Watch VIDEO: Bill O’Reilly’s “Fighting Words” Against AFDI Ads

177

The right gets it wrong.

Our ads quote high-profile Muslims and Muslim organizations calling for jihad, genocide, gender apartheid, creed apartheid, etc. Shutting down free speech won’t stop these savages, it will embolden them.

Story continues below advertisement

My jihad ad afdi OBL My jihad Erdogan afdi ad AFDI my jihad ad Times Square bomber AFDI Fort Hood my jihad ad afdi hamas my jihad adAFDI my jihad gay adsAFDI myjihad gay ad ahmad AFDI my jihad gay ad ruby

 

The “killing Jews is worship to Allah” ad is a direct quote from a Hamas broadcast on “Palestinian” television. Hamas was just re-elected. Do Americans know this? It is about calling attention to the genocidal statements of Hamas, and to Islamic antisemitism in general. It is scandalous that even one penny of American aid goes to these people who nurse this genocidal bloodlust.

I was genuinely surprised that Bill O’Reilly and Judge Napolitano were so clueless about the First Amendment. Yes, O’Reilly is clueless on jihad — when he deigns to mention it at all. But free speech?

Screen Shot 2015-04-25 at 12.02.03 PM

Judge Napolitano’s analysis on Bill O’Reilly was so wrong on constitutional law. There is no such thing as “hate speech” as unprotected speech under the First Amendment. There are “fighting words” (which the ad is not) and there is incitement speech, which the ad is not, as a legal and factual matter. If Bill O’Reilly wants to debate the law, we’re more than ready.

Bill OReilly said that our ad could provoke some devout Muslim (not the term he used) or incite violence. Judge Napolitano agreed that it could, and if that were to occur, then our free speech ads could be stopped.  Wrong. That is the classic case of the heckler’s veto. The  statement by Judge Napolitano is dangerous.

OReilly said that the message might be lost in the ad’s headline, which is “provocative in the extreme.” Jihad, Mr. Reilly, is “provocative in the extreme” — not exposing it.

Judge Napolitano told OReilly that he agrees with the federal judge, citing his statement that “it’s not an easy case.”

I disagree. It is easy peasy. The federal judge was very clear on it.

“The speech is hateful and repellant and certainly provocative,” Napolitano said. “But under the law it does not qualify as hate speech. Hate speech, which is unprotected, is speech which provokes a particular individual to engage in immediate violence.”

He added that if people are provoked to engage in “immediate violence” by the signs, then the court is going to have to readdress this case.

Napolitano stated that the sign standing alone does not meet the hate speech standard under the law.

In reality, there is no such standard. There are three possible exceptions to protected First Amendment speech: incitement, fighting words, and true threat.

The legal standard says that the MTA has the right to prevent speech, that is, it can practice prior restraint of speech, on the basis that there is a reasonable foreseeability of imminent violence or lawlessness. For that standard not to be unconstitutional, it can only be applied in cases falling into those three categories.

A true threat requires, under First Amendment jurisprudence, that one be directing the threat toward a specific individual about a specific crime: “I’m going to kill you.” Our ad does not constitute fighting words; in Jablonski, the Court makes clear that the words have to be spoken in a volatile face-to-face situation — such as the use of the N word in a confrontation.

Read the transcript of the hearing here: Download here

The Judge’s opinion here: Court Opinion

I like this comment from Jack:

This ad controversy is symbolic of the world’s denial about islam. Kill, kill, kill, Islam never changes. Yet, amazingly, Pamela’s ads have become more shocking than the crimes they expose, more controversial than the crimes themselves!

Clearly the world is cowering to Islam. Our leaders are shooting Pamela the messenger, because it’s far easier than confronting an islamic bully. But like the little choo choo that could, freedom and human rights has found a home on the side of a bus. So unpretentious they ride, so pedestrian a place, yet so glorious in purpose. Pam ‘s ads are so dignified in truth, so well-meaning in message, that even on the side of a muddy, smelly bus they can’t help but be magnificent.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
177 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
drsmith123
drsmith123
8 years ago

I support your ads 100% but would like to see ones that question the so called muslim majority to speak up against attacking Jews and Christians in the Middle East and mosques that are training grounds for home ground terrorists. I think most people get hung up on the wording and miss the message.

Keep up the great work.

IslamIsFascism
IslamIsFascism
8 years ago
Reply to  drsmith123

How would you fit such a message onto the side of an MTA bus? There’s not much room for such explication in an advertisement.

milt w
milt w
8 years ago
Reply to  IslamIsFascism

We need bigger buses?

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago
Reply to  milt w

We have bigger buses already – the double MTA buses, plus, we could buy space at the double decker buses used for tourists, lol! Why not? Money speaks doesn’t it???

drsmith123
drsmith123
8 years ago
Reply to  IslamIsFascism

Yes I agree, just wish there was a way to expose the fact that all Muslims , moderate or not support ISIS.

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago
Reply to  IslamIsFascism

Pamela Geller seems to fit a ton of truths on the sides of the buses, in the subways, etc. And if she could, she’d wall paper all cities with them! You’ll be surprised how well and even how explicitly one can fit writing and/or graphics into a limited space….. ;o)

will winn
will winn
8 years ago
Reply to  drsmith123

maybe the muslim majority agree with the “minority.”

drsmith123
drsmith123
8 years ago
Reply to  will winn

I think all of them want to take over the world.

milt w
milt w
8 years ago
Reply to  will winn

Think you may have wrote that backwards though?

rooare
rooare
8 years ago
Reply to  drsmith123

How about “The Muslim extremist cuts off the head, the Muslim moderate holds the feet.”

drsmith123
drsmith123
8 years ago
Reply to  rooare

That should be on a bumper sticker or a bus. I like it…

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago
Reply to  rooare

LOVE IT!!!! I have this version too: “A radical Muslim wants to behead you; a moderate Muslim wants a radical Muslim to behead you.”

AND this great one too: “Feel the fear and do it anyway.
Susan Jeffers and Ellen
Carr”.

PLUS….. ”
You chose disgrace instead of war, you got
disgrace and war as well.” Winston Churchill after the Munich Accords”

I got tons of these gems if anyone wants them. :o)

426 HemiCuda
426 HemiCuda
8 years ago

Bill O’Reilly is a closet liberal, he’s just like the rest of the Media they say what they think will help their ratings, they care nothing about actual freedom of speech !

Larenzo1
Larenzo1
8 years ago
Reply to  426 HemiCuda

I disagree I think that Bill O has done Pam Geller and her heroic work wrong but he is not a liberal like the majority of the media. He has been very harsh on the President and has taken some very unpopular stands with the left. He I does however seem to want to go over board to be fair. For far to long he gave Obama the benefit of the doubt but he has been very hard on Obama I do not know what else he can do at this point he cannot call for an assault on the Whitehouse! Being carful is one thing but being to cautious can be dangerous. he needs to take a harder look at the trends also he cannot try a criminal case in the media. I think he is to worried about being seen as anti-homosexual when it is clear that he thinks it is not normal conduct and is sin. You also need to read his books. he goes overboard to be fair but at a point you have to come to the end of the rope. I have watched his opinion of Obama transform over the last few years from deference and respectful to understanding the guy is an incompetent and bad actor. Quite a few things I will watch the screen and yell you know better!

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago
Reply to  Larenzo1

I too respect O’Reilly, but he can be disingenuous, as you suggest, in his “No Spin Zone.”

I get the feeling as well that in an effort not go too far out on a limb, even when the truth may demand it, he will on occasion prevaricate – and he’s not above throwing someone under the bus, e.g. Pam Geller, whom he has also treated rudely in the past.

It’s sort of like throwing small chunks of meat into the moat where the lefty crocodiles wait patiently for a chance to devour him.

But in so doing, he only succeeds in diminishing himself.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago
Reply to  Larenzo1

A good example, though he will deny it vehemently, of baloney passing for “fair and balanced” commentary.

oifmack
oifmack
8 years ago

“To identify the cause of battle,
one must logically conclude,
that war defeats the cause”
– American Soldier

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

“War is hell.”

No decent person wants war. But when those who want to behead you and rape and enslave your women and children come calling, how will you protect your loved ones? “Pretty, please”? A strongly worded note? A speech?

The only reason Martin Luther King and Gandhi were able to influence law through peaceful means was because they were dealing with basically decent people.

Nothing less than total humiliation/annihilation will stop a brutal, genocidal theology of glory like Islam.

IslamIsFascism
IslamIsFascism
8 years ago

Millions of Germans and German Nazis had to die to defeat Nazism, because not all Germans were Nazis.

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago
Reply to  IslamIsFascism

I’m aware of how Hitler suppressed his genocidal anti-Semitism until he had wormed his way into a position of total power, and I know that Lutheran and Catholic Germans risked everything to save their Jewish neighbors, but how many Germans died fighting Nazism?

Or are you saying that in defeating Nazism, innocent Germans had to die too?

Every Nazi, whether or not they actually slaughtered someone, bore responsibility for the tens of millions dead.

Every devout Muslim — every Muslim who knows about the genocidal pedophile Muhammad’s unutterable depravity and doesn’t renounce Islam — bears the same responsibility for the atrocities committed in Islam’s name.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago
Reply to  IslamIsFascism

Actually, it was 6 percent who were registered with the party.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago

There were men of equal or greater stature in Stalin’s Russia, which is why no one has ever heard of them.

oifmack
oifmack
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

Great Reference!!!

