UK Child Sex Trafficking Trial: Nine Muslim men guilty of exploiting non-Muslim schoolgirls for sex and prostitution after plying them with vodka and drugs

22

It's not race,  it's ideology.

"There is a significant problem for the British Pakistani community, there is an over representation amongst recent convictions in the crime of on street grooming, there should be no silence in addressing the issue of race as this is central to the actions of these criminals. They think that white teenage girls are worthless and can be abused without a second thought; it is this sort of behaviour that is bringing shame on our community. I urge the Police and the Councils not to be frightened to address this issue, there is a strong lesson that you cannot ignore race or be over sensitive ……  Mohammed Shafiq, Chief Executive of the Ramadhan Foundation

Shafiq is urging police not to be afraid, and yet he is lying about the motive and obfuscating the ideology that asserts that Muslims are superior to non-Muslims. "They think that white [sic: non-Muslim] teenage girls are worthless and can be abused without a second thought." Yes, because that is the sharia.

Islam is not a race, and framing the issue this way is just another accommodation to Islam. This reinforces the special status that Muslims have under the sharia, which denies non-Muslims basic human rights.

Of course, the requisite 'backlashophobia" is a main concern of the Muslim community in the UK, which does nothing about the sexploitation of young non-Muslim girls.

The monstrous crimes of these Muslims are exacerbated by a police force that refused to help the schoolgirls who came begging for help. Again, accommodating Islam for fear of offending, inciting or insulting the Muslim community, law enforcement abandoned little girls. That is shocking. The dhimmitude, appeasement and capitulation to the most brutal and oppressive ideology on the face of the earth.

Law enforcement deserves to be indicted and convicted along with this Muslim gang.

And the media? They still dare not speak its name. In the UK, Asian is the euphemism for Muslim. In France it's "youth" or "immigrant youth" (despite being second or third generation), in Denmark it's "immigrant." In the US, the enemedia identifies jihadists and terrorists by nationality (as if that were relevant).

Nine Asian men guilty of grooming white schoolgirls for sex after plying them with vodka and drugs Daily Mail (hat tip David)

  • Five girls aged between 13 and 15 were shared by men in the Rochdale area
  • Teenagers targeted because they were vulnerable and from broken homes
  • Police said one victim was forced to have sex with 20 men in one night
  • Gang used white girl, 15, known as 'The Honey Monster' to recruit victims
  • Girls picked up where young people congregate, such as outside takeaways
  • Attackers range in age from 22 to 59 – all are from Pakistan, apart from one from Afghanistan
  • Muslim leader warns that some British Pakistani men 'think that white teenage girls are worthless and can be abused without a second thought'
     

Nine Asian [sic]  men were today found guilty of grooming and passing round vulnerable white schoolgirls aged between 13 and 15 for sex after plying them with alcohol and drugs.

Five girls were 'shared' by Kabeer Hassan, Abdul Aziz, Abdul Rauf, Mohammed Sajid, Adil Khan, Abdul Qayyum, Mohammed Amin, Hamid Safi and a 59-year-old man who cannot be named for legal reasons.

The ten-week trial was told that the men – who are all from Pakistan, some from the same village, apart from Safi who is from Afghanistan – groomed the teenage girls because they were vulnerable and from broken homes,

Today the leader of the Ramadhan Foundation that on-street grooming 'is a significant problem for the British Pakistani community'.

Abdul Qayyum arriving at Liverpool Crown Court
Abdul Rauf

Convicted: Abdul Qayyum (left) and Abdul Rauf (right) were among nine men found guilty today of being part of a child sexual exploitation ring involving vulnerable girls

 Mohammed Shafiq added: 'They think that white teenage girls are worthless and can be abused without a second thought – it is this sort of behaviour that is bringing shame on our community.'

The jury of three men and nine women heard that the defendants plied the girls, some as young as 13, with fast food, drink and drugs so they could 'pass them around' and use them for sex.

The victims were picked up from 'honeypot locations' where teenagers congregate, such as outside takeaway restaurants, and were then taken to 'chill houses' around the north of England for sex.

