Who Polices the Police?

Both Police Chief Eric Jolliffe and Ricky Veerappan must resign for their gross violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. These two policemen violated their oaths of office. Their resignation letters must be delivered to their superiors Monday morning May 6, 2013 at 9:00AM.

The editorial is incorrect regarding George Galloway. He was never prevented from coming to Canada. He was told there were grounds for not allowing to enter the country because he provided funds to a terrorist organization (Hamas) so he never came. It had nothing to do with the nonsense that dribbles out of his mouth. And two years later he was allowed with no problem. It’s only conservatives who ever run into speech problems in Canada.

Yet another muslim committing gross misconduct by abusing [their] powers for their own warped agenda. What a surprise! [sarc]
The conniving little wretch Veerappan, is unveiled for all to see.
Watch your back Canada!
Well done.

A muslim in charge of Diversity? Equity?and inclusion? You mean like the S.O.B we have in charge of human rights at Great Neck? Muslim Ideology has no place for any of those qualities. That’s the Problem. WTF is this even needs to be discussed, either the koran is inaccurate or these thugs are. Which one is it?

Salim Mansur, a University of Western Ontario academic, wrote: “I am appalled that … we continue to hear regularly how the liberal democratic tradition of Canada and the West is being systematically shredded by institutions sworn to protect it.” Some Muslims who’ve made Canada their home, he said, “need to learn the culture … of a society that is open to debates and discussions however painful this might be to someone else’s sensibilities.”
Yeah, some Muslims have to decide whether they want to live in the West as Muslims with the limitations that implies. Or, if they insist on trying to make the West more Islamic, they really aught to move to a Muslim society/country where they can live more fully as Muslims.

Yes, free speech is under attack in Canada. In Canada you can be charged with a hate crime if you speak out against homosexuality, for example. I can see laws being passed by future liberal governments to prosecute islam critics. I feel for you Pam. I don’t mean to play devil’s advocate here but I saw this coming.

I can’t agree with the 2nd paragraph. Imagine, that this is written after the WWII: “some Nazis have to decide whether they want to live in the West as Nazis with the limitation that implies.”, and so on… Not all Nazis were SS-men, Gestapo officers or concentration camp guards. Nevertheless Nazist ideology, their party NSDAP, all Nazi organizations were forbidden. And none of them could choose “to live as Nazis”, only as former Nazis. Islam is a misanthropic (even more – misogynist) ideology, propagating violence, enslavery, debauchery and other deadly sins. This ideology MUST be blamed and forbidden. For the so called “moderate and peaceful muslims” if they are really peaceful, it would be an act of mercy.

Extremely well said Sarah. It is people like you and Pam that make me proud to be a Western woman. Thank you for this posting.

Have you ever noticed how stupid so many of them are? Ricky kinda reminds me of ‘the emperor with no clothes’…a pompous ass.

I just love the way this Muslim thug entirely proves your point and your raison d’etre, which is to warn the world about JUST SUCH THUGGERY.
Doh! What an idiot. This fool should be tried for treason.
Just goes to prove once again that Muslim fanatics are not trustworthy in positions of power. (Notice I said “fanatics,” not reasonable people like Salim Mansur and the Muslim Canadian Congress.)

A disturbing pattern does appear to be emerging. We saw in in Great Neck, now in Canada. Muslims in the West, even in low level positions of authority, are only to ready to abuse that authority to DICTATE to Jewish religious leaders who they can and cannot have speak in their houses of worship?
Can anyone imagine members of the Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Jewish, or Atheist communities ever daring to tell Muslim clerics who they can and cannot have speak in their Mosques?
The flagrant chauvinism of these Muslim officials towards the Jewish people is mind blowing. It is the very definition of intolerant. It should serve as a warning to those soon to also find themselves at odds with the Muslim community in the West such as homosexuals and feminists– communities still turning a blind eye to the widespread horrors being committed routinely, ‘legally’ against gays, women and girls in Muslim dominated world like Iran, Saudia Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan and now Gaza.
Or are we to understand that honor killings, the hanging of gays, the public stoning of rape victims, and the forced marriage of little girls to grown men are now proud “values” of the York Regional Police Department of Canada, so much so that all criticism of these practices must be vanquished?!
‘O Canada’ is right!

