News Ticker >
[ July 23, 2017 ]

Adult-Onset Islam: The Case of Prison Conversions

[ July 23, 2017 ]

VIDEO: Muslims in Gaza CELEBRATE Slaughter of Jewish Family #savages

[ July 23, 2017 ]

Savage Jew-Hater Linda Sarsour PRAISES mass murder of Jewish family on Shabbat, incites to violence

[ July 23, 2017 ]

Muslims reject surveillance cameras installed at Temple Mount and all security measures to prevent jihad...

[ July 23, 2017 ]

Ann Arbor Jihad: Muslim shot by SWAT lunged at officers with knife, sword, ordered police...

[ July 23, 2017 ]

VIDEO: A Perfect Example of What Good Men Do

[ July 23, 2017 ]

“Moderate” “Peace Partner” Fatah: Abbas says “campaign to take over Jerusalem has begun”

[ July 23, 2017 ]

Hungarian PM: Soros, EU Are Trying to Establish a ‘Muslimized’ Europe

[ July 23, 2017 ]

Muslim migrant employee at Chicago O’Hare Airport who aided, armed ISIS wanted to “bury unbelievers...

[ July 23, 2017 ]

Canada: ANOTHER imam calls for the elimination of Israelis and Jews

Mr. Brexit: Muslim Refugees Will Destroy EU Without ‘Ethnic’ Borders

26

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In an exclusive interview with the Geller Report, British MEP Daniel Hannan — the other Mr. Brexit” — said that the European Union (EU) is collapsing under its own weight because its borders are not “ethnographic.”

“Conflicts all over world are about belonging, and are ethnic in nature,” Hannan said.

“The Balkans, Kashmir, Chechyna, Israel and Palestine —  anywhere in the world — nine times out of ten, it’s an argument about borders not being ethnographic.”

Hannan believes the EU is imploding for two main reasons: because of the systemic instability caused by multiple waves of unscreened Muslim refugees, and lastly, because EU member countries lack a shared culture that is genuine.

“And this is the central problem with the EU. It’s an attempt to create a democracy where there is no shared culture,” remarked Hannan.

Recent headlines confirm Hannan’s dire outlook for the EU. Rape legalization (or active decriminalization of Muslim perpetrators) is effectively being implemented in France, Germany and Sweden.

As for the absence of “shared culture,” Europe’s history reveals “shared culture” that is marred by war and genocide. Such an absurd proposition is akin to a burglar merging households with one of his previous victims because of their “shared culture.”

The increase in borderless terrorist organizations and lone wolf incidents are further proof that “Europe” is still very much a collection of nations, not a standalone entity.

Consider that when Syrian refugees ravaged Germany, when Paris burned, and when Brussels was bombed by ISIS, internal borders were closed and the EU quickly morphed back into 25 separate countries at breakneck speed. Borders closed because Britain, France, and Germany never ceased being independent nations with fully independent identities. The same is true of all other EU member nations.

“We are trying to create a democracy, without a ‘demos,’” Hannan explains. “Democracy works best in units where everyone has enough in common with each other to accept the government.”

And national governments, “where everyone has enough in common,” are still the best known vehicles for delivering the blessings of democracy to the greatest number of people. “Democracy is the worst system, except for all others,” former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill once quipped.

So, if nations do it best, why does the EU keep trying to fill the shoes of its member nations? The EU is based on a flawed premise: namely, that nationalism is evil and the primary cause of global conflict. The argument falls apart when it is considered that no democratic nation has ever fought against another democratic nation. It was internationalism which caused WWI & WWII, not nationalism (rigid regional alliances in the previous – the League of Nations in the latter.)

The destruction of nationhood was an aim of Nazism and Communism. It is unsurprising then, that Communists love the EU. Mikhail Gorbachev jokingly refers to the EU as the “European Soviet.” When the former leader of our Cold War arch-nemesis is supportive, it may be time to pause and reflect.

