Polygamy Website Quickly Attracts 100,000 Western Muslims, US #1

77

Once upon a time, “America’s Polygamy Ban Blocked Muslim Immigration.”

Apparently that obstacle has been removed.

There is mass polygamy in the US (here) and the UK (here).

Story continues below advertisement

Polygamy marriage websites have just crossed the 100,000 members mark. The owner is most proud. He wrote me most excitedly about breaking 100k. “My Polygamy marriage websites have just crossed the 100k members mark. This would make for a great story for any media type. The following article https://www.polygamy.com/press/articles/124578 is ready for publication or modification as you see fit. In the past 60 days, I have been featured on multiple International TV shows, radio shows and almost every prominent Newspaper [sic].”

[the_ad id=”80890″]

I asked Mr. Awad for a breakdown by country.

On polygamy.com, the breakdown is as follow:

1. United States
2. United Kingdom
3. Canada
4. Pakistan
5. Australia
6. India

These make about 80% of all members.

And SecondWife.com which is Muslim only, the breakdown is as follows:

1. United Kingdom
2. Pakistan
3. India
4. United States
5. Saudi Arabia
6. Indonesia
+ many other countries

These make up about 40% of all members.

[the_ad id=”80890″]

polygamy

‘Burkini Ban’ Fuels Polygamy Site Growth says Founder

One unforeseen consequence of the controversial burkini ban has been a renewed interest in polygamous relationships, with the founder of www.SecondWife.com saying that traffic to his marriage site has increased significantly since the ban came into force. Azad Chaiwala – whose websites www.SecondWife.com and www.Polygamy.com have more than 100,000 users worldwide – says that Frances recent burkini ban has led more women to sign up for his company’s services.

With renewed scrutiny of their appearance and how they dress in public, Mr Chaiwala believes many Muslim women are turning to his sites in the hope of finding partners who value them for more than their appearance.

“It’s sad to say but I love the stupid illogical ban, they are finally being honest about their discrimination against women.” says Chaiwala.

“It used to be the case that people worried about women showing too much flesh in public,” Mr Chaiwala said. “Now it seems people are concerned when women aren’t showing enough! If a woman chooses to wear a burkini (which is nothing more than a feminised/modest wetsuit), it’s not for anyone else to deny her that choice. Women are worth far more than the clothes they wear and how they look, and that’s why so many women want to use our services. They are finally coming to the realization that their so called liberal freedom is man’s desire to sexualise/keep them naked in disguise. They deserve happy, loving marriages to men who value them for more than their appearance, men who want to uphold the institution o

f marriage and give their wives the respect & value they deserve.”

Azad addresses women directly “Wake up, stand by your sisters in face of the male dominated oppression that only values you when you take your clothes off & conform to their twisted desires… and then have the cheek to call it liberation… you are worth far more than that… stand by those that are truly liberated… those who choose to wear what they like. Peace to all”.

The decision by a number of French local authorities to ban the ‘burkini’ from public beaches has raised concerns in some quarters, with many Muslims in France and across the wider world believing the hard line being taken by the police is purely discriminatory. In the wake of the European terror attacks claimed by the so-called Islamic State group, many members of France’s large Islamic population have expressed fears that they are being singled out and unfairly targeted in retaliation.

Disturbing photographs have emerged which appear to show armed French police enforcing the “burkini ban” at a beach in Nice. In one image, three officers can be seen towering over& ordering a burkini-clad woman to remove some of her clothing, while one appears to take notes and issue her with a fine. In a separate incident at nearby Cannes, a mother of two was issued with a fine for wearing leggings, a tunic and headscarf on the beach.

For many Muslim women who choose to wear the burkini, headscarf or full veil, their clothing has made them a very visible target in recent months, with worrying statistics showing a rise in hate crime and many fearing the burkini ban is simply a way of scapegoating the Muslim population as fears of terrorism rise.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
77 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Delilah
Delilah
7 years ago

Thanks to redefining marriage in this country to include same sex couples only emboldens the retched Muslims to push their unholy agenda of sharia.

coax
coax
7 years ago
Reply to  Delilah

While I’m against Sharia, what right does the government have in saying who can or cannot get married?

Abandon Islam
Abandon Islam
7 years ago
Reply to  coax

While I am not defending any position, the truth is that the government has, by nature, the right to decide who can or cannot get married. For example, a baby cannot get married to a 60 year old person.
Well, the government decided that.

