Cardinal Danneels admits: “Mafia” club brought down Benedict XVI to make Church “much more modern”

80

Pope Benedict spoke honestly about Islam. Now it has come to light that he was being undermined by a shadowy cabal that wanted to install Cardinal Bergoglio — the present Pope Francis — as Pope and “modernize” the Catholic Church. One thing they’ve certainly succeeded in doing is ending all resistance to the global jihad that has victimized hundreds of thousands of Christians. The Church leadership is betraying its own people.

Godfried-Danneels

“Cardinal Danneels admits: ‘Mafia’ club brought down Benedict XVI to make Church ‘much more modern,’” by Robert Spencer, Jihad Watch, September 25, 2015:

Story continues below advertisement

Danneels “called it a ‘mafia’ club that bore the name of St. Gallen. The group wanted a drastic reform of the Church, to make it ‘much more modern’, and for Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio to head it.”

Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio is Pope Francis. So this “mafia” cabal succeeded. They got their Pope who would help them impose a “drastic reform of the Church, to make it ‘much more modern.'” Why an institution that claims to transmit and preserve divine revelation would need to be “modern” remains unexplained, but clearly this palace coup heralded a significant change in the Church’s stance toward Islam. Pope Benedict XVI said this on September 12, 2006 at the University of Regensburg in Germany:

I was reminded of all this recently, when I read the edition by Professor Theodore Khoury (Münster) of part of the dialogue carried on — perhaps in 1391 in the winter barracks near Ankara — by the erudite Byzantine emperor Manuel II Palaeologus and an educated Persian on the subject of Christianity and Islam, and the truth of both. It was presumably the emperor himself who set down this dialogue, during the siege of Constantinople between 1394 and 1402; and this would explain why his arguments are given in greater detail than those of his Persian interlocutor. The dialogue ranges widely over the structures of faith contained in the Bible and in the Qur’an, and deals especially with the image of God and of man, while necessarily returning repeatedly to the relationship between — as they were called — three “Laws” or “rules of life”: the Old Testament, the New Testament and the Qur’an. It is not my intention to discuss this question in the present lecture; here I would like to discuss only one point — itself rather marginal to the dialogue as a whole — which, in the context of the issue of “faith and reason”, I found interesting and which can serve as the starting-point for my reflections on this issue.

In the seventh conversation edited by Professor Khoury, the emperor touches on the theme of the holy war. The emperor must have known that sura 2, 256 reads: “There is no compulsion in religion”. According to the experts, this is one of the suras of the early period, when Mohammed was still powerless and under threat. But naturally the emperor also knew the instructions, developed later and recorded in the Qur’an, concerning holy war. Without descending to details, such as the difference in treatment accorded to those who have the “Book” and the “infidels”, he addresses his interlocutor with a startling brusqueness, a brusqueness that we find unacceptable, on the central question about the relationship between religion and violence in general, saying: “Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached”. The emperor, after having expressed himself so forcefully, goes on to explain in detail the reasons why spreading the faith through violence is something unreasonable. Violence is incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul. “God”, he says, “is not pleased by blood — and not acting reasonably is contrary to God’s nature. Faith is born of the soul, not the body. Whoever would lead someone to faith needs the ability to speak well and to reason properly, without violence and threats… To convince a reasonable soul, one does not need a strong arm, or weapons of any kind, or any other means of threatening a person with death…”

The decisive statement in this argument against violent conversion is this: not to act in accordance with reason is contrary to God’s nature. The editor, Theodore Khoury, observes: “For the emperor, as a Byzantine shaped by Greek philosophy, this statement is self-evident. But for Muslim teaching, God is absolutely transcendent. His will is not bound up with any of our categories, even that of rationality.” Here Khoury quotes a work of the noted French Islamist R. Arnaldez, who points out that Ibn Hazn went so far as to state that God is not bound even by his own word, and that nothing would oblige him to reveal the truth to us. Were it God’s will, we would even have to practice idolatry.

It is a swift and sudden descent from these honest, accurate, and carefully reasoned observations to this, from Pope Francis’ Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium, November 24, 2013:

In order to sustain dialogue with Islam, suitable training is essential for all involved, not only so that they can be solidly and joyfully grounded in their own identity, but so that they can also acknowledge the values of others, appreciate the concerns underlying their demands and shed light on shared beliefs. We Christians should embrace with affection and respect Muslim immigrants to our countries in the same way that we hope and ask to be received and respected in countries of Islamic tradition. I ask and I humbly entreat those countries to grant Christians freedom to worship and to practice their faith, in light of the freedom which followers of Islam enjoy in Western countries! Faced with disconcerting episodes of violent fundamentalism, our respect for true followers of Islam should lead us to avoid hateful generalisations, for authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence.

And more twaddle from Pope Francis’ address to Congress, September 24, 2015:

Our world is increasingly a place of violent conflict, hatred and brutal atrocities, committed even in the name of God and of religion. We know that no religion is immune from forms of individual delusion or ideological extremism.

And because Roman Catholics in the U.S. have such an exaggerated and borderline idolatrous awe for the papacy, they go along with all this readily enough: if the Pope is a Leftist multicultutalist who dissembles about the nature of Islam and the jihad threat, well, then, so are they. Even those who realize that this is not only nonsense, but suicidal nonsense, fear to say anything, out of “respect” for the Pope and his office. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, filled with weak and feckless limousine liberals such as Robert McManus, Kevin Farrell and Jaime Soto, has for years been a mouth organ of the far Left, and so today is eager to go along with Francis’ futile, naive, and wrongheaded commitment to “dialogue” with the Religion of Peace, even at the price of abandoning Middle Eastern Christians to their fate and working actively to silence those who speak out against this persecution. It is as ruthless and persistent as any Inquisition board ever was in rooting out even the slightest public dissent from their “Islam is a religion of peace and dialogue will solve everything, so shut up about the persecuted Christians” line.

And so the Catholic Church hierarchy of today opens the gates of the West to those who would destroy it and kill, convert or subjugate its people. I am apparently a very bad Catholic, as I believe all this to an abomination. The Church could have and should have been a voice for a genuinely charitable response to the jihad threat, and a robust defense of the value of Judeo-Christian civilization. Instead, Danneels and his henchmen rule the day, and have their man in the Vatican.

Godfried Danneels

“Cardinal Danneels Admits to Being Part of ‘Mafia’ Club Opposed to Benedict XVI,” by Edward Pentin, National Catholic Register, September 24, 2015:

Further serious concerns are being raised about Cardinal Godfried Danneels, one of the papal delegates chosen to attend the upcoming Ordinary Synod on the Family, after the archbishop emeritus of Brussels confessed this week to being part of a radical “mafia” reformist group opposed to Benedict XVI.It was also revealed this week that he once wrote a letter to the Belgium government favoring same-sex “marriage” legislation because it ended discrimination against LGBT groups.