An old joke captures the essence of longstanding European national rivalries:

“Heaven is where the police are British, the lovers French, the mechanics German, the chefs Italian, and it is all organized by the Swiss.”

“Hell is where the police are German, the lovers Swiss, the mechanics French, the chefs British, and it is all organized by the Italians,” the punchline reads.

In short, nations still matter. And nations at their most basic, are a collection of people with shared ethnic, religious, and cultural heritage together constituting a singular national identity. Immigrants to a host country traditionally are expected to adopt the characteristics of this shared identity, or be sent home.

When European host countries open their doors today, reverse assimilation arguably occurs. The hosts are in many cases expected to adopt the identity of the guest, or risk death.

For Hannan, the failure to assimilate and integrate new prospective “Europeans” is due to the lack of any ethnic “European” identity. “Europe” is co-opting the functions most efficiently performed by nation-states, and chaos is the result.

“Overseeing the economy and securing the national territory are primal functions of any government, but both on monetary policy and immigration, European member states found themselves powerless,” Hannan told The Daily Caller News Foundation in March. “Now, that wouldn’t matter if people came together as ‘Europeans.’”

“When the EU turned 60,” there was no “sign of anyone thinking or voting as Europeans. In fact, since the first European Parliament elections in 1979, we’ve seen an unbroken decline in participation,” Hannan told Geller Report.

“If you look at all the conflicts in the world now, the biggest problem people have today is feeling like they’re in the wrong country, either that they are a minority that feels no loyalty to the national government, or that they are cut off from the community,” Hannan argues.

Beyond the immigration and security issues raised by Hannan deriving from the nebulous and basically nonexistent “European” identity, EU member states are also partly to blame for the widespread ethnic conflict permeating Europe.

In the case of the United Kingdom, a nation that once controlled over a quarter of the Earth’s surface, “open borders” policies dating back to the seventies challenge conventional British assumptions about immigration. Traditionally, any prospective resident or citizen wishing to enter the UK must want to be British — or at the very least harbor no plans to cause inhabitants grievous bodily harm.

Not so today. Common sense is considered “insensitive.” But, then so were the London Tube bombings.

Muslims were historically viewed by the British as a case of oil and water where it concerns assimilation. Afterall, a faith that fanatically adheres to a system wholly opposed to British values is irreconcilable, certainly.

Where it was once painfully obvious to a majority of British citizens that large-scale Muslim immigration is a death wish, staggering and willful ignorance is the new normal.

“If this turns out to be an act of Islamic terrorism, I think the fact that the man is a Muslim is utterly and completely irrelevant,” remarked Lord Digby Jones, ranking member of the House of Lords, after the March terror attack in London. He added: “You’re safer in London than you’ve ever been.”

Muslim Mayor of London Sadiq Khan told the media that Islamic terrorism was “part and parcel” of living in a big city. He forgot to add, “when populated by Muslims.”

Churchill once compared Islam to “hydrophobia in a dog” in his unabridged book, The River War, adding that, “Insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.”

Words like those written by Churchill earned another famous Brit his walking papers only a few decades later.

Nowhere is the transformation of British public opinion on the issue of immigration more evident than the tragic political suicide of statesman Enoch Powell. Forty years ago, Powell delivered the courageous speech that would end his career. Called the “Rivers of Blood” speech, his words are nothing short of prophetic.

“It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre,” Powell lamented.

“Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will be occupied by sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.  We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants,” Powell continued.

“As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding. Like the Roman, I seem to see ‘the River Tiber foaming with much blood,’” Powell said.

Powell was more correct in his predictions than he could even imagine. Britain’s Muslim population is now so aggressive that the British government recently began enforcing Islamic “Sharia” law  alongside British law in the UK. 

“If Sharia is implemented then you can turn this country into a haven of peace …Once a thief’s hand is cut off, nobody is going to steal. Once an adulterer is stoned, nobody is going to commit this crime at all. This is why we say we want to offer it to British society,” remarked the chief Justice of London’s Sharia Court in a chilling statement.

