San Bernardino jihad murderer was vetted by FIVE different government agencies

ByPamela Geller on December 15, 2015
69 Comments
san bernardino christmas party

Tashfeen Malik was subjected to no less than five background checks by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security before she was allowed to enter the country. She passed both. That is a stunning indictment of Obama’s vaunted “vetting process” for the Syrian refugees he is intent upon inflicting upon this country.

The Obama administration won’t review social postings of social media, but they monitor social postings critical of his treasonous administration.

Photo above: Christmas party before the jihad massacre began.

“San Bernardino jihad murderer was vetted by FIVE different government agencies,” thanks to Robert Spencer, December 15, 2015

It just keeps getting worse. At first we were told that she had been vetted by two agencies. Apparently Obama Administration officials were hoping to cover up the magnitude of this failure. In any case, Tashfeen Malik stands as a witness to the impossibility of vetting for jihadis.

Tashfeen-Malik

“U.S. missed ‘red flags’ with San Bernardino shooter,” CBS News, December 14, 2015:

As investigators focus on what or who motivated San Bernardino shooters Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, to open fire at the Inland Regional Center, a report about Malik’s comments on social media before she moved to the U.S. is raising questions about how thoroughly she was vetted.

Law enforcement sources confirmed to CBS News that Malik made radical postings on Facebook as far back as 2012 — the year before she married Farook and moved to the U.S., reports CBS News correspondent Carter Evans. According to a report in the New York Times, Malik spoke openly on social media about her support for violent jihad and said she wanted to be a part of it. But none of these postings were discovered when Malik applied for a U.S. K-1 fiancé visa.

“If you’re going to start doing a deeper dive into somebody and looking at their social media postings or other things, you really want to focus your effort on the high-risk traveler, the person that you’re really worried about being a threat to the United States,” said James Carafano, national security expert and vice president of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy at the Heritage Foundation. “The question is, how do you identify them?”

Malik was not identified as a threat despite being interviewed at the U.S. Embassy in Pakistan and vetted by five different government agencies that checked her name and picture against a terror watch list and ran her fingerprints against two databases.

Stay on top of what's really happening. Follow me on Twitter here. Like me on Facebook here.

Print This Post Print This Post

Disclamer

Comments at Atlas Shrugs are unmoderated. Posts using foul language, as well as abusive, hateful, libelous and genocidal posts, will be deleted if seen. However, if a comment remains on the site, it in no way constitutes an endorsement by Pamela Geller of the sentiments contained therein.

  • All this proves is that WE THE PEOPLE should be vetting these savages.

    • Pray Hard

      More like deporting and blocking.

  • Honcho

    It’s possibly more an indication that these agencies have been forced to vet these people ‘with their eyes closed’.

    We saw this in the commitments our soldiers had in Iraq and Afghanistan with the rules of engagement set so that our soldiers had to fight with ‘their hands tied behind their backs’

    It all comes back to some libtards in the administration who would rather not be called meanies even if it means trading good peoples livesm

    • ruthy k

      More like the Muslim Brotherhood which officially schools the government agencies on Islam has infiltrated and usurped much of the real power granted to these agencies. Hence what we face now. Muslim Brotherhood manifesto (2nd half is English): https://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/20.pdf

      • Guest*

        So how are these veminous infiltrator scum still allowed in the US?

        • ruthy k

          They came in decades ago. Read the link and google. They use our system against us, I.E. PC Islamafauxbia, refugee crisis, open boarders. There’s lot’s of $ sick rich greedy people gain from this. Add on all the blackmail, sexual depravity and drugs involved. They grease each other. Money and immorality is one of the greatest roots of all evil. It’s ridiculous to think the common man or most politicians call the shots. That’s mostly a veneer. E/t is set up so that the more corrupt s/o is, the higher and more powerful that person becomes.
          In short, they get in with the red carpet rolled out for them.
          “If there’s a will there’s a way.”- But that goes for us too.

          • Guest*

            I read it, I googled, and it still beggars belief that these people have a manifesto of conquest and systematic plan of infiltration, coercion and subversion that is well documented, has been uncovered and made publicly available yet they are left free to operate and advance their plot. Whether or not the muslim brotherhood technically operate just within the bounds of the law or not, the spirit of the law must have been well and truly broken?, surely the legislature didn’t intend to allow these foreign viruses the liberty to further their plans to install a divisive foreign theocratic culture which is so antithetical to the spirit of the constitution and America in general?
            Your point about the corrupt symbiosis is well taken but isn’t that why we have the ‘untouchable’ FBI?
            And the argument that the right to religious freedom is paramount is flawed if a violent intolerant political totalitarianism such as islam can masquerade as a religion and obtain immunity under it.
            Essentially, if these ‘ unindicted ‘ crooks and crims use our laws against us we need to specifically outline exceptions to the rights and tighten loopholes too.
            Otherwise common sense has been legislated against.

          • Guest*

            It’s one of the most annoying things muslims do, using the very laws and system of democracy they seek to change to change it! Is there a better example of a virus?

          • SFTOBEY

            Nope.

          • ruthy k

            S/o in the FBI called into Michael Savage’s show. Basically when the admiinistration can’t pass an executive order and wants to stop them from doing the job the FBI really want and should legally do, the higher ups get what they want by policy. The FBI is not being allowed to do it’s job. The IRS CIA and FBI now serve the President’s purposes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpXRa4Clb-s -They do what they want, basically

          • Guest*

            Wow! Scratch what I said before then re FBI, handpicked tame Attorneys General, ulterior motives and political horsetrading, security protocols that only apply to some people, “something is rotten in the state of Denmark” .
            So much for an independant untouchable umpire. It must be in someone’s short term political or financial interest for the MB to flourish. Sickening. God only knows what hillary has been up to re Benghazi
            Meanwhile; more whitehouse idiocy and schmoosing with CAIR http://www.investigativeproject.org/list/track.php?u=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5pbnZlc3RpZ2F0aXZlcHJvamVjdC5vcmcvNTA5Ni93aGl0ZS1ob3VzZS1vcGVucy1kb29yLXRvLWNhaXItcmVwLWlnbm9yZXMtbXVzbGlt&m=8038&s=30098

          • Ballady

            I believe the MB has been infiltrating since Bush Sr. The depths of the systemic corruption have just been coming to light over the past 6-7 years. Our presidents are all puppets, Obama is just accelerating the pace on behalf of his mastahs and the average joe is wising up.

          • ruthy k

            From my research they’ve been working on this since the 70’s. So you’re likely correct.

          • SFTOBEY

            And don’t forget Grover Norquist – the quisling in “conservative” clothing – that is for all things izlam (sic – on purpose).

          • Richard

            A couple of very interesting guests on Savage. I worked in a SCIF with proper clearances for 26 years, so it all rang true. SF86 every 5 years, polygraphed twice in my career, secrets forever, the whole 9. No, in this case 10. Jail for life for divulging secrets, it is serious stuff.
            The one thing I learned after many years is that if there is a potential violation it’s up to the security personnel to determine if it was serious enough to be reportable to the customer. I’ll leave it to the reader to guess who the customer is. The lesson learned is that it’s not so much what you did as it is who you are.
            I’ve seen special program security folks do incredibly stupid things handling information only to declare for some pretzel logic reasoning that it was not in violation.
            For Hillary to get classified satellite imagery onto an unclassified system some IT person in a SCIF had to remove it from the classified internal network, perhaps CWAN, and take it out of a compartmented facility. Clinton may be politically savvy, but in other matters like IT she is as dumb as a bag of hammers. Someone, or several people, with SSBI conspired to facilitate her getting classified off the classified intranet.
            Others have gone to prison for life for this kind of deliberate action to remove classified info from the classified systems and disseminate on unclassified systems, or transfer it to foreign entities. Like I stated, it’s not what you do as much as it is who you are that determines what is a security violation.

          • sodacrackers2

            Political Islam and Sharia law are unconstitutional in the USA and should be banned. Any “religion” that does not allow you to leave is a cult. Any religion that allows you to murder on enslave those who do not believe what you believe is a death cult.

          • Guest*

            Yes and yes again! Yet somehow they’re here and many more adherants are on their way.
            It’s fast becoming apparent to me that common sense has become anything but common amongst the political class, public safety, cultural harmony, freedom of expression and speech, those values I would have called non-negotiable have been made negotiable for the sake of political correctness, a silly liberal notion that provides exactly zero returns on the positive side of the ledger and veritable tsunami of side effects and unintended consequences, disharmony and muslim supremacism on the negative side.
            Ditto with preposterous ‘cultural relativity’ which posits that no culture is any better or worse than any other!! Hence advanced western mechanised modernised culture with it’s guarantees of equality before the law, freedom of speech/religion/movement and right to dissent, to gather in groups and to criticize the ruling elite is EQUAL, according to cultural relativity, to a mud hut culture in which 9 year olds are married off, clitorii are sanded off, men are worth two women and any dissent is labelled apostasy for which the punishment is death.
            Criticism of the ruling elite=death, or a public flogging. Being gay=death. Having sex outside marriage=death.
            If you are female and have the temerity to fall victim to a rapist…= death, after all it was your own fault, what were you doing out without your owner or male relative?
            A culture of equal value to America’s or France’s? Really? Yet were you to voice the obvious you would be called a racist, an intolerant islamophobe.

          • sodacrackers2

            Thank you and may God bless you abundantly for speaking the truth without fear.

          • SFTOBEY

            The “only a tiny minority” meme is still in play.

          • Ballady

            In play, full blast. But something I’m finding interesting is that in the comment sections on MSM leftist propagandist articles, there are MANY more people who are growing wise to the “religion of peace” than I’ve ever seen before, even post 9/11. It remains to be seen how much more American blood needs to be spilled in order to shatter the illusion in it’s entirety.

          • Ballady

            This is exactly correct. I wish more people would wise up to the fact that this is a bipartisan attack on the people. Islam is a convenient, evil theocratic system that the globalist elites are using to further their goal: a politically correct, paralyzed, fearful people that have been systematically robbed of our freedoms. Islam is one of many tools at the elite’s disposal…Our people have been intentionally dumbed down and indoctrinated over the last two generations, numbed with drugs and distracted with toys while becoming increasingly and intentionally divided amongst ourselves. Thus insuring we will not revolt.

        • ruthy k

          This is how sophisticated those ISIS !@@#$! are:http://www.siotw.org/news_english.item.1290/an-islamic-caliphate-in-seven-easy-steps.html
          http://www.quilliamfoundation.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/FINAL-documenting-the-virtual-caliphate.pdf

          The MB would dearly love the same end results. It’s not how they’re here now. (BO is there, nuf said.) It’s where and who are they and how to get all Jihadi control out and decimate them that concerns me.

    • Rob Porter

      Last night in the Republican candidates’ debate, we learned that Obama’s next to worthless coalition airforce is now doing between 13 to 17 strikes day. Gee whiz, do you realize that this ‘wondrous’ new Obama effort is up from an average of 7 a day – whereas during Desert Storm the U.S. was doing more than 1,100 a day. No wonder Putin has publicly stated that Obama is “only pretending to bomb ISIS”. This U.S. president is a contemptible pathological liar – and yet continues to get away with it because of a spineless Republican opposition.

  • Mahou Shoujo

    Scratch a democrat, find a dhimmi.

    • Richard

      That’s a scratch and sniff I’ll pass on!

      • Mahou Shoujo

        True, they do tend to be odiferous, especially when pontificating.

      • Guest*

        💩👃❌

  • Rocinante44

    the families of those murdered need to lawyer up and sue the directors and employees of the federal agencies who were negligent in their duty to protect the deceased from these animals, no different than some federal dufus who lets a rabid dog into the country after having 5 chances to prevent it. sue them criminally as accessories to murder, and personally for negligence for all they have. this is the only way to get the attention of the democrat employees in the federal agencies from believing that they don’t have to care about the consequences of obeying their lawless boss

    • jobird

      Well said.I agree 100% with your post.

    • SFTOBEY

      Unfortunately, as in the bad old days, you can’t sue the king.

      • Rocinante44

        i disagree. there is a level of negligence beyond which these democrat federal employees can’t hide. i keep wondering where the millions of hungry trial lawyers are, but i guess they are all democrats

    • Rocky Lucchetta

      Rocinante44, that’s not such a bad idea. I like it. That would definitely throw a scare into the federal agencies responsible for this useless vetting.