Delilah
Delilah
7 years ago
Reply to  coax

Society as in culture has every right to decide which relationships will be legally recognized. It is usually done in the best interests for child rearing and for a stable society.

conan_drum
conan_drum
7 years ago
Reply to  coax

The only functional result of polygamy is to increase the number of births of Muslims, there by assisting in their domination. There is not benefit to the women. I have a first hand experience of this, I was teaching in an Islamic country and I got into conversation with one of my female students. I cannot remember how it came up but I asked about her father in some context. Her reply was, we (her mother and her) did not see him much as he now lived in the capital with his new wife. According to the rules the man is supposed to treat each wife equally. I assume that applies to his children also.
Only women who have been brought up to be subservient to men would accept the arrangement

G P
G P
7 years ago
Reply to  conan_drum

Polygamy produces terrorists as there are no women for many males to marry therefore one way to cull the herd of bachelors and rid the old bulls of rivals is to send them out in a religious war with the promise of pie in the sky virgins.

Article on this very thing

http://humanevents.com/2014/02/18/why-wwii-movies-are-the-best/

“Well, yes. In any human society there are approximately the same number of men and women. Under monogamy, which limits each man to one wife, everyone gets a fair chance to marry. When powerful and successful men are allowed to take more than one wife, however, as they are in a polygamous society, this creates a pool of unsuccessful men at the bottom of society who are constantly in conflict with the system.”

freewoman
freewoman
7 years ago
Reply to  G P

yes, that has to be the natural consequence. So then you have a large army of young sexually frustrated men to go wage jihad via rape and violence.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
7 years ago
Reply to  conan_drum

I’ll tell ya, muslum states almost make atheist North Korea look good by comparison. At least N. Korea isn’t run by the rantings and ravings of a 7th century Jew hating, lying, mass murdering, thieving, child molesting dirtbag prophet for profit.

hugo
hugo
7 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

and SADIST !!! prophet for profit

Tilt
Tilt
7 years ago
Reply to  coax

Any responsible government in a western liberal country MUST totally prohibit the *exploitation / marginalization of women or it can’t be deemed a western, liberal country anymore

*The oppressive practice of Polygamy manifests severe exploitation / marginalization of women thus breaching the basic tenants of human / civil rights that are the corner stone of any truly Democratic society

People who wish to practice these offensive, Anti-Democratic traditions, should return to the countries in which these Anti-Democratic traditions are tolerated.

Mark Steiner
Mark Steiner
7 years ago
Reply to  coax

Last year, June 26, 2015 the government (US Supreme Court) ruled in favor or same sex marriage – goaded by the morality of 21st Century America.

Dennis Durkop
Dennis Durkop
7 years ago
Reply to  coax

None! Polygamy has always been legal in more than half of all US states. It is just that most men are brainwashed thinking it is not so. The problem is now because of the way the economy works few men can afford multiple wives with many children. These Muslim men will expect the US Government to pay for it there evil at treating women like breeding livestock, which the liberal politicians most likely will do furthering the coming economic collapse that much faster.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
7 years ago
Reply to  Dennis Durkop

Let’s seem some proof of this statement Farshad Al Fuqwad.

Dennis Durkop
Dennis Durkop
7 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

http://www.christianpolygamy.com as applies to America by law.

The world’s largest family in the world is a Christian family in India with 39 wives and 94 children: See:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrHk9KSkxOk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eftrQOVqZ9g

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7o6BzFWlgM

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
7 years ago
Reply to  Dennis Durkop

Dear mormon halfwit you haven’t proved your statement that polygamy has always been legal in half of US states.

Dennis Durkop
Dennis Durkop
7 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

I have never been a member of the Latter Day Saints or been around them, and do not follow any other religion, as religions of the world are cults including atheism if the truth were known. I am an American sovereign if you have any idea what that is! You are the halfwit! A legal moron in so many ways is laughable! You are lazy wanting the answers put into your lap! Do the research instead of wanting it handed to you like a putz! You probably are not even aware that Mormons with multiple wives live in many US states and other countries. People stay quiet about it as most of America is brainwashed not to know the truth just like you! These people do not want to-be persecuted by moral so-called Christian holy roller bigots who do not even understand what the Bible says or have read it to understand what it truly says. What is the difference if a rich man like now retired CNN founder Ted Turner is bedding down with three young heifers 50 years younger or Playboy founder Hugh Hefner with twins 60 years younger. It is no ones damn business! People judge those who want to-be free! Calling me a Mormon halfwit when you know nothing about me you are a hypocritical bigot and a just another prick in the making! Todays Christianity is a cult! See: http://www.jesusneverexisted.com

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
7 years ago
Reply to  coax

Yes, muslum men should be able to marry any pre-pubescent girl they want!

