At last the whole truth has come to light. Speaking on Monday at a Conservative Friends of Israel event attended by over 800 people and over 200 Parliamentarians, British Prime Minister Theresa May said that she had banned me from entering the UK because “Islamophobia” is just as harmful as anti-Semitism.
Geert Wilders joins me in this rather exclusive club of heretics persecuted in the UK under the blasphemy laws under Islam. Here he writes about it at Breitbart News: “Exclusive–Geert Wilders: Delusional Britain Would Rather Ban Donald Trump Rather than Confront Unpleasant Facts” By Geert Wilders, Breitbart News, January 19, 2016 Deja-vu. It is not…
My latest article, just up, over at Breitbart News has certainly struck a chord. It has thousands of comments and it’s only been live a few hours: “Geller: The Nation That Gave the World the Magna Carta Is Dead” By Pamela Geller, Breitbart News, January 19, 2016: The British Parliament on Monday debated whether or…
The supreme Mr. Steyn nails it, yet again. Further proof we are living in “the age of the crank” partner with “the age of the coward”. Mark Steyn: “No serious person thinks Spencer and Geller are any threat to ‘public order’” thanks to Robert Spencer, February 11, 2015 The problem is, the un-serious people are…
The Muslim Brotherhood, just another Muslim liberation movement, that’s all, but Robert Spencer and I — we are the real trouble. Well, that’s the world view of the British government. The British people should sleep well at night, knowing that their safety and security are in the hands of those who are so well informed and in touch with reality. What is striking — well, so much of this is ….
The Home Secretary Theresa May failed to ban the Nazi leader, Gábor Vona, from the UK. He arrived on the eve of Holocaust Memorial Day, when his party and its politicians openly express repulsive antisemitic views. Despite calls to bar entry, the Home Secretary welcomed him to speak in Britain. Apparently, Home Secretary Theresa May thinks Nazi leaders are “conducive to the public good,” but pro-Israel voices are banned.
The Jobbik party loves Islam and hates Israel so they cannot be banned; only Robert and I can be.
We have long known that this would be a long, tough legal fight. We don’t expect to see justice until we appeal to the very highest court. The lower courts, where our cases are heard early in our court battle, are low on the totem pole and very politically driven. Once we get out of the sewer of those who are bowing to thugs, real justice will be served. It’s not just our battle; we are mere proxies. It is the fight for freedom for all, equality of rights before the law. And the law (at least not yet) is not the boot of sharia.
Abhijit P.G. Pandya, one of our British solicitors penned this thoughtful and stunning indictment of the latest tribulation in our legal battle against the de facto sharia ban on Robert Spencer and I in the UK.
We were banned from the UK, our presence not being “conducive to the public good.”Apparently our pro-Israel views were unwelcome as well. Free speech is essential to the public good.
An official (name redacted) in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office wrote in a May 7 letter: “We do have concerns with some of the reasoning in the sub,” that is, the “subject profiles” that had been prepared on Spencer and me, “particularly citing pro-Israeli views.” The official explained that “pro-Israeli views (and also support for waterboarding) apply to a large number of Americans, including former presidents. If, for instance, Geller and Spencer were to request details of their exclusion under FOI/DPA or other mechanism, that being pro-Israeli is cited as a reason may be problematic and they could argue publically that their exclusion is on the basis of their support for Israel.”
The British government tried to cover its tracks. But a new cache of documents that Robert Spencer and I have received in our battle to overturn our being banned from Britain reveal that a chief reason why we were banned from the country was because we strongly support Israel. As part of our lawsuit against the Queen of England and the Home Secretary et al, we are in receipt of numerous documents between the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the Office of Security and Counterterrorism, and the Home Secretary. In one of them, an official in the Foreign & Commonwealth Office who name was redacted wrote this letter on May 7 to a recipient whose name was also redacted: