UK Police Investigate ‘Offensive’ Social Media Critics Of Huge New Migrant Centre

87

This is sharia enforcement in the West. Make no mistake — this is sharia.

Voltaire: “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.” In a word, Islam. As I said at my speech at the AFA last week, we are living under the sharia, and people don’t even know it.

 

Story continues below advertisement

“UK Police Investigate ‘Offensive’ Social Media Critics Of Huge New Migrant Centre,” By Liam Deacon, Breitbart, August 30, 2016:

[the_ad id=”80890″]

UK police are investigating social media messages criticising plans to turn a huge former care home into accommodation for ‘asylum seekers’, warning users they could face jail if they ‘offend’ people.

The planning application to transform Lilycross Care Centre, in Widnes, into an “asylum hostel” for up to 120 migrants has attracted strong opposition, with more than 2,500 people signing a petition arguing the site is “unsuitable” and that locals find it difficult to find houses in the area.

At a meeting to discuss the plans last week, local father Anthony Jones, said: “We are not objecting to asylum seekers and refugees but just these plans in particular.

“There will be more than 3,000 people coming to the centre during a 12-month period. Over-population is one of my biggest concerns as it will have an effect on the infrastructure and people living close by.”

He added that he hoped the building would remain as a care home or a rehabilitation centre for ex-armed forces personnel.

Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 15.17.42

Lilycross Care Centre on Wilmere Lane in Widnes. Photo Credit: Google

However, the police are attempting to silence some of the criticism, focusing on messages they say could be perceived as “malicious”, claiming “other people may take offence”.

Sarah Boycott, assistant chief constable, told the St Helens Star: “I want to remind all social media users to think carefully about what they are saying before posting messages online.

“There are a number of laws in place which cover social media; these laws include messages which could be seen to make credible threats of violence towards a person or damage to a property.

“Although you may believe your message is acceptable, other people may take offence, and you could face a large fine up to two years in prison if your message is deemed to have broken the law.

“I would like to reassure the public that we take all reports of malicious communications seriously, and we will take action.”

Ms. Boycott appears to be referring to Section 127 of the Communications Act of 2003, which criminalises “using [a] public electronic communications network in order to cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety,” and can result in a six-month prison term or fine of up to £5,000.

Convictions using the law have increased ten-fold in a decade, official figures revealed in May last year. They showed 1,209 people were found guilty of offences under the law, compared with 143 in 2004, according to the Ministry of Justice.

In May this year, the EU announced that Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Microsoft had “committed” to working more closely with them and national governments and “their law enforcement agencies” to help “criminalise” perceived “illegal hate speech” online.

Even before the EU announcement, British police were increasingly vigilant in imposing section 127 and policing supposedly “offensive” speech crimes online.

At the end of 2014, Police Scotland investigated the provocative, conservative commentator Katie Hopkins for an “offensive” joke about a Scottish nurse being treated for Ebola.

In February this year, Greater Glasgow Police arrested a 41-year-old man under the Communications Act after receiving a report of a supposedly “offensive” comment made on Facebook regarding Syrian migrants arriving on the Isle of Bute.

In April, again, Greater Glasgow Police threatened social media users, ordering them to be “kind” and not “hurtful” unless they wanted to “receive a visit… this weekend”.

And in May, a Muslim Police Chief Inspector for Greater Manchester indicated that, according to his understanding, “freedom of speech does not mean freedom of offending culture, religion or tradition”.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
87 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Save Europe
Save Europe
7 years ago

Muslims, per se, offend me. Does that mean they’ll be eligible for a prison sentence?

Protect America
Protect America
7 years ago
Reply to  Save Europe

No, because they are Muslims. They can rape and kill your family, no problem. But don’t you DARE say “how dare you do that! You’re a bully!” or else you’re in trouble.

Save Europe
Save Europe
7 years ago

Lol. I was being flippantly rhetorical, sir.

Forestlands
Forestlands
7 years ago
Reply to  Save Europe

They are offensive to our society and culture, you can’t mix oil and water!

Ranger Rick
Ranger Rick
7 years ago

So exactly how is this “could be perceived as malicious claiming “other people may take offence” determined?

Makes no sense.

Pray Hard
Pray Hard
7 years ago
Reply to  Ranger Rick

It means that it’s always your fault, never the moslem’s.

Dr. Doomsday
Dr. Doomsday
7 years ago
Reply to  Pray Hard

Exactly right. Typical tyrannical bag of foggy gas type of statement, which boils down to, it means anything they need it to mean in situ.

Tyranny is upon us.

Honkingoose.
Honkingoose.
7 years ago
Reply to  Ranger Rick

What’s the name of the site? I’m willing to go set the bar!!

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
7 years ago

britain is too far gone to respond to an intervention of intelligence, reason and democracy. All that can be done is let it rot in the dung heap that it has made for itself as it sinks into the gutter of an islamic republic. When enough people are disgusted, they will act, right now, there is nothing that can be done but ridicule and isolate the place. Those that will not help themselves, cannot be helped by others, All-is-fubar.

Save Europe
Save Europe
7 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

I don’t actually agree. I would genuinely stand by my opinions of the past which are – a majority are fed up, and ARE irate. These include UKIP supporters, the working class, as a whole, and segments of the middle class who aren’t oblivious. The Brexit vote WAS very largely against Merkel and her insane EU Muslim migrant policy, and I noticed with EVERY Brexit voter I ever encountered – before, and now, after – that there is a REALLY potent dislike for Muslims. That is most true. There is no doubt, the UK is quite a way behind the likes of France, Germany, Sweden and Belgium in terms of being ‘gone.’ Even the Netherlands and Italy are more ‘gone.’ That said, we DO have a massive problem – London, especially as it’s the capital along with Luton, Birmingham, and Bradford. Other cities – not so at all. It’s rather like Rotterdam, den Haag and Amsterdam in the Netherlands, or Brussels and Antwerp in Belgium, whereas Breda and Bruges aren’t gone. Possibly because they’re far too affluent and expensive. Whilst I’m saddened, and angry to have a Muslim mayor and such a large number of Muslims in London, I have to be honest and say the following – just like any huge super city which sprawls everywhere, it is mostly a hellhole and was, even prior to the Muslims arriving. Thus they’ve been attracted to these pockets of hell. Tower hamlets (or Minaret Hamlets), as I call it, was and is vile. To conclude – Muslims are useless. Very very few are professionals or make any money whatsoever – those that do are ultra liberals or apostates. Muslims create nothing. There is no productivity nor free thinking. Hypothetically, X amount of years from now, if they took over London, they wouldn’t survive if left on their own, solely to function. And yes, I DO believe, and i am unsure when – could be 5, 10, even 30 years from now that there will be wars, skirmishes, civil violence in many countries in Europe between Muslims and non Muslims. It is inevitable. They have ‘continuing previous’, and Europe has ‘previous’ when it comes to wars. Despite half of every Western European countries’ male populations being pussies, the others halves aren’t. And that’s the point. Read Breitbart London, and other UK websites to get a flavour.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
7 years ago
Reply to  Save Europe

The way I come to conclusions and develop opinion is by looking at what is happening. There is a little bit going on, but, as is often the case, it is one step forward two steps back. There is no observable concentrated attempt to hold the line against islam, much less push it back. If you don’t do it, it won’t get done. The few of you that are trying, are doing admirable work fighting an uphill battle.

Save Europe
Save Europe
7 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

The good news – in part, today, is that Sharia May has told her MPs, that there will be NO second referendum on Brexit. That’s good for me. As I think I may have mentioned to yourself, many months ago, I regularly travel to NW Europe, fortnightly – either by ferry or EuroTunnel. On various trips, there have been return ferry journies back to the UK, which have been three quarters full of Muslim families, heading for the UK, after getting European passports. They had arrived in Sweden, Germany, Belgium several years back, bided their time, got EU citizenship and we’re now heading for UK – their original preference. One trip was both particularly amusing and freakish. Many were on the deck smoking, before the ferry left Calais, and we were greeted with the sight of about 40 males venerating to the their Allah and their Paedo, openly. A group of intoxicated Geordies proceeded to kick them up their arses, with great vim and vigour. Yet, these cretins, continued. Later several families were accosted merely for drinking alcohol near some Somali families. The result? Beer, wine and pork scratchings were thrown at them. So, in terms of leaving the EU, it will mean an end to ‘Dutch’ Somalis entering the UK. However, the dithering imbecile, Sharia May now needs to pull her head out of her rectum, close down EVERY Sharia Court in the UK, ban the Niqabs and burkas, arrest Anjem Choudhry types immediately – deport them with impunity, and then drop the insane blocking of both Ms Geller and Geert Wilders from entering the UK.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
7 years ago
Reply to  Save Europe

What the few of you are doing to resit the stupidification of england is incredible, but, you are up against, public opinion apathy, aggressive islam and a welfare system that pays welfare muhadajeen to jihad against any . Consider moving to a freedom loving country, western europe is becoming an islamic stalag.

Dr. Doomsday
Dr. Doomsday
7 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

” I come to conclusions and develop opinion is by looking at what is happening.”

Well, you err in judgement if that is how you operate. This method does not account for deliberate manipulation of issues and ideas. You are therefore reactive, but only on the grounds of what you are fed, believing yourself to be objective. This is a dangerous illusion.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
7 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Doomsday

You are so wrong that the only way to reply is tot say “Who am I supposed to believe? You or my own eyes?” You are far too presumptuous to be valid, reality has to be dealt with, even if it is lies.

jeremy steering
jeremy steering
7 years ago
Reply to  Save Europe

Of course there were many unacceptable problems with the EU and immigration. But Britain didn’t need any help in creating its own immigration nightmare. No country in Europe encouraged mass Third World immigration more fervently to increase “diversity”. Think Pakistan, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Somalia. For all the liberals, the politically correct, the diversity-obsessed and the multiculturalism fantasists Britain was just too White and too Christian. What better way to “enrich” its society than flood it with Muslims and black Africans?

A clue to Britain’s “new” citizens and its glorious post-EU multicultural future can be found in this list of the countries of birth of the reported cases of Female Genital Mutilation in Britain in 2015-2106: Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, Egypt, Sudan, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Malaysia, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen. All presumably, on paper at least, now considered to be as “British” as you and me.

Save Europe
Save Europe
7 years ago

I don’t disagree. The main problem is that the Commonwealth still exists. This is the first factor. Annoyingly, there are many Muslim countries within the commonwealth, whose citizens utilise this, so as to enter the UK. The second problem is that we have had SO many Muslims enter the UK on Dutch, Belgian, French, Italian, Swedish, German passports over the last 15 years. As you can probably guess, this happened as a result of Muslims entering the EU over the last two decades, applying for refuge, then citizenship. Then, after they got the relevant passports, they’d head for the UK on the basis that their English was better than their German – even – after 8 years of living in Germany. Plus our benefits system is insane, and lure. One positive? When we are finally out of the EU, then it is goodbye, to those – Muslims and even non Muslim Roma gypsies who never work, and just receive benefits. They will have to leave, as they are not in work. So goodbye Dutch Somalis (never met a working one), French Moroccans et cetera.

Honkingoose.
Honkingoose.
7 years ago
Reply to  Save Europe

That does a goose’s soul much good, I haven’t heard optimism for so long.
So very very happy to hear of a ” REALLY potent dislike ” brewing against Muslims. Very encouraging!

conan_drum
conan_drum
7 years ago
Reply to  Save Europe

Take no notice of Shoujo. His or her opinions are not thought out and often really stupid.

DaveM12
DaveM12
7 years ago
Reply to  conan_drum

His or her opinions are bang on and is exactly what is happening to the Western world. Have you even seen what is going on in Europe, the rapes, killings and attacks by muslims? We need millions of Mahou Shoujo’s to fight islam. In the early 1900’s Turkey was 50% Christian, today 99.9% muslim.

Save Europe
Save Europe
7 years ago
Reply to  DaveM12

Agreed. But you also need the millions of Europeans like me who are PASSIONATELY against Islam in Europe, and elsewhere in the world. I hypothesise this – I’m a Brit – who travels into much of Europe for the last decade. Whilst half of each country is Left and pussified, the other half isn’t. It’s the same in the USA. Would you trust a Democrat? Nope. A republican, yes. Canada, additionally, should not trust Trudeau. The man is both an imbecile and insane. Proper, electable leaders like Trump, Geert Wilders, Hofer in Austria, and a Nigel Farage type in the UK are the required ones.

DaveM12
DaveM12
7 years ago
Reply to  Save Europe

No argument here, totally agree but hopefully Trump, if he wins, will do what Teddy Roosevelt did and ban islam from the US. The left simply will not accept that islam will destroy our society. As Melanie Phillips stated years ago the liberal always believes in compromise so islam baffles them as it is interested only in conquering, never compromise.

Talk about insanity look at Merkel still touting the muslim success story even as they kill her people.

Save Europe
Save Europe
7 years ago
Reply to  DaveM12

Applogies for the tardy response. Melanie Philips – now you’re talking my language. A talented, logical journalist – and a rarity. My best to you Sir. Best regards.

Michael Copeland
Michael Copeland
7 years ago

The police act outside their powers if they pursue messages that MAY be offensive (in their opinion). That is not the wording of the Statute. Such a concept would be everlastingly extendable: that is why it is not enacted.

The criminalising of “using [a] public electronic communications network in order to cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety,” applies if the sender sends “a message that he knows to be false” (s.127, 2. (a)), and if he “persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network” (s.127, 2. (c)).

For other matters (not false) it is not enough for a message to be “offensive”. To constitute a crime it has to be “grossly offensive”.

See the Statute online: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/part/2

The muslim Chief Inspector for Greater Manchester is wrong. English law includes the right to criticise, ridicule, insult, and abuse religions and beliefs.

The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 includes this statement:

29J Protection of freedom of expression
Nothing in this Part shall be read or given effect in a way which
prohibits or restricts discussion, criticism or expressions of
antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions or
the beliefs or practices of their adherents, or of any other belief
system or the beliefs or practices of its adherents, or proselytising or
urging adherents of a different religion or belief system to cease
practising their religion or belief system.
(http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/1/pdfs/ukpga_20060001_en.pdf)

It could be said, though, that under Cameron this part of the law became a museum exhibit.

Allan
Allan
7 years ago

Good point. And…

Muhammad was no messenger of an ilah. And those not with him are hard against the believers and merciful among themselves.

(From Koran 48:29, with improvements)

Allan
Allan
7 years ago

So what has Duke William, Prince of Whatever, been up to? And has the queen taken him aside to explain his future? “Now, look here, my grandson,” she might begin. “There will be another civil war. Britannia will be turned upside down. Millions will flee. You will be the last Christian king of England, and our House is doomed.”

P.S. “As Thomas Jefferson once said, ‘Never trust quotes you find on the internet.'”

http://www.mediaite.com/online/to-learn-who-rules-over-you-viral-voltaire-quote-probably-originated-with-white-supremacist/

RalphB
RalphB
7 years ago

Voltaire had it right:
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

Cutting even closer to the bone, Voltaire also said:
“One who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit atrocities.”

The United Kingdom, homeland of that purveyor of “needless anxiety,” William Shakespeare, of John Locke, Adam Smith, the Scottish Enlightenment, and so many stellar humans, has sold her soul to those who use absurdities to motivate atrocities in a repulsive display of what may well be irredeemable cowardice. It rends the heart of those who love liberty.

Pray Hard
Pray Hard
7 years ago
Reply to  RalphB

Excellent comment!

Allan
Allan
7 years ago
Reply to  Pray Hard

Except that there’s no evidence to support the quote attributed by Pamela to Voltaire.

See http://www.mediaite.com/online/to-learn-who-rules-over-you-viral-voltaire-quote-probably-originated-with-white-supremacist/

Duchess of Pork
Duchess of Pork
7 years ago
Reply to  Allan

“Probably originated” “likely culprit” is no better evidence either.

Honkingoose.
Honkingoose.
7 years ago
Reply to  RalphB

Nice one RalphB??????✌✌✌

Scottysemporium
Scottysemporium
7 years ago
Reply to  RalphB

A great last line. I am gobsmacked at the irredeemable cowardice shown by leaders who won’t face the consequences of their decisions. Merkel made a colossal mistake and knows it, but can only sheepishly and wrongly assert that the muslims will go home when the wars are ‘over’. Doesn’t look like that will happen anytime soon in that region, so it’s a safe bet the non-integrating, haters of the West, will live off the West and its innovations and freedom for the foreseeable future. And just looking at what islam has wrought in the ME, the shari’a which has brought the current conclusion to islamic culture in its poverty, dissolution, ignorance, death, brutality, torture, and war…how can we resist their entreaties? Their threats? Of course they offer a ‘superior way of life’, as they insist, and are ‘the best of peoples’ while we are ‘the worst of creatures.’ Why wouldn’t we rush to import the 7th century barbarisms to Europe and the West? They’ve made a wonderful success of things in their own countries, obviously.

roccolore
roccolore
7 years ago

Yet none of these pro-migrant apologists plan to take any in.

Pray Hard
Pray Hard
7 years ago
Reply to  roccolore

Hey, they’re leftists … it ‘s ALWAYS someone else’s problem.

Lori
Lori
7 years ago

This Sharia Law stuff Is Moving In like A Thief In The Night. Offending People? Got To say not everyone is going To Like Me, and That is okay, Why are these Laws so enforced? They want to control my freewill and try To Be God! Well got to say God will not even mess with My freewill! My freewill is not To live under Sharia Law, And That is Okay Right? Or Wrong? Or Do You Sharia Lovers Know? Or Is It what Islam Says? Or Do We Make up Ways and words as we Go? Pretty Pathetic But The Evil Ones Love To Confuse, So Put up and Shut Up Are there ways.

Abeland Solomon
Abeland Solomon
7 years ago

Part Nine; The Way to Kill the Beast (from The Undoing:Islam by its own words, the amazing free e-book that’s turning heads in some very high places. Get your copy or read it online, 15-20 mins to read it;- http://abelandsolomon.simplesite.com/424568444 for the full story read our full length book Islamic Apocalypse;- https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01AS09LYW

A quest for the truth
These days anyone who criticizes Islam is branded an Islamophobe. In fact, all that most of the so called Islamophobes are actually doing is expressing an informed concern that Islam poses a real threat to our free democratic society. The Islamic State has frequently justified its reign of terror by referring to the Koran and Hadiths, and what their leaders say appears to be theologically correct. If Islam were truly a religion of peace then their sacred book would surely make them peace loving, filled with love and inner tranquility. But it doesn’t. Some of the terrorists reportedly know the Koran off by heart so it can’t be verses of peace and love going round in their heads as they murder innocent people. The Koran says what it says about terror and no one can ever change it. There is no point refusing to accept the truth; we have to deal with it for the sake of the future of our free society. We have to focus all conflict into a debate about ideas and ideals and stop it being a physical conflict. The ongoing failure by our governments to do this is causing a groundswell of true Islamophobia that fuels right wing groups who are more than willing to overstep the boundary of peaceful protest. That helps no-one.

Peace, love and respect
It is clear that the Koran incites terrorism; terrorists read it before going out on mission. While people believe in Islam and propagate it, and the Koran is read, terror will continue. Misfits with aggressive tendencies are easily drawn to Islam, which through Jihad, offers them a religious justification and focus for their violence. Because it’s all done in the name of Islam & Allah, in obedience with the Koran, all other moral considerations go out the window. If we don’t speak up now and point out what is theologically and factually wrong with their religion, more and more young Muslims will fall into the snare of radicalisation. Many Muslims have been indoctrinated with Islamic beliefs that cause them to despise our Western values; (4:144) “Take not for friends, non-Muslims”, (9:107) “they are indeed all liars”, (28:86) “never be a helper to the disbelievers”, (76:24) “obey not…any…non-Muslim” (Even the police, or the authorities, or any non-Sharia law!) Islam hates the West, our free lifestyle and values, it very actively teaches that hatred to millions of Muslims.

Can a tolerant society overcome intolerance?
The Koran teaches Muslims that they will be successful and that non-believers are losers. The statement (47:32) “those who disbelieve…the way of Allah…He will make their actions fruitless”, can be pragmatically scrutinised and proved false. There is not a single Islamic nation in the world’s ten most prosperous by overall GDP. Indonesia is the first Islamic nation coming in 16th just ahead of the rather unreligious Netherlands who have a similar GDP but a population nineteen times smaller. And it is not because Muslims are not hard working, it is because Islamic culture and Sharia law hinder economic growth. Are there not thousands of Muslims begging, risking their lives to get to Europe, the USA and Australia to find work? Many non-Muslim countries are more prosperous than Islamic nations, this is an undeniable fact. We have to show Muslims the Koran is wrong. As soon as Muslims understand that the Koran is not perfect and infallible, they will start to doubt that it is the word of God, and then their confidence in carrying out jihad will fall rapidly. It really is as simple as that.

Human Rights and human wrongs
Islam was invented in the Dark Ages by a man raised in pagan Spiritism, initiated as a medium to talk with demons, who became a religious warlord. During his life he killed thousands, beheading hundreds of Jews in a single day, he had sex slaves and a child bride, he even burned people alive in their homes for not attending his religion’s prayers. After his death, the religion was propagated by war taking over a large part of the earth, its advance was only stopped by the greater power of the Europeans, in Africa and Asia as well in Europe. As Islamic culture never underwent anything like the Reformation or the Enlightenment, its holy book, the Koran, was never subject to the kind of logical scrutiny that the Jewish Torah and Christian Bible have been put through. It is only now in our day that critical attention is uncovering its violent, xenophobic and misogynist prescriptions. In fact, its content does not even stand the test of truth, it contains grave errors of scientific, historical and literary fact, gross failures of logic and much self-contradiction. A book that claims itself to be perfect and infallible, but is so full of flaws, lies even, it cannot possibly be the dictated word of an all wise God. Its Allah wants followers to destroy, kill and plunder all who disagree with it, its Prophet promises each of them a personal demon; this is not faith as we recognize it. Today, Islam and its holy book fail the test of reason which it should have been subjected to centuries past, and as a result can only fall. It is only a matter of how long, it is up to us in the West to decide whether it will be a slow torturous demise, full of barbarity from Islamist groups like ISIS and Boko Haram, or whether it will be a sudden information technology driven worldwide social transformation.

Islam undone
Even Mohammed foresaw the end of Islam, he said; “Verily Islam started as something rare and it would again revert to being rare and would recede… as a serpent crawls back into its hole “, “my people…they will swerve from the religion…. the book of Allah…they will have nothing to do with.”

Pray Hard
Pray Hard
7 years ago

Watch out, patriots, here comes the cavalry and they’re riding … camels and wearing silly hats!

Are the British police a sick joke or is it just my perception?

Honkingoose.
Honkingoose.
7 years ago
Reply to  Pray Hard

I imagine the rank and file are sick of having to pussyfoot around muslim sensibilities-do you know they put little booties on the sniffer dogs paws so as…not to offend muslims?
The top brass and mps are probably the joke behind that sort of bullshih.

Pray Hard
Pray Hard
7 years ago

Come and get me, UK cops. I’ll slap that silly hat off of your head and make you cry for your mommy.

Rocinante44
Rocinante44
7 years ago

where are gilbert and sullivan when we need them? this stuff is funny. the best way to get rid of the muslims is to ridicule them and their phony “religion”

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
7 years ago
Reply to  Rocinante44

With apologies to Gilbert and Sullivan.

The parliamentary mp.
When I was a lad I served a term
As bacha bazi boy to an ayatollah’s sperm
I washed the knob and scrubbed the floor
And polished up the big knob as the imam’s whore
I gobbled the knob so carefully
That now I am the sucker of the caliphate, you see
He gobbled the knob so carefullee
That now he is the drooler of the caliphate you see
As caliphate whore I was such a mark
The isis troops considered me a roll in the park
I accommodated them with a smile so bland
Alway had the right thing in my hand
I sucked and blew so very free
That now I am the whore of the mullah, tee hee.
He gobbled the knob so carefullee
That now he is sucker of the caliphate you see
An imam I soon become
Bowing to the east to the west elevating my bum
Preying in the street like a prostitute
Quoting the qur’an did so well for me
That now I am islams whore on the street for all to see
Passing examinations at the madrassa did so well for me
That now I am a whore for all the world to see
Of shari’a knowledge I spread muchschitt
That a learned mullah spewing qur’an writ
prey in the street with my assss well seen
No matter it does not offend the Queen
Exhibition so suited the likes of me
That the locals kiss my aasss as they must like me.

Honkingoose.
Honkingoose.
7 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

I’m imagining the stage, the dance and costumes!

joker
joker
7 years ago
Reply to  Rocinante44

Well as I see it it is a win win situation for the offended. Knowing muzzrats they are by the slightest offended. And now they have the old Bill on their side, too.
In my opinion the Police Service, used to be known as force but that was not pc, they have rather other priorities.

Dr. Doomsday
Dr. Doomsday
7 years ago
Reply to  Rocinante44

You are correct! A good friend of mine pointed out after 09/11 that one thing they must really hate about us is, almost immediately the jokes start coming out, and the memes and internet amusement about Islam and Osama Bin Laden.

IzzatSo
IzzatSo
7 years ago

You mean that I can’t say “uni-browed Muslim hair-backs” in the UK? How ’bout “violent incestuous cavemen”? I suppose “inbred child-molesters” is out of the question, too.

Let me know if I offend any of you Muslims out there…so I can keep offending you.

Ursula
Ursula
7 years ago

What I want to know: are the UK police working HALF as hard to arrest people who post offensive things about killing gays, enslaving ‘infidels’ or killing anyone who doesn’t submit?

This is insane! People have a right to criticize their government’s open-door, poorly-vetted policy. As long as they’re not inciting people to commit crime, people have every right to speak and post!

Why are people advocating genocide against non-Muslims, gays, and moderate Muslims allowed to post outright incitement to murder, while no one else can even post criticism of their government’s policies ’cause it’s ‘offensive’?