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago

Pace Churchill, I share your impression that O’Reilly is anti-Semitic.

If this becomes widely suspected, watch “Waters’ World” become “Goldberg’s World.”

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago

<>

What do you mean please? Thanks.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago
Reply to  lovezion

Only that O’Reilly will inoculate himself from suspicion of anti-Semitism by using Jews more visibly in the program.

I was referring to his frequent guest Bernard Goldberg.

He’s done this before with other guests whom he has made prominent.

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago

Oh yes, thanks for explaining. Many antis use this tactic, a more refined and more modern way of hiding one’s antisemitism. It used to be “lots of my friends are Jews”…..

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago
Reply to  lovezion

Yes.

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago

Oh my goodness, I didn’t know that even Dr. Krauthammer was a cowee too!!! You know, it feels like a Twilight Zone episode where everyone even loved ones are secretly against someone who doesn’t suspect. Why must there be always a fly on the pie? Why couldn’t someone who tells it like it is preserve his/her integrity in all circumstances? I don’t know, it’s too painful to see reality in depth…. sigh…. 🙁

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago

O’Reilly is a shallow thinker, Goldberg is disappointing, and Krauthammer – the best of the three, has been spectacularly wrong on numerous occasions, not the least of which was his recent endorsement of the Bergdahl fiasco.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago

Yes. Entirely unpersuasive, wasn’t it?

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago

Mel apologized profusely for his drunken tirade. He specifically renounced his comments as contrary to his religion.

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago

Gibson’s “apologized profusely” means nothing to him. He was pressured by many to do it. He’s the prototype antisemitic super jerk!!! My wish for him is to make friends with islamics and then…be murdered on the back by them!

IslamIsFascism
IslamIsFascism
8 years ago
Reply to  lovezion

I seem to remember that after Gibson’s public apology he called a Jewish Hollywood actress an oven-dodger.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago
Reply to  IslamIsFascism

Mel is a class act, isn’t he?

oifmack
oifmack
8 years ago

Obvious!!

Notice the consistency.

oreilly is anally active for hollywood.
his butt buddies are hollywood. hollywood is anti israel and pro American jew.
oreilly writes books that convert to movies.
oreilly”s books rewrite history without any clue to intellectual research and substance.
oreilly appeases islam.
oreilly appeases obama.
oreilly is like aids, useless.

And there remains a gullible, and clueless batch of ignorants who see oreilly as a character of value. Stupid!!!!!!

Warren Raymond
Warren Raymond
8 years ago
Reply to  Larenzo1

O’Reilly took 6 years to call the Obamster a “socialist”. It will take him another 6 years to call him a Muslim. We just don’t have the time for that, bro.

AIG
AIG
8 years ago
Reply to  Warren Raymond

Agreed. O’Reilly is more than a tad slow.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago
Reply to  Warren Raymond

I agree. In six years O’Reilly’s ass will be on fire, and he will not be alone, thanks to Obama’s sympathy for Iranian nuclear aims – and the Clintons having greased the skids for the transfer of uranium to Russia.

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago

And Russia is siding with Iran against Saudi Arabia over oil prices.

Putin ought to know better; his nation feels continually the searing, gut-wrenching agony of jihad. Does he really think that Iran won’t use their weapons against Russia when they have the chance?

IslamIsFascism
IslamIsFascism
8 years ago

I’ve wondered why Putin and the Russian Federation are siding w/Iranian Izlami-nazis. Some of my friends have suggested it’s nothing more than a business deal, he’s selling weapons to the Iranian Izlami-nazis, not allying w/them.

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago
Reply to  IslamIsFascism

Whatever the reason, Putin’s either seriously underestimating Iran’s malevolence or foolishly overestimating his ability to counter it.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago

Yes, it’s puzzling, isn’t it?

Perhaps he is fixed on very attractive short-term advantages.

You’d think he’d know better.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago

Russia is not the target.

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago

Whose target, Iran’s?

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago

Yes.

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago

They will be.

CWS
CWS
8 years ago
Reply to  Larenzo1

Self-contradictory idiocy is O’Reilly’s personal specialty. Well, that and phone sex.

Susan
Susan
8 years ago
Reply to  Larenzo1

Bill O’Reilly needs to understand that as a muslim, (p)resident obama is allowed to lie so you can’t believe a word he says.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago
Reply to  Susan

The fact are clear; Obama is an inveterate liar, second only to Hillary Clinton – and the equal, at least, of Harry Reid.

The Muslim question is, I think, incidental.

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago

Whether or not the president is Muslim — none of us can see into his heart — his words and deeds all indicate that at the very least, Barack Hussein Obama has a pathological attraction to Islam.

He’s supported the overthrow of several more-or-less-secular Islamic strong men in favor of their more devout (and vile) brethren, and he refused to do anything to help the Christians and decent/secular Muslims of Egypt and Iran who actually stood up for freedom in the face of their nations’ ruling tyrants.

When one “mistake” after another all err in favor of jihad and shari’a, then it’s no longer incompetence that you’re looking at, but intent.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago

I agree entirely that Obama’s intent is malign, but I think that is a function of his view of the world.

I don’t think that view makes him a Muslim, necessarily.

milt w
milt w
8 years ago

But it sure helps a lot.

oifmack
oifmack
8 years ago
Reply to  Larenzo1

Obama is about as friendly to veterans as he is to Israel. Or the American flag for that matter. That filthy thing of a wife of his, used veterans as her “first lady thing” to do. The bitch was hashtagging “bring our girls home” (those hundreds of little nigerian/african girls kidnapped by boko harram islamic terror group) but NEVER hashtagged “save our veterans from abuse and neglect and the intentional killing of”……..

If you people are so gullible to believe that obama is friendly to anything other than his filthy racist black playmates and islam, stupidity is obviously your greatest attribute and so you deserve the same demise as islam and obama……..

Suck it up!! FACTS ARE BASED UPON TRUTHS
….

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

Don’t throw Michelle’s dirty bathwater on the innocent victims of Islam.

oifmack
oifmack
8 years ago

Identify the “innocent victims of islam”…

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

The girls kidnapped, raped, and sold into slavery by Boko Haram, of course.

I’ve given you the benefit of the doubt.

Don’t abuse it.

oifmack
oifmack
8 years ago

None of which are any value to America.

Your bleeding heart is only sympathetic, based on fraudulent moral guides.

I asked you to identify the “innocent victims”. You only identified collateral damage, and, had anybody with a lick of sense been on the job, they would have realized they were in a bad place.
But, we are talking about africa, were intellectual value Just Does Not exist anywhere on that continent.

“Don’t abuse it”?

Really??

Now go away!!!

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

I asked you to identify the “innocent victims”. You only identified collateral damage, and, had anybody with a lick of sense been on the job, they would have realized they were in a bad place. But, we are talking about africa, were intellectual value Just Does Not exist anywhere on that continent.

So, the benefit of the doubt didn’t suit you.

Clearly, you’re deranged, racist.

oifmack
oifmack
8 years ago

Racist? Yes, but not a hyphenated racist.

Benefit of the doubt? Who do you think you are, Kant?

You are a fraudulent…

Get lost…..

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

Thanks for proving my point.

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago
Reply to  Larenzo1

<>

That’s what’s wrong with all liberals, going overboard trying to be fair with the culprits that simply encourages them to become more empowered and fearless and aggressive. I liked OReily when he used to,correctly, blame and harshly criticize the savages…..but now with his petulant and ignoramus critic of Pamela…..he’s lost my grace forever!!! DITTO FOR JUDGE NAPOLITANO. I always thought of him SO MUCH MORE intelligent darn it!!!!!!!!!!!

oifmack
oifmack
8 years ago
Reply to  426 HemiCuda

Finally, a voice of reason and patriotic logic.

I have said in posts and articles elsewhere, that bill o’reilly, and fox news in general, are no different than the other networks or media outlets. In fact, there are only two individuals that I adhere to. I am a very strong supporter, and follower, of Judge Jeannine Pirro, and in most cases, Sean Hannity.

The only thing, oreilly and his idiotic playmates are promoting, is themselves and books. When the idiotic piece of human inconvenience, oreilly boasts a “rewrite of history”, based on hollywood standard, it is really, just too easy to see his covert, yet overt deviancy to the patriotic American.

Killing Patton. Killing Jesus. Killing Kennedy. Books? Plays?

…..or blasphemy. Examples of pathetic literature and a profound ignorance of common decency and intellectual standard. He is like that filthy sub standard black residue, harris perry, from msnbc, i think,who i actually caught the other day promoting racism. My understanding is that she too, got a token Ivy League seat with a diploma attached to it. I WOULD SLAM HER ON PATRIOTIC AND FAMILY VALUE AND CONSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE…

If you are curious, Black Live Do Not Matter. ONLY AMERICAN LIVES MATTER. Want to hyphenate? Temain stupid….

Moving along……

O’reilly is as trustworthy as your neighborhood muslim or those pathetic college anarchist. The folks at fox are all about power ratings and oreilly, like obama’s pathetic to marriage wife, uses military and veterans as a “talking point”, and tosses money at them to say “hey, look at what I bought for you”.