GreyhoundFancier
GreyhoundFancier
7 years ago
Reply to  coax

Government gets involved when there is the possibility of children, who if not supported by their parents must receive state assistance.

In same-sex arrangements, there can’t be children unless a third party is brought in (who ordinarily doesn’t live with the same-sex couple) to help conceive/gestate the baby.

Keith Johnson
Keith Johnson
7 years ago
Reply to  coax

If they have to pay for it then they should have a say. Besides the laws say they can’t do it.

spacearcadian
spacearcadian
7 years ago
Reply to  Delilah

Islam, where men are men and women are happy of it. Women prefer wild macho tarzan-like muslims who takes control and show her place. Western women seems to be not so happy with their “kind” and “respectful” western men, “sexist pigs”, prefer to be gay lol

Zaba
Zaba
7 years ago
Reply to  spacearcadian

islam: a child molester as a role model.

Dennis Durkop
Dennis Durkop
7 years ago
Reply to  spacearcadian

There are thousands of gay Muslim men who are in hiding! Muslim men are taught that rape and gang rape of females of any age is permissible and the right thing to do to unbelievers. Muslims are made up of many races to say they are macho is so funny, as US military easily kill them on the battlefield at a ratio of better than 10 to 1. Muslim men who have to force girls by raping and especially gang rape shows that they cannot get women any other way being loosers. Muslim men act like animals according to stupid Mohammad’s evil psychopathic words of the unholy Quran with its pages only worthy to-be used as butt wipe then flushed down the toilet. I enjoy burning or deleting from the hard drive being super easy to destroy it, as Muslims do all the time out of ignorance. I love watching young little Muslim immigrant men get beat up as is comical! Not macho at all only ignorant stupidity with big mouths that do not have a clue about the real world only what they have been programmed to think by the backward verses of the Quran! Muslim men do much better sticking with goats and sheep. I have 4 wives already and aint no stupid Muslim!

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
7 years ago
Reply to  Dennis Durkop

Mormon, muslum what’s the difference? A few letters and a lie.

Dennis Durkop
Dennis Durkop
7 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

Polygamy and marriage what’s the difference? A few letters and a lie. People use marriage contract, as a crutch with a fictional third-party be it a religious organization, government or both instead of taking their own insecurity and basing only on love. Marriage is for the ancients as far as I am concerned. Does not matter if one wife or many or for the woman with one husband or many or some cultures no husband at all only the older women dictating who the young girls breed with. You are free to do as your culture wants. American society freedom goes much further than what most closed-minded brainwashed individuals think when they no so little because of the media. You are living in the matrix of mind control system of the Federal Government.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
7 years ago
Reply to  Delilah

If the US government OK’s polygamous marriages it will be MUCH worse than same sex marriages. The muslum apes will all be marrying 4 wives and the ones that can’t afford to support their harem will be going on welfare and draining the system dry.

spacearcadian
spacearcadian
7 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

Islam, where men are men and women are happy of it. Women prefer macho tarzan-like muslims who takes control and show her place. Western women seems to be not so happy with their western men, “sexist pigs”, prefer to be gay lol. Western women, everytime you see a muslim, remember that there is a place for you in his harem!

joe1429
joe1429
7 years ago
Reply to  Delilah

Wait until all the other “marriage” wackos start petitioning the court

Hannah Szenes
Hannah Szenes
7 years ago

Someone PLEASE hack these sites, get all their names so we can deport the whole bunch of them!!

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
7 years ago

Polygamy should be allowed, but only one spousal claim for any taxation, welfare or spousal benefits. Only children with the identified couple’s dna should be allowed any tax benefit to the parents. All others ward’s of the state and treated as such.

knightsstrength
knightsstrength
7 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Islam would fund the other with the Jizzya tax we already pay under different names even Halal Certification would go to growing Islam and funding polygamist

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
7 years ago

That is why church and state must be kept separate, even if it is not shari’a or democrat.

jeremy steering
jeremy steering
7 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Correct! Which is why France is sticking two fingers up to the rest of the world furiously condemning it for “Islamophobia” – since 1905 the church and state have been separate and it has no intention of changing that. It knows that the biggest problem with Islam is that religion controls everything (and Islam is the only acceptable religion), and at its core it totally rejects blasphemous “man-made” states or democracy.