The cardinal is already known for having once advised the king of Belgium to sign an abortion law in 1990, for telling a victim of clerical sex abuse to keep quiet, and for refusing to forbid pornographic, “educational” materials being used in Belgian Catholic schools.

He also once said same-sex “marriage” was a “positive development,” although he has sought to distinguish such a union from the Church’s understanding of marriage.

According to a forthcoming authorized biography on the cardinal co-written by Jürgen Mettepenningen, a former spokesman for Cardinal Danneels’ successor, Archbishop Andre Joseph Leonard, and Karim Schelkens, a Church historian and theologian, the cardinal expressed satisfaction over the disappearance of “discrimination” against LGBT couples after legislation was passed approving same-sex “marriage” in 2003.

The authors of the biography, to be published Sept. 29, reveal that the cardinal wrote a letter on May 28, 2003, to then-Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt, who at that time was putting together his second government.

In the letter, the cardinal wrote favorably about “one of the last achievements of Verhofstadt’s first governments, the approval of a legal statute for a stable relationship between partners of the same sex.” Verhofstadt’s government introduced same sex-‘marriage’ into Belgium in 2003.

“He wanted to stop discrimination between married heterosexuals and homosexuals who had a long-term relationship,” write the two authors of the biography. “But there should be no confusion between the use of the term ‘marriage’.”

Asked about the letter, Verhofstadt said he did not recall it, but added: “I never had any problem with the cardinal. Our relationship was good.”

Under Verhofstadt’s leadership, from 1999 to 2007, the Belgian government not only introduced same sex “marriage”, but also laws on euthanasia, experiments on human embryos, and IVF.

Despite the poor record of the Belgian Church in resisting these laws, and the country being far smaller than many African countries that have one delegate representing them, Cardinal Danneels, 82, will be one of three Belgian prelates to attend the synod in October.

The Vatican listed him second in importance out of 45 delegates personally chosen by Pope Francis to participate in the upcoming meeting. He also took part in last year’s Extraordinary Synod as a papal delegate.

At the launch of the book in Brussels this week, the cardinal said he was part of a secret club of cardinals opposed to Pope Benedict XVI.

He called it a “mafia” club that bore the name of St. Gallen. The group wanted a drastic reform of the Church, to make it “much more modern”, and for Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio to head it. The group, which also comprised Cardinal Walter Kasper and the late Jesuit Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, has been documented in Austen Ivereigh’s biography of Pope Francis, The Great Reformer.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
80 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
8 years ago

I said from the beginning that this pope was a commie plant.

Obama and other leftists wanted his predecessor gone, because he ‘offended Islam’ so they forced him out. Then the media-managers took over, papering the world with false stories about the new popes’ “simplicity” and “conservatism”. Many dumb pundits even claimed that “Imbroglio” (as I call him) was very much against ‘liberation theology’. Now we find out that the guy is left of Lenin.

Jesus never said a single thing in support of communism. He was not a communist or a socialist. He did NOT advocate “social justice”. Jesus NEVER said a thing about climate change. Jesus was a Jew, who was incredibly knowledgeable about the Bible. And that’s what he talked about. He said each person must be responsible for their own fate, before G_d. You can’t do that through a ‘collective’.

Giving to the poor is a personal thing, that each person does, as a way of bonding with G_d’s will, to do good in the world. Having the government seize your income and give some of it to the poor is against Jesus’ teachings. It robs a person of giving of their own free will.

Cement-headed liberation theologists do not read the Bible, New or Old Testaments. They’re just commies.

Erudite Mavin
Erudite Mavin
8 years ago

Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger who became Benedict XVI is both a Spiritual and Intellect.
He knows who are the enemies of Judeo Christianity starting with
Radical Islam.
One of his great books, “Without Roots: The West, Relativism, Christianity, Islam”
By Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger and Marcello Pera.
Benedict also takes on Relativism.
Now Francis who was born and grew up in South America but never had the curiosity to visit the United States until age 78 or learn English until the past months in a token way.
Francis is Social gospel, Libertarian Theology, the opposite of Benedict.
Cardinals that have died or retired are being replaced by Francis in his same agenda.
It is the Cardinals who vote on who will be a Pope.

Maria
Maria
8 years ago
Reply to  Erudite Mavin

I totally agree with you Erudite Mavin.

s;vbkr0boc,klos;
s;vbkr0boc,klos;
8 years ago

I’m Catholic and we call him around here Pope Petain.

St. Michael Defend Us
St. Michael Defend Us
8 years ago

I had to do some research, but your name for him seems very apt.

Tatonka
Tatonka
8 years ago

All organized religions are false religions.
The pope is an idiot

Tatonka
Tatonka
8 years ago
Reply to  Tatonka

One does not have to be associated with a religion to believe in God.
I stick with my first post.

s;vbkr0boc,klos;
s;vbkr0boc,klos;
8 years ago
Reply to  Tatonka

Are you ‘spiritual but not religious’ – so is that Intelligent Evil force known as Satan.

M
M
8 years ago

This pope is a dangerous nincompoop. He is useless on the muslim issue, unlike his brave and courageous predecessor Pope Benedict. Jorge should go back to argentina, a backward country, and return to his old jobs of gardening and foot washing. That is all the current pope is good at. I’m a non believer. francis isn’t qualified to wash Benedict’s feet or walk in the shadow of John Paul II. As a non-Catholic the previous two popes were much, much better. There is very little to the persona of the current pope. he loves obama and illegal immigrants. The speech itself was inoffensive by design, and yet Congress should not have invited him to speak to a joint session of Congress. Shame on you Boehner. Glad you’re leaving!

Kriemhild
Kriemhild
8 years ago

I live in Germany and know a lot about this man.. Pope Benedict XV! (Joseph Ratzinger) was from the beginning a homosexual (as most Catholic priests are) and as a young priest “visited the orphanages” which means raped the orphans living in these institutions. In Rome he carried on an afffair with the handsome Archbishop Georg Gänswein who was his private secretary since 2005. After Benedict retired, they now live together in a converted monastary in the Vatican Gardens, Gänswein goes to work for the present Pope during the day, and returns to Benedict in the evening. Perhaps they still have breakfast, lunch, dinner and naptime together as they did when he was Pope.
All the complaints from Ireland about the priests raping children came to the desk of Ratzinger before he became Pope, and so were ignored, because he sympathsized with the priests, not the victims.
For whatever reason the creature who is now Pope is the Pope, he is disgusting, a Communist and like everything in the Catholic Church, has nothing to do with the Gospel of Jesus Christ, just with their disgusting rituals and dogma. Just the sight of a Pope makes me sick to my stomach.

tommo2
tommo2
8 years ago
Reply to  Kriemhild

Child abuse in the Catholic church was going on well before Ratzinger and ignored then as well. It has a history of sexual abuse carried out across the world and covered up. Wherever the Catholic Church and children mix you will find it. In many diocese, rather than pay compensation to their victims, the church declared bankruptcy. This is how much compassion they have for the abused and shows how little regard they have for the laws of Jesus Christ.

Kriemhild
Kriemhild
8 years ago
Reply to  tommo2

You are certainly right — in the Middle Ages, homos went into the church for just the same reasons — a safe place where they can have food and clothing and a nice place to live, and plenty of young children to ravish. Thank heavens for Martin Luther.

KG89
KG89
8 years ago
Reply to  tommo2

Just one word, “Decameron,” and maybe that is the reason Passolini got murdered as many others who have criticized Rome.

Bronish
Bronish
8 years ago
Reply to  tommo2

Catholicism is evil thru n thru…..it’s just not as blatently blood thirsty as islam.

Bradley Lexvold
Bradley Lexvold
8 years ago
Reply to  tommo2

One thing to be aware of is that most think it would end child molestation if priests could marry. I can assure you this would not be the case. When a normal male thinks about sex, it is with a woman, not a child. Child molestation comes from a dark place of having power over someone, not a sexual appetite. This next statement will bring controversy, but needs to be addressed. If a priest forgives sins and these sins aren’t forgiven by God then the priest has incorporated himself into an unforgivable sin, and thus the decay of his perception of moral right and wrong, leading to all kinds of depraved ideas.

tommo2
tommo2
8 years ago

Having survived the control freakery of the Christian Brothers, I can confirm that what you say about having power over someone is important to them. Methods used spanned from collective punishment to mental abuse and being made aware that you are being watched.

The confessional is the ultimate control method where the ‘sinner’ is obliged to tell another being who sits in judgement over you how horrible you are in the sight of God. What to confess and what to leave out was always a problem for me. But one thing I learned early on is that masturbation for a growing boy is not a sin but another ploy to make you feel guilty and inferior to others. Guilt plays a big part in catholicism.

And then you learn about the systematic abuses carried out by the Christian Brothers in remote parts of Australia which amounted to slavery and where these religious bigots carried out the most horrific acts on young vulnerable boys without any shame or thought that what they were doing was sinful.

Bradley Lexvold
Bradley Lexvold
8 years ago
Reply to  tommo2

I’m not a Catholic and never have been and wasn’t aware of how their system worked but in the HBO documentary it explained that the hierarchy considers priests on a higher plane of existence than average people and they go through a ritual to attain this and they believe that makes them untouchable. This is suicide and until they change this makes them dangerous. They don’t have the perspective to see this. I couldn’t in good conscience suggest any one be a Catholic because of this. I’ve moved on even beyond Protestantism and become Christian Orthodox. Do the best of everything and discard the nonsense. I haven’t met a Catholic I didn’t like and I haven’t met a priest I liked. Hope they can get themselves fixed as that would be best, but realize that is all but impossible. Maybe someone can fix it and that would be the best.

Wemedge
Wemedge
8 years ago
Reply to  Kriemhild

This comment was written by a the same maroon who thinks Michelle Obama is a man. I wouldn’t take him too seriously, friends. BTW, Benedict was a towering intellect- look at what writer Andrew Klavan has to say about him:

Joseph Ratzinger — aka Pope Benedict XVI — is one of the greatest men of the age — possibly the only great man of the age — and almost certainly the last great man Europe will produce. As far as I’m concerned, he should have turned the continent’s lights out when he stepped down in 2013.

B-16′s greatness doesn’t lie in his papacy. Or that is, if it does, I wouldn’t know. It’s his writing, his theology, his thought that elevate him in my mind. When I was but a youngish dude, pounding my way through the great works, it seemed to me that the wisdom of many of the great German thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries had been thrown aside for no good reason. Kant and Hegel had philosophically rescued the essence of Christianity for the scientific age, and had been ultimately left behind by mainstream thinkers not because they were wrong, but because they were just sort of out of keeping with the atheistic spirit of the day.

As Nietzsche understood, that God-is-dead zeitgeist would perforce lead to moral relativism. And so it has. But Ratzinger, shrugging off the zeitgeist like the cheap suit it is, humbly went on tilling the Kantian and Hegelian fields, making his way back not just to the essentials of Christianity but to the sacred person of Christ himself.

This is a great act — an intellectual feat that shows the idols of the age — men like Derrida and Lacan and Foucault — to be the mental pygmies that they are. When they are forgotten (which will be around Thursday at 4PM), the writings of Ratzinger will be remembered and read and discussed for their radical divergence away from the wisdom of the age and toward the truth. Or make that Truth.

Anyway, I know the news media will be trying anything they can to make it sound as if B-16 was somehow responsible for the execrable child-molesting business. (As far as I can tell, he had no culpability there and even helped clean up the mess.)

But I’d like to see someone more expert than I am in these matters talk about B-16′s role as a philosopher in the great German tradition. It was that tradition that gave us Kant and Hegel and Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. And I think Ratzinger was like one of those.

Maria
Maria
8 years ago
Reply to  Wemedge

Agree. Thank you for sharing.

Kriemhild
Kriemhild
8 years ago
Reply to  Wemedge

Ratzinger could certainly read and write very well, nevertheless he was a homo. I maself have stdied philosophy for years, and I disagree with you that Hegel had anything to do with rescuing Christianity. In fact his ideas were used by Marx to further Communism. While still in high school, Marx was initiated into the Satanic Church (please read “Marx and Satan” by Richard Wurmbrand) and began concocting his evil Communist ideas. Marx, dedicated heart and soul to atheism, derived the centerpiece of his thinking from Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Human progress was defined by Hegel as a process very much like a discussion between two men arguing about something in order to explain it. One man states his opinion or theory. His companion criticizes that theory, and proposes a different one. From their continuing — a friendly and constructive one — there emerges a third and new theory, which preserves what was true in the first two and which both men accept. Hege called the first theory a thesis. The second theory he said was an antithesis, because it opposed the first. The discussion itself he labeled a dialectic. And the throry finally accepted out of this process he called a synthesis. . . All human progress, said Hegel, from the most primative condition up to the most refined, proceeded along the lines of this triple-stage dialectic toward an ultimate goal. Marx was a thoroighly convinced atheist, fully persuaded there was no such thing as a soul and no such thing as a spirit in man. He said the history of mankind was a series of clashes, or dialectics, which were ways of getting people to change their opinions.
Goethe said that nobody could understand Hegel — certainly his students did not. What I remember of him is that he said: Whatever is, is right”.
As for Kant, he also wrapped his thoughts somewhat in mystery, partly because he feared the censor of the government which was Catholic, so he could not say what he wanted to say clearly. He also had a problem with women — every day he invited friends to lunch, and the conversations were quite exquisite, but a woman was never invited. Also he had two rather vague female acquaintances but didn’t want to marry — I don’t say he was a homo —I do not know — but I do know he could live very well without a woman in his life. About his influencing Christianity that much, I don’t know — his mother was a Deist, and had a deep influence on him.
Schopenhauer was a great writer and admired by Goethe, he argues that human beings are not, as Kant thought, free agents but are ruled by a universal will — he believed the tyranny
of the will could be combatted through art, especially music, he had a great influence on Wagner. His mother was headstrong, nervous and self-centered (as was he), she hated her husband and was probably the cause of his suicide. She also hated her son because he looked like his father, she was a bit of a writer and had an literary salon in Weimar where she was a friend of Goethe’s. Artur visited her there, they quarreled and she pushed him down the stairs. He left, and they never saw each other again.So he was a bit misogynous. He lived for several years with an opera singer, there was even a child who soon died, but for him marriage was out of the question. Eventually his books had a huge influence on thinkers in many countries. I do not think anything Ratzinger wrote could be put in the same category as these great philosophers.
And as far as Nietzsche is concerned, he was a homosexual, he lived with his sister who had an evil boy friend, after he died she edited all of his works to eliminate his insanity and all the horrible things he had written. It’s not a compliment to be compared to him.
If you want to read something inspiring by philosophers about religion, read Blaise Pascal and Baruch Spinoza. I would guess more inspiring than anything written by Ratzinger.