This is merely a predictable result of showing tolerance to the intolerant. And “progressives” think it is fine.

One point I forgot to add-it’s a good reminder for all of us who oppose Islam to band together (whatever race or religion) and work to defeat Islam. Take self-defense, carry whatever is legal in your state/province to protect yourself and learn to take down the enemy because they will come at us with everything.

I still think the Rabbi was a coward for caving into the thug. Is this voluntary position so important that he is willing to stop freedom of speech?

WHEN Canadians will GET IT ??!
I. PEACE, VIOLENCE, AND ABROGATION
Muslims in the West are quick to point to passages such as Qur’an 109:6 (“You shall have your religion and I shall have my religion”) and 2:256 (“There is no compulsion in religion”) as evidence that Islam is a religion of peace. When confronted with harsher passages such as 9:5 (“Slay the idolaters wherever you find them”) and 9:29 (“Fight those who believe not in Allah”), Westernized Muslims interpret these verses in light of the more peaceful teachings of the Qur’an, typically saying something like: “Well, the Qur’an can’t be commanding us to kill unbelievers, since it says that there’s no compulsion in religion.”
Hence, Westernized Muslims pick the verses of the Qur’an they find most attractive, and they use these verses to sanitize the rest of the Qur’an. But is this the correct way to interpret the Qur’an? Unfortunately, the answer is no. The Qur’an presents its own method of interpretation—the Doctrine of Abrogation.
Qur’an 2:106—Whatever verse we shall abrogate, or cause [thee] to forget, we will bring a better than it, or one like unto it. Dost thou not know that God is almighty?
Qur’an 16:101—When We substitute one revelation for another—and God knows best what He reveals (in stages)—they say, “Thou art but a forger”: but most of them understand not.
According to the Qur’an, then, when Muslims are faced with conflicting commands, they aren’t supposed to pick the one they like best. Rather, they are to go to history and see which verse was revealed last. Whichever verse came last is said to abrogate (or cancel) earlier revelations.
What happens when we apply this methodology to Qur’anic verses on peace and violence?
II. THE CALL TO JIHAD: THREE STAGES
When we turn to Islam’s theological sources and historical writings (Qur’an, Hadith, Sira, and Tafsir), we find that there are three stages in the call to Jihad, depending on the status of Muslims in a society.
STAGE ONE—When Muslims are completely outnumbered and can’t possibly win a physical confrontation with unbelievers, they are to live in peace with non-Muslims and preach a message of tolerance. We see an example of this stage when Muhammad and his followers were a persecuted minority in Mecca. Since the Muslims were entirely outnumbered, the revelations Muhammad received during this stage (e.g. “You shall have your religion and I shall have my religion”) called for religious tolerance and proclaimed a future punishment (rather than a worldly punishment) for unbelievers.
STAGE TWO—When there are enough Muslims and resources to defend the Islamic community, Muslims are called to engage in defensive Jihad. Thus, when Muhammad had formed alliances with various groups outside Mecca and the Muslim community had become large enough to begin fighting, Muhammad received Qur’an 22:39-40:
Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed, and most surely Allah is well able to assist them; Those who have been expelled from their homes without a just cause except that they say: our Lord is Allah. . . .
Although Muslims in the West often pretend that Islam only allows defensive fighting, later revelations show otherwise.
STAGE THREE—When Muslims establish a majority and achieve political power in an area, they are commanded to engage in offensive Jihad. Hence, once Mecca and Arabia were under Muhammad’s control, he received the call the fight all unbelievers. In Surah 9:29, we read:
Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
Notice that this verse doesn’t order Muslims to fight oppressors, but to fight those who don’t believe in Islam (including the “People of the Book”—Jews and Christians).
Not surprisingly, we find similar commands in Islam’s most trusted collections of ahadith (traditions containing Muhammad’s teachings).
Sahih al-Bukhari 6924—Muhammad said: “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: La ilaha illallah (none has the right to be worshipped but Allah), and whoever said La ilaha illahllah, Allah will save his property and his life from me.”
