[ April 24, 2024 ]
So many parents have written me about the islamization of their children’s schools and the proselytizing of Islam in the curriculum and textbooks. I applaud parents who had taken on this difficult task of taking on teachers, school boards and the Department of Education at the state level — all things that must be done.
Parents have often asked me for a replacement textbook to suggest to school boards, etc. in place of the dawah books like “History Alive” currently being taught in “World History” classes. The problem is there are no good ones. It is a terrible situation.
Ali Sina saw the problem, too, and has decided to write a very short history of the life of Muhammad for seventh graders:
Story continues below advertisement
Download
A Short Biography of Muhammad
Parents, start here. Print this out — bring it to your children’s teachers, principals and school board meetings.
Robert Spencer wrote extensively on this subject in his seminal book, The Truth About Muhammad. Bring that to school as well. Maybe Sina’s work will meet with greater success than the work of Robert Spencer, Bat Ye’or, Ibn Warraq, etc.
As for Muhammad — join us for an art retrospective of Muhammad throughout history (tickets here) and enter the Muhammad cartoon contest here.
“A Short Biography of Muhammad,” By Ali Sina, Faith Freedom, February 25, 2015
Recently, I met an American lady on Facebook who said she was shocked to read what her seventh grade daughter is being taught in school about Islam. When she sent me a scanned copy of the text I was appalled.
Muhammad is presented as a holy man, someone who stood for the weak and the needy, who was opposed to his people because they were a greedy folk. They chased him out of his home because they feared he will destroy their income. The book claims all Muhammad’s wars were in self-defense, and says Islam spread thanks to Arabs traders. According to this book, as Muslims went to other countries for trade, they taught their religion along the way and people flocked to Islam embracing it eagerly. There is no mention of any of Muhammad raids and the savagery of Muslims in attacking and massacring millions of people after him. Jihad is mentioned as struggle for self improvement. It is clear that this book is written by Muslims. And the reason is that few people know about the history of Islam. Some even doubt Muhammad’s historicity. If scholars can be this confused, what do we expect from ordinary folk?
The ignorance of the life of Muhammad is not because of lack of information, but rather because of overabundance of it. There are four original sources of the biography of Muhammad. The Sira of Ibn Ishaq, the History of Tabari, the Book of Raids of al Waqidi and the Books of Classifications (Tabaqat) of Ibn Sa’d. These books are voluminous. The Tabaqat alone is in eight volumes, each having 400 to 800 pages. Not everything in these books is important. Al Waqidi, for example, dedicates several pages reporting when Muslims went to the Battle of Badr, and had to share their camels, who rode with whom and if other hadiths said differently he reported them too. Information like this, are utterly unimportant. It is easy to get drowned in the irrelevant and miss the relevant.
It is a real chore to go through thousands of pages and read irrelevant stories to get to the important facts and separate wheat from chaff. But that is only a minor problem. A bigger problem is to separate fact from fiction. There is virtually no story that does not contain some fiction. It is as if Muslims could not help themselves but to embellish everything they said about their prophet.
I went through all these books as well as the Quran and countless hadith and wrote a comprehensive book on the life of Muhammad. The result will be published in my new book The Life of Muhammad and hopefully will be shown also in a biopic. The movie and the book cover everything that is important and one need to know about the prophet of Islam.
Meanwhile I decided to write a very short history of the life of Muhammad for seventh graders and with the help of this mother and her lawyer we will try to convince the school to drop those books of lies and teach the truth to children. Uninformed children are easy prey, as we can witness so many teens going to join IS to either become murderers or satisfy them sexually. Also uninformed children grow up to become uninformed adults and lose their country to the enemy.
The text is short. It is written in an easy language for children in mind. But for adults I also included a reference so you can check and verify that nothing in this book is made up by me.
We are in the process of forming a task force, to first write about the other topics such as the history of the caliphs and the early Islam and the elements and laws of Islam. Once the text is complete, it is our goal to convince the authorities to adopt it as official text and stop feeding children with lies.