joe1429
joe1429
8 years ago
Reply to  Kriemhild

I disagree… but the church will never satisfy the pedophile issue, until they allow priests to marry

Bronish
Bronish
8 years ago
Reply to  Kriemhild

I tend to agree with you…I believe the Catholic Church is evil and hides but loves sin. I have yet to view a pope(lower case on purpose) that even comes across as straight, honest and authentic.

Poptoy1949D
Poptoy1949
8 years ago
Reply to  Kriemhild

Can you Present Proof of what you say? I would love to see the proof. Please print it here. I await your response openly. Thanks.

Kriemhild
Kriemhild
8 years ago
Reply to  Poptoy1949

Look in the Internet under Benedict XVI with lover Gänswein — you will get the whole story, with pictures of them together. I got all my info from articles I found looking for info about this Pope — all of it well-documented. It said that while he was Pope, they had breakfast, lunch, dinner and naptime together, and Gänswein said they had a very special feeling for each other, or something like that.I live in Munich, near Regensberg, Ratzingers home town, I know people who knew him as a young priest who told me the story that “he visited orphanages just like all the others”. I cannot prove this, I was just told it by Regenbergers. It’s up to you to decide what you believe, after reading all you can about the situation.
By the way, I LOVE your picture of Robert E. Lee, one of my heroes.

Poptoy1949D
Poptoy1949
8 years ago
Reply to  Kriemhild

I Thank You for that information…..I will begin my research with this. Yeah, The General was a Gentleman in every way and this is one of the reasons he has my Admiration. Again, Thank YOU for the information it was very kind of you. PT.

Lia
Lia
8 years ago

And now that there is a much more modern church, what use is it to anybody?

Lia
Lia
8 years ago
Reply to  Lia

Doesn’t seem so …

Fafifoernik
Fafifoernik
8 years ago

Islam and the Crurch has one thing in common, their addiction to young boys…the pederast!

Globalfirm:humanrights&ecology
Globalfirm:humanrights&ecology
8 years ago

I disagree with Benedict: The Muhammad-personified deity or rather Muhammad acts with reason: the reason of a mad, sadist, psychopath theist wanting to impose his mad religion of sadism on the world.
& to Francis: there’s only one identity, value & shared belief: human rights which Muhammad actively fought & indefinitely commanded to fight, -that’s authentic Islam. If he can’t identify with human rights the new religion he indeed needs some sensitivity-training. Catholic is a synonym for universal, which shouldn’t include theism.
As for the non-Islam related topics I have no problem, though I’m heterosexual.

>> We shouldn’t give Islam validity & reassurement through reassurement of an existence of a deity that has not been proven.<<

The only way to protect ourselves from Islam's war & tyranny is by destroying the source which is Muhammad's unethical manifest by publicly discrediting it. This has been proven again & again.
Islam-complicit media & governments want to exactly prevent this.
That's what we need to tackle.

It's called law. Muhammad did crimes & we must punish that.

Shame on the unworthy establishment for not preparing the public to the righteousness of Anti-Islamism.

Our agenda is that of ethics: human rights, ecology, atheism, globalism, English & animal rights. Muhammad's & those of obeying him, not simulating open or secret Muslims, agenda is that of institutionalized, indefinite sadist psychopath theism, institutionalized insensitivity, institutionalized torture, institutionalized pro-Arab & pro-Turk racism, institutionalized anti-African enslavement,  institutionalized pederasty, institutionalized child genital mutilation, institutionalized crucifixions, amputations, institutionalized murder of atheists & apostates, institutionalized deceit, institutionalized strict enslaving mind-control & institutionalized sadist halal-slaughter & institutionalized Arabic & institutionalized incest.
To hide their institutionalized, unethical hidden agenda the pro Islamic media insensitevely leaves the public blind to the ethical & sensitive moving causes of the human rights Anti-Islam movement & new government. 

Islam is an insensitive, strong, sadist not to be underestimated unethical force in the world (Churchill said the most retrograde force & he knew fighting Jihadis in Nazi uniforms).
Governments, media want Muslims because they are currently run by secret Muslims who want a reward in their imagined afterlife. It's that simple. I might be exact in my evaluation & it's too dangerous to be unprepared. And after all, may they be Muslims or not, the result is unprogressive: Islamic.
For the same reason (imagined Islamic afterlife) Muslim migrants don't protest for military enforcement of the law of human rights in their home countries but for the unsensitive, unethical Islamic law in their new.
The people who applaud them probably don't even want to have kids.

The difference between an open or secret not simulating Muslim & not simulating open or secret human rights person is that a Muslim obeys Muhammad's insensitive & unjust Sharia tyranny & Jihad war (Islam translates submission) while a human rights person opposes it & fights for human rights.

A deceiving or new & deceived harmless Muslim assuming he is a product of Islamic indoctrination (dawah) really is means of Islamic indoctrination: Muhammad was an insensitive, sadist psychopath theist indefinitely commanding his sadist, insensitive law-system 
& Islamic majority (institutionalized deceit & institutionalized outnumbering through the deceitful indoctrination, terror, breeding & migration are Muhammad's war tactics) turns a system into a racist, sadist, insensitive psychopath theocracy, because Muslims are indoctrinated into not opposing Muhammad's sadist, insensitive sick law system Sharia & the pro-Islamic public behavior scale ranges from indoctrinated to tolerant to indifferent to complicit to brainwashed to enslaved.

