VIDEO: Pamela Geller on ABC News covering Pro-Israel Bus ads

These guys are unreal. It is as if I hear them yelling “She’s in the Attic.”

Matthews was clearly running on shear ignorance of Islam, the man is shamelessly clueless as he spouted his comments fed to him by local Muslims.
Matthews tried to sound like someone who knew what he was talking about when he said jihad means struggle, how ignorant can you get in your San Francisco bubble Mr. Matthews.

So Jihad means stuggle all I want to see is peace in Israel , How do you reason with people who preach The Death to Israel, just look at how they treat their own. The stange part is this how our counrty sweeps this under the carpet.

People like Matthews should be locked up in sanitorium and the key thrown away. Pillock!

2 tweets worthy of a note from SFV4I to pillock features Matthews:
https://twitter.com/SFV4I/status/234541845085036544/photo/1
and
@MatthewsABC7 factual error in your story- the last anti-Israel ads were run in March/April of this year- not “a year ago”
Will be interesting to see if the fool blocks those 2 tweets.

This ad campaign, together with the reactions of the public, will illustrate to those in the know, just HOW much the US public are ignorant of the colonisation Jihad in America now being waged against them, together with the degree of PC bias in favour of the aggressor.
Like the UK, American public opinion is SO far behind the truth of the reality behind Islamic colonisation. Largly hidden, it is mis-represented by the left as something not to be concerned about, or worse, only “Cultural diversity”.
That this campaign will cause comment, some or most hostile, is no bad thing,perhaps the islamic meanings of Jihad could be displayed alongside next time, to prove to those decieved by lies that there really IS an issue, and people had better start talking about it. Rot and corruption both need darkness to thrive.

There was a factual error in the ABC story: The last anti-Israel ads were in SF train stations in April 2012 – not “a year ago”.
Additionally- the Mondoweiss Hate Site printed an extortion from their writer Annie Robbins to vandalize the ads yesterday.

Here’s something that UREPORT should know about:
jihad will only mean “a struggle” when liberal bastards like you are struggling to breathe after the devout savage muslims cut your neck as prescribed in the koran that you never took the time to investigate.

“No matter what side you’re on, you should not describe your opponent as a savage,” he said.
………………………………………………………………………..
This is an unbelievable statement. He sounds like he is talking about a sporting event. These aren’t “opponents”, these are inhuman enemies who’s aim is the annihilation of the Jewish people.
The fact that it is controversial to refer to terrorists who are waging a genocidal war against the Jewish people, who slit the throats of children and babies and who blow up buses, cafes etc. as savages, shows how morally bankrupt the supposed civilized world has become.

Matthews in clearly in Kingergarden since he works for enemedia ABC. He does not know the ABCs of Islam.

I suggest writing directly to ABC/Disney president Anne Sweeney to register one’s having been offended by Mathews’s “report”. I think that her email address is :
[email protected]

by Gary DeMar
The following remarks were made by President Obama at an Iftar Dinner for Muslims held at in the East Room at the White House:
“As I’ve noted before, Thomas Jefferson once held a sunset dinner here with an envoy from Tunisia – perhaps the first Iftar at the White House, more than 200 years ago. And some of you, as you arrived tonight, may have seen our special display, courtesy of our friends at the Library of Congress – the Koran that belonged to Thomas Jefferson. And that’s a reminder, along with the generations of patriotic Muslims in America, that Islam – like so many faiths – is part of our national story.”
Little has changed since the eighteenth century. In Joseph Wheelan’s well researched and highly readable book on America’s first war on terror with Islam, we learn that “Jefferson’s war pitted a modern republic with a free-trade, entrepreneurial creed against a medieval autocracy whose credo was piracy and terror. It matched an ostensibly Christian nation against an avowed Islamic one that professed to despise Christians.” Wheelan’s historical assessment of the time is on target. “Except for its Native American population and a small percentage of Jews, the United States was solidly Christian, while the North African regencies were just as solidly Muslim – openly hostile toward Christians.”
The Quran’s peace initiatives are one sided. To have peace, opposing forces must submit to Islam or be destroyed.
The Crusades, far from being an outrageous prototype of Western imperialism, as is taught in most of our schools, were a mere episode in a struggle that has lasted 1,400 years and were one of the few occasions when Christians took the offensive to regain the “occupied territories” of the Holy Land.
When President Jefferson refused to increase the tribute demanded by the Islamists of his day, Tripoli declared war on the United States. A United States navy squadron, under Commander Edward Preble, blockaded Tripoli from 1803 to 1805. After rebel soldiers from Tripoli, led by United States Marines, captured the city of Derna, the Pasha of Tripoli signed a treaty promising to exact no more tribute.
The Marine’s Hymn with the line “From the Halls of Montezuma to the Shores of Tripoli” should have been sung in the East Room of the White House to put history in perspective for the President and his Muslim guests.
Paul Johnson, “‘Relentlessly and Thoroughly’: The Only Way to Respond,” National Review (October 15, 2001). Consider this from John Quincy Adams: Consider the following from John Quincy Adams: “The precept of the koran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that Mahomet is the prophet of God. The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the prophet, may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective.