VIDEO: Pamela Geller Fox News, Dallas on the First Anniversary of Garland Jihad Attack

10

I am sure I don’t have to tell you that the reporter Jobim Panicker interviewed me for a half hour and used 30 seconds of it. No surprise there. But even now, even still, the media gives terror-tied group CAIR a bigger platform, without identifying them as indicted co-conspirators in the largest terrorist funding trial in our nations history. Nor do they mention the good number of CAIR leadership serving time behind bars for jihad-terror related crimes, or that CAIR is a US front for Hamas.

Alia Salem, the Hamas-CAIR rep, says no good came from Garland. Allow me to enlighten her. The Garland jihadis had been planning an attack for well over a year, way before we announced our Muhammad art exhibit. Had we not staged our free speech event, the Garland jihadis would have attacked somewhere else, a softer target, and we would have had a Chattanooga or San Bernardino on our hands. Garland saved lives. But they were kuffar lives, which is probably why the Hamas-CAIR rep sees no value in it. Alia Salem said, “there are no winners. There is no one who is benefiting from what happened on May 3rd last year.” The people whose lives were saved are “benefiting.” But this is what Hamas-CAIR does — deceive, deny, dissemble, distract.

She goes on to decry “hate speech,” the marketing term for blasphemy under the sharia, the brutal Islamic laws against free speech which we saw Muslims try to impose in Garland, one year ago.

  • Michael Copeland

    This attack continued the conflict that had already been going on, gradually, between Islam’s jihad terrorists and the US people.
    There have been dozens of continuing jihad attacks and conspiracies since, as detailed by Pamela Geller at Jihad Watch.
    Islamic State has declared war on the West.
    Obama, Cameron, Hollande and Merkel have not even declared a self-defence.
    How frequent do attacks have to be for a conflict to be termed a war?

  • IzlamIsTyranny

    I can only imagine the kinda leading questions they asked you in your interview Mrs. Geller. Maybe they hope the longer they interrogate you the more they can hope for something they can twist to their own sick, dishonest ends.
    The dishonest muslimah beotch was the icing on the cake.

  • pennant8

    Ms. Salem was using a variation the standard CAIR response to these kinds of attacks. I call it the “both sides” response. You see Muslims never ever, ever admit that they were the instigators of an attack. They always find a way to describe the incident as one that both sides share responsibility for.

    • Draw Muhammad Contest Again

      True. I agree with you. Muslims never show sympathy for victims of Muslim terrorist attacks.

      They always point the finger elsewhere. They never take responsibility.

      They could start by showing sympathy for victims of 911 instead of dancing in the street and celebrating.

      The Garland event at least brought these terrorists out before they could kill anyone. Its unfortunate no organization or facility is brave enough to hold another Muhammad event it might be a good way to get rid of more terrorists before they harm innocent people.

  • WarEagle82

    The Battle of Garland is what led me to arm myself and get my CCW permit.

    I suggest everyone else do likewise as Obama is bringing in tens of thousands more “refugees” to launch jihad on American citizens.

  • arnoldspriggs

    Didn’t actually time it but it seemed like the muslim baghead was given more time than Ms.Geller.

    “First” Islamic State attack ? First of many.

  • Drew the Infidel

    When the media says “no good came from Garland” , what they are actually saying is no good film footage involving blood, guts, and gore was available. After all, they see it as sort of anticlimactic that two heavily armed jihadis drive up, barely wound one civilian, and get taken out by a traffic cop using his service pistol.

  • Patti York

    To think that Pam, Robert and all of the attendees, were in that much danger,,it is almost too much to bear. We MUST soldier on though, keep reading ,learning, sharing and above all never , under any circumstances, surrender. Refuse to be silenced, shake people until their teeth rattle, if that is what it takes to be heard!

  • joe kulak

    “Hate speech” is simply speech someone else hates. That makes them the “hater”.

    Unpopular speech is the only speech that needs protection.
    The next project of the Left is, after labelling speech they don’t like as “hate speech”, is to try and make “hate speech” illegal.

    Remember that fat little pig Loretta Lynch threatening to come down on “anti-muslim” rhetoric? Well, come and get us, Bee-itch!

  • Bradley Lexvold

    No one will hold one of these events again? Give me time, I’ll have one. As someone who had cartoons in the event and was there I can say no one was in real fear. As the speeches came to an end and people were leaving I heard thumping coming from the outside glass and people started briskly walking back in. They did not have fear in their eyes for they knew their immortal soul was not in danger. I must be clear about this, Pam’s followers will literally walk through hell with her, and that is something I know of no one else on the planet. No politician, no preacher, no guru, no other leader has. We must dispel with ” Stay Safe” and be willing to walk where angels fear to tread. We must also be smart and use tools available to us. Common Law Grand Juries are being formed around the country and have the ability to legally call Islam sedition and use Common Law juries to assess appropriate response be it treasonous sedition calling for the death penalty or seditious speech leading to deportation. These are fully established legal instruments, they just haven’t been used for 150 years. Brad

Pin It on Pinterest