If you have a teen or know one, send this text to them. Send it to teachers and anyone you think should know it. If you think you can help in pushing the school board in your town to adopt this text please contact me. Our children are being indoctrinated and we must put an end to that. Not only children even most adults have no clue about Islam. This book is simple and makes things clear.
Ali Sina
Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction. See it for yourself and if you don’t believe check the reference.
Dr. Ali Sina is a former Muslim from Iran who is atheist and currently residing in Canada. He is the author of Understanding Muhammad, and is the founder of Faith Freedom International
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
63 Comments
9 years ago
Mohammad was a pervert !
D
9 years ago
Reply to
426 HemiCuda
You forgot the “sprouting wood” that should at least be hinted at…I mean…he’s is standing next to a little girl…or who knows…maybe a “little boy” would elicite the same “woody growth”…
9 years ago
I am incredulous that in the USA children are being taught such screamingly obviously propagandist material about Islam. Similarly the media and our politicians globally are pretending Islam is ‘The Religion of Peace’ – this is completely fraudulent. I just can’t understand why Western powers should want to delude their people in this way – what are we gaining from pandering to Islam in this way? Nobody wants Muslims to be attacked – and I don’t believe anyone would attack Muslims. But in light of the constant attacks on humanity by Muslims based on Islamic tradition, it is criminally insane to continue the deception in the West as it allows Islam to continue to perpetuate its message without any sanctions.
The truth about Islam must be told in the mainstream media, in our educational establishments and by our leaders. Sign and share this to demand it – https://www.change.org/p/president-dean-spielmann-examine-whether-islam-is-antithetical-to-human-rights
9 years ago
I cannot read Muhammad’s biography, but thanks for the offer. The open hatred, perversion, pedophilia, goat humping, etc is against my religion.
9 years ago
Needs to be edited for spelling and grammar errors before submitting this to educators for this age group. The editorial commentary is questionable as well, given the intent to provide straight up facts…for instance, page 17:
“With each success, more people joined Islam. Primitive people equate might to right. Muhammad told them the reason he is winning is because angels help him. The smarter people did not believe that, but Islam owes its success to less educated people, who were prepared to fight, to kill and to loot all in the name of God.
The idea behind the italicized portion of this text could be brought in through socratic questioning as part of a lesson instead.
9 years ago
Reply to
wtd
If you send me the errors that you find in the text I will be grateful. Send them to faithfreedom2 at gmail dot.com
9 years ago
Reply to
Ali Sina
I hope wtd does indeed send you the typos, as they are several, and most certainly detract from the quality of the work.
9 years ago
Reply to
Jim Fox
I am aware of this. His efforts to distribute this is more likely to succeed in reaching his targeted audience with a polished product.
9 years ago
That is a great read. It helped me put together much of the disjointed Islam I have learned over the years. Somehow I never learned the early Quran was similar to poetry Muhammad learned from his cave friend.
My only wish is that the book told the story of Muhammad’s death with citations to the Islamic sources used in David Wood’s video. The aorta story which shows Muhammad was a false prophet, according to canonical Islamic theology no less, would be a great ending.
9 years ago
Reply to
Beagle
This short biography is written for children. I have spoken amply about every major detail of his life including his death in my book, The Life of Muhammad.. It is a voluminous book, over 200,000 words. This is enough for 7th graders.
D
9 years ago
Reply to
Beagle
On his death…one of his closest followers asked him once about what allah was going to do with him( “Big Mo”, that is) when he died…Muhammad only answered, “I don’t know”…here we have “THE prophet” for allah(the last one, to boot) and this “prophet” doesn’t know what his “god” is going to do to him after he dies…pretty sad. On his death, though…alot of things floated around…he was poisoned, he died of sickness or old age. What we DO know is that he IS dead.
My Savior lives, by-the-way…
9 years ago
Please give facts… childrens mind can be moulded easily.. just like they do in madrassas… let us not make normal public schools into copies of madrassas
9 years ago
Reply to
Ajay
It is loaded with the accepted mainstream facts to be fair. Unless one wants to delve into college seminar territory and question Muhammad’s existence or get into Luxenberg’s theories on the Quran, the booklet recounts the accepted facts.