  • Gee, THANKS PAMELA! I can get some sleep now !!!

  • DRESS BRITISH

    Shouldn’t Obama be under surveillance?

    • Lisa

      Shouldn’t he be locked up?

      • notislam

        The longer they think that his reign-of-tyranny will soon be over the more damage will occur to our country as he funnels our taxes to the ISIS and lets them into our land to get jihad ready

  • atl slayer

    I got it,,,,solution found,,,Islam is the tea party and the radicals are Republican tea partyers,,,,that should start the vetting back up the the 11 notch,,,,then they’ll be looking at their Facebook etc. postings :/

  • Roger Wallace

    Veted means screened by Obama and cleared by Obama for entry into the US.

    • call a spade a spade

      Exactly right. Why would we expect competent vetting when we have a racist American-hater Muslim in the WH?

    • notislam

      Obama was not vetted and ALL OF CONGRESS knew it—

  • Summerwarmth

    It almost seems like Obama let her in because she appeared to be a potential jihadist.

    • Roger Wallace

      Here is something to think about, it from one of my previous posts:

      In the foreign media it is said that Obama is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. If that is true that Obama is part of the Muslim Brotherhood:

      Then a lot of people may not know that the Brotherhood and ISIS have the same objectives and goals in trying to take over the world for radical Islam.

      But in public, ISIS is suppose to be a enemy I believe to the Brotherhood. And seeing that Russia has shown recently the free world that Obama hasn’t really done much of anything at all to ISIS in Syria:

      That in it’s self makes one wonder if Obama is using ISIS in some in direct way, as to accomplish Islam radicalism for the Muslim Brotherhood beliefs, that is, if Obama is a member of the Brotherhood..

      But, one of Islams military ploys, is to send Islam Muslims to another non Muslim nation to repopulate that host nation with Islam births, so that in the future, Islam in that host nation:

      Can push out Christianity and replace it with Islam as an example, as by more Islam people births than Christian births being born in that Christian nation.

      That act of Islam is called a Hijah and that is what Obama I believe is trying to do to America through Islam Muslim refugees who have ISIS soldiers hid in them.

      ISIS said they would create this Hijah condition back in Feb to occur in Europe and in America and they have also said they would place something like 500,000 ISIS soldiers in those refugees that Obama wants so badly to bring into our nation now.

      And even though Obama says we can screen all of those Syrian refugees and be safe, he is lying about that to America.

      And it is because I saw some of the Director of the FBI’s testimony to the HOUSE, and the Director said no data exists anywhere in Syria to even try to screen thousands and thousands of those refugees to see if they can be allowed to become new citizens in America.

      So that means that if we screen those refugees, then the results will come back screened but no data applied to the refuges to know if they are ISIS or not.

      But, apparently, Obama has been letting those Muslim Islam refugees come on into America in the past unconditionally, I believe from Syria.

      So if we don’t get Obama stopped, Obama might end up getting ISIS soldiers living here secretly in America by the thousands for Islam, that is if Obama is secretly a Muslim Brotherhood member.

      But Obama is grooming America for Islam I believe for he says he wants 10,000 of them here next year, but he is lying, I believe he wants them here now.

      Trouble is, that in New York not long ago, a senator there is wanting 1.5 million of those refugees form Syria to be allowed to settle in that state .

      And around that same time in New York, in another state I believe, wanted 1 million to come to America. And nearly all the refugees are men of military age with their families back in the middle east.

      So it would seem to me that Obama may have set his hopes on 15 to 30 million of those refugees to be allowed to immigrate in the near future into the US from the middle east as they claim to be Syrian.

      And many are not Syrian and we can‘t prove if they be Syrian or not, for many of them are data less people to be screened by us and Obama knows this.

      • SFTOBEY

        The word you were looking for is “hijra”.

  • lee

    The best vetting is don’t let Muslim sandbaggers in to the country.

  • Ivan Yee

    Obama is a Muslim and part of the Muslim Brotherhood. How ignorant and silly Americans had voted twice for a Muslim president!

    Qur’an (40:28) – A man is introduced as a believer, but one who had to “hide his faith” among those who are not believers.