I have told Pamela Geller on a few posts, obviously she ignores her true followers or partners against islam, and these posts are mere entertainment, she should stay clear of fox news, or at best, align with Hannity as he is actually Thee ONLY character who openly shows hatred towards islam and does not kiss as much islamic ass as the rest.

Pamela Geller. Your best approach will come when you chat with Jeannine Pirro.

The United States of America and Israel

Oreilly. Obama. Limbaugh. Beck. Islam. Muslims. fox. msnbc…
AND THE DIFFERENCE IS…

oifmack
oifmack
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

I did not say she has invited her..
Listen to HOW, Pirro uses the “peaceful religion”….

You actually confirm that islam has an iota of “peaceful” agenda.
See how I recognize islam, then see how you recognize Islam..

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

she should stay clear of fox news, or at best, align with Hannity as he
is actually Thee ONLY character who openly shows hatred towards islam
[…].

No, Pamela wants to spread the truth as far and wide as possible. That means speaking at every venue which will allow her unedited access to their audiences.

Now is not the time to hide in your own little echo chamber, now is not the time to preach to the choir. Everyone needs to know.

And Sean’s getting better, but he’s banned me in the past.

oifmack
oifmack
8 years ago

The choir remains deaf, dumb, and stupid. Period!! All keyboard, no action…..

There is no such “venue”.

As for my hiding in an echo chamber, I hide in nothing. However, echo chamber does mean I am consistent.

I am ruthless, unrelenting, and intellectually proficient. I do not succumb to ignorance or bleeding heart thought and theory.

Fox network is a joke. Like I said, if I had a choice to make I would semi align with hannity. Pirro is a solid mass of political incorrectness and Consitutional integrity.

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

The “your” was rhetorical. “Preach to the choir” is an idiom that means to speak only to those who agree with you, which is what you’re advocating.

Pamela’s proven that she will go into the devils’ den (e.g., Brooklyn College) to tell the truth about Islam.

oifmack
oifmack
8 years ago

I have been inside the devils den.
Literally!!

I know what “preach to the choir” means. I stand by my response, word for word.

I am speaking to both. And yes, even to those who stand on the side of anti islam, while I fully support PG and Atlas. To call Brooklyn College the devils den, is giving islam and its muslim ignorants, credit.

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

Literally? Don’t be absurd.

oifmack
oifmack
8 years ago

Yes!! Literally……….

Absurd?? No, but next time FOLLOW ME!!!!

Now that is a hint. or….maybe..
you should leave well enough alone…….

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

You gonna call your buddy Molech?

oifmack
oifmack
8 years ago

Are you on crack???

Or in it???

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

That’s quite a turn of phrase, Shakespeare.

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

Not only Brooklyn College is a devils den, but because the whole world is infiltrated with the savage devils, all colleges and universities are polluted with them! How in the world you think denouncing this is “giving islam and its muslim ignorants, credit.” ???

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

You’re SO right, it’s evident he’s there for the money and “prestige”!

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago
Reply to  oifmack

Pirro, like everyone else, has a producer, who answers to the suits in the front office.

MAS
MAS
8 years ago

Bill O’Reilly is a true dim bulb squish who (unlike Rush, who is joking) really does like to hear his own voice. Likes it so much that he will say or do just about anything to get that voice out…even if he has nothing to actually say. Most often he should just be thought an idiot rather than to open his mouth and remove all doubt. If it weren’t for Watters’ World and Dennis Miller I would not even watch his clips on the U Tube.

Anneke9
Anneke9
8 years ago
Reply to  MAS

O’Reilly fancies himself to be a “rational moderate” and that’s the role he acts on his show. No surprise there. On the other hand, several of my die-hard Tea Party friends are livid at Napolitano’s response. They used to worship every word out of his mouth. Not so much after this…

MAS
MAS
8 years ago
Reply to  Anneke9

I don’t care what Bill fancies himself as…this sums it up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vt9q-WChfeM

reddickranch@msn.com
8 years ago

O’Reilly is a
pile of crap!

lostlegends
lostlegends
8 years ago

https://youtu.be/rl2X8mwMebg

Americans will not yield.

alilwacked
alilwacked
8 years ago

I guess we have to wait for a deli full of Jewish people and others for the courts to decide whether this speech is hateful and incitefull…

alilwacked
alilwacked
8 years ago

The only way to make a point is to put a very similar poster on buses that ate demeaning to muslims.. in the same sense that their poster is..

cmh
cmh
8 years ago

We can assuredly count on the muslims to begin atrocities that they will claim to commit as a result of being incited by these ads. Bet on it.

Larenzo1
Larenzo1
8 years ago
Reply to  cmh

These ads have been on buses in other cities for years.

EJO
EJO
8 years ago

1. Now you all know why Rush Limbaugh refers to Bill O’Reilly as Ted Baxter.

2. The Islamic lunatics don’t need Miss Geller, and/or her signs to get all riled up. They rile up each other. Their Imams rile them up. They get riled up when they see a Jew breathing. Or any non-muslim breathing for that matter. They are virtually always in a state of annoyance. They are almost always right on the verge of becoming totally pissed off over some stupid shit, like a cartoon.

3. Don’t tell the truth about Islam. The Muslims might get mad.

Don’t put up anti-Jew hatred signs. The Muslims might get mad.

Don’t display anti-terrorist signs. Anti-cold blooded murder of women/homosexuals/Jew/Christians, et al. signs. The Muslim might get mad.

Don’t do this. Don’t do that. Don’t do this other thing, or that other thing. And especially don’t do whatchamacallit. Because then the muzzies will REALLY get mad.

sodacrackers2
sodacrackers2
8 years ago
Reply to  EJO

It is dhimmitude, pure and simple. Now pay the tax or….!

Santiago Matamoros
Santiago Matamoros
8 years ago
Reply to  EJO

Pamela’s quoting their words, and Bill’s attacking her.

That’s something only the craven and the clueless do.

Jim Fox
Jim Fox
8 years ago
Reply to  EJO

[img]https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR2ehdgy1ujrkrAr6V-boVz22poqQsEzuZ-0GkK6u2FuP0ycGBP[/img]

DowntotheBone
DowntotheBone
8 years ago

O’Reilly is a clown who thinks that he’s very much smarter than he actually is.
He’s also not a conservative; he’s just mush.
His comments were not unexpected at all.
One reason why we stopped watching/listening to/paying attention to him several or more years ago, and haven’t missed his show at all.

I was surprised and very disappointed at Napolitano’s comments, however.
Is no one consistent and resolute?
Are there so few that can be trusted?
By those comments, Napolitano sounds like merely another cowardly media empty suit.

Bobbie M
Bobbie M
8 years ago

I watched and listened to the video you posted…and I believe both men are saying your billboards are protected as free speech. I didn’t hear either man deny your right to post those billboards. What’s your beef with the analysis??

Everyone Else
Everyone Else
8 years ago
Reply to  Bobbie M

I agree more or less. The big point is they decided to plug the AFDI ad. The secondary point was the babble about the legal intricacies that few people have the time and interest to follow.

Fox News is trying to present itself as fair and balanced, neither democrat nor republican, so when it comes to someone controversial, they feel obliged to make some noise that the opposing point of view can seek comfort in. This kind of crypto-critique goes with the territory of Fox’s cable news dominance.

Patti York
Patti York
8 years ago

Idiots

DowntotheBone
DowntotheBone
8 years ago
Reply to  Patti York

Ditto.

WhyDoYouCare
WhyDoYouCare
8 years ago

No quranic verses on these ads. That’s the greatest failure in them.

WhyDoYouCare
WhyDoYouCare
8 years ago

There are no quranic quotes on these ads. That is their greatest failure

Thinking From First Principles
Thinking From First Principles
8 years ago

Perhaps the real take away is to rethink the messaging.
There is universal agreement that racism and wrong and must be opposed. Call out Islam on its inherent ‘racism:’
“Racism is considered piety within Islam. If Muslim is a ‘race’ then so is non-Muslim. Muslims are commanded in Quran 48:29 to treat other Muslims with mercy and to be harsh to non-Muslims. A Muslim cannot live in obedience to the Quran without being racist against non-Muslims. It’s that simple.”
Quote chapter and verse for things that violate universal western values like pedophilia, slavery, bigotry, tolerance.

Walt Parkman
Walt Parkman
8 years ago

The ultimate first principal behind islam is the worship of death and the promise of paradise to violent, primitive jihadists. In ancient times, death surrounded you every day. Lacking science or engineering of any kind, people found escape by seeking consolation in cults, the more militant the better. Some cults were tamed over time, but islam was not. Until science and engineering, the foundations of civilization, can solve the problem of death, cults will still be around. Someday the big life extension breakthroughs will happen. Don’t count on any muslim institutions to do that. The first ad that went up, “in the war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man” that ad should be on billboards everywhere.

Jan
Jan
8 years ago

Pamela,
I’m an Orthodox Jew living in Israel, which I love with all my heart. And, I understand that you also love Israel and have devoted your professional life to her. But, your ads are horrible and inciteful! When I read them, I thought they were put there by Hamas, Hezbollah, etc. How shocked I was to learn that they were the initiative of someone so pro-Israel as you. They will be completely misinterpreted, as I misinterpreted them. No one will understand that they are there to point out the horrors of Islam. They will most certainly be seen as a recruitment campaign for al quaida, ISIS, whatever! Please stop them! You’re the only one who can!

