News Ticker >
[ July 26, 2017 ]

Rep Steve King: Democrat Muslim IT spy ring is” an enormous act of treason, a...

[ July 26, 2017 ]

Village council orders ‘revenge rape’ of girl in Pakistan

[ July 26, 2017 ]

Tillerson ‘taking a little time off’ amid exit rumors

[ July 26, 2017 ]

Germany: Muslim Migrant Set To Be Released From Prison Despite Making Jihad Terror Threats

[ July 26, 2017 ]

Sharia in Tanzania: Church in Zanzibar Shaken as Court Supports Muslims’ Opposition to Building

[ July 26, 2017 ]

Justine Damond shot to death by Muslim cop because she ‘slapped police car’

[ July 26, 2017 ]

Democrat Muslim IT Spy Scandal Spreads to Pelosi and Clinton

[ July 26, 2017 ]

Hamas Marches in ‘Victory’ in Gaza Strip, and Calls for Day of Rage Against Israel

[ July 26, 2017 ]

Turkish politician from Erdogan’s ruling party: “There is no use in teaching math to a...

[ July 26, 2017 ]

Terror-tied CAIR FIRED from San Diego Schools Partnership

Watch VIDEO: Winning Muhammad Cartoonist Bosch Fawstin Acceptance Speech and the Winning Cartoon

156

This is what the media won’t show you: the winning cartoon:
bosch fawstin

SpencerFawstinWildersGeller74-700x400

And here is the acceptance speech from the winner of Muhammad cartoon competition, former Muslim Bosch Fawstin. Fawstin is a hero, a legend.

Bosch Fawston on Greta, who shamefully did not show the cartoon:
‘Once Free Speech Goes, It’s Over’: ‘Draw Muhammad’ Contest Winner Sounds Off

Fawstin said that the contest was important to him because it’s about freedom of speech, which he asserted is “under siege.”

“I understand the threat that we face and that’s why I do what I do,” Fawstin said. “I do it because we’re being threatened. This has to be fought head-on.”

“As artists, as writers, as thinkers, as Americans, as people who love freedom, and the entire West, we need to hit back. Not with violence, with the truth, with our art, with our writing,” Fawstin said. “Once free speech goes, it’s over.”

  • Harry Jakarta

    As an expatriate working in Muslim country I completely agree with the people raising their voices to defend the freedom of speech and religious believes as well as atheism … to point out that not all Muslims are fanatics is not an objection to do so … having lived three years in Cairo Egypt, found even friends among Muslims but it also became clear to me that the average ‘Muslim’ already is quietly tolerating or supporting the Islamist’s or crimes and acts of discrimination against non believers which are committed nearly every day. Among he European politicians Geert Wilders is standing out by his realistic assessment of the dangers of immigration in connection with the emergence of Islamist subcultures … sadly I also see that people like him or Mrs Geller are exceptional thinkers defamed by the mainstream media … as more we should thank them for exposing themselves to such hostilities and putting their lives into real danger.

    • Death Ray

      Pamela Geller is an arch bigot. Her right to free speech should not lead you to believe that she has anything to say that is worth hearing.

      • Raphael

        Pamela Geller is an archangel.

      • 4True

        You are either a Muslim, a moron or get paid very well from someone in Saudi Arabia Probably all the above.

        • Death Ray

          The work is GARBAGE.

          • OM

            Oh you’re a troll! ( I guess I’m the idiot:))

          • Pray Hard

            Show us your academic take on reality, a-hole.

          • Tony Fallucco

            thanks for the input asshole

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Everybody’s a critic.

          • Roger_T73

            DR is right, defending i-SLAM is GARBAGE

          • rossbro

            In FREE Countries, we are allowed to draw Garbage such as your Leader, the child rapist and murder monger, Mohammud. YOU are the one with the problem. You can’t allow freedom to exist. Otherwise some Muslims would see the truth and leave the Cult called Islam.

      • Pray Hard

        And you have what to add, Mohammed?

      • Dug FmJamul

        And what to you call the fundamentalists of Islam that support ISIS? Freedom fighters?

        • shrugger

          I’m fairly certain that “islamic freedom fighter” is an oxymoron.

          • Dug FmJamul

            Islam means SUBMIT, a Muslim gives up their freedom to follow Islamic Law.

      • Shwayz

        Why?

        • Death Ray

          It is devoid of any real invention or cleverness, and has been created to serve the goals of meanness.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Everybody has an opinion.

          • Shwayz

            You seem to be missing the point. You can’t kill someone because they are mean. My old science teacher was mean. I have no intentions me slaughtering him. This was simply about freedom of speech. Anyway, the jihadists still want to destroy America. They have stated this many times before the cartoon contest came along.

      • Roger_T73

        The how do YOU explain that “While not all muslims are terrorists, ALL “TERRORISTS ARE mud-SLIMES?

      • Demsci

        Ah, you are only defending Islam and it’s tactic to intimidate others, then to downgrade those who rightfully protest.

        Imagine, you Muslims try to win by foul play! By intimidation instead of fair competition, like the rest.

        But you can’t stop the reaction, you don’t have the power anymore.

      • Joy Daniels Brower

        Let freedom-loving people be the judge of what Geller has to say. Your mindless slam of Pam Geller is just that – mindless.

      • joker

        Pamela Geller might not say anything worth saying just imagine the m….f….. Muhammed.

      • martster

        EVERY decent non-liberal is, in your mind. Her actions are the most patriotic ever, and everyone denouncing her is brainwashed, with their minds having been hijacked, it appears.

    • KristenTSeitz

      ★✩★✩GET PROFlT Sitting h0me with Google FlNANCE@nh16::

      ,,,,

      ➨➨➨➨https://WhiteHatNetGuide.com/solid/step

  • Death Ray

    THAT’S the winning cartoon, Pam? That’s what a Texas police officer might have given his life for? That’s what was why you brought the “war…here’? That’s your big score for free speech??

    • phone2000

      IT IS LEGAL IN USA TO DRAW PORTRAITS IT IS NOT LEGAL TO INSTIGATE OR COMMIT MASS MURDER…YOU ARE SLAMMING THE WRONG PERSON

      • Death Ray

        I’m slamming exactly the right people: self-aggrandizing douchebags with no taste and no skills. The Charlie Hebdo cartoonists would have crapped all over this event!

        • JacktheRipper

          I take it your entry didn’t win? ;)

          • Death Ray

            Has Pam posted the riunners-up? I’d love to see what she considers UNWORTHY of twelve grand.

        • Evan3457

          The right to free speech does not depend on “taste” or “skills”. Speech does not have to meet your aesthetic or technical criteria to be protected under the Constitution.

          • Death Ray

            1) The purpose of Pam’s event was to bait Muslims, not to promote free speech. When Charlie Hebdo ran Mohammed cartoons, it was in the spirit of political criticism. They did not run cartoons of Mohammed every day or invite people to contribute the worst examples they could create for the purpose of spectacle. Charlie Hebdo attacked Islamic superstitions, not Islamic worshippers.

            In other words, have as many Mohammed cartoon contests as you want, it’s not like anyone intended to HIRE these schmucks.

            2) Pamela Geller does not hate Islam, she hates Muslims. Her routine reference to Muslims as “savages” (a term now popularized by American Sniper) is not reserved for terrorists. If you need a little reminder about where Pamella and Co. are coming from, just listen to the joke about “Mohammed’s mommy” in the video above. It is humor in the same vein as “Ho-dee-doh!” and “Na-Cho-Cheese!” (Yeah, you know what I’m talking about.)

            3) At this point, there have been enough shootings over Muslim cartoons that Pamela knew (and probably hoped) that she was courting danger. You don’t get to run a public ” We Dare to Insult Mohammed Through Cartoons” event (with
            a notorious Dutch reactionary by your side) and then feign ignorance of the consequences. This event was conducted in the spirit of confrontation, not dialogue. Therefor, the shooting could actually be said to be the desired result.

          • defcon 4

            I’m sorry, but how do cartoons “attack” anyone again?

          • Death Ray

            Unless you doubt the ability of art or writing to be used to incite hatred against a person or a people, then I don’t understand your question.

          • IzlamIsTyranny

            If I were to hit you with a right cross while you draw a cartoon who would feel more attacked when it was all done?

          • Death Ray

            It would never land, punk

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Is the writing in the Koran used to incite hatred against a person or a group???

            What about the calls in Fascist Iran for death to America?

            How about burning ISIS flags, burning effiges of the Supreme Leader of Fascist iran and ayatollah khoomeni?

          • Demsci

            To incite hatred is perfectly legal in democracies. you may do it back. Sometimes it is logical to hate something you consider bad. It simply is no problem.

            Kuffars do it to Muslims, Muslims do it to Kuffars. But among them plenty of praise and support is also going on. Look at Obama who exonerates and praises Islam often.

            Either prohibit hate-speech by all or none. Either allow hate-speech by all or none.

            We draw the line only at violence and incitement to it, and intimidation through it, gaining an unfair advantage through it, like Muslims do, and you?

          • defcon 4

            How about we conduct an experiment half wit? I’ll kick you in the crotch with all my might and then you attack me w/a cartoon and we’ll see who feels more provoked when it’s all over?

          • JacktheRipper

            This whole idea that muslims have the right to place creative restrictions on the world’s citizens is insane. It’s an obnoxious, unenforceable, baseless, demand that is in itself a provocation against non-muslims. THEY are provoking US with a preposterous order to not perform an act that is so ordinary and harmless that the order must be seen as a warrantless threat against our right to peaceably exist. It’s like me telling you, you can’t sneeze for a whole week, and if you do I might have to kill someone, I’ll be so angry. Well, that’s a groundless threat against others based on an unreasonable demand placed on you.

            And my analogy is good enough, because their demand that others not draw cartoons of muhammad is an obnoxious, unenforceable, baseless, demand against non-muslims under threat of violence. You seem to want to place the entire moral burden on the cartoonists over that of the angry muslims. But it’s the angry muslims that are provoking the situation with their unreasonable demand in the first place. And to top it off, the moral consequence of murder far exceeds any moral responsibility the cartoonists may bear to not draw the cartoons!

            Your muslims lose all the way around with this thing, as they are the provocateurs, and the killers. The angry muslims are solely responsible for any bad consequences, because they manufactured from thin air the reasons for their occurrence.

          • Death Ray

            Free speech is free speech, right? Well, now that its excercise has, on this occasion, led to led to blood and mayhem (as the event organizers anticipated), what’s the GOOD outcome?