    • Roger Wallace

      If Obama is a Muslim, then: Obama was perhaps introduced to US voters as a christian, but hid his faith in Islam to deceive the US, so he could work toward Islam goals for dominating a host nation for Islam.

  • No Quarter

    She went through 5 checks, but not her stupid face book page ?? How many other muslim creeps went through 5 checks and are here festering and waiting for their chance at paradise? They get there by killing us!! islam=submit or die.

    • Roger Wallace

      I heard something like close to 70 Muslims are being looked at as if they maybe terrorists. Perhaps many of them are of the 1,800 Syrians that the US let in the states lately after they were vetted by the US.

      • Ballady

        Perhaps, and perhaps more of them are second generation “Americans” waiting for a stab at jihad like their fellow warriors the Bostonian bombers.

  • Guest*

    Then I contend that they ” WEREN’T ” vetted five times.
    How can anyone have confidence in the screening methods if different agencies take five bites of the cherry and find nothing

    • Pray Hard

      It’s a show, nothing more.

    • Roger Wallace

      But they were screened by the US and allowed entry into our nation, even though the US has no paperwork from Syria for us to have vetted them with.

      So Obama had to have let them in the US unconditionally, as without proper background information on who they really are from Syria.

      This I wrote, I believe is what Obama means when he says we can screen Syrian Muslims.

    • Roger Wallace

      Obama has already let 1,800, suppose to be Syrians into our country recently. Now, in my opinion is that Obama knows we couldn’t vet them in any way at all, because he knows that the Syria has no official records to help us vet Syrians, then or even now. So Obama got em screened officially anyway and Obama did it unconditionally I think and accepted anyway, even by their own word that they are our friend and etc. Now, from that point of view on vetting problems, Obama may have purposely let possible Islam radical terrorists into America anyway, in my opinion. And I know what I say is possible, because not long ago, the Director of the FBI testified to the House and spoke about these vetting problems for us concerning the US vetting Syrians.

      • Guest*

        They bring nothing of value, why take any risk? We don’t need them here. These aren’t highly sought specialists, experts in their fields bringing hard to find experience with them, they are young untrained and looking for welfare.
        Sure help them but do it over there in Syria, provide safe havens, food and medical aid, not US citizenship.

  • Benton Marder

    She gave a phony address. If they had bothered to check that, they would have just denied the application out of hand—or, would they? They didn’t bother. This alone condemns the whole pack of them.

  • Darrell Standing

    http://i.imgur.com/jtQbnrt.jpg

    “I just don’t see any Islamic terrorists at all … you Islamaphobes”!!! 😎
    signed : Imam Pretendident Zero

  • Drew the Infidel

    First things first, you have to make an honest effort. This is what happens when some jackwad shows up to his or her government job only focused on paydays and holidays.

  • kb

    It’s not just that O. is an Islamist sympathizer, but too many workers we rely on are totally blind (unintelligent, dull, without any sense of responsibility).

  • Jack

    Pamela, Jeh Johnson on the job. He probably outsourced the vetting process to his friends & those of Barack Obama, The Muslim Brotherhood.

  • Ron Cole

    I used to say with some authority as I am an octogenarian plus that gummit seldom does anything right.

    After hussien the aliased paperless father unknown muslim fascist terrorist created it’s caliphate I can only say the nothing feral gummit does is right. Certainly nothing gummit does is Constitutional, in the interest of America or it’s legal taxpaying citizens.

  • jobird

    The enemy is inside the gates, this all started with Obama in the WH.It is open season
    now on Americans with his blessings. Wonder if the Mao ornament is on the tree this year?

    • Ballady

      Don’t be naive. Yes, Obama is heinous but our government stopped representing the people decades ago. The masses are just finally waking up to the reality…slowly.

  • What good is VETTING with a RADICAL MUSLIME in the White House?

    #Trump2016 #Obama is a RADICAL #MUSLIM !!!

    http://socialmediavote.blogspot.com/2015/12/trumo2016-obama-is-radical-muslim-now.html?spref=tw

  • sodacrackers2

    Has anyone else had comments removed? I don’t know is disqus is doing it or the large number of trolls spouting politically correct leftist propaganda are flagging anyone who dares to speak the truth.

  • Pray Hard

    She could have been “vetted” by five hundred or five thousand and it still would have made no difference in this sick political climate.

