US gynecologists urge “compromise” on female genital mutilation

ByPamela Geller on February 23, 2016
#EndFGM campaign - video

Unconscionable. The poison fruit of Muslim immigration.

The more Muslims immigrate to Western countries, and as the norming of sharia continues in the West, the more clitoridectomies will become horrifyingly commonplace.

Dissemblers and deceivers claim that FGM is cultural phenomenon, not religious. FGM is an Islamic cultural phenomenon. FGM is found only within and adjacent to Muslim communities (source: Gerry Mackie, “Ending Footbinding and Infibulation: A Convention Account”, American Sociological Review, 61(6), December 1996, pp. 1004–1005).

This same recommendation was made a few ago: the American Academy of Pediatrics advocated that American doctors be allowed to perform a “ritual nick,” so as to satisfy Muslim families’ demand for female genital mutilation: “It might be more effective if federal and state laws enabled pediatricians to reach out to families by offering a ritual nick as a possible compromise to avoid greater harm.”

We fought it then and won but that was then.

And now these gynecologists are saying: “we only argue that certain procedures ought to be tolerated by liberal societies.”

The sanction of the savage.

The Brits are suffering an epidemic of clitoris cutting. So subdued and conquered are they, the dhimmi British authorities propose to increase prosecution of FGM to include non-Muslim adult women who have piercings… That way it won’t appear that they are singling out Muslims. Got that?


“Doctors urge ‘compromise’ on female genital cutting,” AFP, February 22, 2016:

Western states should legally permit immigrant communities to surgically “nick” young girls’ vaginas as an alternative to genital mutilation, a pair of US gynaecologists argued in a hotly-challenged paper Tuesday.

Such a “compromise” could allow groups to honour cultural or religious prescripts while saving millions of girls from invasive and disfiguring genital slashing practised in some African and Middle Eastern cultures, the two doctors stated in the Journal of Medical Ethics.

“We are not arguing that any procedure on the female genitalia is desirable,” said Kavita Arora of the Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland and Allan Jacobs of Stony Brook University in New York state.

“Rather, we only argue that certain procedures ought to be tolerated by liberal societies”, which have outlawed such practices but host immigrants for whom it is part of their culture.

Efforts to enforce an outright ban on female genital mutilation (FGM) have often had the opposite effect — driving the practice underground and putting women at even greater risk, said the duo.

But many peers immediately dismissed the idea.

According to Arianne Shahvisi of the University of Sussex ethics department in Britain: “One must not cause irreversible changes to the body of another person without their consent.”

Arora and Jacobs, however, contended that a one-size-fits-all approach ignored that many people believed the procedure to be a means of achieving “moral or ritual purity” for their child.

Vaginal cutting is widely regarded as a libido-reducer, intended in certain cultures to keep a woman chaste.

According to the World Health Organization, about three million girls a year fall victim to genital mutilation.

It can cause urinary difficulties, cysts and infection, infertility and complications in childbirth.

– Like dental work –

Arora and Jacobs have proposed new sub-categories of genital cutting.

Category One would entail procedures with no long-lasting effect on the appearance or function of the genitalia, such as a “small nick” in the skin.

Procedures under Category Two may affect appearance, but not reproductive capacity or sexual enjoyment, they said. This could include removing the “hood” or skin-fold covering the clitoris or trimming the labia (labiaplasty).

The first two categories, they said, should be reclassified as female genital “alteration” (FGA) rather than “mutilation”.

“These procedures are equivalent or less extensive than male circumcision in procedure, scope and effect,” they wrote.

“Indeed, they are equivalent or less extensive than orthodontia, breast implantation or even the elective labiaplasty for which affluent women pay thousands of dollars.”

Unclear is whether this type of procedure would be considered valid by communities who perform FGM.

Categories Three to Five should remain outlawed, said the pair.

These included procedures to remove the clitoris or other parts of the vagina, often to be stitched closed with only a small hole for urine, menstrual blood and intercourse.

Brian Earp of the Bioethics Research Institute in New York said Arora and Jacobs erred in using male circumcision as a benchmark for what is permissible.

“Ultimately, I suggest that children of whatever sex or gender should be free from having healthy parts of their most intimate sexual organs either damaged or removed, before they can understand what is at stake in such an intervention and agree to it themselves,” he wrote in a commentary.

Earlier this month, the United Nations said at least 200 million girls and women alive today have been subjected to FGM — some 44 million aged 14 and younger.

In the 30 countries where the practice is most widespread, the majority were cut before their fifth birthday, according to the UN.

Stay on top of what's really happening. Follow me on Twitter here. Like me on Facebook here.

Print This Post Print This Post


Comments at Atlas Shrugs are unmoderated. Posts using foul language, as well as abusive, hateful, libelous and genocidal posts, will be deleted if seen. However, if a comment remains on the site, it in no way constitutes an endorsement by Pamela Geller of the sentiments contained therein.

  • thefounderswereright

    Here is a way to solve a lot of Muslim problems nutter the men!!

    • Fred

      Works for me

      • Mahou Shoujo

        Fred… Don’t do it, let them de-nut muslims…

        • IzlamIsTyranny

          Isn’t de-ball the correct medical term?

          • Mahou Shoujo

            Depends on if metric or imperial measure.

  • Mahou Shoujo

    Here are the terms of the compromise. Don’t do it, prohibited by law, jail for those violating the law.

    • DowntotheBone


      • Mahou Shoujo

        Short and sweet, easy to understand.

        • Ron Cole

          Perhaps we can suggest to our Spooks that they create a new “custom” for mu%%ies. We could implant `rewriting` imams.

          Every boy child dropped has it’s stuff cut off.
          This may appeal to them, and it certainly would check their population malignant “growth”.

          • Mahou Shoujo

            Yes, re-wireing muslims, as they are “hard wired” it will be necessary to remove the pre-existing wire, replacing it with plastic tubing.

          • Don Grantham

            Remember, always cut the green wire first. Or is it the red wire… maybe the blue… oh what the hell. Just shoot them.

          • Mahou Shoujo

            Nothing wrong with taking an axe to the wiring, then bashing whats left with the blunt end.

          • eagle keeper

            Or just like we castrate calves we could do to the male child the same thing.

          • Mahou Shoujo

            That is quite possibly the only solution, as self control is not possible by muslim males.

    • Politically Accurate

      We must demand of our Parliaments and colleges of physicians and surgeons that any licensed doctor performing this barbaric Islamonazi practice be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and stripped of his/her medical license for life.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        That is a good idea.

      • IzlamIsTyranny

        Excellent idea, but I get the feeling muslum FGM is mostly performed outside of any sort of established medical practice or hospital.

        • The origional roger

          We had routine medical examinations for all students when I was a kid, if it isn’t done now it should be, and the parents should face a jail sentence that is a deterrent that will work, maybe 15 o20.

        • Just_me_and_God

          That is absolutely correct!
          In MudSlime countries, the deed is mainly done by an untrained person, sometimes a close relative, or a person who is similar to a mid-wife. No sanitary equipment or procedures are used or anything to relieve pain. They just a dirty double-edged razor blade!
          So… What is the difference from “Sending it Underground”?

          150 million of Muslim women are victims of female circumcision.


          You don’t ‘choose’ FGM at six years or younger, it is forcefully done to you, whether you like it or not. You can object all you want, but it is “done for your own good”.

          “Women have the right to undergo female circumcision” (FGM)
          — Sunaan Abu Dawud – 41.5251

    • JustThinking

      Well said, and I agree, but that doesn’t address the larger issue of Islam, which is the source of this immoral behavior. Such a law would impugn the religious liberties of Muslims, who will further grievance monger and stir the pot that will lead to more conflict.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        The only way muslims can stir the pot, is if the rest of the population tolerate it. As the tolerance of intolerance is a liberal socialist democrat value, it will have to stop being tolerated. When muslims start making demands, they should immediately get a swift kick, followed by another, until the get the idea that they are not in charge of anything.

        • ubik

          A swift kick, jail time and then deportation to a country of their choice.

        • Roger Baldridge

          The bottom line is that western society and islam cannot coexist

          • Mahou Shoujo

            Right, so, to keep things functional, islam will have to go.

          • Roger Baldridge

            Muslims will have to go

          • Mahou Shoujo

            They will be sent back to the gutters they crawled out of, after a good fight, many will be happy for the security of a mid eastern gutter.