            We didn’t need Pam Geller to show us that lunatics will attack you for no good reason, or to learn that “freedom isn’t free”. We already KNOW these things. And as for the cartoons themselves, they were not manufactured for any productive reason….. they were simply BAIT.

            As a cartoonist I am offended to see art used in this way, as a mere prop in a bigoted political stunt that wound up getting people killed and injured. Explain to me what benefit you and I should both feel we got from this? What do we learn that we didn’t know before? What improvement to our country has come from all this?

          • JacktheRipper

            Free speech is free speech, right? Well, now that its excercise has, on this occasion, led to led to blood and mayhem (as the event organizers anticipated), what’s the GOOD outcome?

            Well, the first good outcome is two murderers are dead. The second good outcome, is the participants in the event had the chance to enjoy themselves freely, to be wild and wacky for freedom, and that’s their right in our free country. The “blood and mayhem” is the total responsibility of those who broke the law for indefensible reasons.

            We didn’t need Pam Geller to show us that lunatics will attack you for no good reason, or to learn that “freedom isn’t free”.

            You’re right, muslims show us well enough that “lunatics will attack you for no good reason.” And it’s true, “freedom isn’t free.” But the moral burden for that sad fact is not on the shoulders of those whose freedom is threatened or denied. Muslims’ unethical/immoral reasons for depriving others their basic liberties are not superior to the fundamental right to those liberties. The fact that “freedom isn’t free” is not a reason to give up freedom, instead it reaffirms the need to fight for freedom. If you understand that, then you understand this contest.

            And as for the cartoons themselves, they were not manufactured
            for any productive reason….. they were simply BAIT.

            No, exercising their basic liberty of free expression is not baiting muslims, they are baiting us with their senseless provocation. They have no right to bait us with a demand that no free people should have to honor. And if these cartoons were BAIT, it’s in the same sense that my standing on a street corner is bait for a thief to rob me. You are taking our fundamental right to free expression in our free nation and twisting it into a kind “bait” for murder. You have inverted the moral burden from the victimizer to the victim. I find that an astonishing lapse in judgment.

            As a cartoonist I am offended to see art used in this way, as a mere prop in a bigoted political stunt that wound up getting people killed and injured.

            And as a human being with basic human liberties, I am offended to see a murderous “religion” trying to dominate the world’s citizens with barbarity and oppression. I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree on this point.

            Explain to me what benefit you and I should both feel we got from this? What do we learn that we didn’t know before? What improvement to our country has come from all this?

            The obvious benefit is we had a chance to reaffirm our free lives, to live according to our own good conscience, and to express ourselves freely. If we are confronting islamic oppression with cartoons, then the improvement is the reaffirmation of our sacred principles of liberty and free speech, and we improve ourselves in dignity and self-respect by standing in defense of what is good and right. Millions have died for these freedoms. We stand nobly in their defense. And if we learn anything in this, it’s that there is a force in the world that’s trying to rob us of our freedoms, to impose its tyrannical will on us all. Of course we islamophobes know this already, but some folks are still debating. So let’s hope they’re learning from this.

            If our 1st amendment must be a battle front against the madness of islam then so be it. If this is where the war for freedom must be fought, then let’s cock and load our pens and start “shooting.” Because nobody tells us Americans who or what we can draw.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            JackTheRipper AKBAR!!!

          • Death Ray

            First of all, Jack, they weren’t murderers. You first have to MURDER to be a murderer. Keep your English straight.

            Second, this was a conservative art exhibit, a contest to see who could express the most fear through poor taste. No one was having fun.

            But I’m glad you have verified what I have been contending all along, which is that this was an exercise in provoking and insulting Muslims, out of hatred, and not an exercise in free speech against terrorism for the sake of democracy. I will defend Pam’s free speech rights either way, but is it too much to ask that you be honest about what is in the woman’s heart?

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            So you hate the art contest, not the Ilslamofascist TERRORISTS with machine guns and body armor who were neutralized?

            Whose side are you on comrade?

          • JacktheRipper

            First of all, Jack, they weren’t murderers.

            Oh, excuse me for taking that liberty. I should have been more careful with my English. I should have said those two armed gentlemen that had intended to commit mass murder but were gunned down before they could. I beg your pardon. I changed it to “Jihadist,” does that make you feel any better?

            But I’m glad you have verified what I have been contending all along, which is that this was an exercise in provoking and insulting Muslims, out of hatred, and not an exercise in free speech against terrorism for the sake of democracy.

            Show me how I verified that.

          • Demsci

            I like to try to explain, since you ask.

            Say, there are 10 religions, lifestyles with big number of followers.

            What is the difference between the 9 and the 1, say Islam?

            No followers of the 9 ever respond with violence on non-violent “hating”,”bating”, “taunting”,”hurting feelings”, “denigration”, “drawing it’s prophets or leaders”, “ridicule” of THEIR religion or prophet.

            Only a substantial part of the 10th religion does that.

            In response, without a second thought, in the West the media, artists, citizens, all do “hate, bait, taunt, hurt feelings, denigrate, draw leaders/ historical figures

            Of all 9 other religions ALL THE TIME.

            There is one exception, such criticism and ridicule is withheld when ISLAM is concerned. Big advantage for Islam and Muslims!

            SoPamela and Robert say that Islamic intimidation WORKS. And I say that Islam and all Muslims PROPHIT from this intimidation.