One 13-year-old victim became pregnant and had the child aborted.

Another gave evidence of being raped by two men while she was 'so drunk she was vomiting over the side of the bed'.The court heard that some of the girls were raped and physically assaulted and some were forced to have sex with 'several men in a day, several times a week'.

Police said one victim was forced to have sex with 20 men in one night when she was drunk.

Detectives said she could 'barely recount the events' but her friend was downstairs and remembers 'innumerable men' going upstairs.

The gang used a 15-year-old white girl they nicknamed 'The Honey Monster' as their recruiter

ISLAMIC LEADER: 'PAKISTANI COMMUNITY ELDERS IGNORED GROOMING'

The leader of the Ramadhan Foundation has accused Pakistani community elders of 'burying their heads in the sand' on the issue of on-street grooming.

Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of the group, said police should not let the 'issue of race' stop them from addressing the issue.

The Ramadhan Foundation is a Manchester-based Muslim organisation that works for 'peaceful co-existence and dialogue for all communities'.

Mr Shafiq said: 'There is a significant problem for the British Pakistani community, there is an over-representation amongst recent convictions in the crime of on-street grooming, there should be no silence in addressing the issue of race as this is central to the actions of these criminals.

'They think that white [sic- non-Muslim]  teenage girls are worthless and can be abused without a second thought; it is this sort of behaviour that is bringing shame on our community.

'I urge the police and the councils not to be frightened to address this issue, there is a strong lesson that you cannot ignore race or be over sensitive.'

He added: 'I have been overwhelmed by the support the Ramadhan Foundation has been given by young people for our campaign on child grooming but concerned that community elders are once again burying their heads in the sand, this concerns us all and we must speak out.

'The community elders need to learn from the reaction of young people and reject any attempt to silence the reaction from our community.'

He said the police would need to 'reflect on their failures' in this case.

'Finally the far-Right and fascist movements are not welcome to Rochdale, we reject their division and hatred and it has no place in a tolerant and diverse society.

'We will learn lessons from this case but not allow outsiders to divide us,' Mr Shafiq added.

She became the girlfriend of one of the gang and often plied the victims with alcohol, food and money.

The court heard that she sometimes had sex with one man while another raped a girl in the same room

The 59-year-old man was found guilty of conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with children under the age of 16, two counts of rape, aiding and abetting a rape, one count of sexual assault and an allegation of trafficking within the UK for sexual exploitation.

It took the jury of three men and nine women 21 hours and 22 minutes to reach all their verdicts.Judge Gerald Clifton adjourned sentencing until tomorrow.

The offences happened in and around Rochdale in 2008 and 2009.

Arriving at court: Mohamed Sajid (left) was convicted while Qamar Shazad (right) was acquitted

Arriving at court: Mohamed Sajid (left) was convicted while Qamar Shazad (right) was acquitted

The father of one victim told the court he joined the BNP after he heard what had happened to his daughter.

At the start of the trial Rachel Smith, for the prosecution, told the jury: 'No child should be exploited as these girls say they were.'

Miss Smith said the girls – aged between 13 and 15 – were given alcohol, food and money in return for sex but that there were times when violence was used.

'There were also occasions on which one or more of the girls were so incapacitated by alcohol and/or drugs that they were incapable of having any control over whether or with whom they had sexual intercourse,' she said.

Only one of the girls was in care at the time of the abuse but all were said to have been known to social services at some point in their childhood.

Police said the victims were from 'chaotic', 'council estate' backgrounds.

The court was told that some of the defendants paid the girls and took payments from other men to whom they supplied the girls for sex. The court heard that the men knew each other and that the abuse began at the Tasty Bites and the Balti House takeaways, both in the Heywood area of Rochdale.

Those takeaways are now under new management, police said.

Four of the defendants worked as cab drivers at local taxi firms, one was a student and four were jobless.

They were known to the girls by nicknames such as 'Master' and 'Tiger'.