This world has gone insane.

Honkingoose.
Honkingoose.
7 years ago
Reply to  Ursula

I feel your anger and frustration. We’re having a similar debate here in Australia over the wording of a piece of legislation ( 18C of the racial vilification act or something ) essentially the contentious wording is ” it’s an offence to villify threaten insult or offend on the grounds of race or religion” with the INSULT or OFFEND bit being the part many want removed as offend is a bit subjective.

I can’t find anyone who wants all these muslims allowed free unfettered entry. But I still get looks as though I’ve offered someone an enema if I dare to try discussing what Australia’s (in my case) population should look like.
‘That’s racist” they say.
“Well, yes…I’m talking about race! Do we want another 200,000 Black Somali muslims when the 100,000 we already took in are causing so many crimes, forming gangs and doing drive-by shootings and rapes? They can’t find work, they don’t or won’t speak English, they have no respect for our police or us and they’re often aggressive ”
” You’re a racist scumbag! Australia is wonderful and multicultural, just look at all the wonderful foods we have now!” (buy a bloody cookbook! I think)
” Well how do we discuss what we want our country to be and who makes up the population, how do we select who comes here..we can’t just let ALL the Africans who want to come just to turn up?”
” It’s offensive to look at people as being a certain race”
“Why? If there’s nothing wrong with being black or muslim why can’t I? and if they DO cause crime and trouble then again…Why can’t I?”

And it seems discussion is not really permitted because …. racist…….because….offensive

Mr Paul Middleton
Mr Paul Middleton
7 years ago
Reply to  Ursula

Yes Ursula. Carry on criticising Islam nevertheless. You know it’s right. If you worry about getting your social media account struck, you can cover yourself in a number of ways. Let your attacks clearly be a response-in-kind reply to previous hate-postings from Muslims, you can get in some pretty heavy attacks that way. (The originator [Muslim] gets the blame). I know it’s going to sound a bit simple, but for example, I have posted as part of my comments on YouTube – many times – “all Muslims should be shot” and I know I can get away with that whereas if I posted “I’m going to find you and shoot you” that puts YOU in the censor’s firing line as it’s a “real threat.” In general, outsmart Muslims in this free speech ‘game’ – it’s not so hard, as thick as they usually are. You certainly sound to me as though you can do it.

Ursula
Ursula
7 years ago

Mr Paul Middleton
I’m definitely against censorship; I don’t always like what people say, but they can say it.

I don’t feel “all Muslims should be shot” a good thing to say, though. You can say it, yes, that’s your right, but it isn’t going to help protect free speech…it’s a genocidal statement in and of itself, and could play into hands of censorship-supporters. Remember, there are many Muslims who disagree with sharia/jihad/censorship.

Nonie Darwish ( a Muslim who converted to Christianity) wrote amazing book about her life, “Now they Call Me Infidel” where she speaks against jihad and censorship. She described both the fanatics she met in the Middle East, but also those who were victims–one was a rape victim named Hosneya who was murdered by her family in a so-called ‘honor-killing’. She was only sixteen years old.

Hosneya would no doubt hate censorship as much as anyone on this message-board, because it was such suppression of ideas that created a society where her family didn’t even question killing her.
If Hosneya were alive and in America, I imagine she would be working with Ms. Darwish, and Ms. Geller, and Ms. Brigitte Gabriel to protect freedom and human rights, including speech.

Ms. Darwish pointed out that there were many other Muslims in the Middle East who felt trapped by oppressive laws, were sick of the hatred they were taught, and wanted an escape…just as much as she did.
What I’m trying to say is, there are people worldwide–both non-Muslims and Muslims–who are sick and tired of censorship, and sick of authorities ignoring jihadists’ online postings. And whatever religion one is, it’s the people who are against censorship who need to stick together.

Mr Paul Middleton
Mr Paul Middleton
7 years ago
Reply to  Ursula

Yes, I’ve watched some Nonie videos and I know about and admire her. I’ve read a dozen or so ‘infidel’ books. It would be wrong to think I just post things like all Muslims should be shot, that was a ‘worst example’ to prove that plenty can be got away with, depending on how you do it. As you will agree, Islam MUST and should be criticised. One of my favourite Brigitte videos, in case you haven’t seen it (I bet you have).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYjiSaV5VoE&list=LLTtXWSNmUEBuPQrA_-RVEGQ&index=5

Ursula
Ursula
7 years ago

Mr Paul Middleton,

Sorry about that, I’d thought you were actually condoning that kind of statement; I didn’t realize it was just an example!

Yes, all religions should be open to criticism, that’s the only way there will ever be any progress, or any changes when necessary.

Debate, education, and criticism can be tough for many to deal with, especially regarding religion; but people need to keep open minds…otherwise we’d all be like trained seal pups jumping through hoops because we’re told to.

Mr Paul Middleton
Mr Paul Middleton
7 years ago
Reply to  Ursula

No no, I DO condone saying “all Muslims should be shot” – although it’s not a ‘stock statement’ I use, I have used it albeit sparingly, directed as a retort against the worst Muslims I’ve fought with who see no wrong with their filthy Islam. I say it, as opposed to believing that it should actually happen, but I care not. Their ideology sanctions ME being killed, and you too, so I have no wish to hold back, if they mouth the words of the filthy Koran and walk the walk, why should I not attack them viciously too?

I could go on for a very long time, with endless quotes from the real world, and from Islam’s “holy” trinity of books. Sura 9, the Koran, is a single reason for giving them hell. And for another, less “dry” one, have a look at what is reputedly one of the two worst video nasties on the open internet if you dare. “The Dagestan Beheading Massacre.” I warn you, you may not sleep for a night or two.

I’m proud that I’m no ‘clear blue sky’ opponent of Islam. I know too much about the root of Islam, so know that that’s not going to get the job done against an Arab supremacist death cult that sanctions the killing of non-Muslims at every level that ALL Muslims subscribe to, the Koran, the Sira (Muhammad’s example) Hadith and sharia as laid out in the already mentioned books plus Reliance of the Traveller. Now I’ve said this much (this little actually) I have no wish to belabour or harangue you, rather I seek to enlighten.

Notwithstanding, I know you see it differently. You fight your way and I’ll fight mine. I will kill them without hesitation if it came to that. Throwing platitudes at Islam (or the majority of Muslims) is a waste of time – as someone who has read Nonie Darwish, you must know that. Apostates, I have all the time in the world for, they are amongst our best allies, I know that, I’m not a fool, only incandescent at the murderous Islamic ideology and those who profess to follow it.