Walt Parkman
Walt Parkman
8 years ago
Reply to  Jan

The purpose of the ads is to stimulate discussion and debate. This is the desired effect. Articles about the ads are more valuable than the ads themselves, if only because they expose the fools among us, like this O’Reilly. Pedestrians seeing the bus might just get a glimpse of some muslim with a handkerchief on his head, and get irritated enough to want to find out more about it. The discussion on the web and cable broadcasts can be reviewed in comfort over dinner and the viewers living a cozy life in the US can casually start to think that, yes, maybe I should do something about the islam death cult, and its supporters. In Israel, on the front line of the war, the death cult is in your face all day, so I can see how you would get alarmed by what looks like hamas recruitment. In the US, islam has to be revealed as something more than just another lifestyle fashion choice.

Demsci
Demsci
8 years ago
Reply to  Jan

OK, so you were shocked and sickened for a time. And other pro-Israel-people with you. And in the worst case a number of Muslims will get from it that their religion orders them to kill Jews.

But that shocked, sickening or conversely inciting reaction would make a person think, perhaps seek conversation about this then influential ad. And somethinking so thoughtprovoking is good! And thoughtprovoked persons soon enough can find out the true meaning of the ads. And these ads should in this way make people less naive, ignorant.

And anyway, it is not Pamela’s invention; Hamas said that! And Hamas get’s it from Islamic scriptures. And the ads are for most already interested and knowledgeable people only a reminder.

And when that is so, then the pro-Israel-person rejoices about this well-aimed exposure of Muslim mentality and the Pro-Islam people, Muslims and their sympathizers, get a shock from this exposure too, because they deny Islamic hate and agression all the time, but they can’t deny that Hamas did say this!

The advantages of the ads far outweigh the disadvantages.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago
Reply to  Jan

Oh God!

IslamIsFascism
IslamIsFascism
8 years ago
Reply to  Jan

LOL, you’re bothered by an advertisement in NYC? I’d think musswein blowing up pizza parlors, blowing up jazz clubs, blowing up buses, running over people w/cars, firing missiles into Israel, slitting the throats of infants, kidnapping and killing unarmed teenagers would be a more pressing concern. Then there’s the charter of Hamas which is in complete ideological agreement w/what Ms. Geller’s advertisement quoted. Of course, you could be merely another lying musswein.

vlparker
vlparker
8 years ago

So, according to Judge Napolitano, all the jihadists have to do to stop your ads is to start engaging in violence and say that the ads caused them to do it. How stupid is that? About as stupid as it gets.

If they engage in violence as a response to the ads the violence is Pam’s fault? What planet are these morons living on?

The whole concept of hate speech is absurd. First of all, hate speech is in the eye (of ear) of the beholder, and secondly it simply punishes thought, which is what tyrants do.

As for O’Reilly’s claim that the buses drive by too fast and people can’t read the whole sign, that is so ridiculous it is laughable. The buses stop to pick up and let off people all the time. Funny he had nothing to say about the people who actually spoke those words.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
8 years ago
Reply to  vlparker

No one but Judge Napolitano’s mother, Mrs. Napolitano, ever claimed the judge was a genius.

EJO
EJO
8 years ago

I hope this doesn’t get lost here.

Don’t be surprised if some bizarre New York pol comes to this same conclusion.
———-
British Labour Party: We’ll Make Fear of Islam an Aggravated Crime

Posted by Jim Hoft on Saturday, April 25, 2015, 1:48 PM

And here we thought the US Democratic Party was the nuttiest political group in the world.

The British Labor Party announced this week they will outlaw fear of Islam.
———-
Muslim News reported, via Religion of Peace:

A future Labour Government is committed to outlaw the scourge of Islamophobia by changing the law and making it an aggravated crime, according to the Party’s Leader Ed Miliband.

“We are going to make it an aggravated crime. We are going to make sure it is marked on people’s records with the police to make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime,” Miliband told the Editor of The Muslim News, Ahmed J Versi in a wide ranging exclusive interview.

Read more: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com#ixzz3YMArOTJf
———-
Do you think Ted Baxter, AKA Bill “O” would like this idea?

This would outlaw Miss Geller’s signs on buses, etc.

Fromafar
Fromafar
8 years ago

Hey everyone….write an email to [email protected]

I did ….

Here’s mine! It’s the only way (if we get a big enough push through to O’Reilly’s screeners) that Pamela will get a fair hearing on his show!

Bill,
I think you need to ask Pamela Geller of AFDI to come on your show and explain to you why YOU ARE SO WRONG about her bus ads.
Both you and Judge Napolitano seemed to think that Ms. Geller just “made some hate message up”! Nothing could be further from the truth.

Ms. Geller is merely EXACTLY QUOTING what real HATERS have ACTUALLY said. She did not “make up” a line of hate speech to put on a billboard or a bus which is what you implied.

You have inadvertently helped promote the concept that “TRUTH is the NEW HATE SPEECH”.

When she won her court case, she had to PROVE to the judge that what she said was TRUE.

Ms. Geller can easily defend herself if you’ll give her the opportunity.
I think you should.

(My name was sent to O’Reilly – withheld here for the obvious reasons)
Los Angeles, CA

Fromafar
Fromafar
8 years ago
Reply to  Fromafar

I actually saw this live on TV and when O’Reilly and Napolitano started their “take” on these ads, I almost fell out of my chair! I wrote Pamela who said to WRITE O’REILLY. So I did and I hope all of you will too!

***Remember, you must put your name and town or his screeners will not read your email.***

Larenzo1
Larenzo1
8 years ago
Reply to  Fromafar

Very good email. I will try to send something also.

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago
Reply to  Fromafar

THANK YOU SO MUCH Fromafar!!! For your very effecitve message and for giving us his email addy!!! I’ll write him in a half hour. Thanks again!!! :o)

Fromafar
Fromafar
8 years ago
Reply to  lovezion

Lovezion….You’re most welcome!

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago
Reply to  Fromafar

Just wanted to ask you, do you think it’s ok to tell him something like: “And ditto for Judge Napolitano”? If not, do you happen to have his email addy too? Thanks.

Fromafar
Fromafar
8 years ago
Reply to  lovezion

I don’t have his email, but I bet it’s [email protected]
You can go to the FOX website and check.
I hadn’t thought to send it to him as it was the O’Reilly show that Pam needs to get on. She’s friends with Sean Hannity, so I hope she’s asked him to ask O’Reilly to have her on?
Who knows? O’Reilly is his own temperamental creature….

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago
Reply to  lovezion

I just wrote this to him and will email it right now:

Mr. O’Reilly I thought you were (though
mildly) FOR justice and AGAINST the savages! It’s a sign of cowardice to criticize in absentia. Pamela Geller, of AFDI, deserves the chance to
defend herself in your show. Don’t go down on history as that
who throws the stone and hides the hand. Please invite Ms. Geller to respond to your
imputations to her. If you think you are right, then the world will know
it at that time, don’t you think?

UnderzogD
Underzog
8 years ago

I wasn’t sure that the Jews against Obama group on Facebook got the ad so I had to explain it to them. I hope they got the message, including the pun on Hamas/CAIR’s that’s my jihad. What’s yours? ads. Personally, I think they’re very effective and Bill O’Reilly is Ted Baxter, as Rush Limbaugh cracked, while Judge Napolitano is practically the antisemite Ron Paul’s mouthpiece.

Jade
Jade
8 years ago

Bill thinks he is the only one with a mind and understanding

milt w
milt w
8 years ago
Reply to  Jade

You could have left off the last 5 words and still been correct.

Jon Sobieski
Jon Sobieski
8 years ago

The judge implied ‘hate speech’ is a federal law. The only federal law close to that is committing a violent act against an ‘identified’ group while berating that group. Then they can call it a ‘hate crime.’ And even that is problematic. Then you have universities that have all kinds of hate speech ‘conduct’ rules. They are not govt. hate speech laws. They can kick you out of school, but not imprison you. Not yet.

Second, why didn’t O’Reilly invite you on the show and allow you to defend yourself? You’re readily available, what’s the problem.

famouswolf
famouswolf
8 years ago

Yep, fighting words. o reilly and Napolitano both uttered them.

Dick Peabody
Dick Peabody
8 years ago

O’Reilly is a jerk-oaf who wants to protect his sycophantic relationship and access, with the moozlim-in-chief. And I don’t know about Napolitano sometimes. If these two pinheads bothered to read the damn ads they would see that they are QUOTING the “hate” speech of moozlims.

Larenzo1
Larenzo1
8 years ago
Reply to  Dick Peabody

He has no relationship with Obama. I assure you he is despised in Obama’s world. he will never be given an interview with Obama again. You have evidently not even been reading his talking points.

ApolloSpeaks
ApolloSpeaks
8 years ago

I’M DUMBFOUNDED!

Quoting evil Moslem hate speech against Jews intended to incite Moslems to kill them as acts of religious worship pleasing to God is itself evil hate speech dangerous and morally wrong-though protected by the constitution? O’Reilly and Napolitano are pin heads on this issue.

http://www.apollospeaks.com

michelle robin
michelle robin
8 years ago

Ok IMO , when I FIRST read the signs I thought they were pro muslim. It was on second read that it got through to me that it was quoting the garbage these soul deprived animals spew. My take on what BO’R was trying to say is some people might not catch what the point is, and only read the quote.