So for Muslims the 20th century concept of separating religion and state is beyond the comprehension of their 7th-century-religion-inspired thinking.

conan_drum
conan_drum
7 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

This will only increase the demographic imbalance that already exists.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
7 years ago
Reply to  conan_drum

What is a reasonable alternative?

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
7 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Criminal prosecution for polygamy and polygamous welfare fraud.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
7 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

Would be nice to see a few laws that protect society rather then pander to parasites enforced.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
7 years ago
Reply to  conan_drum

Obviously and putting the entire harem and its progeny on welfare will also serve to drain the system dry simultaneously.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
7 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Nice idea, but once the camel’s nose is in the tent you aren’t going to be pushing him out. Once you’ve recognized muslum polygamy it’s only a matter of time ’til the f’ing muslums agitate for welfare rights for their entire harem.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
7 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

They already are getting welfare for wives, sisters, aunts, what ever or who ever. Time to make and enforce a few rules about how welfare, which is tax money, gets spent. Those receiving welfare should not be allowed to vote as welfare is easily turned it bribes.

knightsstrength
knightsstrength
7 years ago

No need for Muslims to work, live of welfare and populate the country with many others that the face of country changes quickly

Just did a search on this man, and this is what came up
Indian polygamist has 39 wives, 94 kids, and 33 grandkids, and still wants more: Mohamamd Inaamulillah Bin Ashaari centre, Rohaiza Esa …

Abeland Solomon
Abeland Solomon
7 years ago

The following extracts are from our free e-book The Undoing:Islam by its own words, get your copy here;- http://abelandsolomon.simplesite.com/424568444
for the full picture get our full length book, Islamic Apocalypse;- https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01AS09LYW

A child bride
Mohammed took further wives after the death of his beloved Khadijah, the one we know most about is Aisha, who in her own words, married; “when I was six and we consummated the marriage when I was nine. I still used to play with dolls…” Indeed, the marriage might have been consummated earlier had it not been for the poor girl falling sick and losing all of her hair straight after the marriage. This marriage became a model for child marriages which is enshrined in Sharia Law. The United Nations and medical charities report that in Muslim countries some children die from these child marriages because their bodies are not yet ready for sex or childbearing.

A taste for killing
Mohammed’s biographies recount; “Then they (the Jews) surrendered, and the apostle confined them in Medina…the apostle went out to the market of Medina and dug trenches in it. The he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out in batches…There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900.” “The Messenger of Allah commanded that all of the Jewish men and boys who had reached puberty should be beheaded. Then the Prophet divided the wealth, wives, and children of the Banu Qurayza Jews among the Muslims.”

Sex-slaves
The keeping of women as captives was not a moral issue in early Islam. Hadiths record a discussion involving Mohammed about trying to preserve the resale value of sex slaves by not getting them pregnant; “(Al-Khudri) sitting with Allah’s Apostle asked, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?’ Mohammed traded sex-slaves; “the Apostle traded for Safiyah by giving Dihyah her two cousins (and five others). The women of Khaybar were distributed among the Muslims.”

Poison!
At Khaybar, a captive named Zaynab, who, in revenge for what Mohammed had done to her people, plotted to prepare him a meal which she would poison, saying to herself, “if he was a true prophet he would not be tricked, but if he merely was a king he would eat and die”. “When the messenger of Allah rested from his labour, Zaynab bt. al-Harith, the wife of Sallam b. Mishkam (whom Muhammad had killed), served him a roast sheep. She had asked what part of the sheep the messenger of Allah liked best and was told that it was the foreleg. So she loaded that part with poison…” He took the poisoned meat and it was a long, slow and painful demise lasting over three years.

Zaba
Zaba
7 years ago

what Mohammed had done to her people…..
the Jews

spacearcadian
spacearcadian
7 years ago

Islam, where men are men and women are happy of it. Women prefer wild macho tarzan-like muslims who takes control and show her place. Western women seems to be not so happy with their western men, racist pigs, prefere to be gay lol

Zaba
Zaba
7 years ago
Reply to  spacearcadian

islam: a thug for a role model.