            So now YOU imagine that for instance the Mormons, Scientologists and Amish all decide that intimidation works and so will from now on let a minority of their followers kill non-violent artists, writers who denigrate THEIR religion. To gain the same advantage.

            When Mormons, Scientologists, Amish really would do that, maybe THEN you would understand Pamela.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Why are he lunatics always koran thumping fascists?

          • Evan3457

            1) So YOU say. Other people say she is standing up to defend free speech in defiance of death threats. There is speech all over the culture that baits, attacks, insults just about every other religion under the sun. A major Broadway production mocks a religion for several hours every night, and not only do people not demand it be closed down, the leftist powers that be award it multiple Emmys. Christianity is routinely attacked all over the place; Orthodox and Hasidic Judaism as well, though not as openly or frequently. Nobody, but nobody, says this speech is not free speech. Again, the right to free speech does not depend on the marketability of the end product.

            2) “Savages” is an accurate description of the people she’s fighting. They’re savages, whether we say so or not. We might as well say so; we might as we call a thing by its rightful name. You say she’s referring to ALL muslims. I don’t think so.

            3) She noted what’s happened at the past and took steps to make sure they didn’t happen in Texas. Would she have the right to free speech if she hadn’t hired security, and the goons that attacked had slaughtered her and every other participant? If that’s what you think, what a stupid notion: you earn the right to free speech if you deliberately martyr yourself.

            She’s not feigning ignorance of anything. She may have assumed an attack might happen, and it’s her position that such an attack is not justified no matter what she or anyone else says about Islam, or how she says it, and she’s right, and you’re wrong. The fact that this speech is confrontational is completely irrelevant. Much political speech is confrontational. The civil rights protests of the 60’s were confrontation; so were the Vietnam war protests. That doesn’t mean they weren’t free speech. And if you really think what Geller, AFDI, Spencer et al did and said isn’t worthy of the protection of the 1st Amendment, then put the chains on yourself and close the shackles, because you’re already mentally enslaved.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Evan3457 AKBAR!!!

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            The VILE and EVIL westboro baptist church and its late unlamented leader were confrontational – and were permitted their free speech.

            Islam is NOT above criticism – especially after 9/11, Boston Marathon, Mumbai, Nairobi, Paris, Beslan, Bamiyan, Mosul…

          • Demsci

            Yes, Muslims were baited, taunted. The same way that Christians, Mormons, Scientologists, Amish, Jehovah;s witnesses, atheists, buddhists are regularly baited and taunted.

            It is not the baiting and taunting that differs, it is only the reaction to it that is different.

            a part of the muslims intimidates the majority with death-threats and actual murder. And yes, the majority then withholds criticism, but only for Islam.

            This is unfair advantage for Islam and all Muslims, and that is what you now try to defend; an unfair advantage of Islam over all the other religions or lifestyles.

            If your true motive is clear, your words lose all credibility and trustworthyness.

          • joker

            You got a point here, I must say.

    • AJA0

      Victim blaming. You’re attacking a person who drew a cartoon rather than the person who attempted to kill a person… for drawing a cartoon.

      • Death Ray

        I’m not attacking anyone for drawing the Pro’ Mo’… I’m saying that they blasphemed against ART! Why should any cop (CORRECTION: it was a security guard who was shot) risk their life for trash? GIVE YOUR MONEY TO QUALITY CARTOONISTS, PAM!

        • 4True

          Art isn’t the most important factor here. Its’ the expression. Although Muslims aren’t tolerant of much Western art either. Third Reich is OK with them.

        • Canadian Patriot

          The guards risked their lives to protect lives. They risked their lives not to protect the content of free speech, but to protect free speech itself. They risked their lives to maintain peace, law, and order, fundamental American values. They risked their lives, ultimately, to protect you from being murdered for saying and writing what you want to express. A little gratitude might be in order.

          • Death Ray

            Yes, a LOT of gratitude is in order, especially when you consider the awful, Muslim-baiting nature of the ACTUAL work the guard was, by extension, defending. If you’re going to bring down the heat on a Texas town that is far afield of your OWN home, at least do it for something worthy.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Exercising Free Speech IS worthy.

            You don’t like some ‘art’ that makes you think? That’s OK. Go about your lawful business. When you make death threats and act upon them, you cross the line and will have to suffer the lawful consequences.

          • Death Ray

            A fukkin’ fanged Mohammed that looks like Wolverine shouting “How dare you draw me?!” is supposed to make me THINK?

          • Demsci

            Yes, it already did make you think and write, didn’t it? Bosch Fawstin wrote on it: “I draw you (Mohammed) precisely you (or Muslims) forbid me to do this.

            And that HARAM is totally out of line and pure intimidation. And no followers of other religions ever do it. Only a part of the Muslims does it!

            And what are Ordinary Muslims, like CAIR, going to do about it? think!

            Or admit that they will do nothing substantial to stop this intimidation that works, from which they prophit.

          • Death Ray

            Really, you guys need to stop using all the these Arabic words as if you really know what they mean. Study Arabic if you want to sound educated.

            And no, nothing about the winning entry or the runners-up (the only one I’ve seen is Mohammed with a beard full of snakes– how profound) have given me any incentive to think more deeply on the subject. Surface level commentary is not provocative.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Maybe these meet with your artistic standards?