Yes, I already knew that Nonie and other apostates caution that many Muslims would like to leave Islam if they got the chance, but since half of Islam involves lying, and no one but their closest confidantes could know who those Muslims are, yes, I admit that in dialogue I assume nothing, but address my vitriol in the first instance, against Islam, and only get personal later if they are liars, true “believers” or apologists for their filthy “religion” – because it is not that – a religion. It’s primarily an ideology based on a religion.

Also, Islam only ever deserves consideration (?) on its own terms, as it’s the only “religion” NOT founded on The Golden Rule. Morality is based on Muhammad’s example. If Muhammad did it then it’s okay for all Mozlems. And Muhammad himself BEHEADED people for not submitting to it or joining it. Finally, from Muslims themselves;

Ayatollah Khomeini, Winds Of Jihad, 21 January 2012: “Islam is a religion of blood for the infidels.”

Ali Gomaa, Grand Mufti of Egypt, the highest Muslim religious authority in the world, Citizen Warrior, October 2010: “Muslims must kill non-believers wherever they are unless they convert to Islam.”

Yusuf al Qaradawi, Egypt, Adviser to Muslim Brotherhood, Al Jazeera TV, 9 January 2009: “No peace can be made between us [Muslims] and the non-believers. This what our holy book says. This what Allah says.”

Mosab Hassan Yousef, son of Hamas leader, American Thinker, March 2013: “The voice in the Qur’an is filled with hate and the desire to have all non-Muslims, the non-believers, be killed or required to submit to Allah.”

Al-Aqsa TV (Hamas), Palestinian Media Watch, 3 December 2010: “Allah, oh our Lord, vanquish Your enemies, enemies of the religion in all places. Allah, strike the Jews and their sympathizers, the Christians and their supporters, the Communists and their adherents. Allah, count them and kill them to the last one, and don’t leave even one.”

Ursula
Ursula
7 years ago

I know what you mean; I know Islam has tons of violent verses, and that’s a huge part of the reason so many people are being killed
There needs to be a reform movement, something to help moderates get the others not to follow everything they read. There needs to be debate and conversation–and yes, we should all know how to protect ourselves if we need to.

Having said that, I’d like to point out that if you say or post things like “all Muslims should be shot”, that’s the kind of thing people like Clinton and Obama want, because it makes anyone who disagrees with them look like they want to kill people. And that’s the kind of thing they can use as fodder.

You can speak your mind, but I’ve noticed people can convince more people to stand with them by holding back on statements that are outright hostile, and instead use logic and evidence to debate.

The list of quotes you posted is a perfect way to make your point, with logic and evidence. That’s the kind of thing that gets people thinking and debating and talking…and maybe even change minds.

Words that are regarded as hostile tend to make people dig their heels in…you can say that stuff, but it may do more good to tell people proof and evidence they can’t ignore.

Mr Paul Middleton
Mr Paul Middleton
7 years ago
Reply to  Ursula

I’m proud of abusing Muslims in general because they are worse than the Nazis. The Koran and Muhammad’s Sunna (his deeds, performances and statements) are the example which every male Muhammadan follower is supposed to emulate to the letter, and it commands in Surah 47:4 – “When you meet the unbelievers in the battlefield, strike off their heads.” And to fundamental Mozlems their “battlefield” is the entire world and that includes their own home.

All 67 out of 68 wars of Muhammad were offensive (called qazwah – raid, ambush, sudden attack). That’s how Muhammad waged his wars. He raided, massacred and looted civilians with no warning. The one defensive war, “ditch” was not fought. Surrendering in Islam is called “offering peace.” That’s why the Islamic terrorism “jihad” will continue until the West “offers peace.” (As was made clear by Bin Laden).

All the hadiths show beyond a reasonable doubt that it was Muhammad who always INITIATED all acts of aggression against his victims, starting with his own kith and kin the Quraiysh, then other Pagan Arabs, then the Jews, and finally the Christians.Islam’s aggression has continued unbroken for fourteen hundred years, only slowing down occasionally, at the times when Islam has been weak.THAT’S THE MUSLIM PLOT. Know anything at all about the Koran and the Sura and you can’t miss the plot.

Suras 9 and 5, the most violent and vile of Suras, were the last spoken by Muhammad, and abrogate all previous verses that conflict with them. We don’t allow Muslim apologists to deceive us brilliant Kufr by citing verses abrograted by Suras 9 and 5.

“The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.” (Koran 9:30).”Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.” (Koran 3:85).”When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.” Koran 9:5).”Make war on the infidels living in your neighbourhood.” (Koran 9:123).”Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.” (Koran 2:191).”Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” (Koran 9:29).

Islam, like the other fascisms, for example, Nazism, Maoism or Stalinism, etc., corrupt the human mind by peddling poisonous doctrines of supremacism and racial superiority. Rather than admitting the proposition that Islam’s radical jihadists are a part of Islam, Muslims often flatly deny it in absolute terms, even despite the fact that jihadists shout “Allahu Akhbar” when carrying out their crimes, committing innocents to an early grave.

We non-Muslims need to get real and not be frightened to tackle them head on.

Ursula
Ursula
7 years ago

Believe me, I understand your frustration.
I get so angry and sickened when I hear about all these terror attacks, how jihadists call us horrible names like “kuffar”, and when I think of what they’ve put all those Yazidi women and children through.

I’ll never be able to understand how jihadists can do those things…I can read about what they say to excuse it, but I sill can’t fathom how people can behead and rape and stab without even the least bit of pity for the victims.

And I’ve known cruel people in my life, so it’s not as if I’ve never seen evil or hate before.

I agree with you when you say we need to get real. There hasn’t been enough recognition on the parts of our government (or Germany’s or the UK’s) about the threat we face.

I didn’t mean to upset you; I just meant to say that using evidence in debates works well–people who try to downplay terrorism will have a harder time refuting facts; refuting documented threats by jihadists would be hard. Your lists of the hadiths, for instance, is good to use in a debate.

And remember, there are many Muslims who hate jihad and that genocidal movement as much as we do.

Mr Paul Middleton
Mr Paul Middleton
7 years ago
Reply to  Ursula

If you study it at all (Stephen Coughlin’s ‘Catastrophic Failure is good for that), Islam without jihad is not Islam.
To believe otherwise is what has got us into this mess.
Islam must be banned and mosques must be destroyed.

Ursula
Ursula
7 years ago

I guess we disagree on that point–because I really think Islam can reform if enough Muslims push for it, push for a complete break from the jihadist verses. Such a reformation would be extremely difficult, but I think it’s possible.

I’m not optimistic about it happening anytime soon, though, because not enough Muslims have pushed for it–then again, extremists scare the hell out of the brave ones who try, so that’s no doubt part of the problem. (And not enough world leaders have come out and said ‘hey, these verses are causing serious problems; we have to do something’).