The girls would often spend their days 'unsupervised by responsible adults'.They were not in school regularly and 'drank and smoked and hung around with little to do'.Miss Smith said they were the 'sort of children who were easy to identify, target and exploit for the sexual gratification of these men'.

One girl, who was 13 when the alleged abuse began, told police that the men she met were 'friends' who looked after her and 'her number would be passed around amongst the Pakistani men in her area'.

She told police: 'When you've got Asian friends, your number gets passed and they pass it to their friends. And they pass it to their friends, end up with a massive circle… everyone's got it.'

Miss Smith said: 'The prosecution say that what this girl was describing was the group activity of a number of adult men, including these defendants, who had spotted the opportunity to sexually exploit children who were vulnerable to that sort of exploitation and were taking it.'

It can be revealed today that Greater Manchester Police and the Crown Prosecution Service apologised after they failed to bring the case of the first victim to trial following her cry for help in August 2008.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission is spearheading an investigation into that botched inquiry.

It can also now be reported that the trial was delayed by two weeks when two Asian barristers quit the case due to intimidation by far right groups outside Liverpool Crown Court.

The trial almost collapsed following a tweet from BNP leader Nick Griffin.

Police interviewed 47 young girls from the area who they believed could have been victims of this gang.

Commenting on the case, Greater Manchester Police Assistant Chief Constable Steve Heywood denied that it was about race.

He said: It is not a racial issue. This is about adults preying on vulnerable young children. It just happens that in this particular area and time the demographics were that these were Asian men.

'However, in large parts of the country we are seeing on-street grooming, child sexual exploitation happening in each of our towns and it isn't about a race issue.'

He added: 'The street grooming issue is about vulnerability and who has access to that vulnerability.'

Taxi driver Abdul Aziz, 41, of Rochdale, was found guilty of conspiracy and trafficking for sexual exploitation. He was found not guilty of two counts of rape.

Kabeer Hassan, 25, of Oldham, Greater Manchester, was found guilty of conspiracy and rape.

Adil Khan, 42, of Rochdale, was found guilty of conspiracy and trafficking for sexual exploitation.

Abdul Rauf, 43, of Rochdale, was found guilty of conspiracy and trafficking for sexual exploitation.

Mohammed Sajid, 35, of Rochdale, was found guilty of conspiracy, trafficking, one count of rape and one count of sexual activity with a child.

Abdul Qayyum, 44, of Rochdale, was found guilty of conspiracy.

Mohammed Amin, 45, of Rochdale, was found guilty of conspiracy and sexual assault.

Hamid Safi, 22, who was found guilty of conspiracy and trafficking but not guilty of two counts of rape.

Liaquat Shah, 41, of Rochdale, was cleared sexual assault by the jury and was cleared of conspiracy after the jury was unable to agree a verdict and the prosecution offered no further evidence.

Qamar Shahzad, 30, of Rochdale, was found not guilty of conspiracy.

VICTIM, 15, REVEALS HOW SHE WAS 'LET DOWN' BY POLICE

A victim of the ring said she was 'let down' by police and the Crown Prosecution Service (file picture)

A victim of the ring said she was 'let down' by police and the Crown Prosecution Service (file picture)

A victim of the ring said she was 'let down' by police and the Crown Prosecution Service because the issue of Asian [sic- Muslim]  gangs grooming young white girls was 'unheard of' at the time.

The girl, who was 15 when she was targeted by the gang, reported the abuse to police in August 2008 but the CPS decided not to prosecute because they did not believe a jury would find her 'credible'.

After reporting the abuse she suffered for four more months at the hands of the gang and continued to be forced into having sex by her 'friend' – a teenage girl who was acting as a pimp for the men.

She said the problem got 'worse' after telling the police.

'I felt let down. But I know that they (police) believed me… but… because they said to me at the end that something should have been done but the CPS just would not – what's the word? – prosecute is it?

'It's like, then, in 2008 it weren't really heard of… Asian [sic – Muslim] men with white girls.

'It was just unheard of. I've never heard of it. Now it's going on everywhere. You think of Muslim men as religious and family-minded and just nice people. You don't think… I don't know… you just don't think they'd do things like that.'