      • John Galtius

        No. Cannibalism is a religious practice, but when the practice of a religion causes someone else harm… you cannot justify child abuse and mutilation by claiming religion.

        • JustThinking

          Thanks for your reply, and my goal of this post is to challenge you to think about this from perhaps a deeper, but certainly a different perspective, with the ultimate goal of addressing the root cause of the behavior, which we both agree is immoral. Therefore, I ask: By what authority do you claim your moral rule of it’s okay so long as it doesn’t cause “someone else harm” trump the moral authority of Islam’s god, Allah, and its prophet, Muhammad, who all Muslims are to emulate because he is considered the most perfect example of a human being? What superior moral truth do you claim to possess over Islam (which would cause Muslims to abandon Islam and thereby end the practice of FGM and many others commanded by it)?

          • eagle keeper

            Perhaps Jehovah God might be a first starting point and go from there. When you worship Satan Islam is the disastrous result one can expect. That is death and destruction no matter which way you turn. No grace, mercy and definitely No love of forgiveness to be found in the pages of their so called holy books. But if you enjoy killing and lots of it, Islam might just be right for you. The highway to Hell is greased with its victim’s blood and guts.

      • eagle keeper

        Sorry but there is NOTHING remotely “religious” about Islam. It is a heathenism and earthly manifestation of Satanic worship. In fact it give religion a bad name.

    • DVult

      Go ahead and do it then we will hang you.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        What did I do to deserve that?

        • DVult

          Sorry, it wasn’t aimed at you. I was paraphrasing what General Napier saId to the Indians when they complained about suttee being forbidden.

          Purloined from Wikiedia which undoubtedly purloined it elsewhere.:

          A story for which Napier is often noted involved Hindu priests complaining to him about the prohibition of Sati by British authorities. This was the custom of burning a widow alive on the funeral pyre of her husband. As first recounted by his brother William, he replied:

          “Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs.”

          • Mahou Shoujo

            There is much to be said for compromise in cultural diversity. Imagine my relief.

          • eagle keeper

            My suggestion is to read the book Not All Roads Lead To Heaven. You might find your so called diversity to be a stumbling block as a way or the way to Heaven.

          • Mahou Shoujo

            There are may roads that lead to heave, the only stumbling blocks are self inflicted ones.

          • ubik

            Donald Trump and Boris Johnson will ride that sentiment to the highest office of their lands. So, how to get rid of the Commie Pope and get a new JP II?
            Where are JP I’s associates when needed?

          • DVult

            I’d rather a new Urban than a JP.

    • Joe Friday

      Wrong. This is a cultural problem. That means that to end the practice, you end the culture. Any girl determined to have had this procedure performed will have her father, brothers, male cousins and uncles castrated. Mandatory. No, this is not a joke. You fight brutality by ending the ability of the brutal to be brutal.

      Keep an open mind and look at it from a perspective of numbers. 200 million women have been butchered this way. My bet is that fewer than a thousand males worldwide will have to become eunuchs for this to be completely wiped out. Plus, the world gets the benefit of excising the societal fungus from our ranks.

      By the way, I know it won’t happen under our current constitution. This is part of why the constitution needs the ol’ heave-ho. If the constitution doesn’t allow my proposal in our country and for us to do it in others, then it’s a fatal flaw and we need something else in its place.

      And yes – I’m serious.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        You can’t be serious.

  • ro

    This video of Donald Trump reading the lyrics of “the Snake” says it all.

  • DowntotheBone

    So many “physicians” are leftist/statist flakes; that this, and what the fool pediatrics society stated a few years ago, are not in the least surprising.

    I canceled my membership in the AMA more than few years ago because of similar crap, and haven’t regretted it for an instant.

    • eagle keeper

      The leftist solution is of course planned parenthood. If these loony doctors and their staff have zero heartburn with killing the unborn, why would they have any concerning female mutilation? After all it’s all about women’s health issues anyway, right??

  • Sifter

    So, they mutilate young girls, serial rape young boys, honor kill their daughters, committee suicide while blowing up Jews Christians and Hindus, demand respect for their veil, food, and holidays, and force you to convert or be beheaded.

    Islam….what’s not to like?