A pro-Islamic stance is a corrupt evasion to not deal with the problem of Islam, hence Islamic studies in universities cultivating this evasion for media & government.
Islamic deceiving as means of Jihad war, Muhammad said war is deceit must be understood in context: Non Islamic topics are Unislamic distraction & deviation (fitnah) to Muhammad which is defined by Muhammad as worse than murder & therefore guilty of murder & torture.
Truth is, the assumption of a deity as a fact itself is deception. Muhammad's assertion that his imagined deity Allah is the greatest deceiver or imposter leaves out that Allah is Muhammad's greatest deception & he an imposter.
We shouldn't give Islam validity & reassurement through reassurement of an existence of a deity that has not been proven.

Pro-Islam critics insensitively argue with comparisons over reality forcing us to argue with reality over comparisons.

The institutionally insensitive 'Islam is peace' indoctrinated,-normed people need a tough regime to drive out their ignorant impudence.

There's a world war going on since Muhammad & the institutionally insensitive pro-Islamic media picked the wrong side.

They're in a game of institutionalized insensitive Islamic mind-control which we naturally oppose & eliminate.

Islam tolerant people are institutionally insensitive towards human rights.

The institutionalized insensitive legal status of Islam reflects through the policies & it's consequences in history (mass-murder around North-West Nigeria, in Syria, Iraq, the establishment of Isis murdering, enslaving, torturing people, Sharia in the new North-Sudan, Al-Shabab, Islamic migration to Europe, US & & &) & we have to prosecute who's responsible for this.

When the insensitive Islam is praised we have to be alarmed.

I'm also alarmed by the failure to suspect & recognize Jihad as main motivation by Hitler's & Amin El Husseini's Jihad by Nazi-holocaust survivors & memorials & the education-system.

Keeping Islam legal despite Muhammad's indefinite, insensitive, sadist commands against human rights & atheists, together with legal Islamic proselytising gives people the deceptive impression that Islam is a universal, human rights respecting ideology giving them 2 options: assume that it's peaceful, join the Jihad. (It also let's people accept new Sharia governments after Jihad war like the new North-Sudan or the new Muslim president in Nigeria.) It doesn't give people any space nor reasonal support at all to sensitivity, to reject Muhammad, Islam as unethical. It creates an desensitized error-based status quo paradigm & puts down & defames, destabilises the intelligent instead of empowering them & oppresses men through procreation sabotaging, institutionalized excluding mind-control. That's why the legality of Islam must be overturned. 

The (useless) law of freedom of religion can't be equal to or tolerably above the law of human rights & that must be transparently effective, perceivable through all other laws. The law of religious freedom is not a ticket to bend the law of human rights but instead to responsibility to human rights. Freedom of religion is subpositioned, subordinated to the law of human rights & that must be transparently recognizable in law & pedagogy especially when the ideology of the alleged religion is insensitive like the Islam doctrine & unethically subversive to the main-law of human rights in which case the candidate religion must be banned. Human rights is the best religion. 

Children with Islamic background need to learn that it's not just ok, but sensitive, courages & righteous, ethical to discriminate against Muhammad's indefinitely insensitive, sick doctrine, just as Jihadist terrorists & Sharia Islamic governments/ tyrannies disrespecting human rights (the new religion) must feel the enforcement of the law of human rights of the new human rights & ecology government, just as 'Islam means peace' normed & hypnotized fascists need to feel the might of a new radical, radical is the opposite of simulating & thus powerful government dedicated to ethics, to human rights, ecology & not to Islamic fascism, or simulation of ethics.

The whole 'Islam is peace'-indoctrination is just so people accept (or submit to (Islam translates submission)) Boko haram, Isis, Omar Al-Bashir's North-Sudan, Sharia-tyrannies, Islamic migration, oil money & subsidizing to Islamic governments & pro-Islam media.

We know what happens when we got an Islamic president. We catch Obama, the Islamic US EU-regime ruled by the mind-con-'trolling' hidden Jihad slipping again & again. They impudently proclaim 'Islam means peace', Boko haram would have "legitimate concerns" (Obama), sabotaging Israeli arms deals to the Nigerian army while Boko haram slaughters, protecting the estimated 60 Isis training camps, rewarding mass-murdering Islamic psychopath sadist theist Omar Al Bashir with a new country (North-Sudan) for a Sharia-tyranny. We got to prosecute the whole administration.

We need to stop reacting & stop assuming that they're reacting & instead be proactive & realize they are proactive but in an institutionalized insensitive, psychopath theist way, Muhammad's way, too.

Nazis after their Jihadist slaughter under & with Amin El-Husseini & Muhammad adoring Hitler (he hailed to the back- to Muhammad? Did he secretely identify as Turk?) are no longer of use to Islam so it's only convenient for the Islamic media to cloth the Nazi-movement as Anti-Islam movement & defame the human rights Anti-Islam movement as insensitive & Naziistic, putting Nazis who are suspectingly compatible with Islam in charge of the Anti-Islam human rights movement (in the eye of the public). To hide their institutionalized, unethical hidden agenda the pro Islamic media insensitively, leaves the public blind to the ethical & sensitive moving causes of the human rights Anti-Islam movement & new government. 

