Islamic supremacists will force Western feminists into burqas

31

Every time there is an Islamic challenge to Western “women’s issues,” our feminists fail the test. Look at what happened during a Swedish trip to Tehran.

On January 20, while at the White House, Donald Trump was signing his first executive order, the Swedish Deputy Prime Minister Isabella Lovin was photographed sitting at her desk and signing an order alongside seven other female ministers. “We are a feminist government and this picture proves it,” the Deputy Prime Minister said. In 2014 the Swedish Prime Minister, Stefan Löfven, formed a coalition between his Social Democratic party and the Greens, and since then, Sweden has claimed to be the first “feminist government” in the world. Except when a large Swedish delegation travels to Iran.

The Swedish Minister of Commerce, Ann Linde, and ten other female members of Löfven’s cabinet paraded in front of the Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and other ayatollahs wearing hijab, chador, and long coats, in obedience to the laws of “modesty” that Iran mandates. This despite the Swedish promise to promote “a gender perspective at the international level” and to adopt a “feminist foreign policy” in which “equality between women and men is a fundamental goal.”

Thus feminists in power in Sweden have ignored the recent appeal of the Iranian women’s rights activist Masih Alinejad, who had called on European leaders to refuse to bow to the Islamic veil. “European female politicians are hypocrites,” says Alinejad. “They stand with French Muslim women and condemn the burkini ban — because they think compulsion is bad — but when it happens to Iran, they just care about money.”

The Swedes, in fact, were in Iran to sign many contracts. “If Sweden really care about women’s rights, then the female ministers never should have gone to misogynistic Iran in the first place,” said UN Watch executive director Hillel Neuer. After the attacks of the Liberal leader Jan Björklund in an interview with the Swedish tabloid Aftonbladet, Ann Linde has defended herself by saying that she was not willing to violate Iranian law, which has made it mandatory for women to wear the headgear in public since the Islamic revolution in 1979. According to the Swedish newspaper Expressen, there were 11 women on the Iranian trip out of 15 in total of the delegation. The Swedish officials were photographed wearing the Islamic obscurantist veils “almost all the time” they were in Teheran.

Yet there was another female European leader who has refused to give in to the blackmail of Islam: the German Minister of Defense, Ursula von der Leyen, who a month ago, during a trip to Saudi Arabia, refused to wear the veil and the abaya, the traditional long dress. Ursula von der Leyen has proven herself to be more courageous than the feminists in power in Sweden, who are always ready to plead issues of principle when at stake are the hymen and the hair of Western women or the Muslim swimsuits in the French Riviera, but who become submissive and promptly relativist as soon as they land in Tehran. For these feminists, domination comes only from the white male Europeans. The feminist Rebecca Brink Vipond said it: “I won’t take the bait of a patronizing call for feminists to set aside their goals in America to address problems in Muslim theocracies.”

The feminists of the National Women’s Studies Association, who voted for a boycott of Israeli colleagues, did not condemn the atrocities perpetrated on women by Hamas, Islamic State, Boko Haram and Taliban. They did not pass any resolution on the female genital mutilation and marriage childhood in the Arab-Islamic world and Europe’s Muslim enclaves.

Look at what happened also during the burkini affair. Western non-Muslim women dumped tons of sand outside the French embassy in London and sported burkinis to protest against the French law banning this obscurantist Islamic garment. The New York Times ran an article titled: “At the beach with my burkini.” To quote Eiad Shalabne: “By banning the burkini, the French view themselves as the ones liberating veiled women from Muslim patriarchy. Instead, they are only imposing a different form of oppression.”

Elisabeth Badinter is one of the very few Western feminists who dared to speak the truth about Islam. Christine Delphy, who in 1981 founded, along with Simone de Beauvoir, the magazine Nouvelles Questions Féministes, called Badinter an “Islamophobe” for her uncompromising stance on freedom and women’s rights. Badinter testified at the National Assembly of France in favor of the law that banned the burqa in the workplace. She penned an open letter to Muslim women: “Are we so despicable and impure at your eyes as to refuse any contact, any connection with us, till the smile?”

Another brave feminist is Elisabeth Lévy, who fought all the progressive struggles. Then she wrote a book, La gauche contre le reel (The Left Against Reality), explaining why she abandoned her old comrades in the struggle. “They have become moralists and unrepentant puritans.”

How is it possible, in fact, that a Swedish or American feminist would defend this Islamic medieval tradition? The Islamic veil directly contradicts the Western values that the relativistic and romantic Left, to which the Swedish feminists belong, defends them with such enthusiasm. Islamic supremcists understood this sick psychology among our feminist élite, who are so terrified of being accused of “xenophobia.” In a speech at the Independent Women’s Forum, Ayaan Hirsi Ali declared that feminism in the West has “won,” but also that feminists are now wasting their victory on “trivial bullshit.” “We are seeing that Western feminists are shy about pointing out the misogyny that’s committed in the name of the religion of Islam, because they feel we can’t impose our ethnocentric or Eurocentric or American-centric ways,” Hirsi Ali also said in an interview.

