to the question, does anybody have a live documentation? It would change more quickly if shown. Some would complain about it being too graphic and porn like, but their minds cannot be fixed any way. There is something that happens to you when shown, it startles your conscience and awakens righteous indignation.

        • oneworld65

          No problem. People need to know the truth.

          • kathy kalb

            The men are in charge of the woman they would not let them quit this practice!

      • oneworld65

        These people are sick. It should be banned in every country.

    • loadnabox

      Hell, in the US they can take 50% of the penile shaft skin and 90% of the specialized nerve receptors.

      Doctors usually charge $300 for this and it is done to 60% of US males

      • Pamela Keck

        but they have a choice of having it done.

        • loadnabox

          Really? I don’t remember being offered the choice, I was just a day out of the womb so maybe the exhaustion got to me

  • FedUpInFL

    Those poor babies :-(

  • Susan

    Islam hates females because mohammad aka allah hated females. 1400 years of female subjugation and cruelty and we still don’t stop this. Why, because this islamic nazis cult hides behind a religious facade? Wake up world!!!!

    • Cuda

      not to mention additional accepted practices such as rape of boys, goats unescorted women, the entire lifestyle ( I refuse to call the cult a religion) needs to be eradicated as it is evil, disgusting and without morals!

  • Judi

    What annoys me is that in the UK, the NHS is losing thousands of pounds a week and they are throwing money away treating these girls for a barbaric 7th Century practice inflicted on them. Why should the UK be held responsible? This money could be used for more important things, like treating the indigenous population who are forced to contribute a big chunk of their salary towards the health system.

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      That’s because the UK has been overtaken by Islamofascists, thanks to the tireless efforts of the UKs fascist Left wing.

      See new labor, oxfam..

      • Judi

        Agree!

  • lee

    What kind of animal would not want their wives to enjoy sex with them? A little d-ck , insecure Muslim, that’s who.

  • michaelwarden

    I think the number of arrests in the UK for performing FGM or allowing it to be performed is ZERO. Sharia compliant governments. Arrests not made because of orders from on high. Don’t upset the muslims. Maintain Social Cohesion at all costs.

  • SCREW SOCIALISM

    As hygienic as a back alley abortion.

    As progressive as islamofascists throwing gay teens off roofs..

    Where is the outrage over this by UNICEF???????????????????????

  • kathy kalb

    What a discussing, barbaric thing to do to any girl. This is sick!

    • dan

      Hi Kathy,

      The benefit of female circumcision are :

      It prevents unpleasant odours which result from foul secretions beneath
      the prepuce.
      It reduces the incidence of urinary tract infections
      It reduces the incidence of infections of the reproductive system.
      In the book on Traditions that affect the health of women and children, which was published by the World Health Organization in 1979 it says:
      With regard to the type of female circumcision which involves removal of the prepuce of the clitoris, which is similar to male circumcision, no harmful health effects have been noted.

      Impact of circumcisions studied

      CHAPS, the Center for HIV and AIDS Prevention Studies, which manages the clinics, continues to study the impact of circumcisions.

      CEO Dirk Taljaard said new data suggests circumcision benefits women, too.

      “We saw a protective effect for women. If you had women in the community that have only had circumcised partners, the risk was reduced already by 20 percent for 15- to 25-years-old women,” Taljaard said.

      Some studies estimate that, in South Africa, for every four circumcisions, one HIV infection is avoided. Since 2007, more than 1.5 million circumcisions have been performed in the country, suggesting close to 400,000 new infections may have been avoided.
      http://www.voanews.com/content/south-africa-sees-male-circumcision-as-way-to-reduce-hiv-infections/2538279.html

      http://www.cogwriter.com/news/doctrine/cdc-finally-supports-circumcision-health-benefits-of-circumcision/

      ♠ Medical research has found that a high percentage of women who have had genital surgery “have rich sexual lives, including desire, arousal, orgasm, and satisfaction, and their frequency of sexual activity is not reduced.”
      ♠ Reproductive health and medical complications linked to female genital surgery happen
      infrequently.
      ♠ Those who value female genital surgery view it as aesthetic enhancement, not mutilation.
      ♠ In almost all societies where female genital surgery is performed, male genital surgery also takes place. Broadly speaking, then, such societies “are not singling out females as targets of punishment, sexual deprivation, or humiliation.”
      ♠ The link between patriarchy and female genital surgery is unfounded. Almost no
      patriarchal societies adhere to the practice and, at the same time, the practice is not customary in the world’s most sexually restrictive societies.