Muslims are projected to be a de facto majority in Europe by 2050. Democracy in Europe cannot survive when the fastest-growing ethnic demographic fundamentally rejects the core democratic values of European countries.

Hannan agrees. “The refugee crisis exposes the democratic weakness [of the EU], the extent to which European integration is purchased at a democratic price,” he concludes.

One thing is clear to all who study the EU: it is a foolhardy attempt to undo the natural order in pursuit of a Utopia that can never exist as long as human beings are involved.

 

  • bd

    Taking over other lands, which used to happen in the past through violent conquest, today happens in a different manner. Muslims are the inventors of this type of conquest, which can be termed – Modern era conquest. It happens like this –

    – Muslims go into a non-muslim area. Start outbreeding the natives. And when they become numerous enough, they claim this non-muslim land in which they reside, as their own, and demand secession. To the outside world, it seems like separatism, when in reality, it is muslims taking over non-muslim territory. To see this type of conquest in action, one needs to look no further than kosovo –

    In 1901, muslims in kosovo were 45%. Serbs also 45%. 30 years later, in 1931, muslims became 61% of kosovo. And serbs 28%. By 1991 muslims became 81% of kosovo, and serbs only 13%. And, as expected – Kosovo muslims declared independence from serbia—took over serbia’s territory—in 2008 as the republic of kosovo – Conquest. Today muslims are 96% of kosovo.

    This is how modern era conquest works. What happened to kosovo, is precisely what will happen to most of the european nations, once muslims become numerous enough in those nations. We can thank muslims for the invention of this type of conquest – Modern era conquest.

  • rambler

    The “refugees” have come to assimilate everyone else or else. It is nothing short of total conquest.

    • Orarolsen

      Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj310d:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      !mj310d:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash310TopBigGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj310d..,…..

  • Michael Copeland

    Hannan rightly says the idea is hopelessly flawed that wars occur because people have separate nations with their own territories. The Kurds in Iraq and Turkey are in a state of war because they do NOT have their desired separate nation with its own territory.
    War after war has been started by the muslim world in order to subjugate all the rest of the world into their NATION:
    “The muslim nation is one nation to the exclusion of all others” (placard in Oxford St., thinkafricapress).
    “Fight the non-muslims to the death until the “deen” (governance), all of it, is Islam”, Koran 8:39.
    Islam has been an aggressive colonising and “nation-building” force for nearly 1400 years. All parts of the world which are not the Realm of Islam, Dar al Islam, are Dar al Harb, the Realm of War.
    War is Islam’s raison d’être.

    • berserker

      Hannah should ask why the Belgians are barely able to keep their own country together given the animosity between the Walloons and the Flemish. The Belgians went more than a year without a government because of it.

    • Steve

      The duality of Mecca vs Medina kuran is the ultimate weapon of muslamists.

  • Mahou Shoujo

    islam is destruction, constantly spiralling inward until the individual muslim is a victim of his own jihad. As other cultures lose the will to live, the nihilist fatalism of islam becomes morbidly appealing, The results are the death and destruction of every place islam has dominated. The social theorists and pseudo intelligentsia persuade society that it has progressed as far a possible along conventional lines, that it is no ready to be a leader in the new evolved humanity. Note sweden, a socialist stupid power and abject failure in the realm of social engineering.

    • Steve

      The cult attracts the worse of the worse. The duality of the Mecca vs Medina kuran is perhaps the ultimate muslamic stealth weapon.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        Everywhere in islam are examples of lies, lies and more lies.

        • Pathfinder0100

          Ya know Mahou–That kinda goes for OUR Democrats also, doesn’t it??

          • Mahou Shoujo

            Absolutely.

  • berserker

    What I find about the multiculturalism idiots in Brussels is that Belgium can barely keep itself together because of animosity between the Walloons and the Flemish. Yet they want more people to join the mix.