Don’t be so hard on him, Pamela. Its just that some of us are not so swift at times!

Je suis Charlie Martel

chris wolf
chris wolf
8 years ago

This fight against islam that we’re heading straight into at an accelerating pace looks just too hard for a lot of people apparently including Bill O’Reilly to face up too.
Thanks to you Pam — along with Robert Spencer, Frank Gaffney, Sean Hannity, Peter Boyles, Bridgette Gabriel and the other great Americans — for calling us to arms against its existential threat.

CWS
CWS
8 years ago

I don’t think it’s fair or accurate to equate Bill O’Reilly with “the right”. He’s not a conservative, and he’s not even a Republican. He is, however, a complete imbecile.

Larenzo1
Larenzo1
8 years ago
Reply to  CWS

Damn never thought I would see this day that I would defend Bill. He is unfair to Pam who is an absolute hero to me and my family. We all went to her speaking engagement in Gatlinburg. But Bill is far from an imbecile. He has not been fair to Pam and I am going to try and find out why.

Butseriously
Butseriously
8 years ago

Mr. sell-out Bill forgot to mention the ad is not hypothetical but very reality based. No focus on those who do actually promote such genocide.

paendragon
paendragon
8 years ago

Islam can be easily studied and known in its entirety, by anyone. It will never change!

So, when Western people won’t educate them *selves* about islam because our culture defers all thinking to those “authorities” we PAY to do our thinking and research for us, while they secretly know full-well that the salesmen in charge will always sell us all out, they ARE CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT INFANTILE DELINQUENT TRAITORS TO RATIONALITY AND CIVILIZATION!

It should never be allowed by backwards people to be considered “illegal” to accuse these criminals (muslims) of their crimes, allegedly because the painful truth might offend them or hurt their feelings, and so “make” them commit even more crimes!

No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, and nobody is doing even these muslims any favours, by indulging their historic lies that islam is a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) or a “race” (much less one of poor oppressed “People Of Colour”)!

Pretending there is NOT a Muslim problem but only a white racist problem accepting diversity, is criminally negligent TREASON.

Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

“I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

– Muhammad –

Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

Islam is a threat to everyone because it says it is.

According to their own Eastern histories, islam has an official 1,400 year history of “holy” lies, extortions, robberies, tortures, arsons, kindappings, slaveries, rapes and 270 million murders (that’s OVER A QUARTER-BILLION INNOCENTS SACRIFICED TO ALLAH, so far – it’s a larger death-tally than that of EVERYONE ELSE, both secular and religious, COMBINED, and with an historical average of less than 1% of the global population to have committed it with, too)!

Do the math: 270 million divided by 1,400 is almost 200,000 per year, or over 500 per day, or over 20 per hour or about one person every three minutes being murdered by Muslims ever since Islam was founded.

So, simply and precisely because of their “THOU SHALT KILL!” cultural indoctrination, MUSLIMS ARE STILL FROM BETWEEN FOUR AND SEVERAL HUNDRED TIMES MORE LIKELY TO ENGAGE IN MURDER (and all other crimes,) THAN EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD!

So, islam is not a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) nor is it a “race” (at all, much less one of “Poor, Oppressed, People Of Colour”)!

Obviously, islam is ONLY an ancient, ongoing extortion-racket CRIME-syndicate, and the only “religious” part in it, is where they say:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”

(Capisce?)!

😉

We should simply BAN ISLAM – because everything muslims pretend to consider “holy” is already a crime!

;-(

The Qur’an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims.

So, if and when you consider islam to be a religion, you must agree with it’s main tenet: that God is a violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?

Bottom line: If you decide to believe in “allah,” you have declared yourself a criminal, and so must be arrested, indicted, tried and convicted. Your confession of “faith” in your crime-god will help us to do so.

Larenzo1
Larenzo1
8 years ago
Reply to  paendragon

Superb comment and factual it should be outlawed as a cult in every corner of the earth.
Winston Churchill understood it and warned the rest of the world that the only thing that saves us from this monster is our technology and now Obama is making it possible for the worst country that ever existed Persia that has been a nation of conquest ever since it’s existed. the only time when it was not was when the Shaw tried to bring the fools into the 20th century and Jimmy Carter betrayed him. But Churchill’s admonition is amazingly accurate. I think the quote is from The River Wars.

paendragon
paendragon
8 years ago
Reply to  Larenzo1

Yes, the Shah was modernizing Iran until idiot proto-Obama Carter stopped him, “because he was torturing jihadis!” (the big meany).

Giving muslims democracy is insane, because it’s not “tyranny” which they oppose, but only the secular tyranny of mere mortal leaders – they long for the “safely predictable” tyranny of Allah’s Law, sharia, and so can be counted on to “elect” the Ayatollahs and Caliphs, every time!

IslamIsFascism
IslamIsFascism
8 years ago
Reply to  paendragon

When the Izlamic Revolution happened in Iran, the Shah wasn’t even present, he was getting cancer treatments abroad and he ultimately died of cancer.

paendragon
paendragon
8 years ago
Reply to  IslamIsFascism
lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago
Reply to  Larenzo1

Yes, people like Churchill just don’t exist anymore and judging by what’s going on in the world TODAY from all viewpoints….I don’t think the world will ever get another like him (or the few others we have now) in centuries to come! I just found the following while searching related matters (I also found lots more quotes from him that are so accurate and wonderful): Enjoy!

*Churchill on islam: http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/churchillislam.asp

* http://www.brutallyhonest.org/brutally_honest/2010/02/winston-churchill-on-islam.html

Our government would do well to remember the nature of the forces arrayed against us, and to remember Churchill’s advice about recognizing the enemy sooner, rather than later:

“Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you
will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”

But I think our current leader would be happy to live as a slave, because he does not see much in our culture that is worth saving by fighting. I know that Obama suffers from a vast historical ignorance, one he reveals on a regular basis, so I doubt he has more than a passing familiarity with Churchill’s life or thinking. Nevertheless, it was entirely fitting that our Quisling, Vichy-esque President, as one of his first acts in office, got rid of the Churchill
reminder occupying space in his office, and sent it on an ignominious trip aback to its land of origin [*Mr. BH
– In the President’s eyes, the equivalent of a wood shed, or a garden shed, or anywhere that won’t remind him of his
inadequacy in comparison.]

And now we know the rest of the story.

*If you quote Winston Churchill on this topic, you could go to jail in modern-day Great Britain

http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2014/04/27/if-you-quote-winston-churchill-on-this-topic-you-could-go-to-jail-in-modern-day-great-britain/

*UK politician arrested for quoting Churchill, could face 2 years in
prison

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/04/uk_politician_arrested_for_quoting_churchill_could_face_2_years_in_prison.html

*Quoting Churchill in Great Britain will get you Arrested

http://shoebat.com/2014/04/27/quoting-churchill-great-britain-will-get-arrested/

Demsci
Demsci
8 years ago
Reply to  paendragon

Read it, agree to high degree. Especially about inaction or support or exoneration of Islam is criminal neglection.

But we have a decision to make, Pendragon. Is Islam clear or not? If it is clear and hostile, OK, then …. you know …

But what if Islam is UNCLEAR? It is supposed to be divine, so has not changed for 1300 years or so. And so must be obsolete, incomplete, ambiguous, prone to bad understanding etc.

Now, religion is a choice, yes? Now, can we hold Muslims accountable for believing in and following and placing on top:

Very Obsolete texts, very prone to bad interpretation! and bad interpretations of Quran-Hadiths, which we by now know very well, ABOUND. ISIS attracts tens of thousands of Muslims with bad interpretations.

And I know, these interpretations are the more accurate ones, but the point is; we have to show that the texts themselves are faulty and easily used by ISIS for anti-democratic, anti-human-rights use. And to the majority in parliament!

If we can, we can with THIS argument perhaps convince enough leaders to force the Muslims into division; those that can live with democracy and those that can’t or won’t. Because following such texts is a CHOICE.

I know, I know, they will lie until blue in the face, but it could be a start to force them to say that “Democracy is Halal” and if they refuse on the basis of being totalitarian intolerant expel or refuse them!

Susan
Susan
8 years ago
Reply to  Demsci

The first thing you need to realize that islam grew by the sword “convert or die” “try to leave you die”. 1500 years ago the ME and a large part of Africa were occupied by Christians and Jews. Muslims slaughtered them in the millions 300,000,000 and counting. 80 million Hindus are included in that number as well as Buddhist and Persians. Muslims living in western countries know exactly what they are doing.

Demsci
Demsci
8 years ago
Reply to  Susan

I see your point, Susan, I believe it is true too. But it is not just the Muslims that we are up against. We are democratic, so we need a majority. And the majority in Western Democratic Nations will need reasonable, logical reasons to even consider “discriminating on grounds of being Islamic or not”.

THE possibility to for the first time persuade the majority to discriminate among “totalitarian and democratic Muslims” is by showing that the Quran-Hadiths-Sira are shamefully, faulty, obsolete, incomplete, ambiguous,

prone to be understood in a totalitarian, anti-democratic violent way, as ISIS and it’s attraction to so many Muslims is showing.