      There are studies that claim female circumcision lowers HIV and STD risk

      Kankiet al. reported that, in Senegalese prostitutes, women who had undergone Female Circumcision had a significantly decreased risk of HIV-2 infection when compared to those who had not. Kanki P, M’BoupS, Marlink R, et al. “Prevalence and risk determinants of human
      immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in west African female prostitutes Am. J. Epidemiol. 136 (7): 895-907. PMID

      http://www.islamnewsroom.com/news-we-need/1827-priests-a-preachers-enter-islam-list

      Priests & Preachers To Islam (List)

      Many Come To Islam

      Faith – Belief – Salvation: All topics discussed by preachers of all faiths and many people change from one faith to another on a daily basis. Yet, the real question should be, “Why do so many knowledgeable religious leaders – GO TO ISLAM?
      The report estimated around 5,200 men and women have adopted Islam over the past 12 months, including 1,400 in London. Nearly two-thirds were women, more than 70 per cent were white and the average age at conversion was 27.

      The number of Muslim converts in Britain has passed 100,000, fuelled by a surge in young white women adopting the Islamic faith.

      The figure has almost doubled in ten years – with the average convert now a 27-year-old white woman fed up with British consumerism and immorality.

      The survey, conducted by Kevin Brice from Swansea University, asked converts for their views on the negative aspects of British culture.

      They identified alcohol and drunkenness, a ‘lack of morality and sexual permissiveness’, and ‘unrestrained consumerism’.

      Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1343954/100-000-Islam-converts-living-UK-White-women-keen-embrace-Muslim-faith.html#ixzz3jo173Aw4

      May God Bless You and Give You Guidance..worship only the almighty god without any partner

      • Megalith

        Hey Dan. Cutting off your head prevents ignorance and stupidity. Give it a try.

        • henry

          Hi Megalith,

          Impact of circumcisions studied

          CHAPS, the Center for HIV and AIDS Prevention Studies, which manages the clinics, continues to study the impact of circumcisions.

          CEO Dirk Taljaard said new data suggests circumcision benefits women, too.

          “We saw a protective effect for women. If you had women in the community that have only had circumcised partners, the risk was reduced already by 20 percent for 15- to 25-years-old women,” Taljaard said.

          Some studies estimate that, in South Africa, for every four circumcisions, one HIV infection is avoided. Since 2007, more than 1.5 million circumcisions have been performed in the country, suggesting close to 400,000 new infections may have been avoided.
          http://www.voanews.com/content/south-africa-sees-male-circumcision-as-way-to-reduce-hiv-infections/2538279.html

          http://www.cogwriter.com/news/doctrine/cdc-finally-supports-circumcision-health-benefits-of-circumcision/

          ♠ Medical research has found that a high percentage of women who have had genital surgery “have rich sexual lives, including desire, arousal, orgasm, and satisfaction, and their frequency of sexual activity is not reduced.”
          ♠ Reproductive health and medical complications linked to female genital surgery happen
          infrequently.
          ♠ Those who value female genital surgery view it as aesthetic enhancement, not mutilation.
          ♠ In almost all societies where female genital surgery is performed, male genital surgery also takes place. Broadly speaking, then, such societies “are not singling out females as targets of punishment, sexual deprivation, or humiliation.”
          ♠ The link between patriarchy and female genital surgery is unfounded. Almost no
          patriarchal societies adhere to the practice and, at the same time, the practice is not customary in the world’s most sexually restrictive societies.

          There are studies that claim female circumcision lowers HIV and STD risk

          Kankiet al. reported that, in Senegalese prostitutes, women who had undergone Female Circumcision had a significantly decreased risk of HIV-2 infection when compared to those who had not. Kanki P, M’BoupS, Marlink R, et al. “Prevalence and risk determinants of human
          immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in west African female prostitutes Am. J. Epidemiol. 136 (7): 895-907. PMID

          May God Bless You and Give You Guidance.. worship only one almighty god without any partners.

          • Megalith

            Wow, so you hop onto a second account to spew more pro-muslim B.S.? Give it up screwball.

  • mary

    ONLY A SAVAGE WOULD DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS AND TO THEIR OWN NO LESS

  • Inez Aultman

    Male circumcision is prescribed in the Koran at age 7 days. Female genital mutilation is done without any anesthesia much later. Whether this is the intent or not, it certainly is useful in keeping women subjugated in that culture.

  • Pamela Keck

    Wookiee it does not matter female r male. I agree start castrating the men who allow and imprison the women who do this to poor little girls.

  • Truth Seeker

    Many comment this as Savagery. But those who do this believe, it is to please their Allah to get Visa to Jannah

  • Wayne Ville

    So basically the doctors, instead of saying this FGM that be banned as a health issue, is saying that they want to get the revenue.

Pin It on Pinterest