            Mohammed Image Archive

            http://www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/

          • Demsci

            Good to see you are reduced to talk about trivialities with Arabic words and sounding educated,

            Probably because you did run out of good arguments. Because you don’t THINK more deeply on the subject, by your own admission.

            Fine, you don;t have to, but you were the one backing out of the real important discussion, not me.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Degenerate Art – hated by fascist Socialists of the 1930’s too. You’re in good company

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degenerate_art
            .

        • defcon 4

          No one would’ve have had to risk their lives over cartoons if not for musswein, pig.

        • Pray Hard

          Go hang yourself again.

        • Demsci

          The Charlie Hebdo artists were killed for precisely such art! It was forbidden by fundamentalist Muslims to make this kind of art. That is what makes it so special! Not the quality or lack thereof of the art as such.

          This then is a groundless protest, a mere excuse for you in order to be able to denigrate Pamela.

          • Death Ray

            The Charlie Hebdo artists were at least making editorial commentary inside the broader context of a free press. Pam’s fiasco was just about throwing chum in the water while shouting “Come and get me!”. Big difference.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            We will NOT submit to Sharia Law.

            Will you?

          • Demsci

            Pam’s editorial commentary consists of volumes, reams of explanation, it is written on internet, spoken on TV.

            Trust a Muslim who on purpose wants to denigrate an opponent of Islam, Pamela, to deny her “editorial commentary” exists.

            How good to see you are REDUCED to such nonsensical arguments, very probably because those are all you have,

            Maybe also because you refuse to think.

    • Lacouray Too

      The ‘war’ was already here AH.
      Ms. Geller just forced it out from the shadows so that you AHs could recognize it.

    • Raphael

      “Death Ray”? Such an ironic name for a white feather pacifist.

      • JacktheRipper

        He sounds more like an “Uncle Ray” to me, toothless and without brains.

    • Evan3457

      The whole point of free speech is that it is free for ALL. The police officer fought to protect that principle, and it is worth fighting for; it is worth dying for.

      Cartoons are not war. Those who pick up the guns to kill cartoonists “bring the war”. And those, like you, who would appease them, and deny your own constitutional rights,or those of others, guarantee war will happen. Regardless of what you may believe is causing it, it is those who appease totalitarian who guarantee those totalitarians will continue to attack.

    • OM

      You are really too stupid to reply to. But I will.
      The security officer took a bullet (fortunately he’s fine) for western civilization, for freedom, for individual rights, for equality between men and women, for democracy, for freedom of speech, for all the victims (Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, “infidels”, homosexuals, France, little children, all women, all non-muslims and muslim victims of their own leaders) and potential victims of Islamic violence and, bigotry and insanity.
      Get it, idiot?

    • Pray Hard

      Go hang yourself.

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      BrainDeadRay,

      How about this? Does this look more like Moohammed to you?

      http://ncseprojects.org/files/images/stick_figure.JPG

      • Marge Ways

        Ha ha, what do you expect from “Brain DEAD Ray”???
        (!)

      • joker

        I must say this is the winning drawing. It says all about Muhammed: he was a zero. And still I want to become the most hated person in the Islamic world. I want to be the number one on the hit list by IS.

    • Demsci

      Well, listen to what she has to say.

      Islam and all Muslims in a way prophit from intimidation, when Christianity, Mormonism, Scientology, Hindoeism, Buddhism, Atheism ALL get criticized, and humiliated, while NONE of their follower react violently.

      Now meek kuffars darenot criticize, humiliate Islam, but only the other religions. Muslims dare also not criticize, humiliate Islam, but they do that same thing with Jews, Americans, Kuffars, with no fear of intimidation what so ever.

      The violent minority of Muslims thus gives Islam and Muslims a very unfair advantage.

      And to break that unfair advantage this cartoon-convention was very necessary and worth dying for. Because if reasonable people give in to intimidation, what is other intimidators to stop from intimidating more to gain a similar advantage for their groups? . After all it works for the Muslims, doesn’t it?

      So not holding this cartoon-convention in long run gives more intimidation, more deaths.

      • Death Ray

        Demsci– this event was not a “win” for anyone. There was nothing heroic about somply throwing a bunch of cartoons on a wall and saying “come and get me”. Artists who persevere in the face of death threats deserve our support and our prayers, people like Pamella Geller who shout to the world, “Hey, where’s MY death threat??” deserve our contempt.

        • Demsci

          Oh, Death Ray, you KNOW she risked her life then, don;t you? That surely takes courage!

          And oh, what a pity that Christians, Mormons, Atheists, Buddhists, Jews can’t use the same tactics the Muslims use.

          But let us pretend that they do. Here goes. Everywhere where there is you know”ridicule, denigration, hate-speech, drawing of loved leaders” going against the above religions.

          death squads of their followers will also kill, say, 12 artists and writers (like Charlie Hebdo) + threathen to kill all such.

          Suddenly people who routinely “ridicule,denigrate, hate-speech etc” those religions will think twice about it and most will stop.

          Only Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer THEN will also start hosting “insulting exhibitions against these other “then intimidating” religions.

          And then Christians, Mormons, Atheists, Buddhists, or Jews will criticize them for having “taunted their more violent members”.

          But we can thank the followers of those religions that they never use that intimidation tactic. Only a part of the Muslims does that.