Ah, I guess you may have been criticizing what they teach now. If so, never mind.
9 years ago
Reply to
Beagle
Luxenberg’s theories are mere conspiracy theories. I am surprised they were ever taken seriously and discussed, which in itself is evidence of total lack of understanding of Muhammad and Islam.
9 years ago
The truth about Muhammad and Islam must be taught in western schools and all the schools of the free world.
It is through education that Islam will disappear. Islamists know this hence they kill to prevent education about the truth of Islam and Muhammad from spreading.
9 years ago
Reply to
Richard
the truth of Islam must be taught by a non Muzzlem teacher not sympathetic to Islam but cognizant of the “CULT”. Yes Muzzlems themselves are forbidden to ask questions re: the Koran or the cult and of course are forbidden to read about religions but Islam (if these backward packs of garbage could read)
9 years ago
Reply to
jon wright
It must be a standard curriculum, researched and referenced like Ali Sina’s. His would be excellent but in any case definitely compiled by non-Muslims. Muslims are taught not to face the truth about Islam and Muhammad but believe the dogma and lies without question.
9 years ago
Islam’s Unquestionable False Basic Logic -posted yesterday
“Islam has two forms of power to convert unbelievers into Muslims. One is the power of fear induced by the application of deadly force, -as is seen in places where liberty is a far-off dream. One must convert, be enslaved, become a religious special-tax paying subservient subject of the Islamic state, or die.
The other powerful means of gaining new “converts” is via persuasion, logical persuasion. The logic that is employed is so persuasive because it is irrefutable. It asks a question which can only be answered in favor of the Islamic faith and its validity.
9 years ago
Reply to
Adrien Nash
Islamic logic is virtually non-existent, whether in the Koran or in later developments, See here for detailed analysis of this topic:
9 years ago
Reply to
Avi Sion
I didn’t use the words “Islamic logic”. What I illuminate is pre-Islamic logic. After it captures a mind, only then does Islamic logic take over and pervert the mind. If you are unaware of the initial argument that Muslim proselytizer use, then you cannot understand what draws in an unbeliever in the first place. My exposition is at americansod.wordpress.com
9 years ago
Reply to
Adrien Nash
Hi Adrien. It is clear that we are in agreement regarding Islam. Our differences are at most academic. You did use the term “Islam’s … Logic,” but your use of the term is different from my term “Islamic logic.” My study, above referenced, relates to the awareness and use of formal logic within the Koran (and Hadiths, though I do not go deeply into that) and in the area of “fiqh” (Islamic jurisprudence) – and that is virtually non-existent, or rare and low-level. Having read your interesting blog post, I gather that you are referring to the “reasoning” process that makes born Moslems (and eventually potential converts) buy into fundamentalist Islam. Certainly, the way you put it makes sense: but I am not sure that the mental process these people go through is so clear-cut as you make it. You are a person with a rational mind, whereas they are people still functioning mentally at a very unconscious level indeed. Their adherence to extremism is more of a mixed bag of emotions including fear, hate, lust and greed, rather than a rational process.
As regards your comments on Judaism, I would strongly disagree. You suggest that Judaism is not a thorough monotheism in comparison to Islam. References to “other gods” in the Bible are never intended to imply that these other deities indeed exist. The Jewish belief, even in Biblical times, and all the more so in later times and at the time when Islam came into being, is that these other gods are figments of the imaginations of their believers. When these gods are to be “defeated” or “destroyed” the intent is that these believers are to be shown that their gods are non-existent.
On the contrary, Islam’s god “Allah” was originally an Arabian moon-god, and for a while Mohamed adhered to him non-exclusively and he was not sure whether it would be most convenient to his cause to admit other Arabian gods by his side or to go all out for monotheism. This is not my own pet theory, but information available in expert sources. Being very busy, I let you look for it by yourself (but let me know if you really cannot find it). Judaism discovered monotheism long before Islam. Islam simply imitated this premise, preferring it to the Christian idea that God came to earth in human form (which is found as you know in Indian religions too).
Nevertheless, it is correct to call Islam a Judeo-Christian sect since it derives from both these religions, though it went its own crooked, nutty way as soon as it formed. What it lacked most from the outset was both humanity and logic. It is not only inhumane but also markedly illogical. The problem with its adherents is not that they are logical, but that they lack intelligence and kindness.
Do read my essay in full if you have not done so.
9 years ago
Reply to
Avi Sion
It could be noted that the logic I wrote about is the very same logic that is used by Jehovah’s Witnesses; restoring the truth where error has entered over the centuries and perverted the true word of God. Surely God would want his true word restored so he must have entrusted that restoration to some devoted person who then passed it on to others who then viewed him as a prophet. Mormons aren’t far removed from the same sort of unquestioning belief in the “wisdom” of God to fix what he imperfectly failed to get right and keep right all along.
9 years ago
Reply to
Adrien Nash
Yes, it is a reasonable thought that something went wrong in God’s plans and there’s need to fix things somehow. This is suggested already in the Bible, with for instance the story of the flood. Certainly, looking around us today, when everywhere evil is raising its head (Leftism and Islam – to name two big current evils), one cannot but think that something is going wrong in God’s plans! But it should be said that in Judaism the response is supposed to come mainly from mankind (tikkun, repair, of self and the world). God works behind the scenes, as Providence, but does not outwardly interfere. He is patient, not in a hurry. Nevertheless, your analysis of the logic in Islam and JW is sound. They do believe that the word of God has been lost or perverted and must be restored. There is no harm in such beliefs as long as they are not accompanied, as in Islam, by violence! That’s the ugly, evil part.
9 years ago
Oh, by the way, I am no longer an atheist. The weight of the evidence was overwhelming. I am now a believer in God and thanks to His grace a follower of Jesus. See why here.
D
9 years ago
Reply to
Dave from San Antonio
I’m not- Ali Sina now believes all kinds of unscientific nonsense.
Its a pity but still, he exposes Islam for the vile idiocy that it is….
9 years ago
Reply to
Jim Fox
Jim, Science must be based on evidence. When science denied evidence it turns into fanaticism instantly. INSTANTLY!
Materialism is not supported by evidence, In fact evidence disprove it. Observation rules. Observation defines logic and science.
How many time established science has been debunked by observation. Each time the observation was rejected, its advocates were ridiculed and denounced. Remember Galileo, Jordano Bruno, Darwin or even Michael Faraday?
The independence and survival of consciousness is observable, more so than the fake birth certificate of Obama. But we can’t force you to look into the evidence for either with you refuse to see.
9 years ago
Reply to
Guest
Science is not ‘debunked’, rather it is always open to correction. It NEVER claims to know the answers- that is what religion is for.
I disagree totally that “The independence and survival of consciousness is observable” if you are referring to the common phenomenon of NDE’s. A great many people claim these experiences but that’s all they are- claims, very much like alien abduction claims.
Eben Alexander made a fortune from his book “Proof of Heaven” but as explained here, it is no proof whatsoever–
http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/this-must-be-heaven
Extract–
“Again, there is nothing to be said against Alexander’s experience. It sounds perfectly sublime. And such ecstasies do tell us something about how good a human mind can feel. The problem is that the conclusions Alexander has drawn from his experience—he continually reminds us, as a scientist—are based on some very obvious errors in reasoning and gaps in his understanding.”
9 years ago
Reply to
Jim Fox
Jim, Science must be supported by observation. When science contradicts observation it is reduced into fanaticism instantly. INSTANTLY!
How many times established science has been debunked by observation? Remember Galileo, Jordano Bruno, Darwin or even Michael Faraday? The proponents of science dragged their feet to defend what they believed to be the scientific truth only to be discredited in time. Observation always wins. Observation is above science and logic. Both science and logic must be aligned to observation if they don’t want to be reduced to superstition and irrationality.
We have observable evidence that consciousness is independent from the brain. The documentation is so vast that denying it is nothing short of obstinacy. There is more evidence that consciousness is independent from the brain that that there is evidence that Obama’s birth certificate is a fake. And there is plenty of evidence for that.