Sahih Muslim 30—Muhammad said: “I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah.”
Here again, the criterion for fighting people is that the people believe something other than Islam.
It’s clear, then, that when Muslims rose to power, peaceful verses of the Qur’an were abrogated by verses commanding Muslims to fight people based on their beliefs. Islam’s greatest scholars acknowledge this. For instance, Ibn Kathir (Islam’s greatest commentator on the Qur’an) sums up Stage Three as follows: “Therefore all people of the world should be called to Islam. If anyone of them refuses to do so, or refuses to pay the Jizyah, they should be fought till they are killed.”
III. WHEN MUSLIMS REACH STAGE THREE
Abrogation also accounts for shifting attitudes regarding Jews and Christians in the Qur’an. While Muslims are to be friendly to Jews and Christians when the former are outnumbered, the Islamic position changes when Muslims reach Stage Three, at which point Christians and Jews are to recognize their inferior status and pay the Jizyah (a payment made to Muslims in exchange for not being killed by them). Consider some of Muhammad’s later teachings about Christians and Jews:
Qur’an 5:51—O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.
Qur’an 9:30—And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!
Qur’an 98:6—Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein. They are the worst of creatures.
Sahih Muslim 4366—Muhammad said: “I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.”
Al-Bukhari, Al-Adab al-Mufrad 1103—Muhammad said: “Do not give the People of the Book the greeting first. Force them to the narrowest part of the road.”
Needless to say, these teachings can hardly be considered peaceful or tolerant.
IV. MUSLIMS IN THE WEST
Since Muhammad obviously commanded his followers to fight unbelievers (simply for being unbelievers), why do Muslims in the West deny this? Here we must turn to Surah 3:28, which reads:
Let not the believers take disbelievers for their friends in preference to believers. Whoso doeth that hath no connection with Allah unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them, taking (as it were) security.
According to this verse (which uses a variation of the word Taqiyya, meaning “concealment”), Muslims are not allowed to be friends with non-Muslims. However, if Muslims feel threatened by a stronger adversary, they are allowed to pretend to be friendly. Ibn Kathir comments: “In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship outwardly but never inwardly.” Abu Darda, one of Muhammad’s companions, put it this way: “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.”
Is Islam a religion of peace? No. Islam is a religion that pretends to be peaceful when Muslims are too weak to win a war. Of course, there are many Muslims who aren’t violent. Many Muslims in the West love peace and tolerance. But they didn’t get these values from Islam. They got them from the West, and now they’re reinterpreting Islam based on their Western values. For dedicated Muslims, however, there are only two possible situations to be in: (1) fighting unbelievers, and (2) pretending to be peaceful while preparing to fight unbelievers. Either way, fighting non-Muslims and conquering the world in the name of Allah is always the goal.
Email This Blog! Share to TwitterShare to Facebook.
From another FREEDOM LOVING site:
http://www.answeringmuslims.com/p/jihad.html

Any muslim having any affiliation with CAIR should be carefully scrutinised, even the police.

(Re: police officer Ricky Veerappan)
Address all correspondence to:
Police Chief Eric Jolliffe
York Regional Police
17250 Yonge Street
Newmarket, Ontario Canada
L3Y-4W5
1-866-876-5423
Email: [email protected]

HOw do you know these scuzzlums are “reasonable”? They could just as easily be better liars and you a more willing dupe. Yasser Arafat, the islamonazi ape and terrorist, frequently made pretty speeches to the Western media, speeches that made him appear moderate and peaceful, but he also made speeches to his own people (in Arabic) that weren’t meant for the Western media, speeches in which his true intentions were laid bare to commit genocide on the Jewish people and destroy Israel. Similarly Morsi makes such pretty speeches to the Western media, while ranting and raving in Arabic about Jews being evil, sons or apes and swine etc.

Aw gee, I’m glad to see empty words are all you need. Why don’t you see how much the empty words of an islamonazi ape have assisted Eric Brazau, who has been arrested, handcuffed and thrown in prison for publicly criticising pisslam. Some people deserve islamonazism.