I see where you’re coming from, too. There are no easy choices, no easy answers, and we’re all trying to make it through this mess however we can.
It’s so hard to know what to do, how to change things. I think that’s one reason tempers have flared so easily for everyone this election–me included.

Everyone’s scared and upset, and no one’s happy with how things are going–Republican, Democrat, or unaffiliated. We have no easy path to make it better.
None of the candidates will be able to magically solve everything…but we’re all desperately hoping for that.

Mr Paul Middleton
Mr Paul Middleton
7 years ago
Reply to  Ursula

Islam is beyond alteration because Muslims who attempt to modernize and reform its unremitting bigotry, irrational rituals and cruel and draconian punitive measures—are targeted for annihilation. The only way for Muslims to escape from the tyranny of Islam is to leave it altogether.

The only way the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims are going to care about the falsity of their religion and its cruel nature is if we slam their arses unremittingly, because ‘reform’ of Islam is not an option. The terrorist manual, the Koran is “good for all times and places, not one word can be changed.” (Koran 6:115).

As Islam cannot be modernise, Muslims are forced to attempt to Islamise modernity. The only way to reform Mozlems is to destroy Islam.

Scottysemporium
Scottysemporium
7 years ago
Reply to  Ursula

Unfortunately for islam, Mohammed made any criticism of him the worst crime possible…punishable by death. He makes this quite clear several times, including killing a woman poet for writing a poem about him that he didn’t like. As a result, ANY criticism of the prophet is forbidden. Sura 5:33, commands mutilation and crucifixion for striving against Allah and Muhammad. If you deny any portion of the koran, you are denying God, which makes you an apostate, or unbeliever. Death is the result. This makes the idea of reform almost an impossibility, for to do so would be to criticize the prophet, which is not allowed whatsoever. That’s why reformation has eluded them, and the moderate muslim is a rare animal to find.

mark
mark
7 years ago
Reply to  Ursula

There is no such thing as a moderate muslim… they all prove they are at war with us, by doing their warfare lying to disguise islams evil teachings and agenda.

Scottysemporium
Scottysemporium
7 years ago

Well put and well reasoned. I initially read the Koran, thinking I would find a text familiar to the Judeo/Christian tradition, since we were all “people of the book,” citing Abrahamic foundations. This turned out to be, as they say, not quite the case. In fact, I was utterly shocked. The clumsy attempt to insert the koran into the Biblical tradition comes thru strongly, and when I began to understand the split between the Mecca verses and the Medina verses, in the concept of abrogation…I realized that Americans have no idea what they are dealing with here. We have no experience with ME issues or history, and so are easily manipulated by propagandists of which there are no shortage on the Palestinian/Islamic jihad side. Pollywood fake videos and pictures are consumed indiscriminately, and the muslims make almost no pretense of trying to be objective, or at least non-deceitful. Their prophet called himself a great ‘deceiver’, and the concept of taqiyya is at work more than the naive westerner realizes. One can watch underground videos of mosques in London, who were already charged once with spreading intolerance and hate, who are revisited and several years later are still continuing to spread hate speech….a video shows the muslims after an ‘interfaith’ group breaks up, a group with Christians and other faiths designed to show their ‘tolerance’ to other religions. The minute the ‘interfaith’ group is gone…the muslims begin saying “We have nothing to do with those people…they are kuffar…they are filthy, dirty people.” That was shocking, but then she went on, “We go by their churches, I tell you, we don’t wonder what they do in there…they say and do the most filthy things in those churches.” What filthy things are said in church? What filthy things are done in churches. The only ‘filthy’ thing done in a church was a jihadist petty teenage criminal, who cut the throat of an 84 year old priest saying mass. This is islamic tolerance and the religion of peace.

J

Mr Paul Middleton
Mr Paul Middleton
7 years ago

You have it exactly right, Scottysemporium. You get it, and study is the key. The more you learn about Islam the worse it gets and the easier it becomes to see that all its hate and killing and terrorists acts – are sanctioned in Islam’s ideology. In a nutshell, Islam is not a “religion” as we in the West understand religions, but is in fact an ideology based on a religion. And a foul, Arab supremacist, genocidal one at that.

anthony edwards
anthony edwards
7 years ago

The Leftist POS Fascists in UK in power are ….just that .. Leftist POS Fascists ….

Muslim Men Rape Girl Groups? Fine .. protected…

Protests against Islamic violence and murder? Attacked and arrested the Police.

Tommy Robinson and 1000s more continue to be arrested and harrassed by police for thought crime.

Disgusting.

George Orwell should be alive today to see what he predicted coming true.

Tommy Robinson harassed for no good reason by fascist police.

youtube.com/watch?v=E5qxgHSASpw

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
7 years ago

british law enforcement in pursuit of a muslim criminal.

Judi
Judi
7 years ago

I wonder if they are so vigilant when it comes to anti-Semitic comments. Somehow I don’t think so. BDS supporters and anti-Semites (same thing) post comments with impunity. Even politicians such as Jeremy Corbyn have been known to make the “odd comment or two”.

Honkingoose.
Honkingoose.
7 years ago
Reply to  Judi

Well how long did that repulsive muslim whinger Anjem Choudary strut about in his man-dress calling ‘Bomb Bomb UK’ ? 15 years was it?
Imagine a white man leading a chant of “Bomb Bomb Pakistain!”
They had Paul Weston in the back of the van FOR READING a book by WINSTON CHURCHILL OUT LOUD!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2614834/Arrested-quoting-Winston-Churchill-European-election-candidate-accused-religious-racial-harassment-repeats-wartime-prime-ministers-words-Islam-campaign-speech.html

Reverse bigotry of lower expectations? or muslim special treatment?

Judi
Judi
7 years ago
Reply to  Honkingoose.

Exactly! In the UK, muzzrats are a protected species.

AppraisHer
AppraisHer
7 years ago

The British ruling class is able to get away with enslaving their citizens because the citizens have been disarmed and neutered.

THIS is what leftists want for America…THIS is why they want your guns.

Roy Jennings
Roy Jennings
7 years ago

Talk is cheap. It needs intelligent individuals who know how to articulate, to tell the truth in a way that is clear but remains objective. The World needs to see the way Islam is winning the real war (stealth jihad) in every country they now occupy.

Angular Merkin
Angular Merkin
7 years ago

This is how the British police are now treating critics of Islam:

https://youtu.be/LfF8TJ76Ads

Truly nauseating stuff.

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
7 years ago

As long as there is a First Amendment there can be no such thing as politically incorrect. Sad, though, being the UK they have no Second Amendment to drive the point home.