To those who surveil this website, are new to this topic, have been mislead by pro-Islam indoctrination or are potential apostates from theism:
1.: Islam is NOT a universal, human rights respecting ideology.
2.: Humanity needs to come to terms with Muhammad's indefinite institutionalized insensitive command & agenda to sadism through Jihad-terror & Sharia-tyranny against atheists & with Muhammad emulated institutionalized pederasty, institutionalized mythology found enslavement of Africans, institutionalized crucifixions, institutionalized deceit & insensitivity, institutionalized strict enslaving mind-control, institutionalized torture, institutionalized child genital mutilation & institutionalized sadist halal-slaughter, institutionalized incest & Arabic. Muhammad institutionalizedly, insensitively, indefinitely commands to 'slay atheists wherever they are found' in the Koran. Therefore no one should be allowed to promote Islam nor himself as Islamic. Islam also oppresses men through procreation sabotaging, excluding institutionalized mind-control. Creating a proactive culture of discrimination against Islam protects human rights, sensitivity sustainably in the long term militarily, to establish the rule of ethics: human rights, ecology, atheism, globalism, English & animal rights. 
3.: Humanity needs to learn that the genocide of Armenian non-Muslims in the 1. world war & genocide of non-Muslims in west & east Europe (Germany, France, Poland, Ukraine…) in world war 2 were participated & led by Jihadi-'Nobel prize-winner'-Arafat's uncle who was appointed 'Grandmufti of Jerusalem' Amin El-Husseini who was stationed as General in Smyrna after joining the Armenian genocide by the Turks, 'the Ottoman empire' joined by Germany & who later formed the Muslim Nazi SS-division while organizing the slaughter of non-Muslims with the Nazis. After the war he lived in France.
4.: Islam is even racist against Africans:
Muhammad invented the slavery of Africans. Should that be legal in America or any other place on earth? I mean, we still have to free slaves! Are we taking this task serious? Castrated slaves in Saudi Arabia & we promote Mecca, Muhammad & Islam with Malcolm X,  Farrakhan, brainwashing rappers & subsidize it? That must immediately stop.
Muhammad's racist slavery ideology against Africans:
Muhammad invented the slavery of Africans by proclaiming that his deity colored them black so their descendants would be slaves to Arabs & Turks, declaring Arabs & Turks master race & Africans slave race. He had African slaves, was white & dreamed about a pederast paradise with only whites. Abeed means slave or African in Arabic. This slavery exists together with racist laws in Saudi Arabia, new North-Sudan, North Africa (20% of black Africans are slaves in Mauritania) & elsewhere & in every Muslim knowing it.
5.: Muhammad was a pederast:
Muhammad was seen tongue- & lip-sucking little boys & 'kissing' boys' dicks frequently.
He also dreamed about pederasty in his paradise fantasy.
6.: Our agenda is that of ethics: human rights, ecology, atheism, globalism, English & animal rights. Muhammad's agenda is that of institutionalized, indefinite sadist psychopath theism, institutionalized insensitivity, institutionalized torture, institutionalized pro-Arab & pro-Turk racism, institutionalized anti-African enslavement, institutionalized pederasty, institutionalized child genital mutilation, institutionalized crucifixions, amputations, institutionalized murder of atheists & apostates, institutionalized deceit, institutionalized strict enslaving mind-control & institutionalized sadist halal-slaughter & institutionalized Arabic & institutionalized incest.

Muhammad was a racist, psychopath theist, as long as we don't get politically correct 'bout this human rights won't prosper. 
Join Globalfirm: free basics & free base for creatives.

ConcernedCitizen999
ConcernedCitizen999
8 years ago

Mr. Edward Petin says
“Why an institution that claims to transmit and preserve divine revelation would need to be “modern” remains unexplained…”

Oh, I think the explanation is very simple. The Islamic “bag men” have gotten through to and suborned the Cardinals. I’ve said it before, we gave TRILLIONS of dollars in oil money to Islam. What did you think they were going to do with it? They’re going to do what the Koran commands them to do, conquer the world for Allah and make the world submit to supremacist Islam because Allah is the greatest. And one step on the way to world conquest is to use that Trillion dollars to buy the Cardinals, as they’ve bought and paid for so many other Western institutions. The Japanese have a proverb for what happened to Benedict XVI, “The nail that sticks out gets hammered”.

It never ceases to amaze me that people think all these misfortunes brought to us by Islam are disconnected events. They are not. Our enemies have a well thought out but secret plan to conquer the West. They are proceeding step by step, winning one battle after another. World War III has already started, it’s going on right now, but we’re in the early phases, the phase of psychological warfare and secrecy and infiltration and subversion and disguised invasion and deception and propaganda and sabotage, the sabotage of our institutions, so that the enemy (us) doesn’t even know that he’s being set up for the slaughter. In fact WWIII may end in our defeat and Islam’s victory without even getting to the shooting phase.

In chapter III of Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War” he says,

“For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill.
To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.”

Obviously Islam has read SunTzu. Because that’s exactly what they are doing. They are fighting WWIII against the West and the West doesn’t even know it and may be defeated with hardly a shot being fired.

George Macdonald
George Macdonald
8 years ago

Some know it ,they are ignored as islaphobic.

GOOGLE Web JOBS~Earn $97/hour
GOOGLE Web JOBS~Earn $97/hour
8 years ago

A Way To Get Paid $97/hour And More…….After earning an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I’m finally getting 97 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online.….. Weekly paycheck… Bonus opportunities…earn upto $16k to $19k /a month……….Only a few hour required to understand and start working…..look over here
.pua…
➤➤➤http://GoogleTopCareersGetStandardProfit/get/morethan$97/h…
✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥✥

Patti York
Patti York
8 years ago

People have been leaving the Catholic church by the thousands, it wont be long before it collapses. I believe we will see that happen in our lifetime.

JoJo
JoJo
8 years ago
Reply to  Patti York

The pope advocates that the west import more illegals and jihadis to fill the pews and the collection baskets. Catholic charities is prospering with federal diversity contracts. Jihadi refugees are big money.

honeybee
honeybee
8 years ago
Reply to  JoJo

Absolutely correct ! That also goes for the Lutheran Resettlement Services. etc.

Maria
Maria
8 years ago
Reply to  Patti York

Many reformers, heretics, empires have been and gone. If something is not from God it will not last long, but it has been said that ‘the gates of hell will not prevail against the Church’.

Ramona Cooper
Ramona Cooper
8 years ago
Reply to  Maria

The people are the Church, not the building. The Catholics marvel at the beauty of the traditional building with all its fancy statutes, marble and so on.

Maria
Maria
8 years ago
Reply to  Maria

Dorrie, Jesus Christ appointing St Peter as head of the universal Church is parallel to Isaiah 22 where the appointment of the royal steward Eliakim and give him key (authority) of the House of David (Davidic lineage of kings). The Royal Steward is chosen, like a Prime Minister who will oversee the admin and jurisdiction
of things: what he opens, no one will shut; what he shuts, no one will open…”
We look at the New Testament where the stewardship of the Office of St Peter is based on Matthew 16 Simon Peter replied, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” 17 And Jesus answered him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. 18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock[b] I will build my church, and the gates of hell[c] shall not prevail against it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed[d] in heaven.”
Peter is translated as ‘rock’ and the word rock are both “kepa” in Aramaic language. You are ‘rock’ and upon this ‘rock’ I will build my Church.
Historically, earliest creed (Nicean) declare the Four marks of the true Church:
1) One 2) Holy 3) Catholic (meaning universal – ‘katolikos’) for everyone) 4) Apostolic –
Jesus had promised at the outset that “there would be one
flock, one shepherd” (John 10:16) (Protestants have broken up to 30,000+ denominations)
Apostolic succession – There is a succession of stewardship and not just a one time thing. The stewards of this universal Church can be traced from the present (Pope Francis) back to St Peter.

billy roche
billy roche
7 years ago
Reply to  Maria

The RC Church has abandoned the spirit of Jesus. It is no longer “the Church”.

JWM
JWM
8 years ago

I think at the end Christ will say “I never knew you”.

Rick Smith
Rick Smith
8 years ago

When will the Pope change his name to, Pope Karl I

ApolloSpeaks
ApolloSpeaks
8 years ago

POPE FRANCIS THE FIRST: VICAR OF CHRIST? OR ALLAH’S FIRST POPE?