G P
G P
7 years ago
Reply to  spacearcadian

Be real. No woman in her right mind wants to be a mindless semen receptacle and eternal baby factory. muslim women comply only out of fear – how boring for the males to know in their heart of hearts that they’re only ever endured, tolerated and despised.

Western men understand that seduction is a process of indicating interest and having that interest accepted and returned. If a successful match then there is true mutual desire, acceptance and excitement in one’s mate. Men like to know that their woman desires them physically and her desire inspires his desire even more. Correctly socialized men and women understand the exclusivity with one person that builds trust, affection and physical love, and that this is not for sharing with another outside the pair bond which will only breed jealousy, and eventually indifference which is even worse than hatred.

Knuckle-dragging troglodytes are out of fashion.

Craig
Craig
7 years ago
Reply to  G P

Uni-brow, knuckle-dragging, troglodytes…..

spacearcadian
spacearcadian
7 years ago
Reply to  G P

snob bulls**t. women like it strong and rough muslim

karenblairschar
karenblairschar
7 years ago

More wives, more welfare payments for the man.

Mark Steiner
Mark Steiner
7 years ago

God defined marriage in his book beginning in Genesis. After thousands of years of marital experimentation, why is the world so much in love with itself as traditional marriage is being outlawed?

We believe we have a better deal than the Creator’s plan, now we have chaos.

Love and kisses ….

guostD
guost
7 years ago

Of course Natl. Organization of Women (NOW) does not have any position on poligamy.

Robert Batchelor
Robert Batchelor
7 years ago
Reply to  guost

Their position is called silence.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
7 years ago

A silence of implied assent.

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
7 years ago

Being part of a stable of kept women is not submitting to “male oppression”?

martin jenkins
martin jenkins
7 years ago

The facts are there is only 1 rule muslims fight for:
The right to do what they want when they want where they want in the name of Islam.This is Sharia Law.
The reality is also factual and simple. As muslim populations grow they will increase the pressure on authorities to succumb to their islamic demands.
As this pressure grows and muslim populations continue to grow they will seek office in authority. At first small changes towards sharia law will create some misgvings amongst non muslims.but most go unoticed. Larger changes then become easier to pass as law as their hold on the home country grows. Ultimately the one aspect of modern civillisation comes under threat; the democracy they used to create the start of Sharia law will be questioned and the power of numbers ( muslim population) will outvote democracy and sharia law will become the new constitution.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
7 years ago
Reply to  martin jenkins

Exactly, and legalized polygamy will only accelerate the process.

martin jenkins
martin jenkins
7 years ago

The sole reason behind these polygamists attempts to allow up to 4 wives per man is again simple. An even greater explosion in the muslim ;population that will accelerate my comments below. Muslims already average around 4.5 births per women. The West can hardly manange 2 per marriage not per women!

martin jenkins
martin jenkins
7 years ago

Any muslim (or others) that claim in some way muslim women are liberated is totally and utterley insane. Muslim women in so many ways are the most suppressed females on this planet. Just look at the barbaric way Sharia Law turns them into second class citizens. Look at the way they are treated in Saudi Arabia and many other muslim countries. Saudi is a country visited by millions of muslims every year to pay their `respects` to their false prophet. Every time a muslim women `defends` sharia law and its true meaing, its because its demanded of them under islamic rule. To contradict sharia is considered blasphemous and very few muslim women will admit to its many female failings in the name of sexism.

JWM
JWM
7 years ago

Americans are rapidly giving up their constitution, laws and freedom.

Badger
Badger
7 years ago

The British are too cowardly to defend their country again. They have given up.

Guest
Guest
7 years ago

Has everyone forgotten the one wife sindrome…..The white people stopped having kids long ago. Birth control ruined the AMERICAN WAY…I am old enough to remember families with 12 kids and one wife and the father and mother stayed together till death of one of them…….A FAMILY….Now not all families had a dozen kids the average was 5…well that stopped long ago and now the white race is disappearing replaced by multi-race population………Pass and/or enforce laws one wife only whatever the culture was in one’s home country does not go in the host country……….Western countries are giving their countries away.