    • Pray Hard

      There is no such thing as an “honor kill”. There is no honor there. They are shame murders and should be called such. We MUST turn the language around on them.

      • Sifter

        You are correct. Classic example:”Prophet” Muhammed. Not mine.

      • eagle keeper

        Exactly right. Sad story of a Muslim family whose mother’s father came for a visit. The daughter had a two year old daughter. During the night the old man felt the urge. So he brutally raped the two year old. When the daughter learned what happened, instead of seeking medical attention for her daughter, she drowned the little girl in a bucket of water. That was a shame murder if there ever was one. But that is how these barbarians think and act on a daily basis. Nothing new, business as usual. Islam, the religion of peace ???

    • Virgil

      You missed one thing. Slavery. As Sheik Saleh Al-Fabian, a member of the Senior Council of Clerics, Saudi Arabia’s highest religious body declared in 2003,

      “Slavery is part of jihad, and jihad will remain as long as there is Islam”.

    • The origional roger

      That sums up the picture I have.

    • Crystal Waters

      And it is the only religion the left does not find offensive. Amazing.

      • eagle keeper

        We all know nature doesn’t like a vacuum. So as we have systematically removed God and any reference to or about Him in the public square, is it any wonder that Satan has quickly filled the void left by Jehovah’s absence? Might be Europe’s answer through Islam being their own answer to the absence of God. So will we suffer the same fate as them?? We will see. After all we asked God to leave and He did. What happens next is not His fault but ours. The old saying applies here. Note to secular America: “be careful what you ask for, you just might get it”.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        There is nothing, not even a muslim, stupider than a social democrat.

    • Uselesscrap

      Excellent post!

  • oneworld65

    Sick basturds. Do not allow this in the US. Jail time for these sick basturds and prosecute for child abuse.

  • Aaron

    Less invasive than male circumcisions? Nonsense. Come on–Category 2 surgery can definitely negatively impact sexual enjoyment for females (removing the clitoral hood and cutting labia?) If some whacky ADULT Moslem female wants to pay to have someone mutilate her sexual organs, that’s her business. Anything else is purely child abuse–even the “nicks” (which are mostly harmless physically–because it conditions the child’s set concept negatively, so there’s psychological and emotional abuse with these unnecessary surgeries.

    Meanwhile, these monstrous muslim men feast on porn. No wonder their heading in droves to Europe and the US. It’s all about sex.

    I think the doctors pushing this are seeing dollar signs. Big dollar signs.

    • Paula Coyle

      obviously they know this already.

    • IzlamIsTyranny

      Not necessarily, in our muslum future, the f’ing muslums may manage to get FGM covered by 0mamacare.

    • kgrey38

      Clearly you don’t know what male circumcision entails. The amount of tissue removed when the penile prepuce is amputated is not only much larger than what is removed in an amputation of the clitoral prepuce, the tissue in question is extremely innervated. The foreskin is estimated to contain 20,000 nerve endings. Guess how many nerve endings the glans (head) of the penis has? 4,000. Guess how many the clitoris itself has? 8,000. In addition to that massive loss of nerve endings, the unnaturally exposed glans undergoes keratinization over the man’s lifetime: the surface skin becomes thicker, drier, and less sensitive. In sum, male circumcision is tantamount to flaying the penis and results in a physiological status that could be fairly described as colorblindness of the genitals.

  • wilypagan

    I can only say that this is sick and evil. Those proposing it should have their medical licenses revoked and their external genitalia removed without their consent. Any parent or other person who participates in even a “ritual nick” of a child should be executed.

    • The origional roger

      This is right, if it can be proven members of the community knew, (phone records ) then they also should be charged with either aiding and abetting, or criminal negligence.
      Sick of politicians, judges, doctors and apologists for all this.

  • Pray Hard

    Must be getting Muslim money and or promoting their own business interests. F*cking medical assh*les! One step on that road simply leads to rusty can lids and dirty broken glass. Their medical licenses should be revoked for suggesting such barbarity. I thought this was settled a few years ago. This was probably funded through some back door of MObamacare.