The girl, now 20, only escaped the gang in December 2008 when she fell pregnant and moved away.

She was then made to wait until August 2009 for the CPS decision.

A tweet from BNP leader Nick Griffin almost caused the trial to collapse when it led to allegations of the jury having a 'far-Right bias'

A tweet from BNP leader Nick Griffin almost caused the trial to collapse when it led to allegations of the jury having a 'far-Right bias'.

Last Thursday afternoon – two-and-a-half days after the jury retired to consider its verdicts – Griffin posted a comment on his @nickgriffinmep account which read: 'News flash. Seven of the Muslim paedophile rapists found guilty in Liverpool.'

Griffin later backtracked on Twitter when he was told that the jury had not yet officially returned any verdicts.

But the tweet led to eight defence counsel calling on Judge Gerald Clifton to discharge the jury before it delivered verdicts after investigations revealed Griffin’s comment to be a '100 per cent accurate' reflection of its deliberations so far.

The defence counsel who supported the discharge of the jury said there must have been 'two-way communication' between someone in the jury room and a far-right organisation.

Simon Nichol, defending the 59-year-old who cannot be named, said: 'From the outset of this trial there have been attempts by right-wing organisations to influence the outcome.'

He said 'right-wing commentators' had published on the internet reports that the jury had reached guilty verdicts in respect of seven of the 11 defendants.

'Your honour’s inquiries of the jury confirmed the accuracy of those reports on the internet.'

He said that the proposal that the information could have been 'obtained by guesswork is so implausible' that it 'can be discounted as fanciful'.

Mr Nichol said: 'The most reasonable inference from the facts as we know them is that the confidentiality of the jury’s deliberations has been breached and that someone outside of the jury who has an improper interest in the outcome of this trial has been receiving communications from within the jury room.

'It seems at the very least likely that if such communication has taken place then it will have been two-way traffic.'

Mr Nichol added: 'If there has been such improper communication then the impartiality and independence of the jury is compromised.'

But inquiries carried out by the police and the Crown Prosecution Service showed that the message, which the court heard was first published on the Infidels of Britain website, was published at a time when the jury was in its jury room where all electronic equipment is banned.

Judge Clifton said that 'having heard that the jury deny any improper behaviour' he was 'satisfied that no juror is at fault in communicating the jury’s position, either deliberately or accidentally to anyone else'.

'That means that the question of bias doesn’t arise at all,' he said.

'I have found no evidence to suggest a juror is at fault.

'The jury have been strictly confined in their jury room during most of the period that some of these tweets manifested themselves.'

Judge Clifton said the jury had been regularly passing notes and asking questions in relation to specific evidence and had been taking a 'perfectly reasonable, logical and unbiased approach to the evidence'.

He added that the suggestion by counsel that he should be forced to dismiss the jury was 'both unreasonable and illogical'.

He said 'there are other scenarios that can explain the tweets' and the jury was allowed to continue with its work.

Then, on hearing that the jury was about to return some unanimous verdicts, the 59-year-old stood up and shouted at the judge: 'I don’t want this biased jury. You are a biased judge. You are a racist bastard. You bastard!'

He was restrained by security staff and forcibly removed from the dock.

Adil Khan also stood up and said: 'I don’t want to attend for BNP jury,' and he also left the dock.

On Friday afternoon the 59-year-old was allowed back into court only to be restrained again after a complaint was made about him by a jury member.

He shouted: 'They are all racist bastards!'

Judge Clifton ordered him to be taken down and he shouted again: 'You racist judge. You racist jury. You lying bastards!'

One female juror was visibly upset by the outburst and Judge Clifton barred the defendant from coming back into court for the rest of the trial.

He said: 'I’m not having members of this jury intimidated or threatened.'

Read the rest.

