Distorting History

The Real Bosnian Genocide
The REAL Srebrenica “Genocide” NOT reported by the corrupt, racist pro-Islamist Nazi Western corporate controlled media, was the brutal mass murder – using axes, knives, daggers, sledgehammers, iron bars, flamethrowers and explosives – of 3,870 Serbian elderly men, women and young children in and around the town of Srebrenica and its adjoining villages (Bratunac, Skelani, Kravica, Milici, et al) as well as the town of Gorazde

The real cause of the dismemberment of Yugoslavia was a German project stretching back to the late 19th Century. As The Ottoman Empire died-back, the vacuum was being filled by the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and the Russian Empire, and the “impudent” nationalist state of Serbia. The continuation of Serbian independence was an “affront” to Vienna. Good grief, what if the other nationalities of the multiethnic central and eastern European Empires sought sovereignty?
The Serbian Nationalist movement the Black Hand assassinated the heir to the throne of The Habsburg (Austro-Hungarian) Empire. As we all learned in High School (before HS was devoted to denouncing American slavery and oppression of brown peoples), Gavrilo Princip assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia-Herzegovina. This pathetic city saw the beginning of WW1, and the ironically suffered in the final battles between the rivals of The Great War! B-H was part of Austro-Hungaria. Princip a Serbian shot him. Austro-Hungary already resented the “impudence” of a tiny state existing amongst the playground of giants to begin with. Now armed with a Grievance as if made to order, this Slavic Orthodox Nation could be attached to Catholic Vienna. After a series of worsening demands, ultimately to allow Austrian troops to enter and conduct the investigation, were refused, Austria declared War on Serbia. The Orthodox Slavs looked to their ethnic and religious friends in Russia. Russia mobilized her massive but very slow to deploy army. Germany, newly formed from the welding together of the myriad of German principalities that had existed between Austria and France, under the flag of Prussia, had become the newest Great Empire on the block. France had an alliance with Russia. And Germany had recently humiliated la France in the Prussian War, forcing her to surrender Alsace and Lorraine. If Austro-Hungaria declared War on Serbia, and Russia Mobilized, Germany, Austro-Hungary’s ally, would have to mobilize. The German Empire was in a dangerous position, potentially in a two-front war with France and the Russian Empire. Its strategy was to quickly attack France with a swing through Belgium cutting east along the English Channel before turning upon Paris. The goal was to knock France out of the war before turning to face the slower but larger Russian Army in the east. The rest is History. Britain had an agreement with France and a guarantee with Belgium. The Great War cascaded into the Great European War of The Twentieth Century. There was a truce in 1918. Every single one of the eastern european empires had vanished. A system of weak nationalist states arose. Hitler resumed the war in 1939. The war left the remnant of Europe drained and dependent upon two non-European, though Western Powers: The USSR and the USA. The subsequent Cold War was a time out. But when it ended, the SAME ISSUE REMAINED. The Vatican desired to take the Catholic portions of Yugoslavia (which was cobbled together in the aftermath of the Great War, and survived WW2) out. Germany, wanted the Serbs checked. Recall that Yugoslavia was essentially a Greater Serbia.
The final act of the Four Act Play was the dismemberment of Yugoslavia, leaving Catholic Croatia and Slovenia to link up with the German-Catholic Imperium. Bosnia-Herzegovina now had to pried out of the rump of Yugoslavia, or to be accurate, Serbia. This had been the German goal since the 19th century! Modern Germany inherited the appetite from Austro-Hungary (a Germanic Empire also). Germany and the West brought in handy Muslim radicals to destabilize the long history of harmony between Christians and Muslims in Bosnia-Herzegovina. The Serbs were branded as evil, blood thirsty thugs by The West as it digested Yugoslavia. Finally the time for Serbia itself to pay came. Archduke Ferdinand would be avenged! Kosovo had been a part of Serbia for all of Serbian history. It is a region where the great battle against the invading Turks was fought and lost. Think of it as The Alamo. Think of the Islamic Albanian immigrants and Islamic Kosovars as Mexicans, and demanding independence for San Antonio. The Kosovo Liberation Army was filled with islamic militants from Afghanistan to Morocco. Al-Qaida happily enlisted. Both sides committed atrocities. But only Serbia was blamed. Germany threatened to bomb Belgrade in a rerun of its 1940 heyday. The specter of Maltese Cross bearing Luftwaffe again darkening the skies of Belgrade was too much for the rest of Europe to countenance. So, instead of not doing it, they got Clinton to do it! The USA completed the Play begun by Gavrilo Princip in 1914. Finally the impudent Serbs were put in there place, with even Kosovo taken.
But perhaps there is another Act to follow. If the War Crimes Trial pushes too hard, do not think Russia will turn a blind eye to her Serbian friends.