And if we contend that Quran-Hadiths-Sira are unclear and multi-interpretable, then finally a majority of western citizns will demand from the Muslims to choose one or the other possible interpretation and it will hold Muslims accountable for that choice.

Look, I know it sounds far-fetched, but Islam & democracy is a very complex vexed problem and if a peaceful solution were simple it would have been found by now!

And for God’s sake, don’t say I am naive, I am pointing you to what that damned majority of our own citizens maybe will accept from us. Now? they are in majority against us.

Susan
Susan
8 years ago
Reply to  Demsci

Most people will remain ignorant about islam because the (p)resident of the USA is muslim and will do everything in his power and above his power to make sure no one learns the truth. History is being rewritten in the schools the media has been gagged and are not allowed to reveal the truth about this evil. Not looking very hopeful.

IslamIsFascism
IslamIsFascism
8 years ago
Reply to  Susan

@disqus_dp2R6acEGi:disqus
This is the ugly truth. I imagine any instructor/teacher untenured professor who had the courage to teach the truth about Izlam would be minimally castigated for doing so and, at worse, fired for doing so.

milt w
milt w
8 years ago
Reply to  Susan

Like the professor that was fired for handing out the truth about Islum papers to his students in the USA.

As long as money trumps truth they have a chance of winning. Only a very few fight for truth publicly and that few refuse to kneel to fools.

Which in turn gives brain dead fools ,like oreilly a platform.

paendragon
paendragon
8 years ago
Reply to  Demsci

Giving muslims democracy is insane, because it’s not “tyranny” which they oppose, but only the secular tyranny of mere mortal leaders – they long for the “safely predictable” tyranny of Allah’s Law, sharia, and so can be counted on to “elect” these Ayatollahs and Caliphs, every time!

“Religion” in islam is NOT A CHOICE; in fact, anyone even thinking about trying to islam, MUST be murdered by the other, ‘real’ muslims! (Qur’an Sura 4:89)!

And THE TEXTS ARE ALL VERY CLEAR – there have been no personal “interpretation” attempts allowed for hundreds of years, because, as they say, “The Gates of Ijtihad Have Been Closed!”

Beyond that, there is nothing to “reform” in islam!

Let’s just ask the question:
What exactly is the message of Islam?

The “message” of islam (extortion) is nonsensical: “peace” through violence.

Islam’s main trope, that it can create “Peace” (even if only by killing off all its enemies) is entirely false, because it is only idolatry, deferring everyone’s self-reliant free-will responsibility onto it’s main idol, “allah!” Islam does not in any way teach people self-restraint, but only offers up endless alibi-excuses for irresponsibility and criminal desires.

Besides that, how successful at creating “peace” can any creed be, which advises the best way to achieve peace is by violent attack?!

😉

Other than that, it’s “god,” allah, is described as both unknown and unknowable (basically, capriciously random painful violence; Satan).

The main thrust of the Qur’an is a lie: that all those ghost-towns all over Arabia (as described in the opening lines of most Suras or chapters) were caused directly by this “allah,” because the people who used to live there disobeyed his previous prophets.

Obviously, the Arabian ghost-towns were abandoned due to natural disasters (Arabia is like Mordor or Hell, prone to volcanic eruptions and earthquakes) or changed economic circumstances, so Moe’s main assertion is a lie.

Secondly, to avoid that sort of thing happening locally, the Qur’an advises everyone to “Fear the Allah!” and “Obey the Muhammad!”

Only by obeying the Muhammad can the dreaded Allah be appeased.

And how does the Moe say the Allah can be best appeased? Why, by attacking the “infidels” which the Allah has created to annoy itself.

So islam is really only a “Take THEM, Lord – Not ME!” sort of cowardly treason to rationality and civilization.

But even so, the Qur’an warns, since the Allah can and will do anything it wants, even obeying the Muhammad isn’t a sure-fire way to avoid it’s sadistic wrath; after all, it CAUSES the “infidels” one is ordered to attack, too, so anyone can be forced by the Allah to become an infidel at any time, without knowing it.

And so, (according to the ahadiths) when Moe was asked, as he lay dying, what his reward would be, and whether he would go to Paradise, or Hell, he responded with:

“I have absolutely no idea.”

ISLAM IS NOT A RELIGION – IT’S ONLY A CRIME WHICH BLAMES A “GOD” FOR IT’S MEMBERS’ OWN CRIMINAL DESIRES.

Demsci
Demsci
8 years ago
Reply to  paendragon

//Oh, thanks, that was interesting, that insight into Islam. Like about the abandoned cities, and Islam being a religion epitomizing Take Them, Lord, Not ME.”//

There can be Muslims who say “islam’s texts are clear” (I think all Muslims do) and there can be “Islam-savvy outsiders” who say the same.

And there can be “Islam-savvy outsiders” who point out how obsolete, incomplete, unclear, contradictory, ambiguous, abusable “Quran-Hadiths-Sira” are. Even David Wood described how contradictory the Quran is the other day.

What comes out of these stands: If the Quran-Hadiths-Sira are clear, then it is either completely innocent, as many moderate Muslims will tell us, or irredemably malevolent, as you will tell us.

and the neutral majority will stay neutral, defend freedom of religion for Muslims and NOT GIVE IN to demands to hold them accountable and discriminate against Muslims in any way.

But when that which Robert Spencer is saying almost every single day for years; that Islam seems to be yet again to be “misunderstood” is true, that right there shows you an opening;

That the Quran-Hadiths-Sira to the Muslims themselves are NOT CLEAR, that divers interpretations massively exist from same passages. This is what the Muslims now themselves at last admit, now that ISIS is so active.

It is the responsibility of a person when he/ she follows as most important UNCLEAR TEXTS that can be violently and agressively interpreted!!!

paendragon
paendragon
8 years ago
Reply to  Demsci

Re: “What comes out of these stands: If the Quran-Hadiths-Sira are clear, then it is either completely innocent, as many moderate Muslims will tell us, or irredemably malevolent, as you will tell us.”

Let me reply in detail concerning these 2 points of yours:

1.) LYING IS CONSIDERED A HOLY OBLIGATION IN ISLAM:

There are no “moderate” muslims, simply because there is no “moderate” islam.

When your putatively “moderate” muslims tell you that the hadiths soften or better explain away all the apparently nasty bits in the Qur’an, THEY ARE LYING TO YOU, as that very same Qur’an, and those very same ahadiths, order them to:

There are so many calls to deceit, and ways to deceive, as prescribed by their texts. Here’s a small sample thanks to Kurt Vangsness

Taqiyya (Shia) or Muda’rat (Sunni): tactical deceit for the purposes of spreading Islam.
Kitman: deceit by omission.
Tawriya: deceit by ambiguity.
Taysir: deceit through facilitation (not having to observe all the tenets of Sharia).
Darura: deceit through necessity (to engage in something “Haram” or forbidden).
Muruna: the temporary suspension of Sharia in order that Muslim immigrants appear “moderate.” So through the principle of Hijra (Muslim Immigration), the early Muslims are a “red herring” or a Trojan Horse. The Kafir or Kuffar community gets the false sense that the early immigrants are not a threat, at least until the Muslim community has gained strength.

Taqiyya Deception (taqqiya): Dissimulation (Concealment of the truth about a situation) is sanctified hypocrisy. It is considered a part of Islamic strategy to lie and deceive unbelievers by any means. Thus, exercising turkey is very pious behavior. Veiling the truth: Adjustment, deception up to the open lie. -Taqqiya is attached, if it is helpful to the well-being of the religion -Islam (Khomeini).
(To lie and cheat for the good of Islam against an Infidel is considered as a sacred duty)

Kitman also spelled as Kithman is close to Taqqiya (see above) but rather than outright dissimulation, it consists in telling only a part of the truth, with “mental reservation” justifying the omission of the rest. One example may suffice. When a Moslem maintains that “jihad” really means “a spiritual struggle” and fails to add that this definition is a recent one in Islam (Little more than a century old), he misleads by holding back, and is practicing “Kitman.” Another example would be the insistence of a Moslem apologist that, “of course”, there is freedom of conscience in Islam and then quoting that Qur’anic verse: ”There shall be no compulsion in religion.” But the impression given will be false, for there has been no mention of the Moslem doctrine of abrogation, (To abolish, do away with, or annul, especially by authority) or naskh.

There are 109 verses straight from the Quran dictating hate, murder, and terror against all people who will not submit or convert to Islam.

By Moslem Standards: “Success” is measured by what they have done to affect your “status” with them. (A.) Whether they have converted you, by any and all means, (B.) Subjected you to a Dhimmi-Slave status and you have paid the 30% Jizyah Tax, of which you will receive absolutely no benefit as a Non-Moslem (C.) Cut off your hand and foot on opposite sides, (the same as if you were caught as a thief) (D.) or enslaved as an actual slave or (E.) Killed you!

Nope! Absolutely “no compulsion in religion”! (Re: your assertion that “Religion is a choice, yes?”)!

All muslims are liars. Their creed informs them their god wants them to lie all the time, to everyone* – to their own families and friends (“to keep the peace”) and of course to their infidel enemies (“to keep the peace until you are in a position of strength and able to successfully attack them again”). Obviously, since islam is only an extortion racket CRIME syndicate, they have to lie to them selves, too, in order to pretend it’s a “religion” in any way; i.e:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”

(Capisce?)!