We can’t force those who don’t want to see the truth to look at the evidence. There is nothing new in that. Humans cling fast to their cherished beliefs. Materialism is a belief based on ignoring the evince. But if you ignore and deny the evidence you can prove anything.
I rejected God for the lack of evidence and accepted His for not being able to deny the evidence. But I looked. I can’t force anyone to look.
9 years ago
Reply to
Ali Sina
Ali you work tirelessly to oppose and expose Islam.for which we are all indebted to you- I just feel it is sad to exchange one fanciful belief for another, albeit an infinitely less harmful one.
Following Jesus is far far better than following muhammad but the element of delusion is equal in both; there is no evidence for either apart from ancient tribal myths.
Science and religion CANNOT coexist; you confirm that science demands evidence and testing of that evidence, which religion does not and cannot.
Sadly you quote thermodynamics to support your creationist beliefs- surely you MUST know this argument is utterly without merit since those proposing it do not understand what it says- that closed systems exhibit entropy; Earth’s biosphere is an OPEN system, where energy flows across its boundary in both directions but primarily receives input from the Sun. Therefore the Second Law is not broken and entropy does not rule- do you understand this? Please respond with a scientific rebuttal [which is impossible]
Regardless, keep up your anti-Islam work; I only wish I had your power to influence the ignorant masses of muslims…
9 years ago
Reply to
Jim Fox
Dear Jim,
I never talked about thermodynamics. That is not my argument at all.
If you care to know, you may read my articles on this subject here. http://alisina.org/?cat=74
As you can see from these articles, I am a rationalist. The reason i reject materialism is because I don’t see it anymore as a rational argument.
Let me explain. Recently a cleric in Saudi Arabia argued that the Earth is stationary and it is the Sun that revolves around the Earth. He proved his point by explaining that if the Earth moved, a plane, leaving Riadh would never reach China because china would be moving away as the pane tries to reach it.
As you see, he has his logic and what he says is not irrational at all. in fact it is very scientific. So why he is wrong? The problem is that he ignores some the fact that the air rotates along with the Earth.
Likewise, the materialists’ are also rational and their arguments makes perfect sense. I used to believe in them because they sounded rational. However the materialists ignore certain facts. It is this deliberate omission of facts that makes their false belief sound rational.
These facts are observable. That is why i said observation is above science. However no one can make one see things they don’t want to see.
9 years ago
Reply to
Ali Sina
I don’t know if it is worthwhile discussing with you, Ali.
To claim anyone who says The Sun revolves around the Earth is rational is itself the height of irrationality- we know full well this is a false statement! What about the other planets- do they also revolve around Earth?? NO! Of course not.
As for thermodynamics, you did indeed make claims about entropy, which in case you don’t know is a fundamental principle in thermodynamics- which I studied for 4 years. You refuse to answer my challenge to you on this, I note.
Materialism? I accept only that which can be identified, quantified and measured as factual; mysticism is interesting but since we have no way to define, measure and quantify the paranormal I reserve judgement until such time as we do…
You make the outrageous statement that “science rejects observation”.
This is utter bunkum- science depends on observation, but ONLY reliable observations, those which are confirmable and repeatable via the peer review process. Even then it can take a very long time until the weight of evidence is sufficient for a theory to be accepted as true- and even then it is still subject to change when new evidence comes to light. YOUR ideas of ‘observation’ do not fulfil these requirements because they are little more than hearsay ‘observations’.
In any case this is a tedious discussion, for me. Mysticism has caused much suffering in human affairs, be it conventional religion, voodoo, black magic, witch trials or any of thousands of examples of such unsubstantiated and primitive beliefs.
No further response will be forthcoming- I am tired of all of it.
9 years ago
Reply to
Jim Fox
Jim,
You need to read before starting to write. The argument this Muslim cleric says that the Earth is stationary and the Sun revolves around the Earth is as rational as the argument the materialists make to prove there is nothing but matter. The logic is identical and they are both rational and wrong. My point is that as long as you deny the evidence and observation you can prove any absurdity
rationally.
