Julius Caesar Protest “Assassination Porn”: Shut it Down

37

Protest “Julius Caesar” –  Delacorte Theater  – Central Park (and thoughts as I pass from “Julius Caesar” to “1984”).

First – Fri – June 16. The action this night was outside the theatre. Protesting the assassination porn while a counter protest, by a few UWS lefties, supported the violence. Found some pictures on twitter.

Story continues below advertisement

Next – Sat, June 17, 2017 – Central Park – 6:30 pm. 

There was no counter-protest this evening (rain was forecast), but that did not keep the patriots away. Their numbers grew.

Watching people interact with the protesters was interesting. They garnered a few man-on-the-street giggles – and side eye glances – attempting to register their disapproval as they walked by.

Amusingly, the NYPD officers arrived long after the protesters had stood quietly holding their signs and chatting with anyone who wished to ask questions. SO…. the need to place the barricades seemed odd and unnecessary.

Meanwhile, the passersby also took many pictures.



And selfies. There were lots of selfies.



Also, the predictable verbal challenges, “Have you heard of the First Amendment?” and “Why ruin our evening?” While others worked to dissuade the protestors with courteous discourse.


Some passersby showed welcomed support with thumbs up and a smile and/or mouthing a quiet thank you.  Others wound up joining the protest, like this fellow below, who responded confidently to the aggressive query, “Have you read the play?

The last night to protest, Sunday, June 18. Julius Caesar is closing.  A small protest gathered pre-show. Each night, passersby would grab a sign and join the protest. (unfortunately no pictures surfaced from this last evening) But I was told of a young Hispanic girl who said she felt really good having protested the porn inside the Delacourt.

8 pm .The last performance of this abomination was closed with a protest-punch: TWO Proud Boys hit the stage mid-show. (Video clips from Twitter)

First, Jovi Val stormed the stage.

Exercising their the First Amendment right to protest – to interrupt an event, JUST LIKE THE LEFT has done and continues to do . [Alinsky “Protest Rules 101”].

Followed by Sal Cipolla

Twitter clip from  McGINNES interview

All three patriots were arrested for trespassing (on public property) . Gavin McGinnis interviewed  all three: Laura Loomer, Jovi Val and Sal Cipolla

“Anti-Trump and anti-white violence is escalating in the United States of America. From eggs, to fists, to bike locks, and now knives, everyday Trump supporters seem to be in real danger in their own country. Only leftists are allowed to be angry.”


Daniel Greenfield addresses  The Left’s Anger Privilege

“The angry left demands that everyone recognize the absolute righteousness of its anger as the basis for its power. This anger privilege, like tone policing, is often cast in terms of oppressed groups. But its anger isn’t in defiance of oppression, but in pursuit of oppression.

Anger privilege is used to silence opposition, to enforce illegal policies and to seize power. But the left’s monopolies on anger are cultural, not political. The entertainment industry and the media can enforce anger privilege norms through public shaming, but their smears can’t stop the consequences of the collapse of civility in public life. There are no monopolies on emotion.

When anger becomes the basis for political power, then it won’t stop with Howard Dean or Bernie Sanders. That’s what the left found out in the last election. Its phony pearl clutching was a reaction to the consequences of its destruction of civility. Its reaction to that show of anger by conservatives and independents was to escalate the conflict. Instead of being the opposition, the left became the “resistance”. Trump was simultaneously Hitler and a traitor. Republicans were evil beasts.

James Hodgkinson absorbed all this. The left fed his anger. And eventually he snapped.”


No doubt remains,
the Communist infiltration, requiring the dumbing down of America, is bearing motley fruit: Mission Accomplished. 

A new generation now thinks Orwell wrote “1984” as a warning of  TRUMP FASCISM. Incredible. But, true … with a  stunning misunderstanding of “1984” found in a theatre review by Michael Portantiere

June 22, 2017 Theatre: Hudson Theatre,  Broadway

“The dystopia depicted by George Orwell (real name, Eric Arthur Blair) in his chillingly prescient novel 1984 has not come true in all of its nightmarish particulars, at least not to the extent that Orwell envisioned. But, needless to say, the current sociopolitical condition of the world has enough striking similarities to the totalitarian hell of the novel as to make one’s blood run cold—all the more so since the shocking rise of Donald Trump to the Presidency of the United States.

Just how far off are we from the horrors of 1984?

We the populace do not yet have government-installed telescreens in our private domiciles, scrutinizing our every action and utterance so that we may be arrested at any moment if we don’t toe the party line, but most of us have “smart phones” that pinpoint our whereabouts. Also, a great deal of our personal information is available in the ether somewhere, and rare today is the public space that isn’t under video camera surveillance. While probably not even the most rabid conspiracy theorists among us believe that people are employed by the government to censor or destroy historical documents and news archives, as the central character Winston Smith does in the Orwell novel, examples of one or another person or organization attempting to literally rewrite history are not uncommon.

Perhaps most terrifying of all, the Orwellian concept of “doublespeak” and the maxim that “Ignorance is Strength” are hallmarks of the Trump administration (and, some would say, the present-day Republican party in general).

These frightening facts and others have lifted 1984 back onto the best-seller lists, and are no doubt the impetus for a group of producers headed by Sonia Friedman and Scott Rudin having now brought a stage adaptation of the property to Broadway. Some people consider the novel unstageable and unfilmable, but I disagree. Although a 1956 movie version is not well regarded, the 1984 film of 1984 (neat) starring John Hurt is excellent, and I was lucky enough to see a minimalist but powerful adaptation by Alan Lyddiard that was presented in a fine production by the Godlight Theatre Company at 59E59 theaters in 2009.

The current, high profile production at the Hudson Theatre is not quite so minimalist, incorporating as it does some major effects in terms of scenery (designed by Chloe Lamford), lighting (Natasha Chivers), and sound effects (Tom Gibbons), even if the cast is relatively small—nine people plus one alternate, three understudies, and two other actors who appear only on film. This is the Broadway transfer from England of a co-production by Headlong Theatre, the Nottingham Playhouse, and the Almeida Theatre Company. In 101 minutes, adapters/directors Robert Icke & Duncan Macmillan and company retell the story of Winston’s and his beloved Julia’s failed rebellion against Big Brother and the Party that attempts to control every facet of all citizens’ lives, including their very thoughts.

To get the negative out of the way first, it must be said that a few elements of this adaptation and production seem ill considered. A framing device has been added, which is not a bad idea in itself and does allow for the retention of more of Orwell’s voice in the play, but the concept of this particular device is confusing at the start and doesn’t fully make sense in the end. Also, the setting of the story has been fudged. The events of the novel are all the more disturbing because they occur mostly in a future landscape that remains recognizable as London, but while some British references (such as a recurring nursery rhyme) remain in the stage version, the “where is this happening” question is confused in that a few U.S. locales are mentioned, and all of the actors speak in American accents—including Tom Sturridge, the Brit who plays Winston. If resetting the story in an ill-defined, non-specific place was done with a view towards making the tale more universal, it actually has the opposite effect in undercutting one of the novel’s greatest strengths.

There are other issues here. At several points during the evening, the audience is blinded by super-bright lights flashing directly in our faces. This serves the intended purpose of covering the movement of actors and set elements during scene changes, and the effect is arguably all of a piece with the kind of sensory assault that would be practiced by the Party, but it’s annoying and painful in the extreme. Also: Though some extended scenes of Winston and Julia conducting their surreptitious affair are ostensibly being acted live offstage and projected for the audience on a large, sectioned screen that spans the width of the stage at a considerable height, these sequences actually seem to have been prerecorded, and therefore come across as even less immediate and less theatrical.

All of the above are minuses for the production, but ultimately the day is won by the power of Orwell’s words and the high quality of the acting—and, of course, by the story’s eerie relevance to current events. Though Sturridge’s American accent (which he shouldn’t have been required to adopt in the first place) is not 100 percent convincing, he fully and movingly inhabits Winston in every other respect, and he deserves a Tony Award nomination if only for his gut-wrenching portrayal of the poor man’s physical and emotional agony under torture.

Opposite him as Julia, Olivia Wilde gives a performance of quiet power that only grows in intensity as the plot progresses and the characters’ lives go from bad to far worse. The fact that both Sturridge and Wilde are younger and sexier than the actors who played these roles in previous iterations of 1984 lends a new frisson and, arguably, an extra poignancy to the tale.

Having cited the unnecessary and unwise Americanization of 1984 for this production, I’ll now admit that it does pay a dividend in regard to the always brilliant Reed Birney’s performance as Inner Party member O’Brien. In the 1956 and 1984 film versions, this role was played respectively by Michael Redgrave and Richard Burton, whose plummy accents lent the character an aristocratic air. In contrast, Birney sounds like some nice, middle-class guy from Ohio, and as a result, the evil he perpetrates in the almost unbearable sequence during which O’Brien brutally tortures Winston as a means of controlling his mind is all the more devastating. The rest of the cast is very strong, with Michael Potts, Cara Seymour, and Wayne Duvall as standouts; and the direction of Icke and Macmillan is laudable overall, notwithstanding the reservations noted above.

One of the most telling lines in this adaptation of 1984 is not, I believe, a direct quote or paraphrase from the Orwell novel, but it certainly fits the tenor and spirit of the work. In the midst of the torture scene, O’Brien coldly tells Winston: “The people are not going to revolt. They will not look up from their screens long enough to notice what’s really happening.” On this point, at least, there would seem to be hope. A gratifyingly large percentage of the U.S. and world population sees clearly that fascism is growing like a cancer, and is vehemently protesting it. Any and all proud members of this group should attend 1984 on Broadway if only to firm their resolve—but of course, this is an example of preaching to the converted. The tragedy is that no one on the side of darkness is likely to take in this extraordinary production—or read the novel, or see either film version—and therefore has zero chance of having his/her mind or heart opened by the harrowing cautionary tale that sprung from the pen of George Orwell nearly 70 years ago.”

The Marxist Insurrection, revolution nurtured through the arts and media, is responsible for these current versions of “Julius Caesar” and  “1984” – rewritten – reduced to convenient agitprop.

And as this twitter exchange below reveals, the dis-information era, that agitprop spoon-fed to successively compliant generations, has resulted in mind-NUMBING ignorance.

Outside and inside the Delacourt Theatre, the LEFT met a future they didn’t plan. An awakening. Resistance. A compliant people no more. Finally.

[Where indicated, pictures and videos property of Pamela Hall]

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
37 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago

Freedom of speech means just that, if the left want to portray themselves as fools, it is there freedom to do so, it is the freedom of others to say they are fools. There is no freedom from offence, if you don’t like it, that is your choice, others may.

felix1999
felix1999
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

We are long past freedom of speech. The LEFT is advocating assassination of a President and a political party.
WAKE UP!

marlene
marlene
6 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Free speech does not include terroristic threats, threats of bodily harm or murder, threats of assassination, and slander that is not true.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

What happened inside the theater is not freedom of speech and has actually been ruled to be exempt from First Amendment protection (denying others’ free speech). (It would be no different from hecklers interrupting a speech by an invited guest.) Instead, it’s a violation of others’ 1A rights when they rushed the stage. It has to be presumed that they’re trying to kill performers and they must thus be treated that way.

Tm.
Tm.
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Absolute nonsense. They were not armed. These were people who were incensed by the idea the play is obviously trying to suggest. They were disruptive and they were arrested. I think the play should continue. Peaceful protests should also be allowed. I would recommend having more security and police.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago
Reply to  Tm.

They were not armed.

You cannot presume that they’re not armed…especially when you have people traveling to NYC just to commit mayhem (see Ismaaiyl Brinsley as one example).

These were people who were incensed by the idea the play is obviously trying to suggest.

That does not matter in the eyes of New York law. They can walk out. (The play’s limited run ended June 18.)

Peaceful protests should also be allowed.

That was the protest outside the venue as indicated by the pictures. The rushing of the stage is not peaceful. Additionally, this was planned from out of state (across both state and international lines), and so there is a federal offense as well, since a bail website had been set up before this had happened.

Tm.
Tm.
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

I have tried several times to respond to you without success, but I understand what is going in. I am unfamiliar with the case you mentioned but shall look it up.
The disrupters were unarmed. They were not wearing capes, jackets, no backpacks. If a violent response had been anticipated, there would have been a significant police and/or volunteer presence.
The protesters were in error to disrupt, but they were removed and arrested. To suggest that they be harmed in any way is not right.

Tm.
Tm.
6 years ago
Reply to  Tm.

Should say, “I understand what is going on.” Had to type fast since I keep getting blackouts.

famouswolf
famouswolf
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

I have to wonder how you and your ilk would react to a similar play with obama as Julius Caesar.
I think I know. The same response that is given moslem violence, BLM violence, Antifa violence…a pat on the head, ‘nice dog’, and otherwise ignoring it.
It’s not the 1st Amendment you are concerned about, because you want to see it shredded, unless you can use it to silence ALL oppositional thought.
Come on now, be honest (for once) and admit it.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Presumptuous hogwash.

Kalambong Kalambong
Kalambong Kalambong
6 years ago

The trick is not to protest AGAINST a show but to protest FOR another, even more grotesque production aimed back at them

Organize a show of REAL stories like how moslems killed and cooked babies and then feed the meat to mother

Make it as grotesque as ever be

marlene
marlene
6 years ago

LOL – I hear you.

AlgorithmicAnalystD
AlgorithmicAnalyst
6 years ago

Greenfield’s article was quite brilliant, by the way.

Duchess of Pork
Duchess of Pork
6 years ago

As Greenfield always is.

Dave J Lawson
Dave J Lawson
6 years ago

Mutilating/distorting history, downplaying jihadi criminals and sharia hatred of all non-muslims is only way they can get useful idiots to rally behind them.

Don’t be surprised when the Left/Liberals start honoring ISIS, hamas jihadis just the way Islamonazis in America are demanding Americans do http://bit.ly/2qvcHov

MSM will not talk about it ……nor will they be deported for insulting US military & supporting jihadis.

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
6 years ago
Reply to  Dave J Lawson

Agreed. The cops putting up the bicycle rack barricades to control three old geezers are the very same cops who handle muslime thugs and leftist saboteurs with kid gloves.

Milo Yiannopoulos Adopt Milo
Milo Yiannopoulos Adopt Milo
6 years ago

I just started a petition on the White House petitions site, We the People. Please sign and forward onward. Please help spread the message. Tweet it. Email it. And put it out on Fakebook.

The Genius of Trump’s Tweets
Rachel Alexander
President Donald Trump frequently comes under criticism for tweeting, even from his own advisers. But tweeting is probably the smartest thing he has done as president. He is able to speak directly to the American people without going through the biased mainstream media filter. The media doesn’t get to ask him slanted questions or pick and choose parts of his press releases to publish. Instead, Trump gets immense control over every single sentence he issues, which are then read by millions of Americans.
!
Mark Levin: Please, Mr. President, Keep Tweeting
“Keep at it, keep at it, keep at it.”
“If he doesn’t tweet, how in the world is he going to get his message out?”
“Thank you for taking on the media. It’s a damn about time somebody did. Don’t stop tweeting. Be more careful with your tweets, but don’t stop tweeting because you’re able to go over the head of the media the way Reagan did with his speeches. Reagan had a unique ability to communicate and he had to go over the head of the media with speeches that he could give. He was a superb communicator. And I got to thinking, Donald Trump does the same thing in his own way. He could be more careful. I don’t care. Are the media careful about what they report? No. In any event, I’m one of those — count me in the minority that says, ‘Keep at it, keep at it, keep at it.’”

Petition Title: Please, Mr. President, Keep Tweeting
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/please-mr-president-keep-tweeting

gia
gia
6 years ago

Signed !

tg
tg
6 years ago

Somehow, I get the feeling that the motivation behind this is precisely the opposite as is purported to be. For one thing, the president has never considered stopping tweeting in the first place. Yet, this petition is bringing up this issue willy-nilly.

Tm.
Tm.
6 years ago
Reply to  tg

I agree. Proper discernment is vital in this day and age. I think the motivation is suspect.

Milo Yiannopoulos Adopt Milo
Milo Yiannopoulos Adopt Milo
6 years ago
Reply to  tg

Not at all.
MSM is trying to portray him as befuddled, blumbering, buffoon, who can’t get his act together and is constantly torpedoing himself with his tweets. MSM and other pundits, wannabees claim that his tweets got him into trouble. Their intention is to railroad him “at any cost to the country” no matter what he tweets or doesn’t. Their intention is to shut him up and isolate him from his base.
Mark Levin and Rachel Alexander at Town Hall counter that argument beautifully.
https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2017/06/26/the-genius-of-trumps-tweets-n2346555

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
6 years ago

The left’s anger privilege is manifested in other ways, such as the wedding cake case currently before the SC. Instead of searching for a baker who will accommodate their wishes to bake a cake for their homosexual “wedding”, the left finds it more productive to go to the time, effort, and expense of suing any who will not. As in the case of the play, the constitutional liberties the cast claims to justify their production are the very same liberties that allow protest against it.

felix1999
felix1999
6 years ago

The National EMBOWLMENT of the Arts and Humanities must be DEFUNDED. NO tax payer should have to support this filth with their money.

Tm.
Tm.
6 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

I feel that people should vote carefully. Vote in people who you feel have common sense. Take a little time to research and support groups and companies with similar views. Make a tiny personal stand and boycott. Do not support these groups, and check out the groups you do support with your monies.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago

The outside protest is 1A protected. Loomer’s Val’s and Cipolla actions were not. I would have grabbed all 3 and have had security stomp on their backs and heads (intending to paralyze the lawbreakers—21 foot rule), then turned the, over and stomp on their fronts (intending to cause permanent organ damage). Lay down the law and others will think twice…optics be damned, because the law is more important.

Exercising their the First Amendment right to protest – to interrupt an event,

New York says it’s not protected by 1A…and the law saying it’s not was upheldby the Supreme Court in 1951 in an excellent decision authored by Robert H. Jackson (Feiner v. State of New York. Since the theater is privately managed, New York considers it private property. Even if it’s not private property, it’s the same as a heckler’s veto, which is not tolerated in this state. One may get away with that in most states, but New York is not most states.

As for James Hodgkinson, Daniel Greenfield is no different from the now-disbarred Jack Thompson, who blamed Hollywood for real-life violence and tried (unsuccessfully) to sue Hollywood over the Heath High School shooting.

Tm.
Tm.
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

I support peaceful protests. I disagree with your statement that the protesters should have been stomped on and paralyzed. THAT is not peaceful. The disrupters were removed and arrested. And that is the law.
I am not certain I completely understand your meaning. I imagine that you can understand how people would be upset by this play, yet, we live in a country where we respect freedom of speech, and that is good.
I would review all the innumerable incidents where the progressives have harmed, attacked pro Trump gatherings and supporters. Our illustrious universities won’t even hire conservative professors or allow conservatives to speak. Let everyone be heard, but people should try to be peaceful and respectful.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago
Reply to  Tm.

I disagree with your statement that the protesters should have been stomped on and paralyzed. THAT is not peaceful.