But why are the Russians afraid of assistin their Serb brothers?

If you follow the time-lines of major events following the provincial government established by the British East-India Company in 1757, you will find that during the first 100 years British rulers were taking part with Hindus (Pagans) to unsettle Muslim nawabs and kings.
That trend continued even after the mutiny of 1850’s and even when Her Majesty Queen Victoria took over the control of “British India” from the East-India Company.
However, after 1870 British imperialists started to explicitly favor Islam and Muslims over the Hindu (Pagan) masses of Indian Subcontinent.
In their mindset, British imperialists always disdained Pagan faiths; but, held Islam — the religion of Prophet Muhammad — on a higher ground.
British historian Fergusson and his ilk started to promote the idea that, prior to Islamic invasions the whole Subcontinent was in economic and political darkness due to Pagan faiths.
British historians promoted the falsehood that a Muslim Mughal King named Shah-Jahan built “Taj Mahal” (Tejo Mahalaya).
Here is a link for you.
http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/modern/godbole_taj1.html
And, finally, “Two-State Solution” that created Pakistan was also from the British imperialists’ master plan of elevating Muslims and demonizing Pagans.
Furthermore, at its inception, Pakistanian ISI was commanded by an Australia-born British military officer who adored Islam and Muslims, but despised Pagans.
During Islamic riots, with sharp daggers when Muslims were slicing the breasts and genitalia of Hindu (Pagan) women after gang-raping, British military officers were standing-by and facilitating Muslims’ “Holy” Islamic acts against helpless Pagan women.
All of the tolerance of Islamic atrocities was due to the fact that Muslims are the “Chosen people” of Allah.
Allah is a tribal god that lives in Saudi Arabia, who has repeatedly commanded Muslims to kill Pagans, rape and torture Pagan women.
So, as you can understand, British government’s love for Islam dates back more than a century.
Now, I come to President Ronald Wilson Reagan’s love for Islam.
When Hizb’Allah founder Fadla’Allah bombed and killed over 200 American military service-persons in Lebanon, President Reagan immediately withdrew American military presence from Beirut to show respect for Islam.
Because of his love for Muslim “Freedom Fighters” in Lebanon, President Ronald Wilson Reagan thought further American military presence in Lebanon would hamper Islamization of Lebanon.
When Muslim “Freedom Fighters” were throwing acid on the faces of school-going girls in Afghanistan, President Ronald Wilson Reagan in the White House was probably laughing out loud with so much joy for Islamic “Freedom”.
As for not knowing much about Islam before 09-11-2001 was due to the fact that American government does not want non-Muslim Americans to know true history of Islam and Muslims.

Part of the problem is that of major Christian organization like the Vatican rarely stand up verbally or physically for Christians around the world when they are persecuted by the followers of the” religion of peace” Islam. All it would have taken from the pope was a few speeches calling Clinton out and demanding he protect the Serbian Christians from rape and murder that the Muslims were inflicting on them also. It would have put ” Bill I want everyone love to me Clinton” between a rock and a hard place.

Correction to typographical error:
The official death-toll on both South and North Vietnams was 2 million, which means American government directly killed approximately a million Vietnamese people.
No American president, however, went for trial at the ICC for American war-crimes in Vietnam.
President Bush II, VP Dick Cheney, SOD Rumsfeld, and SOS Dr. Rice are yet to be charged with American war-crimes in Iraq.

As a German whose family members fought for Germany in both World Wars, I can honestly say that the comments above have to do with one thing and only one thing and that is OIL. The Muslims have the oil and everyone in the world wants it. It’s as simple as that. Hitler needed the oil so he was friendly towards the Muslims. Other than that fact, no one would have given a damn about the Muslims.
The Serbs have had a long standing hatred for the Bosnians and the Croats. The genocide by them against the Serbs is legendary. Ironically, the genocide against the Jews who lived in Serbia and Bosnia was worse when compared to any other area in Europe on a per capita basis. Everyone seems to forget these facts. Everyone except the Serbs. That hatred towards Islam goes back a long way. It also be noted that Serb Christians during WW2 helped save many Jews from a certain death. They should be commended for those actions.

Crusades were not done in defense. They were a conquest.

