News Ticker >
[ July 28, 2017 ]

Can’t Hardly Wait on an open thread

[ July 28, 2017 ]

White House Backs House Bill To Crack Down On Asylum Fraud

[ July 28, 2017 ]

Reince Priebus is OUT, John Kelly OUT at DHS

[ July 28, 2017 ]

Another U.S. Imam Prays for the Destruction of Jews “Wake up! It’s time to be...

[ July 28, 2017 ]

VIDEO: John McCain Casts Deciding Vote to DEFEAT Obamacare Repeal

[ July 28, 2017 ]

Kosovo: “Kill the Serbs” Graffiti Calls for New Jihad Massacres

[ July 28, 2017 ]

Muslim Media, Memes Mock Israel for Perceived Capitulation at Temple Mount

[ July 28, 2017 ]

‘Australian women need Muslim men to fertilize them,’ says halal food chief in Facebook rant

[ July 28, 2017 ]

Palestinian reaction after their big win on the removal of metal detector from Temple Mount

[ July 28, 2017 ]

Machete-wielding Muslim “shouting ALLAHU AKBAR,” STABS SHOPPERS, kills one, injures many in supermarket in in...

Pamela Geller, WND Column: Banned from Britain – for supporting Israel

More on the vicious motivations behind the ban in Britain in my column for WND this week:

DEFENDING THE WEST Screen Shot 2013-12-10 at 12.50.54 PM
Banned from Britain – for supporting Israel

Exclusive: Pamela Geller reveals U.K. getting many of its ‘facts’ from Wikipedia

At last, the whole truth has come to light. In our court battle to overturn Britain’s ban on our entering the country, Robert Spencer and I have received a new cache of documents that reveal a principal reason why we were banned from the country was because we are pro-Israel.

An official (name redacted) in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office wrote in a May 7 letter: “We do have concerns with some of the reasoning in the sub,” that is, the “subject profiles” that had been prepared on Spencer and me, “particularly citing pro-Israeli views.” The official explained that “pro-Israeli views (and also support for waterboarding) apply to a large number of Americans, including former presidents. If, for instance, Geller and Spencer were to request details of their exclusion under FOI/DPA or other mechanism, that being pro-Israeli is cited as a reason may be problematic and they could argue publically that their exclusion is on the basis of their support for Israel.”

Read the rest here.

Pin It on Pinterest