  • Gleaner1

    Dear Pamela,
    Thank you so much for the coverage you have given to this latest case of Islamic inspired paedophile grooming. The UK is in uproar over Islam and censorship. This was part of my blog today on the subject of Olympic security, bear with me:-
    “At home successive Governments have waved through immigration, hundreds of thousands of turban wearing, Koran waving, beards from Africa and Asia. These have now forced the British security services to turn about and face the terrible threat to us from within our own borders.
    Islam has declared war against us in this country (the UK) and the West in general. Where is the front, you say? The front is the border of Israel – the only democracy in that part of the world where Arabs have full political rights.
    The front is around every mosque and every headscarf, in every Muslim ghetto in the UK. It is at every Asian take-away that grooms and pimps white girls as “spoils of war”, in the “land of conflict”. The front is everywhere the Liberal Leftist alliance screams “racist” and “Islamophobia” – as at Luton.
    There is nothing about claims of Islamophobia that does not induce Islamonausea in me.”
    These paragraphs you have just read were censored earlier today from the comments column article by the Daily Telephaph and Disqus.
    With regard to this case the anger I feel at the culpability of the Manchester Police over their refusal to believe the first appeal to help and their weasel words of denying that race and religion had anything to do with it, together with the unacceptable degree of censorship prevalent in the UK media, has the effect of turning up the gas and increasing the level of hatred that I and millions of fair-minded Brits feel – not only towards these filthy third worlders but supposedly intelligent British figures of authority who protect them by offering such mealy mouthed platitudes and excuses which no-one believes in anymore.
    This may get me into trouble, but I don’t care, because I’m not afraid anymore.
    I’m just bloody angry – I hope these bastards never walk or see again owing to the nature of the hospitality they get in prison, and when they come out I hope somebody kills them, slow and painfull because I’m not the kind of man to retract these views under pressure.
    Two and a half years ago the then Head of the UKs leading childrens’ charity stated on prime time TV that this problem of Muslim paedophile pimping and grooming was prevalent “in every town and city in the UK”. The BBC interviewer, Jeremy Paxman, did not believe him and wanted the answer repeated, which it was.
    When more of these cases emerge, which they will, things may turn very ugly indeed.

  • CGW

    PLEASE HELP.
    Albert Lea, MN pediatrician advocates Female Genital Mutilation:
    PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION:
    http://www.change.org/petitions/fire-dr-hatem-elhagaly-and-revoke-his-certifications

  • CGW

    Russ, please tell us who we can contact to help our dear Jewish brethren. Your story needs to be made public in the West!

  • Many video showing the cruelty of islam towards children:
    http://vattentemperatur.blogspot.se

  • Laura

    “The monstrous crimes of these Muslims are exacerbated by a police force that refused to help the schoolgirls who came begging for help. Again, accommodating Islam for fear of offending, inciting or insulting the Muslim community, law enforcement abandoned little girls”.
    ……………………………………………………….
    Western males have become emasculated cowards. Is it any wonder that islam is running roughshod over the west?

  • Crombouke

    The common background to this and similar offenses: http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/02/sexual-jihad-demoralising-and.html

  • fern

    These sick pervs don’t deserve to breathe in fresh air.

  • Benjie

    It would be terrible, just terrible, if these evil bastards got chibbed inside. Oh what a shame that would be.

  • fern

    This topic is at the moment being discussed on http://ukrp.musicradio.com/lbc973/live

  • Carl D

    Not about race? Please help me understand why the Muslim savages are only grooming/raping/sodomising white girls. Have I missed something? How many black or oriental girls have been groomed? I think it has everything to do with race and their vile religion — both.

  • The damage inflicted by these men not only extends to their female victims, but to the very communities they come from. By reinforcing stereotypes, and fanning the flames of fear.
    Sometimes I hate reading the news.

  • Kufar Dawg

    @Carl D.
    That’s an interesting observation. The islamofascist pigs scream racism, even as they confine the women they exploit to white teenagers.