  • wilypagan

    Here is contact information for the “doctor” recommending these child abusive practices if anyone wants to tell her what they think:


    I understand the draw of pragmatism and perhaps this doctor thinks that it may be a lesser evil, perhaps having seen the results of illegal back-room surgeries. But, changing the law opens the door to many “interpretations” and those parents with a traditional view will still likely want the full mutilation for their daughters, and may be more likely to go ahead, thinking they will not be found guilty if prosecuted. Today, we are leaning toward banning circumcision for boys as well, which would be a huge step forward in this discussion as well.

  • Bob

    Mere semantics, but the American Academy of Pediatrics are not gynecologists. The American College of Obstetrics & Gynecology would be the representatives for gynecologists.

  • Michael Gerzen

    One Muslim set of balls & penis for every female mutilation. Must be performed by Muslim Imam that has been publicly altered & must be verified if asked.

    • bsum1

      sounds good to me…

  • Michael Gerardi

    NO “compromise” with Koranimal barbarians. NONE! And I am utterly fed up with hearing about the “culture” of invaders. They can CHANGE their primitive ways and adopt the culture of the CIVILIZED nations they move to, or go back to the Turd-World crapcans they crawled out of.

  • Um…If they formally Tell the Muslim father that the procedure will leave the daughter able to enjoy sex, then I’m pretty certain they will Reject That procedure!

  • Michael Copeland

    Female genital mutilation is always a conspiracy: the family is involved. It is a crime.
    Withdrawal of citizenship from the whole family is appropriate.

    • James Graham

      No Michael, I think the parents should be held to account and be charged with child pornography.

  • Paula Coyle

    well I guess if babies can be slaughtered in our society… I mean…Why not just make it clean, painless, done by proper doctors in proper hospitals, no more back alley razorblades…

    • The origional roger

      Category three will eventually be legalised if the first category is, and even if there is no way of changing the status quo of the abortion laws at present, I think we should always be ready to state a belief that it is reprehensible, and continue to try to voice our opposition and utter condemnation to, and of something that is going to bring suffering to girls all their lives.

    • Crystal Waters

      You are letting liberals pull you down the rabbit hole. Just say NO.

  • Get em out of here. Their belief system is not compatible with us. Sharia law and Constitutional law cannot coexist.

  • DCCon

    The utter hypocrisy of progressives never fails to amaze me. They vehemently oppose Christian values but tacitly support Islamic ‘values’ like death to nonbelievers.

    Here, they support women’s rights on the one hand, but also support the absolute atrocity of female genital mutilation.

    The reason for this seeming inconsistency is victim status. Progressives view everything through the lens of ‘victim-hood’ and thus, Islam is the designated victim and Christianity is a known bully. Once Islam or any other ‘victim’ is granted victim status, they must never be criticized again, because to do so would be an admission of error by progressives, and they are never, ever, wrong.

  • rambler

    Any society which mutilates its females should be required to mutilate its males as well. Fair is fair!

  • lilyred

    Harvard fired Dr Church, a veteran urologist, for telling homosexual men the dangers of gay sex. Can’t get my mind around that one, either.

  • karl59

    One does not compromise with evil, with what is is morally wrong!

  • Sue Rawson

    this is bullshit! no one has the right to mutilate your body! they should be prosecuted and jailed! This is American, not some backwoods freaking woodlot…I say castrate the evil bastards! and free those poor women from their slavery!!!

    • Don’t be “racist”, Sue.

      • 3percenter

        dont be an “idiot”, idiot…Muslim is NOT a race

        • Whoosh.

          You don’t get sarcasm, do you…

        • You need to look up on the proper use of quotation marks at such times. It means it isn’t true.

          Wow, you really “get” sarcasm, don’t you.

    • Dorrie

      Muslim males should all be castrated at birth!

  • wildjew

    Disgusting SOBs.

  • Rick Meron

    What must be remembered and driven home with every possibility is that Islam is a political ideology with religious trappings, just as Global Warning is a political force with religious overtones. We can no longer afford not to recognize the political foundation of Islam. All moderate and extremist Muslims should be considered first and foremost as de facto members of the Islamic Religion Political Party, and their actions should be judged first for their political ramifications, not for their ”cry me a river” claims of religious discrimination.

    • IzlamIsTyranny

      “moderate and extremist” muslum, the delineation often without any difference except tactics.