Why in your opinion the cleric’s argument is irrational? He makes a very valid argument that if the Earth rotated, a plane leaving Riadh would never reach China. This can be easily proven scientifically too. Take the example of a
butterfly trying to fly from the end of the moving bus at the speed of 100 km/h from the roof. She can’t because she can’t fly that fast. So the argument this cleric makes is neither unscientific nor irrational. Then why is he wrong. Because he ignores the fact that air also rotates with the Earth. The same butterfly can easily fly from the end of a moving bus to the front inside the bus. The only difference
is that this time the air is also moving with the bus.
The reasoning of the cleric is rational, but since he ignores some facts he is wrong. Likewise the reasoning of materialists is also rational, but wrong because they ignore facts.
Facts are there for anyone who cares to see. Evidence of the independence of consciousness is there for anyone who looks into it. You can jump up and down and engage in all sorts of logical fallacies like argumentum ad ridiculum, etc. But as long as you ignore the observation you are wrong.
Reason alone is not enough. Reason and science must be
supported by observation. If they contradict observation they are fanaticism. I see no difference between
the argument made by the cleric and the one made by materialists. Since both deny observation and ignore
facts, they are both false while to those who hold such views they seem very rational.
9 years ago
Reply to
Ali Sina
Ali, you are irrational; it seems your muslim mind has been damaged permanently and you can no longer think logically.
Sorry.
9 years ago
Reply to
Jim Fox
Dear Jim,
Muslims dismiss the mountain of evidence saying the magical word, “out of context.” You reject the mountain of evidence by using the magical word,”hearsay.” Alas the similarities don’t end there. When running out of arguments and feeling defeated, Muslims resort to insults and personal attacks. I hoped at least in this area you would be better. Such a pity. The mind of the bigot works the same way across the board, irrespective of its content.
9 years ago
Reply to
Ali Sina
I’m filled with joy to read that you are now a follower of Beautiful Savior, Jesus. I’m forever in Jesus debt. I owe God my life. Everything I have. How can I ever thank Him? God’s Love is Amazing, His Forgiveness is Astonishing. His Mercy and Kindness are beyond words to express. May God’s Great and Wonderful Name be praised throughout all eternity.
9 years ago
The PDF is full of typos. Someone should make a few more proofreading passes.
9 years ago
Mohammed is being held in a spirit prison along with all his deluded followers, they are lost souls awaiting the final judgment. they are wicked wretched souls tormented by the evil works they enacted while they lived. because they rejected the Son of God and his cross of atonement there’s no hope of salvation for them for they died in their sins and now have to pay for them in the shades of DEATH! He that hath the Son has life while he that hath not the Son shall not see life.” 1 John.5:12
9 years ago
Reply to
High Plains Drifter
I don’t think there is a waiting period. Muhammad crossed to hell the minute he left this world and will continue to be tormented until Islam is wiped out and maybe in a billion years from now he will be released from hell.
9 years ago
This teaching of in the curriculum of the “Common core teaching” now invading in our public schools systems and other texts is a subtle form of indoctrination and is clearly a fundamental violation of the “first Amendment establishment clause” that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,” this is what the Obama administration is clearly doing in violation of the first Amendment only one of the many violations this President has committed and should be IMPEACHED over .not to mention the more weighty matters of treason and collusion with America’s enemies and giving them support and secretly aiding them to levy war against the United States. may the goodness and grace of GOD who has granted and allowed for America to exist in the first place damn up and expunge every treasonous element buried within Americas body politic as a biting mite and parasite.
9 years ago
Why Americans allowed muzzis to shit in their country?
9 years ago
Ali is the business. It’s laudable that Ali took time out to fill a gap with his textbook… but that said… I find it disappointing, as is the case with all of Ali’s stuff, that it could benefit from being proofread by an expert. It’s an especial shame since Ali has clearly worked hard on it, the photographs he has included are impressive and very appropriate. My concern is that of course there will be a number of teaching professionals who will spot very early on that the book lacks in terms of its grammar and comprehension, which is a huge shame. I hope Ali has it fixed and reuploads it or it may not be adopted to the extent it should, leading to a missed opportunity to a greater or lesser extent. Whilst Ali’s grammar and comprehension on his site is less important, for a volume purporting to be for study the benchmark is higher. Oh, the frustration! (Pamela, could you not have told him?)