The Islamic world accuses the West, and many Western feminists are participating in its campaign, so that Western “responsibility” is always affirmed with indignation and contempt. No speech on the Third World can end until these feminists echo a leitmotif: “Only the white man is evil.”

 

Islam hypnotizes these Western feminists and uses the veil against them. That was the meaning of the feminists’ sinful silence about Cologne’s “multicultural gangbang,” as it was called by the German journalist Alice Schwarzer. While thousands of Yazidi women were still enslaved by the Caliph, American feminists were busy protesting against Donald Trump.

 

If these feminists don’t change their views, Islamic supremacists will force them into clitoridectomies and burqas.

  • Nefarious420

    Islam will co-opt any movement and claim it as its own, much like it has claimed all previous prophets from Abraham and Moses through Jesus as originally Muslims who followed Allah.

  • soundclick.com/Globalfirm

    I wonder the Swedish Feminist government delegation didn’t put on fake beards in Iran.
    The reason for the Islamism of Swedish Feminists is the long history of ‘national-sovereignty’-indoctrination. They think every country is a safe isolated entity where Islam can be redefined at will.

    • soundclick.com/Globalfirm

      A ban on Islam must be understood in the context of the long incubation time & the mental tricks needed to indoctrinate a person into Islam.
      A ban on Islam is compulsory freedom.

      • soundclick.com/Globalfirm

        German Minister of Defense, Ursula von der Leyen, might had refused to wear an Islamic head-scar, yet she didn’t refuse to sell weapons to Saudi Arabia which arms Islamistisis, enslaves castrated Africans & kills atheists.
        The reason for the pro-Islamism of white feminists might be the belief that the murder of 6.000.000 Jews under the direction of Amin al-Husseini & Adolf Hitler had nothing to do with Islam.

        • StandTall

          if the Germans (or Americans who sold even more weapons) use the money to deport Muslims, this is fine. But they don’t!

  • Dave Mc

    The question becomes what the idiots won’t do to appease muslims. I’d like to see what would happen if orders go out that they will only talk with women who first place their feet in their mouths, or women who have their hands coated in chimp poop.

    Seriously, where is the line that feminists refuse to cross for muslims because they will not be intimidated by men, ever? It’s ok with them for old men to marry and bed young girls, for girls to be sexually mutilated, for women to be beaten, ect.

    Their principles are so flimsy and malleable to not be considered as such. What they ‘stand for’ is only pretense and affectation since they completely fold when confronted with muslim practices.

    • purplej

      Yes, it is interesting that they have deferred to the law of the land and worn head coverings. But then, they must surely have “broken” a few other local laws as well? Did they have the required male escort? Did they walk behind their male counterparts? Are the agreements they signed even valid, given islam doesn’t recognise women in authority? Why submit to the most visible and powerful symbol of female oppression when it is such a great opportunity to really take a stand for women and confirm their feminist stand.

  • puhiawa

    it is fashionable feminism. Safe feminism that seeks to adopt other cultures as chic.

    • DemocracyRules
    • Mahou Shoujo

      “chic” meaning incomprehensibly stupid.

    • Tatiana Covington

      The question is… why?

      • puhiawa

        Because the entire movement is nothing but an arm of the Democratic Party. The Democrats like victim groups like Muslims for votes, and they like Saudi, Chinese, Russian, or anyone else’s money for giving up such cheap things as Jews, Israel, American oil fields, American atomic energy, American feminism, etc. It was all for sale and is all for sale by the Democratic Party. All sold as a virtue.

        • Tatiana Covington

          Time for people of all sorts to stop being victims. I personally went through my own Hell of sorts, some 50 yr ago. However, what should I do and have done since then? Whine and give up, or commence my own Reconstruction of sorts, still incomplete and which should finish ca. 2060?

          Which is better?

  • DemocracyRules

    iFeminists: This is what REAL women’s equality is about
    iFeminists want equal rights for women. Period.
    http://ifeminists.com/e107_plugins/enews/enews.php
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “An ifeminist is a REAL feminist who does NOT:
    1. Turn to the government for help (unlike radical feminists)
    2. Become a butch lesbian vegan hippie communist prude who hates men, and chastises one for being a heterosexual woman that likes men, looks pretty, and eats meat.
    3. Believe women are weak, helpless victims of patriarchy, and men are strong, powerful oppressors.
    4. Believe a “Big Bad Patriarchy” exists to systematically oppress women.
    5. Turn horrible HUMAN problems like (for example) terrorism, war, rape and domestic violence into gender “women good, men bad” issues.
    6. Be intolerant of dissent from one’s own political beliefs.