On September 23rd, the 266th day of the year, the 266th Roman Catholic Pope set foot on US soil for the first time. Does the number 266 have significance for this Pope and his misguided policies toward Islam? I believe that it does.

Click http://www.apollospeaks.com/?p=11261 and decide for yourself.

Ramona Cooper
Ramona Cooper
8 years ago
Reply to  ApolloSpeaks

Homosexuality is no stranger to the Muslims, what they do behind closed doors is disgusting.

cassandra
cassandra
8 years ago
Reply to  ApolloSpeaks

Pope Francis, the wh ore of Babylon

ApolloSpeaks
ApolloSpeaks
8 years ago
Reply to  cassandra

That would be true if he were Pope Francine.

Reta Mae Cherry
Reta Mae Cherry
7 years ago
Reply to  cassandra

You are so right. thegreatwhore.com
Catholics and Obama have no power over the real church.

Bradley Lexvold
Bradley Lexvold
8 years ago

The previous Pope resigned 2 days before the HBO documentary : Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence in the House of God. ” Shows how every molesting report came across his desk. He was in charge of all the investigations. If Catholics watch this, will become filled with righteous indignation and will be moved to do something about it. Also shows how Jeb Bush’s friends are child molesters, but what else would you expect from the man who killed Paul Hill. Protestants didn’t say anything as they have same problem in their circle. Very sad all around, but we can’t stick our heads in the sand. No one likes hypocrisy and there isn’t any way to change them, don’t let their actions affect you. I know there is a God and he has a Son and with them a Holy Spirit. They left us a book that shows a lot about human failure and how to correct. Don’t let the limitations and inabilities of others become your own. Become someone trustworthy, informed, and an advocate for what is right, from a researched position. Others have taken this up. Will You?

Lpasopooch
Lpasopooch
8 years ago

Bradley, your post is as passionate, profound, and provocative as it gets. Thank you for your thoughts. I think I have become trustworthy over a lifetime even though I have allowed “the limitations and inabilities of others” to become my own on many occasions. I do, however, remain faithful to the fact that every step I take is a wiling step, be it right or wrong. Mea Culpa. I know there is a God as well. All of that said, I have been uncomfortable with Pope Francis. I have to look away from the fear.

Bradley Lexvold
Bradley Lexvold
8 years ago
Reply to  Lpasopooch

The fact that you recognize that you have let others influence you in a wrong manner goes a long way toward a correct position. This is going to take a while, unfortunately. As far as looking away from the fear, not exactly sure what that means. God told Cain, ” Sin is crouching at your door and you must conquer it.” He wouldn’t said that if it wasn’t within your ability. One of the main problems with the present church is their position of Flee From Sin. I find this absolutely inadequate. God told us to take a good look at sin and see it for what it is and reject it. I have a website http://www.secedelinks.org and feel free to look at it and try to find error in it. All the Best, Brad

s;vbkr0boc,klos;
s;vbkr0boc,klos;
8 years ago

And the same day Daneels and his ‘mafia’ forced Benedict to abdicate this is what happened:comment image?w=260

bill reitzes
bill reitzes
8 years ago

Reminds me of the lightning strike on the crane that came crashing down on the Grand mosque in Mecca on 9/11 this year, killing 100’s

Wumingren
Wumingren
8 years ago
Reply to  bill reitzes

Schadenfreude!

seanmom
seanmom
8 years ago

Can someone engineer a coup to get Benedict back? Is Tom Hanks available? But seriously is there any mechanism to bring back Benedict? This Pope is a nightmare.

Benton Marder
Benton Marder
8 years ago

However, King Bauduoin refused to sign the abortion law, forcing the Belgian government to concoct a short-term abdication, during which ‘interregnum’, the abortion law came into force without the Royal Assent.

Benton Marder
Benton Marder
8 years ago

However, King Bauduoin refused to sign the abortion law, thereby forcing the Belgian government to concoct a short-term abdication, during which ‘interregnum’, the law came into force without the Royal Assent.

Alison Swain
Alison Swain
8 years ago

Something was always fishy about Benedict’s sudden decision to abdicate. Leftism had been kept at bay from the ’80s with Reagan, Thatcher, and John Paul II but not completely vanquished. There is nothing random about the surge of Leftism in the past 10 years and the resultant world in upheaval.

Now the world belongs to Obama, Putin, Francis and the mullahs and we are not going to enjoy the outcome. The Red Army (Russia) has aligned with the Arab prince (Assad) and the Antichrist (Pope Francis) has taken his throne. We all know what come next.

jwbaumann
jwbaumann
8 years ago

It appears that Satan has seized control of the Catholic church. When the Muslim gain control, they will have been invited in by the Pope. The only remaining question is will he publicly convert to Islam, or say that Catholicism and Islam are one and the same?

Bronish
Bronish
8 years ago
Reply to  jwbaumann

I’ll toss in my 2 cents on the latter.

sodacrackers2
sodacrackers2
8 years ago
Reply to  jwbaumann

All the commie world leaders will share the blame for enabling those who want us dead.

Metatrona
Metatrona
8 years ago

Catholics are actively helping Muslims to destroy Catholics! Where is their sense?

Rick Smith
Rick Smith
8 years ago

Pope Karl I

marlene
marlene
8 years ago

The dreck always rises to the top.

Miller
Miller
8 years ago

any man who claims to be gods vicar on earth is insane, how can any reasonable person deal will someone who believes that, but not only do they deal with him, and to be fair, many others who think they are Napoleon, but they actually buy into the delusion, heads of state and billions of others believe that this man is gods choice to represent His will on earth. a little bit of Bible is a dangerous thing. we have citizens who receive a check because they say they talk to god, but with this one we give him a throne

mackykam
mackykam
8 years ago

And after all those western countries cave and their religious institutions wither away it will lead to one thing: THE JEWS, who fought the paganism of Hellenism, fought forced conversion to Christianity and Islam, will be the rock that destroys islam. That is why islam hates the Jews. It realized the truth that allah has as much value as the baal did back in the day. Everyone tries to destroy the Jew, everyone that has tried was broken against that indestructible rock of ages.

mackykam
mackykam
8 years ago
Reply to  mackykam

The problem associated with grafting is the need for a firm, steady, solid rooting system. The grafted entity needs that support, not the other way around. All the benefits are distributed outwardly.

Po Tato
Po Tato
8 years ago

Have any of you heard of “Grey Wolves” from Turkey?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_Wolves_(organization)

The moslem man who shot Pope John Paul II was from the Grey Wolves

The bombing in Bangkok was carried out by the Grey Wolves

Nowadays, the Grey Wolves have morphed into an organization with many fronts – one of them have infiltrated the Vatican – many of the clergies are working for them

Note to the Catholics, you can forget the clergies, at least those in the Vatican, working for G-d, as they have turned to Satan, it’s more profitable that way!

