Obama’s legacy: Pushes Afghan Pres Karzai to surrender to bloody, brutal Taliban

9 Comments

The criminally corrupt media refuses to report on this issue with any candor or accuracy. It is shocking. America was always the country that refused to negotiate with terrorists.

Obama karzi
Now we are begging them to allow us to surrender to them. That is the legacy of Obama.

The Taliban have been warring against US troops in Afghsnistan, slaughtering our soldiers, poisoning girls' schools, beheading anyone and everyone who does not adhere to pure Islam …..

Barack Obama is to use the Nato summit to press the Afghan leader Hamid Karzai to engage with greater urgency with the Taliban about a political settlement in Afghanistan…

Obama to urge Afghan president Karzai to push for Taliban settlement

Barack Obama is to use the Nato summit to press the Afghan leader Hamid Karzai to engage with greater urgency with the Taliban about a political settlement in Afghanistan.

The US president flew to Chicago on Saturday night after 24 hours of negotiations with the leaders of the G8, dominated by the eurozone crisis but which also included talks on issues including Afghanistan.

With US allies pressing for a speedy exit from a war their countries have become weary of, Obama is to discuss with Karzai and Nato allies a timetable that will see Afghan forces taking over combat duties from the US and its allies by the middle of next year.

Almost all international forces are scheduled to be out by the end of 2014 after completion of the Afghanistan elections. Karzai will not be standing in that election.

The Obama administration had hoped Chicago would be the venue for a major announcement of a political settlement with the Taliban. But these hopes crumbled when the Taliban walked away from reconciliation talks in March.

Such lethal asshattery is without parallel.

UPDATE: More reality in the face of fairy tale delsuion:

Afghanistan's Taliban have sent a message to NATO leaders at a major summit in Chicago, calling the "war on terror" an excuse for colonisation and urging them to follow the French lead and get out.
A statement on the Taliban website, Voice of Jihad, says no Afghans were involved in Al-Qaeda's 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington that prompted a US-led invasion of Afghanistan.

The statement fails to mention that the invasion in late 2001 followed a refusal by the hardline Islamists, who were then in power, to hand over Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, who was based in the country…

Stay on top of what's really happening. Follow me on Twitter here. Like me on Facebook here.

Print This Post Print This Post
Disclamer

Comments at Atlas Shrugs are unmoderated. Posts using foul language, as well as abusive, hateful, libelous and genocidal posts, will be deleted if seen. However, if a comment remains on the site, it in no way constitutes an endorsement by Pamela Geller of the sentiments contained therein.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  1. So what will happen to all of the women in Afganistan who have been trying to get an education or earn a living.
    Under the Taliban they were not allowed to do either.
    Anybody who truly thinks the Taliban will change are idiots. Even communism was better for Afganistan then what will be coming now.
    Also why did we sacrifice the lives of our soldiers if we are just going to return the Afgan people to the horrors they lived with before we came.
    Like with Eastern Europe,South Vietnam and the Christian and Jewish Middle East the so-called free world is very quick to sacrifice people to totalitarian ideologies on the mistaken basis that it could never happen to us.

  2. Alyn21
    We have lost a lot of blood and treasure in shitcanastan. Only 15% of the people there can read. Its a lost cause to think we can change such a backward people. We need to back off and just nuke the place from orbit when needed. I don’t consider anyone there an innocent life. And the first person we need to nuke is Karzi.

  3. Sounds like a war on Afgan women among all the causualties .. Hillary? Huma? Nancy? .. .. .. anyone? .. United Nimrods .. ? .. crickets

  4. I think Christopher Hitchens put it well in terms of the reasons why we are at war not only with Al Qaeda but also with the Taliban. Obama’s appeasement to fascists should make him unelectable for November, you don’t negotiate with terrorists and they remain terrorists unless they have wholeheartedly surrendered like the Japenese in WW2. What Obama is doing puts lives in danger from another terrorist attack!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cezMflNbV7A
    Furthermore, I agree with Mitt Romneys approach for dealing with the Taliban…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1VSKlIwlYo
    and especially here…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=PY5rLjFLd3w

  5. THE REAL URGENCY
    Barack Obama is to use the Nato summit to press the Afghan leader Hamid Karzai to engage with greater urgency with the Taliban about a political settlement so that he can extend his dreadful presidency another four disastrous years.

  6. Obama, Karzai, and Afghanistan? A pathetically not flawlessly choreographed “submission” to the longer range agenda of Sunni Islam in said country.
    Where does the ordinary Afghani sign up for democracy and vouchers of hearts and minds won?

  7. Thanks Mr. Wise I didn’t know that. I have never agreed with C. Hitchins on anything until now.
    For the record I think many of us American conservatives were even disappointed with Bush’s weak response to 9/11. We could have lost far far fewer of our armed forces had we done more by remote control. Let the Islams that love Islam clean up, we know they would hate us no matter what.

  8. I hold that treasonous O’bama with such contempt that I literally become ill everytime I see or hear him. That surrender monkey has the unmitigated gall to refer to himself
    as ‘commander-in-chief’. He is an enemy of America and all free nations.