  • The Last English Prince

    So who reports the pediatrician AND the parents to CPS for child abuse? Will it be left up to the R.N. – who might then lose her job and face a lawsuit?
    FGM is a barbaric, medieval practice which has no place in the West. We should never normalize behavior which endangers a child.

    • The origional roger

      Yeah, it might be like the story of a young guy in Sweden I think it was that was arrested and charged for gathering evidence of a migrant drug gang in his neighbourhood, no not allowed to do that.

      • Mahou Shoujo

        Swede has become synonymous with stupid.

  • Martin

    What a fully grown free mentally normal adult does to his her body is their own business after been fully informed of the risks involved. Hacking away the private parts of a boy or girl for parents who believe in and ideology that think rape victims should be punished. No to anything islamic what they think is right is usually a sin or a crime or both in our culture.

  • IzlamIsTyranny

    As usual, the lieberal’s resort to the tired fallacy of argumentation called false equivalence to defend islamic barbarity, because male circumcision is not like FGM because a penis is not a vagina, but maybe muslum men don’t have much opportunity to notice that when they’re busily buggering little boys across the muslum world.

    • kgrey38

      The genitals have the same developmental origins in utero. After a certain point they diverge, but physiological analogues both direct and indirect remain. The clitoral prepuce (hood) is basically the same thing as the penile prepuce (foreskin). The clitoris has a glans, the penis has a glans (head). The clitoris even has a shaft, though it’s “buried”.

  • Dave Mason

    The one time I condone cutting off hands! ..of any and all people involved in this evil practice!!! NO COMPROMISE!!! Muslims can go back to hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • nativejoe

    The should give vasectomies to all Muslim boys born

  • yzwisey

    I’m ok with as long as you can sterilize the men in the same manner.

  • WarEagle82

    How about this compromise. Any adult male that permits his daughter to undergo FGM should have is testicles removed by an X-acto knife.

    This compromise seems fair and should have a profound and immediate impact on the practice.

    • Patricia

      . . . and their population!

    • You forget that women are approving, enforcing and performing the procedure. Such is the powerful influence of culture/religion.

  • ubik

    Either we accept barbarism or we defeat it.
    It is that simple, like slavery, segregation or suffrage. Still not sold on the last.

  • Ken Baker

    Who are these US Gynecologists this article refers to? Name them, so we can shame them.

  • J P Sundharam

    usual libtards want to push the envelope and state that the
    conservatives are using the invalid slippery slope argument. Doctors
    should first prove that FGM has valid health benefits for the girl.

  • 762x51FMJ

    Disaster girl

    • They would happily stone a little girl like her to death for such a thing…

  • The origional roger

    According to Arianne Shahvisi of the University of Sussex ethics department in Britain: “One must not cause irreversible changes to the body of another person without their consent.”
    What happened to: “First of all, do no harm” ?
    Category one.. a small nick for “Cultural purposes.
    Category two.. “would not affect function or reproductive”.
    Category three “we’ll just leave for a bit later when all this is more acceptable, and speaking against it will get you a jail sentence.
    Kavita Arora, and Alan Jacobs need jailing.

  • Crystal Waters

    What happened to a woman’s right to choose?

  • When you bend your laws to accommodate Islamic law soon the muslems will bend you to their law. SAY NO TO SHARIA LAW

  • Dick Ellis


  • conan_drum

    Any GYO who agrees with this heinous idea should be struck off without appeal.
    Of course that won’t happen in litigious USA
    TW nobody is frocing women to have labial piercings

  • Dicehunter

    Anyone found doing this to a woman should be immediately hung.

  • Owen_Morgan

    Pamela is rightly disgusted by having been refused entry to the UK, as if she were a kind of terror threat, but I can’t see why she singles out the UK here. The insane academics are both Americans. The only voice of sanity in the article quoted is at the University of Sussex (and that’s probably the first time “sanity” and “University of Sussex” have been used in the same sentence in the last fifty years, but it’s a start).

  • Kaitlyn Thomas

    How about this…instead of mutilating a female’s body how about cutting every male’s penis off after the age of five, problem solved.!

  • Janet

    Are these people insane? If they want to live in America than they need to forget about this barbaric act! I don’t give a crap about their culture!!! But the way this country is going it wouldn’t surprise me if they do start doing something like that! That dispicable Hillary Clinton thinks you should be able to abort a baby up to the 9th month so she probably thinks this is ok! Anything to appease the immigrants!