          • Death Ray

            The difference here, Demsci, is that this was not meant as a thoughtful criticism of Islam, much less an artistic one. Pam really DOES hate Muslims. A ploy to win attention for one’s self is not heroic in the least.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            It’s done in the same spirit as burning the American flag.

            Protected speech – needs to be backed up with armed and trained security guards.

            The price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Like Islam, the self proclaimed “final revelation” and “religion of peace” is open to criticism. LOL!

          • joker

            I do hate Islam!

          • Death Ray

            Then throw your own contest!

          • Demsci

            It was meant as a reaction to the intimidation of the killing of the 12 Charlie Hebdo cartoonists. And explained as such.

            Thoughtful criticism on Islam? Well, if you acknowledge anything as such, great! Can you give an example of that?

            Pamela gives plenty of that in my opinion. But the only reaction to ALL she says from Muslims is: she HATES us!

            You too, are reduced to that judgement again. How do you expect a fair debate if that is all you can react with to criticism by her?

          • Death Ray

            No Demsci, she does not have courage. It does not take courage to put others in harm’s way, and it would have taken greater courage for her to conduct, say, a symposium with Muslims on the very topic of free speech. Pam does not have the courage to speak to Muslims, only to insult them. She put nothing at all on the line.

  • JacktheRipper

    It’s fantastic that this fine man would use his talent for such a good cause. And I so appreciate his candor about his muslim upbringing. His mention of hitler as some sort of familial hero is telling. It takes courage to stand before the world and say such things about ones youth. And I was worried he would fail as a speaker since his talent is in another area, but I was pleasantly surprised, he’s a natural. And his quote of Pamela Geller’s about our 1st amendment made my eyes water, I’m not ashamed to admit it.

    Pam, this was a phenomenal success! I won’t be tacky and gloat over the death of
    the jihadists, even though they deserved every bullet. I only want to wish my heart-felt thanks for what you are doing for all of us, and more than that, for human rights in general. I never can seem to find the right words to capture the fullness of my gratitude. And yes, I do give, though perhaps not as much as I should. I do speak out whenever possible. And I carry in my heart the same dedication to freedom that you and your cohorts do, though not with the same brilliance and achievement. Thank you, and may god and fate be on your side.

  • Warren Raymond

    That Greta is such a flake. She loves the Donald; she can go on forever about Anna Nicole (LOL!) and missing blond children. But she knows shiite about Islam, and her ignorance is only trumped by her cowardice to do her job. But there is always Geraldo, the moustachioed king of stupid. Can’t wait to see that.

  • Dan Griffing

    In his (May-5-2015) “Morning Jolt” column of the online National Review, Jim Geraghty says “We Have Invented Jihadist Flypaper”. I agree.

    In the way that Obama dealt with the Ft Hood shooting and throughout his whole administration’s foreign policy, our president as demonstrated that he doesn’t have the stones to confront Islamist Jihadism, much less even let the words pass his lips. But Pam Geller, has.

    The Danish cartoonists, the Charlie Hebdo Satirists, Theo van Gough and Ayaan Hirsi Ali have all demonstrated that Islamists cannot stand to be criticized or lampooned with cartoons.

    What Pam Geller’s Garland Texas Muhammad Cartoon contest has shown is that one person using her First Amendment Rights can make a difference by evoking a response from jihadist terrorists that they cannot avoid. Geller may have come across the magic formula for making home-grown terrorists expose themselves in such a way that they are taken care of in the only manner that they deserve. Thanks, Pam.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/417909/we-have-invented-jihadist-flypaper-jim-geraghty

  • Motownfan

    Pam Geller was on FOX News complaining that no one will publish the cartoons that were drawn in this contest in Texas, but I can’t even find them on her own website. Does anyone know where one can find these cartoons? Post a weblink if you have one.

    • Pray Hard

      They’ve been here and probably are here somewhere.

  • 4True

    His work is great and not even offensive. Quite mild mannered and still enough to make Muslims foam at the mouth.

  • JohnLeB
  • Pray Hard

    MacCallum needs a Muslim husband to beat her half to death about once a week to wake her stupid @$$ up.

    • Roger_T73

      So does MUX.

  • Rich

    I may not agree with what you say..But I will defend (to my death) You’re RIGHT to say it..

  • Dug FmJamul

    Laura Ingraham told O’Reilly tonight even tho she didn’t know the ‘ins and outs’ of what the cartoons were about she had no problem agreeing with him the event was counter productive for Christians and America alike. Really? I support whatever Robert Spencer choses to do in exposing the truth about Islam.

  • Anthony

    Bosch, Robert and Pamela hug you three very tight so that if you are struck, I die and you three keep SPEAKING and enjoy our freedom. We live and we die the way we want, the way we like and the way we desire. Fear not those Cartoons out there !

  • Daryl Nuccio

    Great job on Hannity tonight, Pam! Who would ever imagine that in America a cartoon would upset more people than armed gunmen?
    “Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.”


    Benjamin Franklin

  • cryptoid

    Critics of Geller and her motives have succumb to the comfort of their oblivion and, thus, are the most worrisome component of this ever creeping problem. Using the impending threat of death, radical Islamists seek to impose their version of “law” on ALL, including cultures thus far free of such medieval belief and practice. It is for this very reason that our freedoms must be exerted, and the validity of radical Islam challenged, in the wake of events like Hebdo, etc. The freedoms of the civilized world must be exercised bravely and loudly at such times, not not tucked away by cowards who hope their closed eyes, ears, and mouths will make it all go away.