That (what happened inside the theater during the performance) is not considered protesting for purposes of the First Amendment…it’s lawbreaking because the free speech of the performers in their venue is denied.

I imagine that you can understand how people would be upset by this play,

Don’t see the play then, OR do what those who did outside the theater did…protest peacefully outside of the venue before the admission barrier.

I would review all the innumerable incidents where the progressives have harmed, attacked pro Trump gatherings and supporters.

Notably, exactly zero of those incidents have happened in the State of New York, because such isn’t tolerated by law enforcement here. People know better than to even try that here. When a pro-Israel group was invited to speak at Brooklyn College in 2013, NYPD and CUNY police planned in advance to ensure that disrupters had no chance of getting in.

Tm.
Tm.
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

I understand what you are saying, but, I have to respond by saying that the disrupting protesters were removed and arrested.
I agree with your solution that people not see the play, or protest peacefully, quietly.
As far as your third paragraph. I cannot possibly believe that. The state of NY is a highly “progressive” state. I would have to sit and compile lengthy lists of incidents of concern as I look them up. Have conservatives ever had a fair shake in NYS?
The laws must be fair and just for all citizens.
People should read as much as their free time allows. Read about global concerns and events.
Have you noted the few comments on this thread, on other threads? But we all know what our favorite reality stars are wearing. What does that tell you?
I don’t know what it tells you, but this blind complacency is extremely worrisome to me.

marlene
marlene
6 years ago
Reply to  Tm.

I respect your level-head in an unlevel playing field. I also appreciate your healthy cynicism. Chaos precludes truth. FYI (referring to all your comments).

famouswolf
famouswolf
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

LOL The law for me but not for thee, eh.
Leftist scumbag loser. There’s my free speech, you’re welcome.

Edward Cline
Edward Cline
6 years ago

Pamela: The print size is too small, making it difficult to read, on virtually all your recent postings.

marlene
marlene
6 years ago
Reply to  Edward Cline

Had the same problems. Changed my settings in Control Panel.

Tm.
Tm.
6 years ago

It is freedom of speech, I would allow it, but monitor it. Let the left be seen for what it is. President Trump won because the majority of people did not, do not agree with the agenda pushed by the left.
I think the protests were fine as long as they remain peaceful, and respectful. I think the numbers were very low, and the protesters were not organized. I feel that effective protests should be organized, with good signs that can be easily read, remain calm and respectful, be as informed about matters as possible.
Also, consider researching and boycotting movies, stars, and shopping places, and services that are blatantly against one’s views. I personally can do without supporting shops, coffee places, or watching movies featuring people who have stated violent or vile retorts against our President.
For the long term, please listen to this, educate your children. Encourage them in careers of law, politics, engineering, medicine, science, as well as the trades, such as carpentry, plumbing and so forth. This encouragement is vital, for the future.
Stand up for your rights, organize, be polite, be prayerful, pray for the others daily, even though some days it may be difficult to do so.

Tm.
Tm.
6 years ago

I looked at the videos. I ask this. Where are the recordings and the videos of conservatives being harmed by the left? The conservative speakers being manhandled. I cannot recall all the incidents I’ve read about, but one elderly speaker was thrown to the ground at a university. What about the young woman who was accosted and egged and humiliated at a pro Trump pre election event? What about the homeowner whose pro Trump sign was removed from her lawn and smashed and I believe she was also manhandled. What about the exits being blocked at pre electin Trump rallies? What about some high ups at CNN who were musing about a plane incident when Trump and Pence were on board? What about that incident with Ms. Griffin, and these are just a few cases. We never hear much about those. Is that right?
Everyone feels strongly about his own opinion, we should not be hating on one another like this. Let us be fair.

Menseisvolstrond
Menseisvolstrond
6 years ago

Freedoms without boundaries leads to chaos. What has happened to respect for self and others, integrity, honesty, decency, couth and patriotism?
Think about it!

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago

These people didn’t exactly engage in that.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!