Michelle
Michelle
8 years ago

It was perfectly obvious why Benedict was removed as we had a pope who for once, had his head out of the Vatican cellars and into the open air of reality where the west let alone Christianity is at risk. But Mafia? The original resistance group to the Muslim invaders and who have kept all of the Muslim bad habits? Sounds more like a leftist, brainless benevolent Christian group to me who gave him the ultimatum: retire or be retired. Jesus of Nazareth would not have spouted such sycophantic crap as does this new pope and he defined pacifism, not mealy mouthed obsequiousness to a supremacist group.

Herbert Lee Poteet
Herbert Lee Poteet
8 years ago

I would bet that the Mafia Club inside the Vatican consists of old homosexual clergy, the result of the Roman Church’s thousand year plus denial of St. Paul’s teachings about the character of the episcopate and the daiconate, i.e., that they are to be filled by married men with children. The Vatican needs to be empties and the bishop of Rome sent back to his cathedral church of St. John.

melfarmer
melfarmer
8 years ago

Welcome to the seat of the antichrist – the Vatican….welcome your future satan filled pope! Get ready, it’s coming….”Come out of her, My people before you suffer for her inequities.” Revelation 18 : 4

Dave
Dave
8 years ago

Anyone who has any doubt that the Pope is misguided only needs to hear what the Pope said to Fidel Castro in his visit to Cuba earlier last week. The Pope thanked Fidel Castro for his “contributions to World Peace”. Are you freakin kidding me?!? Fidel Castro…one of the most oppressive and vicious dictators of the 21st century.

Dave
Dave
8 years ago
Reply to  Dave

Agreed Dorrie.

Dave
Dave
8 years ago
Reply to  Dave

Yeah, I never thought I would see the day in my lifetime where the Catholic church does a 180 turn on all of their principles and framework for which the religion is based upon.

Dave
Dave
8 years ago
Reply to  Dave

Yes most Catholics are so brainwashed and have things engrained in them from their childhood that it’s more painful to break away than to keep supporting a regime (the Catholic church) even if it’s helping to destroy the fabric of the nation and world.

Juanita
Juanita
8 years ago

Thanks for getting the truth out. I always thought that there was more to that “resignation” than fatigue. They probably told the Pope to leave or be “removed”.

Maria-Erlinda Martinez
Maria-Erlinda Martinez
8 years ago

Theology of “liberation” (i.e., “TOL”, the Marxist spin of the gospel) has taken over the Catholic Church priest corps from seminarians all the way up to cardinals, and from novices to senior nuns. Catholic parishioners follow like cattle, as it was evident from the disgustingly nauseating massive cult of personality showered over Jorge-Mario “pope Francis” Bergoglio during his recent visit to America.

It was like the cult of personality poured upon Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Mao, Pol Pot, the Castros, and other scum of humanity.

The pope is claimed to be “the Vicar of Christ”, but Jesus was a humble fellow; so humble that he gave away his carnal life for sinners. See in comparison the pomp with which the cult of personality operatives wrapped Jorge-Mario. It is an abomination.

It’s so repugnant per se, and much more so when it is used to herd the membership body like cattle.

Ratzinger knew how powerful TOL had become; most likely the TOL honchos threatened him with a contract on him, forcing him to resign.

Hopefully the Catholic Church will be destroyed from within by TOL.

Wumingren
Wumingren
8 years ago

Honestly, I have not afforded the Catholic Church with any high regard for a very long time. From the moment a priest tossed me out of Catechism for “asking impertinent questions,” to priests who claim that the Bible is “such a complicated text” that it is beyond the common man’s ability to understand, to the current sexual peccadillos that plague the priesthood, even unto the Church sending offending homosexual pedophiles to unsuspecting parishes in South America, rather than to defrock them.

I have had trouble with the Church’s inability or unwillingness to teach God’s word, as though it might create believers who are not docile, fearful, unquestioning drones. I am generous to allow that God has a place in the Body of Christ for all who wish to follow Jesus, even among those who find it more fitting to worship His virgin mother instead.

But, let me get to the point of this message:

No wonder Obama and Pope Francis got along so well: they both want to “fundamentally transform” their respective organizations — Obama, America, and Pope Francis, the Catholic Church — and both appear to be appeasing the Islamists. This has got to be part of the end times. I know that some interpretations suggest that the Pope and the Catholic Church will become corrupt and will be the vision of the Beast. I had never given even the slightest consideration to this possibility, but the world today has been turned upside down. It is time to study this out, to discern the Word of God from that of false prophets.

Why are 75% of the hundreds of thousands of Muslim “refugees” flooding Europe young, able-bodied men of fighting age? Why are they not staying to fight against ISIS in their own countries? One might think they’re cowards, but I think they’re merely being staged for terrorist operations in the heartlands of Christian domains, all in preparation for the One World Order, not the one of the Bilderbergers, but the one called the World Caliphate.

Why are there no Christian refugees among the masses? Why does Obama not make mercy flights available to them, as the Israelis did for Ethiopian Jews? Obama does not want Christians to thrive. Indeed, he and his Leftist League surely want Christians to fade into the sands of time. One reason why there are no Christians in the crowds of refugees is because they are largely being slain where they once lived, and any that may have escaped beheading and crucifixion are being thrown by those Muslim men off the boats into the Mediterranean to perish. No one is trying to save them, not Obama, not even the Pope.

Why does Pope Francis insist, and Obama concede, to a demand that America take tens of thousands of these Muslim male “refugees” into our communities? Surely, they will not assimilate, but they will consume us. They will revert to form, slaying “infidels,” as soon as their numbers are large enough. This diaspora of Muslims is intended to plant the seeds of our destruction. When Obama said he would “fundamentally transform America,” did anyone expect that we would be converted to Islam? It certainly is the World Caliphate’s ultimate goal!

It is time to get educated about what is to come, as Christ’s return is imminent. The end times are upon us.

Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil;
that put darkness for light, and light for darkness;
that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Isaiah 5:20 KJV

js
js
8 years ago

another blog is reporting that there is even more to this story.
http://anglocath.blogspot.it/2015/09/there-was-blackmail-come-from-who-knows.html

AWBenkert
AWBenkert
8 years ago

I doubt if Islam played much of a role in this modernization. More likely, the Church saw that it was losing market share, particularly among the young, and decided to do something about it.

Petrilia
Petrilia
8 years ago

I have long regretted the overthow of Pope Benedict. Now it turns out that he was thrown aside to put the commie Pope Francis in. I wonder how many millions feel like me.

joe1429
joe1429
8 years ago

As a catholic, I am saddend by this pope

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!