    • Roger_T73

      i-SLAM is not a religion,
      it is a CULT of VIOLENCE founded by a PEDOPHILE!!!

  • MUX

    He didn’t draw The Prophet.. he just draw his malice without reason on Islam.

    And other Big Avengeful on Islam a.k.a. initiators of the contest gave him a prize in a shameful party called: “Free Speech” :D

    {the winner of Muhammad cartoon competition former Muslim Bosch Fawstin}

    Bosch Fawstin is a former Muslim? <– hehe yea, you must believe it -_-

    • MUX

      So, Muslims.. keep calm and keep spreading the goodness of Islam peacefully.

      • SCREW SOCIALISM

        What “goodness” of Islam?

        9/11, Boston Marathon bombing, Charlie Hebdo, beheading of Lee Rigby, bombing of Pan Am 103, London transport bombing, Mumbai India massacre, Nairobi Kenya mall massacre, ISIS beheading captives, ISIS burning a man alive, Sydney Australia attack, murder of filmmaker Theo Van Gogh, Beslan school massacre, Boko Haram raping girls in Nigeria, current day slavery in Sudan, ISIS destroying a museum in Mosul with sledgehammers?

        • Roger_T73

          Thank you for a historic Summary of i-SLAM’s contribution the world!!!

          • MUX

            you are always welcome :D
            btw, please call your lang teacher to learn more about how to write the word ISLAM correctly, Okay :v

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            My lang teacher tells us to spell islam like this.

            TERRORISM.

          • MUX

            then find a real school, boy ;D

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            My lang school is NOT a madrassa or terrorist mosque.

        • MUX

          ISIS IS NOT ISLAM,
          ISIS IS A BUNCH OF BEASTS WEAR ISLAMIC CLOTHES.
          I HATE ISIS
          AS SIMPLE AS THAT :D

          • Demsci

            Yes, I am glad you do,

            Now dare you say: “Democracy is HALAL!”?

          • MUX

            NO, DEMOCRACY ISN’T HALAL
            Just keep stick to the stupid drawing contest ok.

            i have no time to waste to long chit-chat how Islam got slandered by hypocrite U.S. and U.K. elites and even more..

            convincing blind ppl who has been fooled by the elites is not a priority thing in my cool life :D

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            The biggest example of hypocrisy is the claim that Islam is “The Religion of Peace” – which you have to close your eyes and ears to shut out the reality of Islam today.

          • Demsci

            Oh, we understand, you won’t because you CAN’T. Having no time is just an excuse. YOU backed out first! We win!

            Cool life?! I believe you, only you have been fooled into Islam from birth.

          • MUX

            yeah, your hypocrite ideology (democracy) is win ..for now.. :D

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Terrorist Islam is Haram (EVIL)

            See 9/11.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Are the black flags of ISIS with their koranic quotes ISLAMIC?
            When ISIS crys allahu akbar – are they infidels or muslims?

          • MUX

            they are infidels wearing muslim clothes, screwyou :D

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            ISIS are Muslim terrorist pigs, like your prophet Moohammed.

            FOAD in Mecca ;-D

          • Dug FmJamul

            Wrong, ISIS is doing exactly what the Qur’an tells them to do as it is written in Arabic.

            You just don’t know what’s in your Qur’an, do you?

        • MUX

          9/11 is an INSIDE JOB.. open your eyes WIDE.. or you don’t have any? :D

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            The hateful KORAN was written by the CIA, MOSSAD, KGB, MI6 to make Islam look like a hateful and racist death cult?

        • MUX

          ISIS, AL-QAEDA, TALIBAN <– MADE BY U.S. :D to fools people like …you? :D

          • Demsci

            I see you believe that absurd conspiracy theory. You must be pretty desperate to deny the obvious, that those organisations carry out the tenets of Quran-Hadiths-Sira, in a valid interpretation of these “holy texts”.

            That or those 3 holy texts are in essence very ambiguous, multi-interpretable, unclear, incomplete, contradictory. And how could they not be? They have not been changed one iota in 1300 years.

            Don’t you see, even if the Israeli’s or Americans organised ISIS, then still these multi-interpretable texts of quran-hadiths-sira made it very easy for them to create a fake-islamic organisation that kills and oppresses wholesale all the time quoting ISLAMIC justification!

            As Muslims you are stuck with a “holy manual” to live by that is much inferior to the most important laws, including the constitution of the West. These can be updated when they are multi-interpreted and still be binding. Islamic holy texts cannot.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            MADE BY THE U.S. – like the U.S. made FASCIST IRAN, SAUDI ARABIA, MALAYSIA, INDONESIA, PAKISTAN, SUDAN, LIBYA, ALGERIA???

          • MUX

            yeah, screw :D

      • Marge Ways

        keep calm, Muslims are the DEMONS OF THE WORLD!!!

        • MUX

          and one of those demons of the world say Hi to you now.. Dude :D

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            The most prominent demon of islam is their satanic prophet who they call ‘mooohammed’.

          • MUX

            u even dont dare showing your own face..why? too screw to be showed? :v

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            I prefer seeing your head hanging from the hands of ISIS

      • Demsci

        Good advice, Mux. No problem.