  • Reagan40

    “Islam, this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives”
    Mustafa Kemal Ataturk

  • Warren

    There can be no compromise between good and evil.
    Ayn Rand

  • Mr Paul Middleton

    200 million girls have undergone FGM, 70 million more than previously thought. The countries in this UN report on FGM (see link) are all Muslim countries. Malaysia, Oman, Yemen, the United Arab Emirates, Djibouti, Saudi Arabia. The report also says FGM is common in Western countries with large numbers of immigrants from countries where FGM is practiced.
    It’s clear this is all about Islam, but the report doesn’t dare say that.
    As Pam says, female genital mutilation, or clitoridectomy is an Islamic tradition, rampant in the Muslim world. Hadiths have Muhammad justifying it. Over 96% of women in Egypt have been clitoridectomized. Back in 2008, devout members of the Egyptian parliament made female genital mutilation (circumcision) legal again in Egypt. The same happened in Nigeria recently. With the advent of increased Muslim immigration, this has become a pressing issue. The Islamic roots of the problem though, aren’t named and are never addressed.
    At least 200 million girls and women in 30 countries are estimated to have undergone female circumcision – half of them in Egypt, Ethiopia and Indonesia.
    A UNICEF statistical report said the global figure includes nearly 70 million more girls and women than estimated in 2014 (saying this is due to population growth in some countries and new data from Indonesia).

  • Borum

    There should be the death penalty for performing the procedure as well as on the parents / guardians for allowing it. No exceptions.

  • joe kulak

    Their “culture” then has no place here as part of ours. They want to retain it? Then they should leave and go back to Krapistan.

  • And now millions of these savage bastards are on their way here…

  • DM

    This is nothing new. As far back as 1998 “Genital Cutting” was advocated-by-american-academy-of-pediatrics . It was referred to a ritual nicking if that doesn’t make you sick. Here is an excerpt;

    the AAP suggested that doctors be allowed to cut or prick girls’ clitorises. The 2010 statement has also revised the way the AAP refers to FGM; in 1998, they called it “female genital mutilation,” but now they are terming it “female genital cutting (FGC) or ritual genital cutting.” This, apparently, is the politically correct way of describing the forced removal of a woman’s sexual organs: “Mutilation” is an inflammatory term

    • The same goes for the use of “terrorists” these days in the leftist idiots MSM outlets. The Guardian now calls IRA terrorists ‘activists’. They are going out of their way to appease their Islamic and leftist terrorists pals.

  • In the picture, her own mother is too sickened to even look at what they’re doing to their own children.

    Here, in Northern Ireland, IRA republican idiots for mothers take their own sons to be shot in the legs by appointment. Any other mother in the world would never allow their offspring to suffer such agony – everywhere except in the Islamic world, third world, and among the idiotic IRA filth here in their ghettos.

  • Marc Goldstone

    As long as Muslim men refuse to be circumcised their women (chattel) must be free to refuse having their genitals mutilated. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, or it should be.

  • trill


  • trill

    How come this culture of people is so openly allowed to abide milest rape and kill children and women and the world just stands by.. I guess it truly is a mans world.. Doesn’t matter the religion no one is fighting back. A society is only as strong as its women because in 2016 men are to pussy to defend anything but there own dick.

  • Patricia

    I have asked many times on these comment sections for one muslim or better yet, one muslimah to explain to me, by whose authority do these men modify God’s creation?

    They are in essence telling women that the CREATOR made a mistake when creating their bodies and they being followers of mo, know better than ALMIGHTY GOD so they are bound to change His Creation!

    Is hell gonna be big enough?

    • Black Eagle

      BE aware that female genital mutilation is done by mothers and aunts upon the little girls, not done by men. The men do circumcisions of the boys.

      • Patricia

        I stand corrected! Thank you. Correct in the physical act, however, the decree, mandate, order, wherever these edicts spring from, are the controlling, dominant men in their society.

      • mjazzguitar
    • kgrey38

      By the same nonsensical authority that people modify another of God’s creations: the foreskin of the penis.

      • Patricia

        You are, of course, right as rain! My own son is a whole male and I don’t regret that decision, his Dad and I made regarding that.