    • DemocracyRules

      7. Buy into fascist political correctness.
      8. Blindly agree with NOW, the Democratic Party, the Feminist Majority, Ms. Magazine, or any other PC leftist group or person on EVERY issue without any knowledge on the issue in question.
      9. Believe guns, porn, etc. are inherently evil patriarchal tools of oppression.
      10. Advocate hypocritical equality by preaching “tolerance” and then discuss how evil whites, heterosexuals, and/or men are.
      11. View well-thinking masculiniists as evil regressive enemies, not allies.
      12. Call capitalism oppressive patriarchal inequality and fascist, communist and/or matriarchal societies peaceful and equal.

      The term, ifeminism, itself was coined by Wendy McElroy, editor of ifeminists.com. This word is short for, individualist/libertarian feminism, which is a tolerant, classically liberal, truthful, consistent, pro-masculiniists, pro-sex, pro-free market school of feminism. It very strongly differs from mainstream radical feminism (Which, actually, should rightly be called feminazism. The conservatives may have created the feminist stereotype, but radical feminists CERTAINLY have helped contribute to the formation of the stereotype).

      Two notable Ifeminists are Wendy McElroy and Cathy Young.”
      http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ifeminist

  • ivan

    mozzie will do anything to bully their way into any western country and change their host country culture. Be careful of these demonic people. they sugar coat everything that touches the five senses. they suck in vulnerable people with islam “peaceful” religion. we are still INFEDILS (KAFIRS) to them. Do not buy into their way of life. they make you scared of them to make you think if i can’t beat them might as well join them.

    • curtis

      hmm, sounds a lot like a liberal too!

  • Mahou Shoujo

    sweden has the first fool of feminism governing it, in addition to looking stupid, all of swewden is seen as a nation of fools that grovel to the subhuman demands of islam. The only statement that is heard from the is the feminist are snivelling grovelling fools, this bunch proving the quote from the qur’an – The Prophet said, “Isn’t the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?” The women said, “Yes.” He said, “This is because of the deficiency of a woman’s mind.” (Bukhari, emphasis added)

    • Semur Jengkol

      Women are not equal to men ….and men are not equal to women ….

      thats why there is men …and there is women …. both are complementary …

      one of women’s trait is more emotional …

      men’s brain and women’s brain are inherently different …

      • Mahou Shoujo

        Women are not to be discriminated against, lied to cheated on or treated as lesser persons. Only islam puts women’s status below the of farm animals. Any woman that is a muslim is a slave, fool or mentally efficient. Muslim men are at best stupid horny heaps of insufficiency that rely on goats rather than women to make themselves feel potent. Muslim males are a bad joke.

        • Semur Jengkol

          Only islam puts women’s status below farm animals ???

          Is that true ??? …are you sure ??? ……ohh noooo …. what can i do ???

          as we know …hijab clothing has been surging phenomenon as millions and millions of muslim women now wearing it …..

          …. I am sure those women will abandon their hijab in no time once they hear your discovery that islam puts women’s status below farm animals …….. Oh no ….

          hehehe…

          • Mahou Shoujo

            Once again you demonstrate a total lack of familiarity of the qur’an, you could very well be a practicing Hindu for all you know about any religion.
            Narrated ‘Aisha: Do you make us (women) equal to dogs and donkeys? (Sahih Bukhari 1.486, cf. Sahih Bukhari 1.490, Sahih Bukhari 1.493, Sahih Bukhari 1.498)

          • Semur Jengkol

            oh my god ….. so islam equals women to dogs and donkeys ???

            your discovery of this hadits is the final nail on the coffin of islam …

            apparently this hadits has been kept hidden from public by some inner Saudi clerics …..

            islam will be abandoned in no time……

            islam will go extinct very soon … so you don’t have to spend day and night on your keyboard to attack islam anymore …

            btw …have you send your job applications yet?? …. heehehe

          • IzlamIsTyranny

            How was your bacha bazi date on Valentine’s day? Was it romantic?

          • tony jordan

            I just looked up the term “bacha bazi” , good come back. He must have been worn out since I dont see no heehehe snarky comeback.

  • AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
    • Mahou Shoujo

      Another in the ongoing saga of her lies.

    • curtis

      Put on that Burque then Killary— it will certainly improve your looks, oh, and it will be even better when we don’t have to hear that screaching voice anymore!

  • Pantalones

    Feminists love Islam…and rape

  • Tatiana Covington

    They’ll force? Not if they’re shot dead.

  • curtis

    Think about it- that is what the dumb a– femi nazis want here,in reality! Think about it Hillary Clinton in a Burque- It will be an huge improvement, or Madonna, or Pelosi, , etc. etc. they keep pushing for this, so, lets give it to them! what better way to get rid of them and get them to shut up- let them do it to themselves! this is stupidity on a level never before achieved by their tiny brains!

Pin It on Pinterest