Oh, boy are you wrong! The Byzantine Emperor asked the Pope for help against the invading Turks, and the Crusaders went on to add the goal of taking Jerusalem back. Except it was not returned to the Byzantines, the last Christian nation that had owned it (albeit not in 461 -four hundred sixty-one years) it was instead set up as its own nation.
So- no, the goal was initially to help the Byzantines out, but they were betrayed even being taken over by those coming to their aid.
It was not defensive because it went far beyond what the Byzantine Emperor had asked for, and he was betrayed by having his rightful lands of Jerusalem taken from him.

They [the left] are so vested in establishing a militant Islamic state in the heart of Europe. Why?
The last alliance of the Socialists (NSDAP) and the Islamists resulted in WWII, which they lost, so this time they want to make sure they win.
Simple.

During his life-time, Prophet Muhammad murdered, converted to Islam,
or drove away Jews, Christians, and Pagans from Arabian Peninsula.
After Prophet Muhammad died at the age of 63, Islamic conquests of
non-Muslims’ lands and properties did not decline, rather flourished
under the auspices of Muslim rulers.
Muslims invaders conquered the Byzantine Christian Kingdom.
During Islamic conquests the conquered non-Muslim men were beheaded,
non-Muslim women and kids were taken into slavery unless the
non-Muslims surrendered and/or converted to Islam.
Forcing non-Muslim women into sexual and other forms of slavery was
the method of conquering Islam.
Crusades were in response to brutal Islamic military conquests that
seized Christian populated lands.
Without Crusades, Christians would have lost the entire Europe to Islam.
One modern day example would be American military bombing of
Afghanistan after September 2001.
America did not bomb Afghanistan before 2001. America bombed after
Muslims attacked America.
Similarly, Crusades were in response to military invasions of Muslims
in Europe. Christians wanted to reclaim their lands from Muslims via
Crusades.
To say that “Crusades were NOT done in defense. They were conquests.”
are incorrect statements.
Crusades helped Christians militarily defend Europe from being
completely taken over by Islam.
Following link might help you understand the basis of all Crusades.
http://www.aei.org/speech/29055

[Your link proves nothing,… ]
That book provides an honest historical time-line.
[…except that religious tensions are kept alive by petty historical revisionism.]
Historical timeline is NOT historical revisionism.
[I detect an obvious bias in that site, and I think the anti-jihadist movement should do well to stay away from Hindu fanaticism because it is not drastically better than that of the Islamic variety.]
I can only hope you truly understand WHAT you exactly wrote there.
[You sound sore that Hindus today do not rule over Muslims, and you blame the British.]
I only described the historical pattern of British government’s love for Islam.
Nothing else.
[It should be expected, since you can’t come to terms with the fact that many from both sides (Pakistan and India) wanted it to be separate.]
What terms are you referring to?
I personally have NO terms with you or your “EXPECTED” outcomes.
I only described the historical facts.
[Furthermore, how dare you say such things about Reagan?]
Truth hurts!!!
[If ever a shining example of conservatism stood tall and restored America to her pride, it was him.]
Let’s not go over Ronald Wilson Reagan’s “Conservatism”, especially with a creature like you.
Time is precious to me.

The Vatican has its own agenda, and it is not necessarily parallel to that of the Anglosphere. Despite the EU’s current Constitutional atheism, it will either change in that regard or vanish into insignificance. The only way for the EU to capture the heart and soul of Europe is to notice the Islamic Invasion and recognize its danger. The Eurocrats in Brussels are completely disconnected from their constituents, if that is even an appropriate term for the elected miniscule numbers voting in EU elections. The “right” is on the rise. The media in Europe as here, is very much more alarmed at the thought of nativist pride, rather than at the demographic deluge which will overturn democratic governments. But despite being labeled “Hate” groups, these groups are pushing back from the specter of Eurocratic Tyranny. The scheme to dilute national populations with Islamic aliens in order to weaken resistance to a European identity is now exposed. The push-back, to be successful, will necessarily be aimed at restoring the term “Christendom”. My spell check originally did not even recognize that word! But the Vatican is patiently awaiting the day when Europeans come to understand that European power in the world rose and fell with Christianity. And then The Vatican will matter, just as it did in the 1980’s with Solidarity in Poland.

One other thing on Higher Education: by pretending to believe the crap that the professors pretend to believe, and prove they can talk the talk, they get their ticket punched to becoming a Corporate Tool. Of course they mock the obvious tools, desparately darting their eyes left and right to be sure they are not appearing to look too earnest nor too slack; just a modicum of “cool”. “Cool” is the great secret to understanding the culture. But I will write about that as a topic in itself.