  • Shawn Kelly

    Maybe the time has come for “guardian angels” to take up the cause by doing what law enforcement hasn t the guts to do; maybe its time a few of these sewer rats go for a little swim, face down in the Thames. In the words of Sean Connery from the movie “Untouchables” Here’s how you get him. He pulls a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. (its the English way)

  • crowsbeak

    Anna’s comment regarding emasculation is correct in this instance.
    As much as I despise the mohammedan vermin who perpetuated these crimes, I can’t help but wonder, where are the so-called ‘fathers’ of these girls? From what I’ve read, it’s the old ‘broken homes’ stuff, parental guidance has been handed over to overwhelmed state services. No wonder they became easy halal meat. After all, correct thinking state employees would be placed in something of a quandary if they dared to interrupt these multicultural celebrations, wouldn’t they? And, worst of all, they might’ve been accused of being a ‘racist’, and that’s far worse than turning a blind eye to enriching and diverse cultural practices.
    It’s safe to assume that the hymens of pubescent ‘chavs’ aren’t as valuable as the delicate sensibilities of the ‘prophet’s” claque in the dhimmi mindset. So, the this-is-not-islam bugs will continue to crawl around in the appeasing media spotlight for all they’re worth (which is not a lot, actually) in the hope that this sordid episode is seen as merely an aberration, a pot hole on the road harmony and integration (or hell).
    And sadly, the nonce vermin will have their worthless lives protected both in prison, and in the so-called ‘community’ when they’re eventually released, because, to paraphrase Orwell, no men stand ready to commit violence on the girls’ behalf.

  • Arturo, DFW Metro

    I read about this on Drudge today. The BK reporting refered to the perps as “Asian” n “white” instead of who they really were. So sickening. What is wrong with those who do the reporting? We know what is wrong with the perps.

  • Burt

    http://biased-bbc.com/2012/05/09/hammering-the-point-home/
    Regarding how the useful idiots at the BBC cover this news item.

  • From later Daily Mail coverage May 9th 2012: at least this judge gets it, but still the sentences are too lenient.

    Judge says nine-strong gang partly preyed on five girls, aged between 13 and 15, because they were from different ‘community and religion’
    Judge Gerald Clifton dismisses defendants’ claims that prosecution was ‘triggered by race’
    The leader of the sex grooming gang who preyed on white girls as young as 13 for sex was jailed for 19 years today after branding the judge a ‘racist bastard’.

    The other convicts were given lighter sentences, as little as four years which could mean release on license in eighteen months, and even less after time on remand is deducted. The ring leader’s name was withheld from press reports as he’ll be facing other charges in a separate trial.

  • no

    they took money for sex
    that means
    1 – they consented
    2 – they were whores
    also do we know the ethnic origin of the jury?
    if they are all white and no asian members
    then the alegations of racism are just

  • Kufar Dawg

    @NO
    LOL. Maybe they can go back to Pakistain and get all the justice
    they need there. The kind of justice that only applies to muslimes
    and not the kaffir.

  • fern

    OMG – BBC Question Time was on last night, I missed it so just watched it on iplayer. The panel and the audience discussed this topic (in the op). Wish I hadn’t bothered tbh.
    If you watch the vid (see below for link), you’ll see how the political correct mentally deranged leftists always blames the victim, never the filthy perp.
    Please note too the clergyman in the audience (the BBC gave this man a lot of airtime to spew his perverted drivel) where he basically blames the children not the perp. He may as well have said the children asked for it! What an absolute disgrace. The whole discussion was horrendious to watch. When that topic finished, I couldn’t bear to watch anymore of the show.
    If you want to watch it, it is the second topic in on the vid which starts about 11:10 mins approximately. http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b01hmwqb/Question_Time_10_05_2012/
    Would love to know who this clergyman is – if anyone knows, please add it here or on twitter under the handle of #BBCQT – name and shame.

  • Kufar Dawg

    Did anyone notice that Mohamed Sajid and Qamar Shazad are wearing the exact same kind of shoes? This despite the fact one of them is dressed like a bum?

  • It has to do with a strict interpretation of a cult. Women for procreation, men and boys for pleasure. Even the President of Afghanistan’s brother had a “Bacha Baz” (boy lover). They dress them up in expensive outfits and parade them around town.

Pin It on Pinterest