  • Roger Wallace

    In the foreign media it is said that Obama is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. If that is true that Obama is part of the Muslim Brotherhood:

    Then a lot of people may not know that the Brotherhood and ISIS have the same objectives and goals in trying to take over the world for radical Islam.

    But in public, ISIS is suppose to be a enemy I believe to the Brotherhood. And seeing that Russia has shown recently the free world that Obama hasn’t really done much of anything at all to ISIS in Syria:

    That in it’s self makes one wonder if Obama is using ISIS in some in direct way, as to accomplish Islam radicalism for the Muslim Brotherhood beliefs, that is, if Obama is a member of the Brotherhood..

    But, one of Islams military ploys, is to send Islam Muslims to another non Muslim nation to repopulate that host nation with Islam births, so that in the future, Islam in that host nation:

    Can push out Christianity and replace it with Islam as an example, as by more Islam people births than Christian births being born in that Christian nation.

    That act of Islam is called a Hijah and that is what Obama I believe is trying to do to America through Islam Muslim refugees who have ISIS soldiers hid in them.

    ISIS said they would create this Hijah condition back in Feb to occur in Europe and in America and they have also said they would place something like 500,000 ISIS soldiers in those Muslim refugees that Obama wants so badly to bring into our nation now.

    And even though Obama says we can screen all of those Syrian refugees and be safe, he is lying about that to America.

    And it is because I saw some of the Director of the FBI’s testimony to the HOUSE, and the Director said no data exists anywhere in Syria to even try to screen thousands and thousands of those refugees to see if they can be allowed to become new citizens in America.

    So that means that if we screen those refugees, then the results will come back screened but no data applied to the refuges to know if they are ISIS or not.

    But, apparently, Obama has been letting those Muslim Islam refugees come on into America in the past unconditionally, I believe from Syria.

    So if we don’t get Obama stopped, Obama might end up getting ISIS soldiers living here secretly in America by the thousands for Islam, that is if Obama is secretly a Muslim Brotherhood member.

    But Obama is grooming America for Islam I believe for he says he wants 10,000 of them here next year, but he is lying, I believe he wants them here now.

    Trouble is, that in New York not long ago, a senator there is wanting 1.5 million of those refugees form Syria to be allowed to settle in that state .

    And around that same time in New York, in another state I believe, wanted 1 million to come to America. And nearly all the refugees are men of military age with their families back in the middle east.

    So it would seem to me that Obama may have set his hopes on 15 to 30 million of those refugees to be allowed to immigrate in the near future into the US from the middle east as they claim to be Syrian.

    And many are not Syrian and we can‘t prove if they be Syrian or not, for many of them are data less people to be screened by us and Obama knows this.

  • Rocky Lucchetta

    This ‘vetting process’ is absurd!!!!! It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Do the Feds really believe that terrorists, posing as refugees, are going to say, “okay, you got me, I’m an ISIS terrorist”??????? When asked where they’re from, are they going to get their former address in the middle east, send agents to find their address, talk to their neighbors and relatives, to find out what their ideology is???????
    COME ON, nothing could more ridiculous. A migrant from the middle east has a better chance off entering the States than a native born Canadian!!

    • Guest*

      Exactly. How does one go about vetting for ‘extent ‘ of islamic belief?
      Even if a reffo comes from the town he or she says, ( and there is an example today of three of the Paris attack muslims being from Pakistan and Egypt yet saying they were Syrian )
      How can you determine HOW muslim he is? ‘Very muslim’ muslims kill non believers, gays anybody not muslim enough, anybody the wrong type of muslim etc etc
      ‘Reasonably muslim’ muslims provide weapons and training and safehouses.
      ‘Fairly muslim’ muslims donate money to “charities” and turn a blind eye.
      Any ‘lapsed muslim’ muslims can’t identify as such because ‘very muslim’ muslims might shoot them as apostates.
      Various polling suggests about 25% of muslims hold the view that islam and shariah law must dominate the world and that it’s permissible to use violence to get their way.
      How do you pick those ones?
      Only one surefire way and that’s to ban 100% of them until such time as they sort their stuff out, that will keep them out for at least the next 2 or 3 EVERS!!