        My husband explained to me that Jesus died on the Cross for all mankind’s sins, He was the final sacrifice, He did it all for ALL.

        Since Jesus made the ultimate sacrifice for us, we do not have to spill our son’s blood anymore.

  • NickandLynds

    If they’re in America, then their culture is American culture. That means no FMG. We should not permit the Third World sewer to spill into our country.

  • Just_me_and_God

    When you compromise with the Devil, you always lose!

  • Ernie

    How about compulsory cockectomies for all moslem men at birth. That would solve most world problems if done for about 50 consecutive years.

  • James Matamoros

    There are just no words for this barbarity. To think a mother actually holds her daughter through this horror convinces me that muslims have submitted themselves to something from hell.

  • Doctor Who?

    Here’s an idea. Any Muslim involved in female genital mutilation gets his own genitals mutilated.

    • kgrey38

      They already are. Male genital mutilation is also common practice among Muslims.

      • Doctor Who?

        WOW! All the more reason to stay out of the Middle East.

  • joe1429

    Any men who dont like the clitoris … like little boys

    • kgrey38

      You’re almost onto something. Historically, genital mutilation has roots in the idea of excising a “masculine” aspect of the female body (the clitoris) and a “feminine” aspect of the male body (the foreskin). That idea takes the form of a puberty rite-of-passage in some cultures, and in other cultures–such as Judaism and Islam–it is done earlier as a rite-of-passage into life/society/religion rather than into adulthood. Even now, most cultures that practice FGM also practice MGM (most commonly circumcision but sometimes other procedures, such as subincision or superincision). Any and all surgical alteration* of the bodies of non-consenting individuals, especially minors, is barbaric.
      * any and all surgical alteration that isn’t a necessary intervention in a critical medical situation

  • Steve

    The picture in this article says it all. It is as if some barbarian culture rite of passage were taking place that somehow had escaped through a time portal from the 7th century and found its way into the 21st century. There the family is at home and here comes papa with his razors and mama to hold her down. Time for a break from home box office. Everyone ready? Screams and mother holding her daughter firmly with understanding and comforting and 30 minutes later daughter is a physically and psychologically permanently scarred child thanks to adherence to an insane cult teaching from hell. There are some who claim circumcision is the same thing as a female genital mutilation. If the two were the same there would be a lot of dick less men-literally.

    Here is a link on this evil practice happening every day followed by good muslims.

    • kgrey38

      I’m guessing you’ve never seen extremely similar photos of Filipino Tuli rites, African circumcisions, etc. Nor photos of American baby boys screaming in agony as the most sensitive tissue on their body is ripped off without anesthesia (or, at best, with inadequate anesthetic), leaving not only scarred, radically altered, functionally reduced genitals but yes, early childhood trauma too, even though they can’t consciously remember what was done to them when they were newborn. Nor must you have seen any videos of American circumcision and heard screams that could haunt you for the rest of your life.

      • Steve

        You’re guessing wrong. In any event no use comparing barbaric “technology” practices with most modern methods. In any event the outcomes are drastically different. Women wind up far worse off. You sound like you are apologizing for islam by bringing up circumcision. In any event both male and female genital mutilation are traumatic events.

        • JC Bond

          why apologize? you support torturing young boys. people are not cuts of meat.

          • Steve

            Sounds like queer logic you’ve used to rationalize your agenda and incorrectly concluded that i support torture like you do.

  • V

    Physical exams done by physician prior to entering school at the five, 10, and 15 year marks. Any mutilation noticed- dad sent back to Syria or Morocco and mom two years in prison.Girl put with Christian foster parents.

  • Kara

    So the West continues to acquiesce to the horrific demands of Islamic “culture.” How can anyone justify FGM on any level? We are losing our ability to identify that which is evil. If we cannot identify it, we cannot stop it.

  • eagle keeper

    If it ain’t broke don’t fix it.

  • JC Bond

    Why West acquiesce to horrific demand of Islam/Hebrew? Circumcision is completley unnecessary “culture”. US practice sharia/halacha law so long. millions of boys, most not islemic or hebrew are tortured as babies, are butchered for forskins! No purpose. Why? Are people cuts of meat to be prepared for what??