9 years ago
What gets me with all this is that no other religion gets a look-in whether its Buddist, Hindu etc. So there is positive discrimination going on in the school system. Read a good book on the background to all this called ‘Mystery Babylon and …’ by Guy Rogers. I bought and downloaded through Amazon (very cheap) and informative.
9 years ago
Thanks for the short biography. I have read several books on the life of Mo., the one I recommend is: The Life and Religion of Mohammed by Rev. J. L. Menezes. The book is less than 200 pages, easy to read, and exposes the true life of Mo. with facts. The last chapter takes all the reasons Muslims claim Mo. was a prophet and dispels them.
9 years ago
What is wrong with the educators today? Why would they proselytize for Islam? Why do they think it is okay to brainwash children with this nonsense?
9 years ago
Reply to
Nanaknows2
The educators have no clue about Islam and know nothing about Muhammad. No one knows about Muhammad, not even Muslims. i was utterly shocked when I started reading his biography. We were never taught these things. That is why I am so eager about his biopic.
9 years ago
Yes this Demons will try to deceived us actually according to their Holy Quran(heretic Actually) they are permitted to lie to the non-believer of islam to promote and their chances that the victim will convert proof? this are the verses
Qur’an (16:106) – Establishes that there are circumstances that can “compel” a Muslim to tell a lie.
Qur’an (3:28) – This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to “guard themselves.”
Qur’an (9:3) – “…Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters…” The dissolution of oaths with the pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway.
Qur’an (40:28) – A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must “hide his faith”among those who are not believers.
Qur’an (2:225) – “Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts” The context of this remark is marriage, which explains why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the greater good.
Qur’an (66:2) – “Allah has already ordained for you, (O men), the dissolution of your oaths”
Qur’an (3:54) – “And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers.” The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) ismakara, which literally means ‘deceit’. If Allah is supremely deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30and 10:21)
source:http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/011-taqiyya.htm
Taken collectively these verses are interpreted to mean that there are circumstances when a Muslim may be “compelled” to deceive others for a greater purpose.
From the Hadith:
Bukhari (52:269) – “The Prophet said, ‘War is deceit.'” The context of this is thought to be the murder of Usayr ibn Zarim and his thirty unarmed men by Muhammad’s men after he “guaranteed” them safe passage (see Additional Notes below).
Bukhari (49:857) – “He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar.” Lying is permitted when the end justifies the means.
Bukhari (84:64-65) – Speaking from a position of power at the time, Ali confirms that lying is permissible in order to deceive an “enemy.”
Muslim (32:6303) – “…he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them).”
Bukhari (50:369) – Recounts the murder of a poet, Ka’b bin al-Ashraf, at Muhammad’s insistence. The men who volunteered for the assassination used dishonesty to gain Ka’b’s trust, pretending that they had turned against Muhammad. This drew the victim out of his fortress, whereupon he was brutally slaughtered despite putting up a ferocious struggle for his life.
From Islamic Law:
Reliance of the Traveler (p. 746 – 8.2) – “Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N:i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory… it is religiously precautionary in all cases to employ words that give a misleading impression…
“One should compare the bad consequences entailed by lying to those entailed by telling the truth, and if the consequences of telling the truth are more damaging, one is entitled to lie.
In Christian we are not permitted to lie even he/she not Embraces to Yahweh and actually we have some violence but it written in the old testament mostly christians embraces the New Testament if you say something about violence in the bible and that is in old testament yes we read the old testament but we don’t acknowledge to follow some brutal acts it is remembrance that How Israel Defended from the Enemies feel free to tell an opinion especially “muslim”
9 years ago
follow the money trail; how much money are the school districts getting to promote this “white washing” and normalizing of beheading and pedophilia, enslavement of women; how far can the money trail be followed? Fox news is owned 9% by al talweed bin tallal; how about our senators; how many of the are owned by jihad shell corporations, shoving their agenda throughout the culture?