*(Narrated in al-Bukhari, 2546; Muslim, 2605)

It was narrated that Asma’ Bint Yazeed said: “The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon
him) said: ‘It is not permissible to tell lies except in three (cases): when a man speaks to his wife in a way to please her; lying in war; and lying in order to reconcile between people.’”

Muslims are told by allah to LIE TO EVERYONE, ALL THE TIME: (and all “to keep the peace!”) to their own families and friends, and of course to their “infidel enemies.”

Similarly, one of Mohammed’s own daughters, Umm Kalthoum, testified that she had never heard the Apostle of Allah condone lying, except in these three situations:

1.) For reconciliation among people.
2.) In war.
3.) Amongst spouses, to keep peace in the family.

In other words, “allah wants you to lie to everyone, all the time!”

And, while they amputate the appropriate limbs for theft, not only do they not cut out their own tongues for lying, but they actively encourage it…yet lying is only the most basic form of theft – it’s the theft of the Truth. And theft IS crime.

So “allah” is only an immoral thief, just like his creator, Muhammad was.

PS: The ends don’t justify the means – they only ever really DEFINE the end results: If you lie, murder and steal to get your way, in the end, you’re NOT “a great success” – you’re still really only a lying, murdering THIEF!

“If that is beyond your means, fast for three days. That is the expiation for the oaths ye have sworn. But keep to your oaths (to each other, not to infidels). Thus doth Allah make clear to you His signs, that ye may be grateful.” Surah 5:89 (In other words, if you feel guilty about lying, just go on a diet for three days and allah will forgive you).

“Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness (vain) in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts; and He is Oft-forgiving, Most Forbearing.” Surah 2:225

“Any one who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief, except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith – but such as open their breast to Unbelief, on them is Wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a dreadful Penalty.” Surah 16: 106.

The noted Islamic commentator, Al-Tabari explained Surah 16:106 as a verse that had been revealed to Mohammed after he learned that Ammar Ibn Yasser was forced to deny his faith in Mohammed when kidnapped by the Banu Moghera tribe. Mohammed consoled Ammar by telling him, “If they turned, you turn.” (Meaning: if they again capture you, you are allowed to deny me again.)

3:28 [http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.8052.html], 3:118, 4:89, 4:139, 4:144, 5:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13

3:28. Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

And why would muslims “fear a danger from unbelievers”?

Maybe because the muslims have been told they are so superior to all the non-muslims in the world, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy responsibility to their god to extort, enslave, and murder them all for their ‘crime’ of not being muslims? That might upset their victims, so of course they’re supposed to lie in order to be able to ‘defend’ their holy right to continue to commit their crimes against their victims!

Ibn Kathir quotes ahadith which are not included in Khan’s translation but are included in Aisha Bewley’s, in his explanation of 3:28.

… meaning, except those believers who in some areas or times fear for their safety from the disbelievers. In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance, Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said,

“We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.”

Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan said, “The Taqiyah (holy deception and lying to infidels to promote the islamic criime-gang) is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.” (i.e: forever and always).

Qur’an 9:3 “Allah and His Messenger dissolve bligations.”
Qur’an 66:2 “Allah has already sanctioned for you the dissolution of your vows.”

Islam elevates lies and deception to the level of a sacrament.

So, don’t ask a muslim about islam, because it’s inevitable that they will lie to you about it, as they lie to themselves about it.

Just read their stuff for your self, secure in the knowledge that it is immutable and will never change.

😉

——-

2.) The HADITHS:

There are a grand total of SIX major hadith collections in islam. They, not the Qur’an, detail how moslems are to pray to their god, perform ablutions, pilgrimages, etc. Without them, the standalone Qur’an is only a war-cult’s crime-manual.

The most “sahih” (official) two ahadith (Bukhari and Moslem) are almost as official as the Qur’an, (in that you get decapitated for disbelieving in them, too) because only they contain the supplementary rules for praying etc., without which the Qur’an is ONLY a list of commands to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-moslems in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being moslems!

The “backgrounder” parts of the islamic narrative (the details concerning what circumstances were occurring behind the scenes in Muhammad’s life, as he was motivated and influenced to write the various parts of the Qur’an as his own personal diary) are recorded in the various collections of “hadiths” (discussions) and can be linked by topic references (tafsirs).

The hadiths are the explanatory supplements developed through the isnad (hear-say) chains of transmission, to detail and expound on the Qur’an’s more obscure, contradictory, and confusing bits; i.e:

“Narrated Abu Hashim: “I was confused by the difference of the earlier, peaceful ‘to you your religion, and to me, mine’ and ‘there is no compulsion in religion’ bits in the Meccan Suras of the Qur’an, and the later “Kill them all, and rape their women and children for allah!” Medina bits, SO I asked the prophet Muhammad, who said:

“Allah is perfect, so he can change his mind whenever he wants to! So, it doesn’t matter what I said he said in the earlier bits, before – it’s what I’m saying NOW that counts! Just obey me because I speak for allah, OK?! When I say “Kill them all and rape their women and children,” I really mean it – capisce?!”

That’s the hadiths for you.

So, when Moe said: “It’s OK to lie, to “defend” yourselves, if and when the infidels seem about to catch on that you intend to extort, enslave, and murder them in their sleep!” in the Qur’an, (giving only specific circumstantial and situational examples) and the hadiths then confirmed it as a general principle, allegedly by asking Moe himself to confirm it all, what’s the difference?!

😉

Here are some perfect examples of the Qur’an’s islamic evil, & confirmation in the hadiths:

Islam itself arbitrarily murders and terrorizes all non-moslems: Qur’an, 8:60: Random victims: “Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know.”

4:77: Those who whined “Hold back your hands (from attacking)” were corrected: “War is compulsory for us – the good and bad both come from allah!”

Qur’an 9:29 ” Fight those people of the Book (Jews and Christians) who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day, do not refrain from what has been prohibited by Allah and His Messenger and do not embrace the religion of truth (Al-Islam), until they pay Jizya (protection tax) with their own hands and feel themselves subdued.”

RELATED:

Sahih Bukhari 4:53:386 “Our Prophet ordered us to Fight you till you worship Allah alone or pay us the Jizyah tribute tax in submission. Our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says: ‘Whoever amongst us is killed as a syahid shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever survives shall become your master.'”

IslamDownpressesHumanity
IslamDownpressesHumanity
8 years ago
Reply to  paendragon

Strangely enough, there are ahadith that indicate Muhammad was a white man.

paendragon
paendragon
8 years ago

They all agree (and modern geneticists classify Arabs, like their Jewish cousins, as ‘Caucasians’) Muhammad was a black-enslaving white man:

http://sheikyermami.com/2015/04/for-the-racists-muhammad-was-a-white-man

😉

rooare
rooare
8 years ago
Reply to  paendragon

Islam is a religion who’s god is Satan.

paendragon
paendragon
8 years ago
Reply to  rooare

Islam really only excuses all crimes by blaming “god.”

The ‘theological’ notion of Allah’s “oneness” is CRUCIAL to their main criminal, might-makes-right alibi, that “we aren’t responsible, and no one is ever really a criminal anyway, because we’re really all only victims:

“The Allah Made Me Do It!”
“In fact, I didn’t do it at all – only the allah did it! Whee!”

[8.17] So you did not slay them, but it was Allah Who slew them, and you did not smite when you smote (the enemy), but it was Allah Who smote, and that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; surely Allah is All-Hearing, Knowing.

Sura 4:77: “Those who whined “Hold back your hands (from attacking)” were corrected:
“War is compulsory for us – the good and bad both come from allah!”

As Muhammad himself put it, “I have been made victorious through terror” (Bukhari 4.52.220).

So, islam is not a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) nor is it a “race” (at all, much less one of “Poor, Oppressed, People Of Colour”)!

Obviously, islam is ONLY an ancient, ongoing extortion-racket CRIME-syndicate, and the only “religious” part in it, is where they say:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”

(Capisce?)!

😉

Warren
Warren
8 years ago

Pamela, I have seen that he often challenges those that he has criticized to come on his show to debate with him. I think that you should request to come on his show.

rsklaroff
rsklaroff
8 years ago

If memory serves, Pamela will be invited to return to Hannity to discuss the ads; Bill will then be forcibly educated.

Bill usually satisfies an agenda in each segment; for example, he stopped tantaros from noting how corker-menendez would lower the threshold for approval from 67 to 34 wnen his goal was to conclude bho is impotent (about 10 days ago).

Therefore, during the segment @ 10, ensure you explicitly and repeatedly ask for a follow-up segment @ 8; then get Hannity to agree to facilitate the date…ASAP.

Larenzo1
Larenzo1
8 years ago
Reply to  rsklaroff

I am not even sure Bill and Hannity even speak to each other.

rsklaroff
rsklaroff
8 years ago
Reply to  Larenzo1

Going public…and perhaps amplifying via Megan…might do the trick.

CWS
CWS
8 years ago
Reply to  Larenzo1

They don’t. O’Reilly hates Hannity, that’s fairly well known.

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
8 years ago

As the old saying goes, “I may not agree with what you say but will fight to the death your right to say it.” In Pamela’s case, I agree with her.

1PierreMontagne1D
1PierreMontagne1
8 years ago

Theres the rub
O’Reilly would not fight to the death for right to say it.
O’Reilly takes the side of the Islamist saying “look what you made him do.”