Soundclick.com/Globalfirm
Soundclick.com/Globalfirm
7 years ago

The governments are infested with ethically undeveloped persons that see only one enemy: the authentic struggle for an ethical standard, for ethics: human rights & ecology in work & security, the freedom fight against Muhammadism including Muhammadan tyranny & slavery & Muhammadan slavery of Africans since Muhammad. Their enemy is the fight for freedom against Muhammadization, against “Islamophobia”, a term formed to crush opposition to Muhammadization.
Worldwide liberation from Muhammadization worldwide NOW!
Expose, condemn & ban Muhammadism.
Let human rights rule.

jeremy steering
jeremy steering
7 years ago

Racism only goes one way. In February, the founder of Black Lives Matter Toronto,
Yusra Khogali, tweeted, “Plz Allah give me strength to not cuss/kill these men and white folks out here today. Plz plz plz.” As far as I know, she was not arrested, or even cautioned. Would that have been the case if a white person had called on Jesus to give him strength to kill black folks?

jeremy steering
jeremy steering
7 years ago

What may yet save the West is that the tolerance and patience of the public are now exhausted and there are signs everywhere in Europe of a fightback, from burkini bans to burning down “refugee” centres to electing politicians with anti-immigration policies. The people’s anger swept away Communism and could do the same with fundamentalist Islam.

Scottysemporium
Scottysemporium
7 years ago

I hope so…
The attacks this summer, right up to Bastille day, and the attack on the 84 year old priest by the half-wit ne’er do wells and petty criminals of the jihad, might have tipped the scales to people finally having enough…and not believing any more of the cynical formulations of the “religion of peace.”

Georgia L
Georgia L
7 years ago

The problem is Islam isn’t the problem, it’s been unleashed on purpose by the problem. Which are the supra-national globalist elite who are entrenched safely in power all over the world. Nearly all national and statewide elections in the US are between globalist and globalist. Why do you think Trump is fighting the entire machine and being attacked from both ‘sides’? He’s not a globalist, he’s a free politician with no agenda.So the machine is eating him alive.

JWM
JWM
7 years ago

As I have said in the past, we will have to fight our own people in the streets to remain free. We have allowed ignorant and evil politicians to create a circumstance where our enemies are living in our towns and cities and are trying to destroy out culture, morals and freedom. Fighting back is going to become real personal.

Georgia L
Georgia L
7 years ago

England, Wales and Scotland are well and fucked.

Save Europe
Save Europe
7 years ago
Reply to  Georgia L

Wales? Nope. I’m not Welsh, but the only Muslims you see are in Cardiff. That’s it. I wouldn’t even half agree about Scotland.

Georgia L
Georgia L
7 years ago
Reply to  Save Europe

Scotland has police wearing hijabs. So. Yea.

Save Europe
Save Europe
7 years ago
Reply to  Georgia L

Well to be honest, I couldn’t care less about the Jocks. They want out of the UK and hate us English, so they can fornicate off, for all I care. You didn’t mention Northern Ireland in your original post, so I assume you are an observer from abroad 😉

John Boston
John Boston
7 years ago

I am beyond anger at this point. My feeling for Islam is something deeper than normal dislike or disgust. I call it bone-deep hatred. So UK has laws prohibiting “insulting religion”. Unless the people of UK rise up and demand freedom of speech and of the press, they will be silenced by Islam.

Make no mistake: when Muslims say plaintively, “respect all religions,” they are lying. They demand that their “religion” or totalitarian ideology be respected, and that all others be put down. The meaning of Islam is “submission”, and so far the West is not putting up much of a fight against it.

I refuse “submission”, and will speak out against it. If I must die in order to defend Liberty, then I will die. However, before I fall, I will cut vast and bloody swathes through the armies of Muhammad.

jeremy steering
jeremy steering
7 years ago
Reply to  John Boston

You are so right, John. I wish I could believe that the people of the civilised world still have somewhere in them the spirit, the will and courage they had in two world wars last century to rise up against and fight the forces of evil seeking to dominate and destroy them. Because, make no mistake, with the rise of Islamist supremacy on every continent and the constant atrocities, the civilised world is facing the greatest threat to world order since those dark days.

Dr. Doomsday
Dr. Doomsday
7 years ago

I guess these idiots forget the initial offense, that Islam is offensive to most western civilizations is left out…

Linda MacLeod Goodman
Linda MacLeod Goodman
7 years ago

Ms. Geller… Obama is relinquishing American control of the Internet to ICANN on October 1st. That will essentially be the end of online free speech for Americans. At any time any sites may be shut down for any reason and there will be no accounting and no recourse. On November 8th there could be a massive shut-down of alternative news sites. October 1st will mark the death of the most wide-reaching empowering and transformative tool in recorded history – a Constitutionally protected Internet. How can we stop it?

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8807/internet-governance
CRISIS: Internet to Have Global Governance October 1. Call Congress!
Better Censorship for Tyrants
http://www.wsj.com/articles/an-internet-giveaway-to-the-u-n-1472421165
An Internet Giveaway to the U.N. If the U.S. abdicates internet stewardship, the United Nations might take control.
excerpts:
U.N. control is the likely result if the U.S. gives up internet stewardship as planned at midnight on Sept. 30.
Antitrust rules don’t apply to governments or organizations operating under government control.
Authoritarian regimes have already proposed Icann become part of the U.N. to make it easier for them to censor the internet globally.

So much for the Obama pledge that the U.S. would never be replaced by a “government-led or an inter-governmental organization solution.”

As the administration…stopped actively overseeing the group. That allowed Icann to abuse its monopoly over internet domains, which earns it hundreds of millions of dollars a year.

Icann also refuses to award the .gay domain to community groups representing gay people around the world. Congress still has time to extend its ban on the Obama administration giving up protection of the internet. Icann has given it every reason to do so.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/29/icann-un-take-internet-oct-1/
UN Could Take Over ICANN, and the Internet, Oct. 1

https://www.rt.com/usa/356337-us-transfer-internet-icann/
US agrees to give up power over internet to private company in October

http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2016/august/american-hurdlers-credit-god-for-1-2-3-sweep
Obama Giving Away the Internet? How that Could Affect the World: The transition is the last step of a long fight by the Obama administration to relinquish control of the Internet.
propaganda that seems to be creating a false sense of security

mark
mark
7 years ago

Muslims = satans whores

Forestlands
Forestlands
7 years ago

This is totally unworkable and unfair! Offending is subjective and you can’t turn it into objective! Police are not trained for such tasks, there will be many people arrested who shouldn’t be arrested which will be a waste of public funds!

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!