9 years ago
Reply to
godisvictorious
Rick Scott got a few million for the state of Florida. he told he wouldn’t except the common core crud. he lied to the people he did take it. and old Jeb Bush wants it and wants all the illegals to stay in this country. and GOD IN HEAVEN ONLY KNOWS WHERE ALL THESE ILLEGALS CAME FROM. WE DO KNOW THAT ALL ARE NOT MEXICANS.
9 years ago
Reply to
godisvictorious
I don’t think it is all about the money. Yes many politicians get money to promote Islam, even Republicans. But not everyone is bought. Many just have no clue. Our enemy is ignorance and our salvation is truth.
9 years ago
Reply to
godisvictorious
Glenn Beck went out of his way to ridicule and discredit anyone who questioned Obama’s fake birth certificate, despite the overwhelming evidence unearthed by Sheriff Joe Arpaio who with a panel of experts proved that document posted by Obama on the government website is forged.
Was Beck bought? I don’t know but I have a strong feeling that he was. You see, he is such an outspoken “critic” of Obama,spewing so much nonsense against him that when he mocked the “birthers” people did not question his integrity. That is how the public is bamboozled.
But once you buy a few, you don’t have to buy everyone. Those few will do their work and will make the public believe what you want to believe.
9 years ago
Mr. Sina,
I appreciate your efforts. I think the war that we are fighting, which is between good and evil, between freedom and compulsion, and between personal responsibility and license is a war that first has to be fought in the field of ideas. To do that we first have to provide our children with something of the truth, and I appreciate your effort as a first step in that regard.
The struggle that we are engaged in is an eternal struggle between those who subordinate their will to natural law and those who want their ego to be unconstrained by morality. On one side is a nesting of order that proceeds up from the individual, to the family, to the community, and then to society. On the other, we have Dionysian disorder and untrammeled autocracy. Communism and Islam are merely two sides of the same coin, both of which mask evil under the false promise of a greater good.
My one critique, after a very brief review of your work, was that it should have emphasized how flexible Mohammed’s revelation was, and how much of his morality was based on his own self interest and his own sexual perversions. In a sense, he was a sociopath and a truly evil man. That should be emphasized, if only because individuals like him are capable of tremendous damage to everyone they encounter.
9 years ago
Reply to
mikey
You are right Mikey. I put plenty of emphasis on Muhammad psychology and his mental insanity in my book. I was the first ever to recognize he was a narcissist sociopath and wrote a book to prove it. The claim that he suffered from TLE is old and true. Others had also diagnosed his acromegaly. Both these claims are true and I spoke of them extensively. But Muhammad suffered from a series of comorbidities, including NPD and OCD.
However, diagnosing Muhammad’s mental disorders is not something we can include in a text book. I have given reference to everything I have said in this short bio.The fact that he was insane is not something we can back up with quotes.
Furthermore, that is above what we should teach our children. We just give them facts and let them come to their own conclusions.
9 years ago
Reply to
Ali Sina
You would be surprised what 7th graders actually know. They are at the age where they are beginning to push against the boundaries that have been established by their parents, even as they look to their age peers for advice and models of behavior.
While we do not want to be too psychological in any presentation to 12 or 13 year olds, one of the things that motivates individuals at this (or any age) is the desire not to look stupid and so be shamed. Under such circumstances these children need to be armed with enough information that they can hold their own in a debate with less informed peers. They need the right kind of information that attacks the foundations upon which Islam is based. Many children incline towards fairness and the good, and we need to assist them in this endeavor before darker forces take hold of them.
9 years ago
Reply to
mikey
Oh yeah
I was a seventh grader once. I very well remember I formed my core values and ideas about life at that age.
Frankly, I can’t see why any decent human, liberal or not would prefer to deceive children after reading the text and seeing for themselves how evil is Islam. As long as people don’t know they always want to give Muslims the benefit of the doubt. This texts leave no such room. My comprehensive book gives a lot more details.
The only way to get rid of Islam is to let people know the truth about it.
7 years ago
The above links to Ali Sina’s biography of Mohammed are no longer current. It can be found here:
7 years ago
Reply to
Classroom Watch