Larenzo1
Larenzo1
8 years ago

I do not understand why Bill did not have you on the program to explain and defend the signs. I think that was a very poor decision on his part and unfair to you. You are on Hannity often. I am sure he could have managed to have you on or do a remote like he does with others. Is he afraid of you?

CWS
CWS
8 years ago
Reply to  Larenzo1

The fact that he doesn’t have her on to refute his little pot-shots should be instructive.

stealth4
stealth4
8 years ago

The Muslims are still fighting the Crusades from centuries ago: Christians and Jews ought to retaliate in every way possible.

rsklaroff
rsklaroff
8 years ago
Reply to  stealth4

All too true

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago
Reply to  stealth4

DEFINITELY!!! And many Christian organizations are already siding with Israel, problem is not enough are joining and so split as we are can never achieve a thing against those savages tightly united that became totally empowered also by hypnotizing the rest of the zombie world!

sheikyermami
sheikyermami
8 years ago

They both sound like retards. O’Reilly thinks people are generally dumber than him, so they can’t possibly understand the message when a bus flashes by. But he has an obligation to inform himself, which he never does. He is too full of himself for that.

CWS
CWS
8 years ago
Reply to  sheikyermami

Yeah, that’s a pretty accurate summary.

OldNorthState
OldNorthState
8 years ago

Folks like O’Reilly only push the envelope “just so far”, as maintenance of their lifestyles trumps the risk of really getting tough by “saying the hard things” that need to be said. To h*ll with political correctness and “tolerance”… both – like so much of the left’s strategy – are manipulations combining twisted semantics with the seemingly natural human desire “to be liked”, in the most devious fashion and only to control.

Concerned
Concerned
8 years ago

I support the bus Ads. I am strongly in favor of free speech, especially in response to the threat of Islamism. But the ad that O’Reilly is complaining about, “Killing Jews is Worship” is ambiguous in intent. Perhaps that one should be reworded. I like all the others.

Pray Hard
Pray Hard
8 years ago

O’Reilly is a f’ing idiot. Pamela didn’t make it up. Read for comprehension morons.

Pray Hard
Pray Hard
8 years ago

“All Jews should die”? Seriously? Muslims scream that all the time. I hope you’re reading this, Bill O’Reilly, you f’ing moron.

IslamDownpressesHumanity
IslamDownpressesHumanity
8 years ago
Reply to  Pray Hard

There are no less than three “authentic” ahadith (one of which is quoted in the charter of Hamas) in which the founder and most holiest man in Izlam plainly calls for a worldwide genocide of Jews.

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago
Reply to  Pray Hard

In this day and time…I’d say FIGHT HARD not pray hard…

got243kids
got243kids
8 years ago

Bill O’Reilly’s purpose is to plant the seed for the acceptance of the systematic undermining of the Constitution. For him there is always a ‘justifiable’ reason to make an exception.

Seeing this live about made me croak and reinforces why I never trust him. Napolitano knows better.

RiverFred
RiverFred
8 years ago

Suggested bus ad – Quote from Marco Polo:
“The militant Muslim is the person who beheads the
infidel, while the moderate Muslim holds the feet of the victim.”

Beagle
Beagle
8 years ago

Napolitano was apparently practicing European law or US Law in the future. I saw that segment and was typically disgusted by both US media and the legal profession. Extend the heckler’s veto to the most thuggish members of humanity? No thanks.

Prinz Eugen
Prinz Eugen
8 years ago

The spin-meister Leprechaun is backing into some strange corners with some weird and violent bedfellows. No wonder he wore that UN blue suit for this “debate.” Bet it has “UN” on the back side!

If Geller created words and phrases for the moslem terrorists, perhaps the Leprechaun might find fault — but these are the words and demands of imams, the pedophile trash prophet and all under the “protection” of sultan Barak Hussein.

O’Reilly is having FNC morph into CNN Lite.

1PierreMontagne1D
1PierreMontagne1
8 years ago

O’Reilly and Napolitano unfortunately are typical of those
that fear Islam. They both know that in their lifetimes they have so far seen
Islam permeate all aspects of their lives.
In contract they could keep their own liberal Christianity on a shelf barely giving it a glance even on Sundays. Their view allows that Christians can be vilified,
excoriated and even legislated against…and the Christians will never flash
back to cut off their heads.

Islam on the other hand is increasing in Violence and increasing in all manner of attacks against the west. Like the RINO liberals they are it has become their nature to either avoid. placate or appease those who would carry out threats against them.
Their thinking comes from being raised in a Nation whose oceans used to separate
America from a reality experienced by 90 percent of the world. They can’t quite wrap their heads around the fact of how fragile our infrastructure really is and how vulnerable this nation is to any crippling attack by even a very small group of suicidal jihadists who represent the mass faithful to the Koran.

O’Reilly for all his platitudes has never carried a story on how to defuse a Radicalized suicidal jihadists who want to bring down America.
In the place of such a story O’Reilly purports himself a sage scolding anyone who would exercise free speech that O’Reilly say provokes Muslims to do what Muslims have already promised to do.

O’Reilly and Napolitano are Ivory tower talking heads. They may as well be warning people to “submit to the Mafia” and pay the “Protection” eracket. Napolitano
for all he purports to offer is afraid to sit in court in fear of revenge from organized
crime so he takes his message to the public on what to do so as not to provoke
Islam?

Now we know why self loathing leftist Rupert Murdoch wants’ Bill O’Reilly on so called Conservative FOX news.

O’Reilly is clearly a faux conservative preaching the liberal “fear of the evil eye”. He fears any who are murderously jealous of Western affluence. He just brings on equally fearful Napolitano as a pinch hitter.

O’Reilly’s and Napolitano’s goal is “Shoot the messenger least
the message interfere with our appeasement”

If this was 1939 O’Reilly and Napolitano woulds be saying “Don’t say things that provoke the NAZIS”

Geppetto
Geppetto
8 years ago

O’Reilly is a narcissistic blow hard more interested in hearing himself talk than
in what those who appear on his program have to say. Judge Napolitano is not so easily dismissed but it is very likely that the judge has little, in depth knowledge or understanding of the nature of the Islamic threat. It may well be that he views these ads as propaganda, falsehoods, photo shopped fabrications from the dark minds of Islamophobes, for how could these ads, which present the raw, incomprehensible, horrific truths of Islamofacism ever be regarded as fabricated hate speech otherwise. “Islam is a religion of peace!”

Exposing the blatant hate speech spoken by others is not itself hate speech, it is a
warning, a sounding of the alarm that continues to be completely ignored and dismissed as false. This will continue until the so called bastions of free speech and “fair and balanced” reporting, with the physical means necessary to influence wide swaths of public opinion, begin to recognize, accept and expose the currently accepted, emotionally appealing, westernized fiction that Islam is a peaceful, non-violent religion.

paendragon
paendragon
8 years ago

Islam: “It is our holy right and duty to our god to murder everyone who isn’t us, for the crime of not being us!”

Islam really only excuses all crimes by blaming “god” for its members’ own criminal desires and actions.

The ‘theological’ notion of Allah’s “oneness” is CRUCIAL to their main criminal, might-makes-right alibi, that “we aren’t responsible, and no one is ever really a criminal anyway, because we’re really all only victims:

“The Allah Made Me Do It!”
“In fact, I didn’t do it at all – only the allah did it! Whee!”

[8.17] So you did not slay them, but it was Allah Who slew them, and you did not smite when you smote (the enemy), but it was Allah Who smote, and that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; surely Allah is All-Hearing, Knowing.

Sura 4:77: “Those who whined “Hold back your hands (from attacking)” were corrected:
“War is compulsory for us – the good and bad both come from allah!”

As Muhammad himself put it, “I have been made victorious through terror” (Bukhari 4.52.220).

So, islam is not a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) nor is it a “race” (at all, much less one of “Poor, Oppressed, People Of Colour”)!

Obviously, islam is ONLY an ancient, ongoing extortion-racket CRIME-syndicate, and the only “religious” part in it, is where they say:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”

(Capisce?)!

😉

lovezion
lovezion
8 years ago

WHAT AN ARROGANT JERK!!! No wonder I never did like him without knowing EXACTLY why. Now, I know!!! I feel he is nothing but an antisemite at heart! Well hidden of course. Hey EJO, I didn’t know Rush Limbaugh referred to him as Ted Baxter – minus Baxter’s charisma for sure!!! It’s too bad he is in Foxnews, he should be in CNN or such other jerk broadcasts….. :o(

Kristi17
Kristi17
8 years ago

Bill O’Reilly is a Catholic and anti-Christian / anti-Israel-Yisrael!! I do NOT watch the Heretic Bill O’Reilly at all!!

Only JUDAISM and CHRISTIANITY is RIGHT as we have the same GOD who art in HEAVEN!! Please PRAY for our Judeo-Christian Nation United States of America and Israel-Yisrael Everyday Everyone!!

Am Yisrael Chai FOREVERMORE!! Shavua Tov Everyone!!

Love and Shalom Everyone,

Kristi Anne

Sgtsnuffy
Sgtsnuffy
8 years ago

O’Reilly is nothing but a RINO Dhimni anyway, I used to watch the mans show but stopped along time ago once I realized he was just an empty suit kowtowing just like the rest in the Media .

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!