Not only did the media and law enforcement cover up Trayvon Martin's criminal record — the attack on Zimmerman and subsequent show trial brought systemic corruption to light and led to the takedown of senior officials.
Trayvon Martin’s Involvement In Local Burglaries Covered Up By Media, School, Police, Prosecutors
Excerpted from The Last Refuge:
Ironically were it not for Frances Robles writing a Miami Herald article on March 26th 2012 an entire chain of events would not have taken place.
It was that Robles article, and the outlining of the Miami-Dade
School Police Department’s report on a Trayvon Martin incident from
October 2011, that kicked off an internal investigation by M-DSPD Police
Chief Hurley against his own officers to find out who leaked the police
[Note: The Miami-Dade Public School System has its own Police
force, and Chief, who report to the School Board and Superintendent –
Not the Police Dept. The Police Chief is appointed by the School
Superintendent, in this example, Alberto Carvalho]
It was that M-DSPD internal affairs investigation which revealed in
October 2011 Trayvon Martin was searched by School Resource Officer,
Darryl Dunn. The search of Trayvon Martin’s backpack turned up at least
12 pcs of ladies jewelry, and a man’s watch, in addition to a flat head
screwdriver described as “a burglary tool”.
When Trayvon was questioned about who owned the jewelry and where it
came from, he claimed he was just holding it for a “friend”. A “friend”
he would not name.
Later, after the police report was outlined in the Robles article,
and despite Trayvon being suspended for the second time in a new school
year, Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, said Trayvon’s dad, Tracy
Martin, and Trayvon’s mom, Sybrina Fulton, did not know anything about
the jewelry case.
It was only as a consequence of the M-DSPD internal affairs investigation that “why” they may not have known came to light.
On October 21st 2011 a burglary took place a few blocks from Krop
Senior High School where Trayvon Martin attended. The stolen property
outlined in the Miami-Dade Police Report (PD111021-422483) matches the
descriptive presented by SRO Dunn in his School Police report
However, there was ONE big issue. SRO Dunn never filed a criminal
report, nor opened a criminal investigation, surrounding the stolen
jewelry. Instead, and as a result of pressure from M-DSPD Chief Hurley
to avoid criminal reports for black male students, Dunn wrote up the
jewelry as “found items”, and transferred them, along with the burglary
tool, to the Miami-Dade Police property room where they sat on a shelf
unassigned to anyone for investigation.
A separate report of “criminal Mischief” (T-08809) was filed for the additional issue of writing “WTF” on a school locker. [It was the search for the marker used to write the graffiti that led to the backpack search].
The school discipline, “suspension”, was attached to the graffiti and not the stolen jewelry.
The connections between the Police Burglary report and the School
Report of “found items” were never made because the regular police
detective in charge of the Burglary case had no idea the School Police
Dept. had filed a “found items” report.
Two differing police departments, and the School Officer, Dunn,
intentionally took the criminal element out of the equation – instead
preferring “school discipline” and not “criminal adjudication”.
It was only when the M-DSPD Internal Affairs investigation kicked in,
and six officers gave sworn affidavits, the manipulative scheme to
improve criminal statistics within the School System were identified
School Superintendent Alberto Carvalho gave his hire, Police Chief
Hurley, instructions to reduce the criminal behavior of young black
males. The chosen strategy between them, to insure optical success, was
to stop using the Criminal Justice System to punish black student
behavior. Instead they instructed the School Resource Officers to use
school discipline in place of criminal justice.
Another approach was the use of The Baker Act, to quantify behaviors
under health HIPPA law secrecy by assigning the students with
psychological problems. This allowed them to again use school discipline
and work around criminal reports.
Without the reports, the statistics would improve immensely; And improve they did.
The final approach, to insure no-one would find out about the
manipulation, was to change the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for
inter-agency information sharing.
This new SOP was outlined by a communications directive in 2010
forbidding the sharing of Miami-Dade School Police reports to outside
agencies without redaction. Officers had to send any and all requests
through the public information officer.
Hence, the furor of Chief Hurley when the Robles article hit the press and cited police reports – Hurley smelled a leaker and launched an investigation.
Ultimately the internal affairs investigation initiated by Hurley led to his own firing, because the officers questioned told the internal affairs investigators the truth of what was going on and outed the scheme.
One of the examples of this in action was the jewelry incident and
Trayvon Martin – as accidentally outlined in the Herald report. But the
Herald never knew their reporting had launched an internal affairs
investigation which led to the collapse of the scheme.
Meanwhile the stolen jewelry from the burglary (PD111021-422483) was
sitting on a shelf in the Property Room listed as (2011-11477 “found
items) gathering dust.
Until we started digging, and the FOIA requests revealed not only the scheme, but the fact a victim was never made whole with the return of their items.
That is, until now.