jeremy steering
jeremy steering
7 years ago

Britain is finished. The obsession with “diversity”, the policy of mass immigration to enforce muticulturalism and political correctness is a particularly lethal blend. Here is an article about polygamy in a British newspaper. Meet Mohammed from Sheffield, who has three wives and eleven children all living on state benefits.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2762988/Strolling-park-London-businessman-THREE-wives-just-one-20-000-multi-wife-marriages-POLYGAMY-BRITAIN.html

s;vbkr0boc,klos;
s;vbkr0boc,klos;
7 years ago

Why ban polygamy? If two men and two women can ‘marry’ why not same sex polygamy. Once we have violated natural law there is no end to it.

tallorder
tallorder
7 years ago

Exactly. Yet, a nation founded on classical liberalism will never be able to explicitly define objective truth and enshrine it as law. After all, the liberalism of today is the direct successor of classical liberalism.

AKcharle
AKcharle
7 years ago

I, for once, have to agree with the Muslim women. If I want to wear capri pants, a tunic and a sun hat on the beach will I be arrested, fined and made to undress??? Come on, freedom is only freedom when it is freedom for ALL. Now lug around a backpack or be a slender person wearing huge amounts of clothes on the beach and yes, I would say that would be cause for search on suspicion but not fined or arrested. A little common sense goes a long way.

GreyhoundFancier
GreyhoundFancier
7 years ago
Reply to  AKcharle

It’s not the burkini, it’s the mohammedan men who don’t like non-mohammedans making note of the burkini-clad women. That led to violence a few weeks ago, and to stop the problem, the burkini was banned.

CainCan
CainCan
7 years ago

And then there’s the whole “Welfare Fraud” benefit to having multiple “wives”…

John Boston
John Boston
7 years ago

I totally agree. The redefinition of marriage to include same-sex partnerships was (as some Christians predicted) a slippery slope to polygamy. Now, here it is! So now we have the institution of polygamy, which was outlawed except in Utah (where a lot of Mormons have “sister wives”). Apart from the obvious problem for women, e.g., how can a man really love more than one woman equally? there is the problem of what to do with all the unmarried men. I stand against polygamy, especially Islamic polygamy.

GreyhoundFancier
GreyhoundFancier
7 years ago
Reply to  John Boston

Polygamy WAS outlawed in Utah, because in 1890 Utah had to choose between polygamy and statehood.

jeremy steering
jeremy steering
7 years ago

In case anyone should imagine that “love” and respect are necessarily involved with a Muslim man having several wives, I would point them to a comment made in a shocking documentary on Britain’s Channel 4, “The Men With Many Wives” about polygamous marriage in Britain. One of the men featured who insists on his wives covering their faces with the traditional veil said on camera:

‘My wives are something to be covered and protected for me,’ he says. ‘Some people put sheets over their cars, they cover their valuables and keep them away from people seeing and desiring the things that they have.’

Women. Possessions. Not cherished life partners.

Tatiana Covington
Tatiana Covington
7 years ago

Nobody in their right mind would want even one spouse!

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
7 years ago

Burkinis don’t bother me as much as burkas. There’s already been one instance in AUS where a muslimah refused to remove her burka when cited for a traffic offense. She later challenged her traffic offense in court, saying it wasn’t her. The office could hardly disagree since how could he identify a walking tent?

jeremy steering
jeremy steering
7 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

Well said, IT. Here in disgustingly politically correct Britain, a few years ago a Somali asylum seeker wanted for the murder of a policewoman is believed to have fled Britain dressed as a woman wearing a Muslim niqab, using his sister’s passport. No-one in Immigration or Security dared to ask “her” to lift the veil.

This scumbag, Mustaf Jama, had been allowed to stay in Britain despite serving four jail terms in six years after arriving with his family on a false passport. But black African AND Muslim? Jackpot for the “multiculturalism” fantasists.

GreyhoundFancier
GreyhoundFancier
7 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

The wearing of the burkini recently resulted in a riot when Mohammedan men objected to women wearing burkinis being stared at. That was why French authorities at some Riviera beaches decided to ban them.

k reed
k reed
7 years ago

France has since rescinded the ban on burkinis. (26 Aug 16)

Douglas
Douglas
7 years ago

This guys narrative reeks of taqiyya when describing how wonderful muslim polygamy is.

GreyhoundFancier
GreyhoundFancier
7 years ago
Reply to  Douglas

Wonderful for him!

joe1429
joe1429
7 years ago

These people are nuts. I can barely take one wife, let alone multiple ones,lol

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!