  • Jasmine

    Has anyone read Bat Ye’or’s book “Eurabia”? She described convincingly that EU was the brainchild of a few European bureaucrats who wanted to counter the US’ power after world war II. So …… the idea was born to form a European group, or ‘country.

    The Europeans of course needed allies, so there was nowhere else to look for allies than across the Mediterranian sea. They thought alligning themselves with these Muslim countries would give them more leverage at the UN, in which forum the Muslims got more leverage after they formed an umah, the OIC, org of Islamic countries.

    It just escalated from here; the European’s foreign workers’ program became more “humane” by letting the workers stay and bring their families, and 50 years on they now have a flood of refugees, not workers.

    The EU became more “inclusive” under the guise of acceptance of “multiculturism”, which of course is at odds with our belief of American exceptionalism and with our intention of keeping the values that make us exceptional, such as freedom of speech, opinion, believe and love in our country, freedom of religion, all values they looked down on.

    Anyway, to put it simply, they hated us, the only country in the world who was able and willing, and most importantly, succeeded in helping them escape tyrany.

    • Pathfinder0100

      Well said Jasmine!!

    • Duchess of Pork

      While the substance of your argument is correct you were not the only country who was willing and able to help Europe escape tyranny. To suggest this is to undermine the enormous contribution made by the Commonwealth countries.

  • AlgorithmicAnalyst

    Democracy works best on a small scale, where everyone knows everyone. The larger it becomes, where the people don’t personally know their leaders, the more it becomes a fraud, tyranny, kleptocracy, run by thieves who are good enough actors to fool the voters.

  • Horace

    The EU is meant to keep people as allies, but its defeating its own purpose by forcing countries to open their borders to unsafe migration. We do live in a global world, but countries rights should still be respected.

    One thing the EU forgets–all this unsafe, unvetted migration isn’t just bad for citizens, but also for real refugees who could also get caught in terrorist attacks. Unvetted migration isn’t the solution; it’s a peeling band-aid. (Maybe not even that).

    What they should do is support middle-east safe-zones so real refugees don’t have to leave their countries to be safe…..And so Europe’s citizens won’t be needlessly endangered by men like the Cologne New Year’s rapists or the people who plan attacks.

  • Jackie

    This is by design. The global elites want a brownish subservient under class in the future. 9 out of 10 of us have to go.

    • Al1005

      “The global elites want a brownish subservient under class in the future”

      As the American Democrats are finding out, once their favored minorities get large enough, they start installing their own kind into positions of power.

    • Steve

      It just may be their ultimate muslama-stake. You can’t tame a rattlesnake.

  • Drew the Infidel

    President Trump said it best, “If you don’t have a border, you don’t have a country.”

  • soundclick.com/Globalfirm

    Europe has a core-culture of Islam.
    Amin Al-Husseini mass-murdered in the Armenian genocide as general in Izmir, organized Islam in Israel & then led Nazis across Europe, the 26.000 Islamic SS-Nazi troops mass-murdering Jews, Christians, Gypsies, Africans & people with common-sense.

    So if the EU wants to implement valuable values it should adopt: the English language, human rights, ecology, ecological best-quality-cultivation,-automation & -essentialization, global solidarity.
    # Ban Islam, save lives worldwide & free the Leavenworth 10,  the Biafra-leader, the African slaves from Saudi Arabia to Mauritania, Israeli soldier Azaria & so on.

  • Steve

    Diversity sympathizers, multicultural apologetics, live-and-let-live golden rule proponents-its SRO-and move to the rear-and shut up.

    So goes the no-go for the right first amendment speakers. And don’t forget your body armor and face shields!

  • Jim Tole

    Fantastic, insightful article-the Canadian electorate should take note of it.

  • InfidelCrusader

    Every now and then the truth manages to slip out in spite of the best efforts to suppress it.

Pin It on Pinterest