        But see context; a part of your fellow-Muslims DID KILL cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo. As a result we daresay Islam, through THIS intimidation, get’s much less criticized than all the other religions and lifestyles.

        So, that intimidation of these extremist Muslims gives YOUR religion a very unfair advantage.

        And you chose Islam, it is not an accident of birth.

        And you do not throw out those intimidators, like we would have done.

        and you stay in the same ummah with them and prophit from their murdering and intimidation.

        Ha, go prophit from it, but know you are not honest, not fair! And WE are.

        And we know, tell you, that in Islamic countries, Jews, Americans, Kuffars and their beloved leaders are just as much or worse INSULTED, HURT, MALICED by Muslims.

        But of course you will let them go on but only try to discourage non-Muslims, you with your double standards.

        Well, this attitude and behavior destroys the credibility and trustworthiness of you and your fellow-Muslims among reasonable people who understand.

        • MUX

          {a part of your fellow-Muslims DID KILL cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo.}

          O.. really the DID KILL them?
          This is a video how they KILL one of some victims on Charlie Hebdo case

          http://anonhq.com/uncensored-footage-paris-terror-attack-raises-serious-questions/

          open your eyes WIDE and be honest to yourself :D

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Using your standards, there are NO videos of moohammed.

            Only cartoons – and every adult knows that cartoons are NOT REAL – so moohammed never existed?

          • Demsci

            I opened and read your link. Fascinating. So now you doubt the official version. But after Charlie Hebdo numerous of your fellow-Muslims condoned and praised what these 2 shooters had done.

            Isn’t it embarrassing to a person like you to be in that “ummah” with those other Muslims?

            If you “ordinary Muslims” can evict, eject those bad Muslims, like ISIS, then it is imperative that YOU get out of their embarrassing company somehow.

            If you are Muslim out of loyalty to your parents and community, that is a dead wrong reason anyway. Only if you believe Islam is true, you have a good reason to be in the Ummah.

          • Demsci

            I mean if you CAN’T EVICT the bad Muslims

          • joker

            Indeed this is very strange. Somebody shot in the head by an AK47 would make a lot of mess on the pavement. And still I want to become the most hated person in the Islamic world.

          • MUX

            the true sentence is:
            And still I want to Islam become the most hated religion in the world. :D think, you smart guy :v

        • MUX

          {that in Islamic countries, Jews, Americans, Kuffars and their beloved leaders are just as much or worse INSULTED, HURT, MALICED by Muslims.}

          you know all about it from US, Uk, Israel mainstream medias.. be honest :D

          • Demsci

            I know it from mainstream news AND MEMRI-tv, AND Al-monitor, Al Arabiya, Al Jazeera and the Internet, from Robert Spencer, who always gives links to his sources.

            Look Mux, you (and I) can deny only so much. Give it up, you can diminish my observation but you cannot reduce thousands of proofs to zero.

      • Joy Daniels Brower

        The entire history of pisslam is one of conquest and slaughter. There hasn’t been one inch of foreign soil acquired by Islam that wasn’t done so without violence, slaughter and bloodshed. So crawl back into your Islamist cave, Mr. Muxlime!

        • MUX

          read also the pisstory of Crusade with Pop Urban II
          read with full of Joy (Daniels Brower) :D

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Moron, The Crusades were 1,000 years ago.

            Your terrorist jihadi pals are slaughtering people TODAY.,

            Is Islam 1,000 years or 1,400 years backward from the civilized world?

          • Joy Daniels Brower

            The ONLY regret most Westerners who prize their freedom of expression regret is that the Crusades didn’t wipe the mudslimes off the map altogether! There was defensive action throughout history to try to contain or repel the muzzies, but they always returned – more evil than ever! They were stopped at the Gates of Vienna, but not in Spain until the ruthless Catholics returned to power. Islam has always been at war with everyone that is not Muslim. The political cult pretending to be a religion needs to experience its own “reformation;” failing that, the goal will or should always be complete & utter defeat for the forces of Islamic terror & evil.

          • MUX

            hahaha it seems you didn’t read that Crusade pisstory with enJoy (Daniels Brower) :D

      • Jaem

        Go live in Iran and then tell me how “good” Islam is. You don’t want freedom? Leave. Be under Sharia law. Iran has executed (as of April 16) 329 Muslims, but I am sure you would love it there!

        • MUX

          Iran is shia, shia is another hijacker of Islam :D

          • Jaem

            Saudi is not Shia and they have just as bad a record of executions and human rights offences.

  • Marge Ways

    grow up MUX, “THIS IS AMERICA”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • MUX

      then please grow up your cool mind, Mr. American Big Boy :D

  • Joshua Pavlovich

    in this country we have a thing called freedom of speech. If you don’t like it shut up and leave!!! We have to listen to everybody else’s bull so now you can listen ours!!!! Muslims can behead, rape, and crucified children but don’t you dare draw a picture of the Muhammad!!! get the hell out of my country and leave us people who love freedom alone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • No such thing as #hatespeech ONLY speech “you” hate #Ihateyourspeech
    http://presumptivephilospher.blogspot.com/2015/05/q-what-is-difference-between-islam- LIberalism is simply Islam INCARNATE….evil is as evil DOES …see without heads left on.

Pin It on Pinterest